Human Computer Interaction: Research and Applications

EnglishTürkçe

CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/ET07.2020.012.06   IUP :10.26650/B/ET07.2020.012.06    Full Text (PDF)

Optimal Location Detection in in-car Placement of Multimedia Devices

Durmuş Koç, Halit Irmak

With the development of technology, there have been significant developments in transport, but despite these developments, driver-related road accidents are still a major problem today. The Turkish Statistical Institute data for 2018 showed that 89.9% of the traffic accidents that occurred in Turkey in 2017 were due to driver error. One of the factors causing driver-induced road accidents is in-car multimedia devices. This study was conducted on the detection of the positional ergonomics of in-car multimedia devices. By determining in which position the devices distract the drivers the least, the most appropriate position of the multimedia devices in the car was determined. For the purpose of the study, drivers used multimedia devices at various locations in the vehicle and this situation was recorded by the vehicle camera. Subsequently, all camera recordings were collected and the measurement was performed by analyzing attentional situations related to the drivers’ eye movements. In addition to the existing data, a user experience survey was conducted and the data obtained was analyzed comparatively. According to the use of the multimedia devices in different locations, attempts were made to estimate in which position the driver’s visual attention load is the least while driving. As a result of the data analysis, it was found that the most useful position of multimedia devices for the driver in the car is the second position (orientation of the driver’s left mirror). Then the first position (center console center-top side), the fourth position (center console center-center side), and the third position (center console center-bottom side) were determined as the next most suitable positions.


Keywords: Human Computer Interaction, Image Processing, Usability, Ergonomics, Car Multimedia Location
DOI :10.26650/B/ET07.2020.012.06   IUP :10.26650/B/ET07.2020.012.06    Full Text (PDF)

Çoklu Ortam Aygıtlarının Araç İçi Yerleşiminde En Uygun Konum Tespiti

Durmuş Koç, Halit Irmak

Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğünün Temmuz 2018 yılında yayınlamış olduğu rapora bakıldığında; Ülkemizde 2003-2017 yılları arasında yaşanmış olan trafik kazalarının en düşük %88,9’u ve en yüksek %90,5 oranında sürücü kaynaklı olduğu görülmektedir (TGDB, 2018). Sürücü kaynaklı trafik kazalarına neden olan etmenlerden biri de araç içi multimedya aygıtlarıdır. Bu çalışma araç içi multimedya aygıtlarının, konum ergonomisinin tespiti üzerine gerçekleştirilmiştir. Aygıtların en az hangi mevkide sürücülerin dikkatini dağıttığının tespitinin gerçekleştirilmesi ile araç içi multimedya aygıtlarının sürücü için en kullanılabilir konumu belirlenmiştir. Araç içi multimedya konum kullanılabilirliğinin ölçümü, sürücülerin araçları sürüş esnasında, multimedyanın farklı konumlarda çalıştırılması ve bu farklı konumlardan göz takibi gerçekleştirebilen bir kamera kullanılarak sürücünün dikkatinin dağıldığı noktalara ait verilerin toplanması ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mevcut verilere ek olarak kullanıcı deneyim anketi uygulanmış ve elde edilen veriler karşılaştırılmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Böylelikle sürüş esnasındaki sürücü görsel dikkat yükünün multimedyanın hangi konumunda en az olduğu tahmin edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Verilerin analizi sonucunda sürücüler, araç içi multimedya aygıtlarının sürücü için en kullanışlılığı yüksek konumun 2. konum (sürücü sol ayna hizası), bu konumu takiben sırasıyla 1. Konum (ön konsol ortası), 4. konum (ön konsol orta alt kısım) ve 3. konum (ön konsol orta alt kısmın daha altı) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. 


