CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/SS26.2020.014.02   IUP :10.26650/B/SS26.2020.014.02    Full Text (PDF)

Pre-trial Procedure in Croatia

Elizabeta Ivıčevıć KarasZoran BurıćMarin Bonačıć

During the last decade, Croatian criminal procedure has been going through legislative reforms, which started with enacting a new Criminal Procedure Act in 2008, and continued in several legislative amendments, mostly aiming to implement European legal standards into Croatian law, but also to restore the disturbed procedural balance. Namely, the major change in the 2008 reform was replacing the traditional judicial investigation with the prosecutorial one and empowering the State Attorneys with more repressive authorities, in order to reinforce efficiency of criminal proceedings in a whole. Yet once adopted, the new Criminal Procedure Act was severely criticised not only in the domestic literature, but also by the Croatian Constitutional Court which in 2012 declared unconstitutional and vacated over forty legislative provisions of the new Criminal Procedure Act, which required further legislative interventions.

After the recent reforms, the pre-trial procedure in Croatia is composed of inquiries, simplified investigation or investigation (depending on the gravity of criminal offence), and of the indicting process, with mandatory judicial control of the indictment. Besides analysing the structure of the pre-trial procedure, the paper provides an overview of basic principles ruling these stages of proceedings, including the principle of mandatory prosecution, the inquisitorial principle and the principle of judicial control over investigatory and prosecutorial powers of the State Attorney. The State Attorney, as a State organ in charge for conducting investigation, is attributed with significant powers and duties regarding gathering evidence, as well as regarding applying various coercive measures against defendant. Those powers and duties are analysed, while particular attention is dedicated to legal position and rights of the suspect and defendant.



References

  • Bonačić M, ‘Kritički osvrt na hrvatsko zakonodavno uređenje instituta kaznenog naloga’ (2015) 22 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 185 google scholar
  • Burić Z and Karas Ž, ‘Prilog raspravi o dvojbama vezanim uz novu definiciju osumnjičenika i radnju njegova ispitivanja’ (2017) 24 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 443 google scholar
  • Đurđević Z, ‘Pravna priroda, pravni okvir i svrha jamstva u kaznenom postupku: mogu li preživjeti odluku Ustavnog suda RH U-III-1451/2015 o ukidanju istražnog zatvora za gradonačelnika Grada Zagreba i vraćanju jamčevine njegova branitelja?’ (2015) 22 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 9 google scholar
  • -- ‘Rekonstrukcija, judicijalizacija, konstitucionalizacija, europeizacija hrvatskog kaznenog postupka V. novelom ZKP/08: Prvi dio?’ (2013) 20 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 315 google scholar
  • -- ‘Odluka Ustavnog suda RH o suglasnosti Zakona o kaznenom postupku s Ustavom’ (2012) 19 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 409 google scholar
  • -- ‘Suvremeni razvoj hrvatskog kaznenog procesnog prava s posebnim osvrtom na novelu ZKP iz 2011. (2011) 18 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 311 google scholar
  • -- ‘Sudska kontrola državnoodvjetničkog kaznenog progona i istrage: poredbeni i ustavni aspekt’ (2010) 17 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 7 google scholar
  • Gluščić S, ‘Posebne dokazne radnje’ (2012) 21 Policija i sigurnost 555 google scholar
  • Ivičević Karas E, ‘Trial Waiver Systems in Croatia: Towards a rights-based approach to trial waiver systems’ (LEAP Legal Experts Advisory Panel 2019), < https://www.fairtrials.org/sites/default/files/publication_ pdf/20190513_Trial_Waivers_Croatia_Final.pdf > accessed 11 February 2020 google scholar
  • -- ‘Pomicanje granica prava na branitelja pod utjecajem europskog kaznenog prava’ (2015) 22 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 355 google scholar
  • Ivičević Karas E, Burić Z and Bonačić M, ‘Unapređenje procesnih prava osumnjičenika i okrivljenika u kaznenom postupku: Pogled kroz prizmu europskih pravnih standarda’ (2016) 23 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 11 google scholar
  • Ivičević Karas E and Valković L, ‘Pravo na branitelja u policiji – pravna i stvarna ograničenja’ (2017) 24 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 413 google scholar
  • Krapac D, Kazneno procesno pravo Prva knjiga: Institucije (7th edn, Narodne novine 2015) google scholar
  • -- Zakon o kaznenom postupku i drugi izvori hrvatskog kaznenog postupovnog prava (6th rev edn, Narodne novine 2006) google scholar
  • Krapac D and Novosel D, ‘Rad državnog odvjetnika u predistražnom postupku i razlozi odbačaja kaznenih prijava prema odredbama Zakona o kaznenom postupku (2010) 17 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 125 google scholar
  • Ljubanović V, ‘Novo hrvatsko pravo državnog odvjetništva’ (2001) 8 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 3 google scholar
  • Martinović I and Bonačić M, ‘Jamstvo kao zamjena za istražni zatvor: otvorena pitanja’ (2015) 22 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 411 google scholar
  • Mrčela M and Bilušić I, ‘Konfrontacijska mjerila’ (2016) 23 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 371 google scholar
  • Novokmet A, ‘Sudska kontrola optužnice – posebni stadij kaznenog postupka’, (2014) 64 Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 1013 google scholar
  • Novokmet A and Vinković Z, ‘Police Interrogation of the Suspect in Croatia after the Implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU – State of Play and Open Questions’ (2018) 2 EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series 418 google scholar
  • Novosel D, ‘Kazneni progon prema Noveli Zakona o kaznenom postupku’ (2013) 20 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 471 google scholar
  • Novosel D and Pajčić M, ‘Državni odvjetnik kao gospodar novog prethodnog kaznenog postupka’ (2009) 16 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 427 google scholar
  • Pavić K and Gluščić S, ‘Odnos policije i državnog odvjetništva prema VII. noveli ZKP’ (2017) 24 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 483 google scholar
  • Pavišić B, ‘Novi hrvatski Zakon o kaznenom postupku’ (2008) 15 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 489 google scholar
  • Pavliček J, ‘Uloga istražitelja u kaznenom postupku’ (2009) 16 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 895 google scholar
  • Valković L, ‘Procesna prava obrane prema V. noveli Zakona o kaznenom postupku’ (2013) 20 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 521 google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.