CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.113   IUP :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.113    Full Text (PDF)

Methods used in the delimitation of agricultural regions

Esen DurmuşAli Yiğit

When talking about the regions, it is assumed that a whole is segmented into pieces. In fact, the exact opposite is the case. That is, the pieces are brought together according to their similarities in order to form a whole. Therefore, the criteria used to delimit the agricultural regions are the methods developed to achieve this wholeness. Even though the criteria used for the delimitation of agricultural regions vary, the regions have actually been considered as a whole while they have been handled in segmented parts. It is necessary to demonstrate how the elements that play a major role in this wholeness are grouped together. While the qualities of agricultural activities were specified in the earlier studies, classification was made for the differences of agricultural products in the later studies. Studies on the delimitation of agricultural regions can be examined in three groups: The first group of studies was carried out in order to determine the world agricultural regions. The initial studies in this field were directed by German Geographers Ratzel (1891) and Hahn (1892) aimed at classifying the world agricultural areas. Later, the most accepted classification in the World Agricultural Zones studies was made by Whittlesey (1936). The second group of studies on the delimitation of agricultural regions was on the continental scale. These were Thünen, Baker’s studies of agricultural areas on the North American scale. Olof Jonasson, a Swedish geographer, used the Thünen theory to delimit the regions in Europe. Hartshorne and Dicken also delimited the agricultural areas of North America and Europe by statistical means. Even though Whittlesey’s influence was observed in Cole’s work in identifying the agricultural areas in the former Soviet Union, its present value is based on the fact that it reveals the relationship between the agricultural products and the need for industry and food in this continent-sized area. In China, another continent-sized country, studies have begun to delimit the agricultural regions. In their study, which they called “An Initiative for the Study of Agricultural Types in China”, Gao Huancheng and Yao J.G. identified 12 agricultural types, hence the regions in the country. The third group related to agricultural regions was consisted of the country-wide studies. Erinç and Tunçdilek (1952) carried out studies aimed at delimiting the agricultural regions of Turkey. As a result, various studies have been conducted in the world, continent and country scale by using many different methods from past to present in delimiting agricultural regions. These studies have the capacity to shed light on the studies aimed at the areas where the agricultural products, which are the main factors in human nutrition, are best adapted and acquiring the highest efficiency per unit area with the planning to be made. 