Keywords: İnsan Bilgisayar Etkileşimi, Konum Ergonomisi, Araç İçi Çoklu Ortam Aygıtı, Yüz Hat Harita Algoritması, Görüntü İşleme

References

  • Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1995). The Effects of a Mobile Telephone Task on Driver Behaviour in a Car Following Situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27(5), 707–715. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(95)00026-V google scholar
  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805. google scholar
  • Bachmann, D., Weichert, F., & Rinkenauer, G. (2018). Review of three-dimensional human-computer interaction with focus on the leap motion controller. Sensors, 18(7), 2194. google scholar
  • Bahreini, K., Nadolski, R., & Westera, W. (2016). Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 590-605. google scholar
  • Bernhaupt, R., Isbister, K., & De Freitas, S. (2015). Introduction to this Special Issue on HCI and Games. Taylor & Francis. google scholar
  • Bevan, N. (1995). Human-Computer Interaction Standards (ss. 885-890). doi:10.1016/S0921-2647(06)80326-6 google scholar
  • Blandford, A. (2019). HCI for health and wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. google scholar
  • Boudette, N. E. (2018, 20 Ocak). Biggest Spike in Traffic Deaths in 50 Years? Blame Apps. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/business/tech-distractions-blamed-for-rise-in-traffic-fatalities.html adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Boz, H., & Kose, U. (2018). Emotion Extraction from Facial Expressions by Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 9(1), 5–16. google scholar
  • Choi, J.-S., Kim, H.-S., Kang, D.-W., Choi, M.-H., Kim, H.-S., Hong, S.-P., … Chung, S.-C. (2013). The Effects of Disruption in Attention on Driving Performance Patterns: Analysis of Jerk-Cost Function and Vehicle Control Data. Applied Ergonomics, 44(4), 538–543. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2012.11.004 google scholar
  • Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2001). 3D or not 3D?: Evaluating the Effect of the Third Dimension in a Document Management System. … on Human factors in computing systems, 3, 434–441. doi:10.1145/365024.365309 google scholar
  • Cowley, B., Filetti, M., Lukander, K., Torniainen, J., Henelius, A., Ahonen, L., … Huotilainen, M. (2016). The psychophysiology primer: A guide to methods and a broad review with a focus on human–computer interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 9(3-4), 151–308. google scholar
  • Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Trawley, S., Collins, L., van Loon, E., Andrews, B., & Underwood, G. (2012). Some Hazards are More Attractive Than Others: Drivers of Varying Experience Respond Differently to Different Types of Hazard. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 600–609. doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2011.09.049 google scholar
  • Eden, G. (2018). Transforming Cars into Computers: Interdisciplinary Opportunities for HCI. Proceedings of 32nd BCS HCI Conference, Belfast, UK, 2018 içinde. British Human Computer Interaction (BHCI). google scholar
  • Green, P. (2000). Crashes Induced by Driver Information Systems and What can be Done to Reduce Them. Converg. 2000 Conf. Proc. Soc. of Automot. Eng. (SAE), Warrendale içinde (ss. 27-36). google scholar
  • Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660. google scholar
  • Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. S. (2012). Chapter 1 - Introduction. R. Hartson ve P. S. Pyla (Ed.), The UX Book içinde (ss. 1-46). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385241-0.00001-4 google scholar
  • Harvey, C., Pickering, C. A., McDonald, M., & Zheng, P. (2011). A Usability Evaluation Toolkit for In-Vehicle Information Systems (IVISs). Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 563–574. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2010.09.013 google scholar
  • Hemanth, J. D., Kose, U., Deperlioglu, O., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2018). An augmented reality-supported mobile application for diagnosis of heart diseases. The Journal of Supercomputing, 1–26. doi: 10.1007/ s11227-018-2483-6 google scholar
  • Hoc, J.-M. (2008). Cognitive ergonomics: A multidisciplinary venture. Ergonomics, 51(1), 71–75. doi:10.1080/00140130701801124 google scholar
  • Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., & Consalus, K. P. (2006). Modeling Drivers’ Visual Attention Allocation While Interacting With In-Vehicle Technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(2), 67–78. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.67 google scholar
