CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/SS07.2021.002.06   IUP :10.26650/B/SS07.2021.002.06    Full Text (PDF)

Leadership and Agency in Algorithmic Society

Ignas Kalpokas

Leadership, as a phenomenon, has a key function in society, mobilising individuals and driving them towards a certain goal. However, it is by now more than clear that leadership has been severely disrupted by digital innovation, not least by the advent of social media, big data, and algorithmic governance. Hence, the aim of this chapter is to explore the changes and to formulate a concept of leadership that is responsive to the modes of mobilisation, new affordances of data analytics, and the irruption of private business logics into the very core of leadership and campaigning strategies. Consequently, the very question of agency in leadership has become straightforward. To that effect, the chapter concludes by finding leadership to be diffused within more-than-human assemblages in which aspiring leaders continue to play a major role but by no means an unquestionably central one. Instead, leadership must constantly be performed, regardless of other considerations and formal conditions.



References

  • Abramovich, G. (2017, June 21). In the age of customer experience, content in context is king [Web log post]. google scholar
  • Retrieved from https://www.cmo.com/features/articles/2017/6/21/in-the-age-of-customer-experience-content-in-context-is-king-adobesymp.html#gs.jBSc3NI google scholar
  • Anspach, N. M. (2017). The new personal influence: How our Facebook friends influence the news we read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590-606. google scholar
  • Bakardjieva, M., Felt, M., & Dumitrica, D. (2018). The mediatization of leadership: Grassroots digital facilitators as organic intellectuals, sociometric stars and caretakers. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 899-914. google scholar
  • Balazs, J. A., & Velasquez, J. D. (2016). Opinion mining and information fusion: A survey. Information Fusion, 27, 95-110. google scholar
  • Beer, D. (2018). Envisioning the power of data analytics. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 465-479. google scholar
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. google scholar
  • Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Knüpfer, C. B. (2018). The democratic interface: Technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1655-1680. google scholar
  • Bielinis, L. (2018). Komunikacijos hibridiskumas politikoje [The hybridity of communication in politics]. In R. Sukaityte & K. Kirtiklis (Eds.), Socialines tikroves mediacija: kultüra, political ir visuomene [Mediation of social reality: culture, politics and society] (pp. 37-52). Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilniaus universiteto leidyka. google scholar
  • Bocullo, D. (2016). European cinema on social media map: Bridging cultural diversity and reaching audience in the era of digitalisation. Media Transformations, 12, 62-87. google scholar
  • Boler, M., & Davis, E. (2018). The affective politics of the ‘post-truth’ era: Feeling rules and networked subjectivity. Emotion, Space & Society, 27, 75-85. google scholar
  • Bostrom, N. (2017). Superintelligence: Paths, data. strategies. Oxford, UK & New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic power andpolitics. Oxford, UK & New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Caplan, R., & Boyd, D. (2018). Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718757253 google scholar
  • Choat, S. (2018). Science, agency and ontology: A historical-materialist response to new materialism. Political Studies, 66(4), 1027-1042. google scholar
  • Clifton, J. (2017). Leaders as ventriloquists: Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organisation. Leadership, 13(3), 301-319. google scholar
  • Collinson, M. (2018). What’s new about leadership-as-practice? Leadership, 14(3), 363-370. google scholar
  • Colvin, S., & Kingston, W. (2017, July 7). Why conversation is the future of customer experience [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.digitalpulse.pwc.com.au/conversation-customer-experience-cco-study google scholar
  • Cooren, F (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1-20. google scholar
  • Couldry, N., & Hepp. A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge, UK & Malden, MA: Polity. google scholar
  • Crevani, L. (2018). Is there leadership in a fluid world? Exploring the ongoing production of direction in organizing. Leadership, 14(1), 83-109. google scholar
  • Dahlgren, P., & Alvares, C. (2013). Political participation in an age of mediatization. Javnost — The Public, 20(2), 47-65. google scholar
  • Dean, J. (2018). Sorted for memes and gifs: Visual media and everyday digital politics. Political Studies Review, 17(3), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807483 google scholar
  • Döveling, K., Harju, H. A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305117743141 google scholar
  • Etter, M., Colleoni, E., Illia, L., Meggiorin, K., & D’Eugenio, A. (2018). Measuring organizational legitimacy in social media: Assessing citizens’ judgments with sentiment analysis. Business & Society, 57(1), 60-97. google scholar
  • Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28, 62-70. google scholar
  • Ferrante, A., & Sartori, D. (2016). From anthropocentrism to post-humanism in the educational debate. Relations, 4(2), 175-194. google scholar
  • Flyverbom, M., & Murray, J. (2018). Datastructuring: Organizing and curating digital traces into action. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718799114 google scholar
  • Giatsoglou, M., Vozalis, M. G., Diamantaras, K., Vakali, A., Sarigiannidis, G., & Chatzisavvas, K. C. (2017). Sentiment analysis leveraging emotions and word embeddings. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 214-224. google scholar
  • Giaxoglou, K., & Döveling, K. (2018). Mediatization of emotion on social media: Forms and norms in digital mourning practices. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117744393 google scholar
  • Gil de Zuniga, H., Weeks, B., & Ardevol-Abreu, A. (2017). Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: Social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 102-123. google scholar
  • Greenfield, A. (2018). Radical technologies: Thee design of everyday life. London, UK & New York, NY: Verso. google scholar
  • Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214-226. google scholar
  • Hauser, M. (2018). Metapopulism in-between democracy and populism: Transformations of Laclau’s concept of populism with Trump and Putin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 68-87. google scholar
  • Hildebrandt, M. (2016). Law as information in the era of data-driven agency. The Modern Law Review, 79(1), 1-30. google scholar
  • Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2017). Governance by algorithms: Reality construction by algorithmic selection in the internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2), 238-258. google scholar
  • Kalpokas, I. (2019). A political theory ofpost-truth. London, UK & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872-886. google scholar
  • Krzyzanowski, M., Triandafyllidou, A., & Wodak, R. (2018). The mediatization and the politicization of the “refugee crisis” in Europe. Journal of Immigrant andRefugee Studies, 16(1-2), 1-14. google scholar
  • Langlois, G., & Elmer, G. (2019). Impersonal subjectivation from platforms to infrastructures. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 236-251. google scholar
  • Larsson, A. O. (2019). Winning and losing on social media: Comparing viral political posts across platforms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(3), 639-657. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354856518821589 google scholar
  • Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e). google scholar
  • Leveille Gauvin, H. (2018). Drawing listener attention in popular music: Testing five musical features arising from the theory of attention economy. Musicae Scientiae, 22(3), 291-304. google scholar
  • Markwica, R. (2018). Emotional choices: How the logic of affect shapes coercive diplomacy. Oxford, UK & New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies and the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137-160. google scholar
  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2017). Big data: The essential guide to work, life and learning in the age of insight. London, UK: John Murray. google scholar
  • Mazzoleni, G. (2017). Changes in contemporary communication ecosystems ask for a ‘new look’ at the concept of mediatisation. Javnost — The Public, 24(2), 136-145. google scholar
  • McIntyre, L. C. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge, MA & London, UK: The MIT Press. google scholar
  • Metz, M., Kruikmeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481-1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244 google scholar
  • Newell, S., & Marabelli, M. (2015). Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification’. Journal ofStrategic Information Systems, 24, 3-14. google scholar
  • Newman, D. (2016, March 8). In the age of experience: The best brands tell better stories and make you a part of them [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2016/03/08/ in-the-age-of-experience-the-best-brands-tell-better-stories-and-make-you-a-part-of-them/#44d83b057799 google scholar
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford, UK & New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307-324. google scholar
  • Papsdorf, C. (2015). How the internet automates communication. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 991-1005. google scholar
  • Peters, J., & Johnson, B. (2016). Conceptualizing private governance in a networked society. North Carolina Journal ofLaw and Technology, 18(1), 15-68. google scholar
  • Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rieder, B., Woltering, R., & Zack, L. (2016). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 994-1014. google scholar
  • Poria, S., Cambria, E., Bajpai, R., & Hussain, A. (2017). A review of affective computing: From unimodal analysis to multimodal fusion. InformationFusion, 37, 98-125. google scholar
  • Post, S. (2019). Polarizing communication as media effects on antagonists. Understanding communication in conflicts in digital media societies. Communication Theory, 29(2), 213-235. google scholar
  • Pötzsch, H. (2018). Archives and identity in the context of social media and algorithmic analytics: Towards an understanding of iArchive and predictive retention. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3304-3322. google scholar
  • Riccio, J. (2017, August 22). Why the experience age is closing the gap between consultancy and agency [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.digitalpulse.pwc.com.au/experience-age-advertising-agency-consultancy google scholar
  • Romaniuk, J., & Nguyen, C. (2017). Is consumer psychology research ready for today’s attention economy? Journal ofMarketing Management, 33(11-12), 909-916. google scholar
  • Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, (6)1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549 google scholar
  • Schaap, J. (2017, April 25). Move over information age - This is the age of experience [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.hospitalitynet.org/opinion/4082347.html google scholar
  • Simpson, B., Buchan, L., & Sillince, J. (2018). The performativity of leadership talk. Leadership, 14(6), 644-661. google scholar
  • Stroud, N. J., & McGregor, S. C. (Eds.). (2019). Digital discussions: How big data informs political communication. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic. Princeton, NJ & Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Sutkute, R. (2016). The mediatization of new movements: The case of ‘Je Suis Charlie’. Media Transformations, 12, 38-61. google scholar
  • Swann, T., & Husted, E. (2017). Undermining anarchy: Facebook’s influence on anarchist principles of organization in Occupy Wall Street. The Information Society, 33(4), 192-204. google scholar
  • Teles, F. (2015). The distinctiveness of democratic political leadership. Political Studies Review, 13(1), 22-36. google scholar
  • Wadhera, M. (2016, May 10). The information age is over: Welcome to the experience age [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/09/the-information-age-is-over -welcome-to-the-experience-age/?guccounter=1 google scholar
  • Webster, J. G. (2017). Three myths of digital media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(4), 352-351. google scholar
  • Williamson, B. (2017). Moulding student emotions through computational psychology: Affective learning technologies and algorithmic governance. Education Media International, 54(4), 267-288. google scholar
  • Wladawsky-Berger, I. (2018, April 20). Customer experience is the key competitive differentiator in the digital age [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2018/04/20/customer -experience-is-the-key-competitive-differentiator-in-the-digital-age google scholar
  • Yeung, K. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118-136. google scholar
  • Zakaraite, L. (2016). Leader’s self-presentation: Changes in social media. Media Transformations, 12, 88-97. google scholar
  • Zatarain, J. M. N. (2017). The role of automated technology in the creation of copyright works: The challenges of artificial intelligence. International Review ofLaw, Computers & Technology, 31(1), 91-104. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.