References

  • Baker, O. E. (1925). The Potential Supply of Wheat. Economic Geography, 1, 31-35. google scholar
  • Baker, O. E. (1926). Agricultural Regions of North America. Economic Geography, 2 (4), 459-493. google scholar
  • Buchanan, R. O. (1959). Some Reflections on Agricultural Geography. Geography, 44, 1-15. google scholar
  • Carol, H. (1952). Das agrargeographische Betrachtungssystem. Ein Beitrag zur landschaftskundlichen Methodik, dargelegt am Beispiel der Karruin Südafrika. Geographic Helvetica, 7, 20-22. google scholar
  • Cholley, A. (1946). Problèmes de structure agraire et d’économie rurale. Annales de’ Géographie, 60, 83-86. google scholar
  • Cole, J. P. (1984). Geography of the Soviet Union, London, p. 156-158. google scholar
  • Coppock, J. T. (1964 a). Crop Livestock and Enterprise Combinations in England and Wales. Economic Geography, 40, 65-81. google scholar
  • Coppock, J. T. (1964 b). An Agricultural Atlas of England and Wales. London: Faber and Faber. p. 212. google scholar
  • Cressey G. B. (1934). Agricultural Regions: Part VI China. Economic Geography, 10, 109-142. google scholar
  • Dunn, E. S. (1954). The Location of Agricultural Production, Gainesville: University of Florida Press. google scholar
  • Durmuş, E. & Yiğit, A. (2003). Türkiye’nin Meyve Üretim Yöreleri. F.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13/2, 23-54. google scholar
  • Durmuş, E. & Yiğit, A. (2006). Türkiye’nin Tarım Yöreleri. IV. Ulusal Coğrafya Sempozyumu Ankara. p.101-113. google scholar
  • Durmuş, E. & Yiğit, A. (2014). Türkiye’nin Tarım Yöreleri ve Bölgeleri. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti. Yayın No: 942. google scholar
  • Engelbrecht, H. (1930). Die Landbauzonen der Erde, Petermanns Mitt. Ergänzungsheft 209, pp. 287-297. google scholar
  • Engelbrecht, T. H. (1883). Der Standort der Landwirtschaftszweige in Nord Amerika. Landwirtschaftliche Jahrbücher, 12, 459-509. google scholar
  • Erinç, S. & Tunçdilek, N. (1952). The Agricultural Regions of Turkey. Geographical Review, 2/2, s. 179-203. google scholar
  • Erinç, S. (1958). Bölge Sınırlandırmasının Esasları. in: İkinci İskân ve Şehircilik Haftası Konferansları, Ankara: Ank. Ünv. SBF Yay. No: 79/61, s. 69. google scholar
  • Fryer, D. W. (1965). World Economic Development. New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 67-118. google scholar
  • Gibson, L. E. (1948) Characteristics of a Regional Margin of the Corn and Dairy Belts. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 38 (4),244-270. google scholar
  • Gregor, H. F. (1963). Environment and Economic Life. Van Nostrand. google scholar
  • Gregor, H. F. (1970). Geography of Agriculture: Themes in Research, London: Prentice-Hall. google scholar
  • Grigg, D. (1965). The Logic of Regional system. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 55(3), 465-491. google scholar
  • Grigg, D. (1969). The Agricultural Regions of the World: Review and Reflections. Economic Geography, 45, 95-132. google scholar
  • Hahn, E. (1892). Die Wirtschaftsformen der Erde. Petermann’s Geographische Mitteilungen, 38, 8-12 google scholar
  • Hall, R. B. (1934). Agricultural Regions of Asia: Part VII. Economic Geography, 10, 323-347. google scholar
  • Hall, R. B. (1935). Agricultural Regions of Asia: Part VII. Economic Geography, 10, 33-52. google scholar
  • Hartshorne, R. & Dicken S. N. (1935). A classification of agricultural regions of Europe and North America on a uniform statistical basis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 25, 101-102. google scholar
  • Harvey, D. W. (1966). Theoretical concepts and the analysis of agricultural land use patterns in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 56, 361-374. google scholar
  • Helburn, N. (1957). The Bases for a Classification of World Agriculture. The Professional Geographers, 9, 2-7. google scholar
  • Hoover, E. M. (1937). The Location of Economic Activity, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. google scholar
  • Huancheng, G. & Jianxu, Y. & Guozhu, R. (1992). A preliminary study of agricultural types in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 47(6), pp.507-515. google scholar
  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space Economy. New York: Published Jointly by The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley. google scholar
  • Jasbir, S. (1976). An Agricultural Geography of Haryana. Kurukshetra: Vishal Publications. University Campus. pp. 391-442. google scholar