  • IEA. (2019). Definition and Domains of Ergonomics | IEA Website. 13 Ocak 2019 tarihinde https://www.iea. cc/whats/ adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • ISO. (2010). ISO 9241-210. ISO. 13 Ocak 2019 tarihinde http://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/ contents/data/standard/05/20/52075.html adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Jama. (2004). Guideline for In-vehicle Display Systems - Version 3.0. Jama, 1-15. google scholar
  • Janelle, C. M., Singer, R. N., & Williams, A. M. (1999). External Distraction and Attentional Narrowing: Visual Search Evidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21(1), 70–91. doi:10.1123/jsep.21.1.70 google scholar
  • Jara, A. J., Zamora, M. A., & Skarmeta, A. F. (2011). An internet of things–based personal device for diabetes therapy management in ambient assisted living (AAL). Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(4), 431–440. google scholar
  • Kaynak, İ., Seçkin, A. Ç., Yücesoy, S. A., & Koç, D. (2016). Eğitim Uygulamaları için İnsan Bilgisayar Arayüz Aygıtı Tasarımı (ss. 47-51). Uluslararası Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Mühendisliği Konferansı (UBMK’16), sunulmuş bildiri. google scholar
  • Kim, H., & Song, H. (2014a). Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion. Applied Ergonomics, 45(3), 789–798. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.013 google scholar
  • Kim, H., & Song, H. (2014b). Evaluation of the Safety and Usability of Touch Gestures in Operating In-Vehicle Information Systems With Visual Occlusion. Applied Ergonomics, 45(3), 789–798. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2013.10.013 google scholar
  • Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D., & Ramsey, D. J. (2006). A Driving Simulator Study to Explore the Effects of Text Size on The Visual Demand of In-Vehicle Displays. National Highway Safety Administration. doi:10.1016/J.DISPLA.2016.05.003 google scholar
  • Kose, U., & Vasant, P. (2018) Better campus life for visually impaired University students: intelligent social walking system with beacon and assistive technologies. Wireless Networks, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11276- 018-1868-z google scholar
  • Kumar, P. M., Gandhi, U., Varatharajan, R., Manogaran, G., Jidhesh, R., & Vadivel, T. (2017). Intelligent face recognition and navigation system using neural learning for smart security in Internet of Things. Cluster Computing, 1–12. google scholar
  • Land, M., & Horwood, J. (1995). Which Parts of the Road Guide Steering? Nature, 377(6547), 339–340. doi:10.1038/377339a0 google scholar
  • Lee, J. D. (2008). Fifty Years of Driving Safety Research. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 521–528. doi:10.1518/001872008X288376 google scholar
  • Li, R., Chen, Y. V., Sha, C., & Lu, Z. (2017). Effects of Interface Layout on the Usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and Driving Safety. Displays, 49, 124–132. doi:10.1016/J.DISPLA.2017.07.008 google scholar
  • Liang, Y. (2010). Combining Cognitive and Visual Distraction: Less Than the Sum of its Parts. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 881–890. doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2009.05.001 google scholar
  • Marmaras, N., Poulakakis, G., & Papakostopoulos, V. (1999). Ergonomic design in ancient Greece. Applied Ergonomics, 30(4), 361–368. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00050-7 google scholar
  • May, J. (2001). Human–Computer Interaction. N. J. Smelser ve P. B. Baltes (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences içinde (ss. 7031-7035). Oxford: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076- 7/01422-4 google scholar
  • Mirnig, A., Kaiser, T., Lupp, A., Perterer, N., Meschtscherjakov, A., Grah, T., & Tscheligi, M. (2016). Automotive User Experience Design Patterns: An Approach and Pattern Examples. International Journal On Advances in Intelligent Systems, 9, 275–286. google scholar
  • Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Trotter, M. J., & Lenné, M. G. (2011). Effects on Driving Performance of Interacting With an In-Vehicle Music Player: A Comparison of Three Interface Layout Concepts for Information Presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 583–591. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2010.08.017 google scholar
  • Pekcan, B. ve Oğulata, S. N. (2008). Yazılım Ergonomisi ve Bir İşletme Yazılımı Üzerine Uygulanması. Ç.Ü Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 18(2), 76–83. http://fbe.cu.edu.tr/tr/makaleler/200818-2-8.pdf adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Purucker, C., Naujoks, F., Prill, A., & Neukum, A. (2017). Evaluating Distraction of In-Vehicle Information Systems While Driving by Predicting Total Eyes-Off-Road Times With Keystroke Level Modeling. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 543–554. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2016.04.012 google scholar
  • Rahman, A. S. M. M., Saboune, J., & El Saddik, A. (2011). Motion-path Based in Car Gesture Control of the Multimedia Devices. Proceedings of the First ACM International Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications içinde, DIVANet ’11 (ss. 69–76). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2069000.2069013 google scholar
  • Sagonas, C., Antonakos, E., Tzimiropoulos, G., Zafeiriou, S., & Pantic, M. (2016a). 300 faces in-the-wild challenge: Database and results. Image and vision computing, 47, 3–18. google scholar
  • Sagonas, C., Antonakos, E., Tzimiropoulos, G., Zafeiriou, S., & Pantic, M. (2016b). 300 faces in-the-wild challenge. Image and Vision Computing, 47(C), 3–18. google scholar
  • Salomon, K. A. ve Boudreaux, D. (2016). Identification of Future Human-Computer System Needs in Army Aviation. International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations içinde (ss. 209–220). Springer. google scholar
  • Salvucci, D. D. (2001). Predicting the Effects of In-Car Interface Use on Driver Performance: An Integrated Model Approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(1), 85–107. doi:10.1006/ IJHC.2001.0472 google scholar
  • Schaab, P., Beckers, K., & Pape, S. (2017). Social engineering defence mechanisms and counteracting training strategies. Information & Computer Security, 25(2), 206–222. google scholar
  • Sezer, A., İnel, Y., Seçkin, A. Ç., & Uluçınar, U. (2015). An Investigation of University Students’ Attention Levels in Real Classroom Settings with NeuroSky’s MindWave Mobile (EEG) Device. International Educational Technology Conference 2015 içinde (ss. 88-101). IETC 2015, sunulmuş bildiri. google scholar
  • Sezer, A., İnel, Y., Seçkin, A. Ç., & Uluçınar, U. (2017). The Relationship between Attention Levels and Class Participation of First-Year Students in Classroom Teaching Departments. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 55–68. google scholar
  • Stevens, A., & Minton, R. (2001). In-Vehicle Distraction and Fatal Accidents in England and Wales. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(4), 539–545. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00068-3 google scholar
  • Stutts, J. C., Reinfurt, D. W., Staplin, L., & Rodgman, E. A. (2001). The Role of Driver Distraction in Crashes. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Washington, DC. google scholar
  • Svenson, O. ve Patten, C. J. D. (2005). Mobile Phones and Driving: A Review of Contemporary Research. Cognition, Technology & Work, 7(3), 182–197. doi:10.1007/s10111-005-0185-3 google scholar
  • Talhouk, R., Morrissey, K., Fox, S., Pantidi, N., Simpson, E., Michie, L. E. ve Balaam, M. (2018). Human computer interaction & health activism. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems içinde (s. SIG15). ACM. google scholar
  • Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Da Xu, L., Zhang, L., & Li, B. H. (2014). CCIoT-CMfg: cloud computing and internet of things-based cloud manufacturing service system. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1435–1442. google scholar
  • TDK. (2019). Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. 13 Mart 2019 tarihinde http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&arama=kelime&guid=TDK.GTS.5c88b6675cd704.15734543 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • TGDB. (2018). Trafik Kazaları Özeti 2017. T.C.Ulaştırma ve Altyapı Bakanlığı Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü. google scholar
  • TÜİK. (2018). Karayolu Trafik Kaza İstatistikleri, 2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=27668 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Yilmaz, Y., Kose, U., Celik, S., Cankaya, S. F., & Cankaya, I. A. (2018). An arduino based system for calculating the average life time of a person via indoor oxygen content. In 2018 Electric Electronics, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineerings’ Meeting (EBBT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. google scholar
  • Young, K. L., Lenné, M. G., & Williamson, A. R. (2011). Sensitivity of the Lane Change test as a Measure of In-Vehicle System Demand. Applied Ergonomics, 42(4), 611–618. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2010.06.020 google scholar
  • Young, K. L., Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Lenné, M. G. (2012). The Effects of Using a Portable Music Player on Simulated Driving Performance and Task-Sharing Strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 43(4), 738–746. doi:10.1016/J.APERGO.2011.11.007 google scholar
  • Zubov, D., Kose, U., Ramadhan, A. J., & Kupin, A. (2018). Mesh Network of eHealth Intelligent Agents in Smart City: A Case Study on Assistive Devices for Visually Impaired People. 1st International Workshop on Informatics & Data-Driven Medicine (IDDM) 2018, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), Vol. 2255: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2255/paper7.pdf google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.