  • Jasbir, S. & Dhillon, S. S. (2004). Agricultural Region: Concept and Techniques. In: Agricultural geography, (3rd ed., pp. 213-242). New Delhi,India: Tata McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Jasbir, S. & Dhillon, S. S. (2004). Methods of Agriculture Regionalization. In: Agricultural geography, (3rd ed., pp. 245-303). New Delhi, India:Tata McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Jonasson, O. (1925). Agricultural Regions of Europe, Economic Geography, 1, 277-314. google scholar
  • Jonasson, O. (1926). Agricultural Regions of Europe, Economic Geography, 2, 19-48. google scholar
  • Jones, C. F. (1928). Agricultural Regions of South America. Economic Geography. 4, 1-30. google scholar
  • Jones, C. F. (1930). Agricultural Regions of South America. Economic Geography. 6, 1-36. google scholar
  • Jones, W. D. (1930) Ratios and Isopleth Maps in Regional Investigation of Agricultural Land Occupance. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 20, 177-195. google scholar
  • Kawachi, K. (1959). On the method of classifying world agricultural regions, Abstract, Proceedings of İGU Conference 1957, Tokyo p. 355-356. google scholar
  • Kostrowicki, J. (1964). Geographical Typology of Agriculture- Principles and Methods. Geographia Polonica, 1, 111-146. google scholar
  • Kuchler, A. W. (1951). The Relation between Classifying and Mapping Vegetation, Ecology, 32(2), 275-283. google scholar
  • Lewis, A. B. (1952). Land Classification for Agricultural Development (F.A.O. Development Paper No. 18, Rome, pp. 31-33). google scholar
  • Lösch, A. (1954). The Economics of Location (Translated by W.H. Woglom and W.F. Stolper). New Heaven. Yale University Press, pp. 135-137 and 216. google scholar
  • Morgan, W. B. & Munton, R. J. C. (1971). Agricultural Geography. London: Methuen. pp. 126-128 and 143-146. google scholar
  • Otremba, E. (1960). Allgemeine Agrar-Und Industriegeographie, Stuttgart, Franckh. pp. 47. 58, 158-174 google scholar
  • Oxford Economic Atlas of the World (1965). The map is partly based on other distribution maps to be found in the Atlas. London: Oxford Universty Press. google scholar
  • Rakitnikov, A. K. (1962). Economic Geographic Research in Agriculture. In C. D. Harris, (Eds.), Soviet Geography (pp. 230-250). New York:Accomplishments and Tasks. google scholar
  • Ratzel, F. (1891). Anthropogeographie. Die Geographische Verbreitung des Menschen, Stuttgart. google scholar
  • Sapper, K. (1925). Allgemeine Wirtschaft und Verkehrsgeographie. Leipzig: Leipzig Teubner. google scholar
  • Saushkin, Yu. G. (1966). A History of Soviet Economic Geography, Soviet Geography, 7, 56-57. google scholar
  • Shantz, H. L. (1940). Agricultural Regions of Africa. Economic Geography, 16(1). 1-47. google scholar
  • Shantz, H. L. (1943). Agricultural Regions of Africa. Economic Geography, 19, 77-109. google scholar
  • Symons, L. (1967). Agricultural Geography, London: G. Bell and Sons. London. 1972. 1967, pp. 95, 170-176, 195, 196, 207, 208, 220 and 227. google scholar
  • Thoman, R. S. (1962). The Geography of Economic Activity, An introductory World Survey. New York, Toronto, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. google scholar
  • Timmons, J. F. (1944). Distribution of World Land Resources, Land Policy Review. google scholar
  • Tümertekin, E. (1953). Whittlesey’in Zirai Mıntıkalar Tasnifi ve A.B.D.’nde Mandıracılık. İstanbul Üniversitesi Coğrafya Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5-6, 95-111. google scholar
  • Tümertekin, E. & Özgüç, N. (1995). Ekonomik Coğrafya Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma. İstanbul: Çantay Kitapevi. (15. baskı 2016) google scholar
  • van Royen, W. (1954). The Agricultural Resources of the World. New York: Prentice Hall. google scholar
  • van Valkenburg, S. (1931). Agricultural Regions of Asia. Economic Geography, 7(3), 217-237. google scholar
  • van Valkenburg, S. (1936). Agricultural Regions of Asia. Economic Geography, 12(3), 231-249 google scholar
  • von Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtshaft und Nationalökonomie, Part I. Rostock, Berlin: Collected Edition. google scholar
  • Waibel, L. (1933). Probleme der Landwirtschafts-Geographie, Breslau: Ferdinand Hirt; Leipzig, p. 8 google scholar
  • Weaver, J. C. (1954 a). Crop-Combination Regions in the Middle West. Geographical Review, 44, 175-200. google scholar
  • Weaver, J. C. (1954 b). Crop combination regions for 1919 and 1929 in the Middle West. Geographical Review, 44, 560-572. google scholar
  • Whittlesey, D. S. (1936). Major Agricultural Regions of the Earth. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 26(4), 199-249. google scholar
  • Whittlesey, D. S. (1954). The regional concept and the regional method. in: American Geography; Inventory and Prospect, P.E, James, C.R. James and J.K. Wright (Eds,), Syracuse, Syracuse University Press, pp. 19-70 google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.