Journal of Economy Culture and Society

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2021-1023894   IUP :10.26650/JECS2021-1023894    Full Text (PDF)

Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation

Sacit Hadi Akdede, Jinyoung Hwang, Nazlı Keyifli

This paper empirically investigates the impact of dominant religion and radical right-wing political views on social trust, using data taken from the World Values Survey on 60 countries over the period 2010–2014. To supplement the existing literature, we consider both religion and political views at the same regression equation, and relatively recent data to reflect terrorism and anti-immigration policies in recent years. It is found that people living in Asian countries where Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism, and Shintoism are the dominant religions trust others more than people living in Christian and Muslim countries. A plausible explanation is that Asian religions are closely related to the ethics of life regarding relations with neighbors, which may have a positive impact on trust among people. However, when classified according to the frequency of participation in prayer, it is observed that these religions may not have a distinctly discriminatory impact on social trust. The impact of radical right-wing political views on trust is negative and statistically significant, meaning that people with radical right-wing political views have a relatively lower social trust than others. The empirical results suggest that religion and political views influence trust and can be a factor in producing either harmony or division among people.

Keywords: Religion, Political View, Right-Wing, Social Trust

PDF View

References

  • Alesina, A., & E. La Ferrara. (2002). Who trusts others?. Journal of Public Economics, 85: 207-234. google scholar
  • Balliet, D., J. Tybur, M. J. Wu, C. Antonellis, & A. P. M. Van Lange. (2018). Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: in-group favoritism among republicans and democrats during a US national election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62 (4): 797-818. google scholar
  • Berggren, N., & C. Bj0rnskov. (2011. Is the importance of religion in daily life related to social trust? cross-country and cross-state comparisons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80 (3): 459-480. google scholar
  • Berning, C. C., & C. Ziller. (2017). Social trust and radical right-wing populist party preferences. ActaPolitica, 52: 198-217. google scholar
  • Beugelsdijk, S., & M. J. Klasing. (2016). Diversity and trust: the role of shared values. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44: 522-540. google scholar
  • Bj0rnskov, C. (2012). How does social trust affect economic growth? Southern Economic Journal, 78 (4): 13461368. Center for Systemic Peace. Retrived from: https://www.systemicpeace.org/. google scholar
  • Clobert, M., V. Saroglou, K.-K. Hwang, & W.-L. Soong. (2014). East asian religious tolerance-a myth or a reality? empirical investigations of religious prejudice in east asian societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (10): 1515-1533. google scholar
  • Daniels, J. P., & M. von der Ruhr. (2010). Trust in others: does religion matter? Review of Social Economy, 68 (2): 163-186. google scholar
  • Delhey, J., & K. Newton. (2003). Who trusts? the origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5 (2): 93-137. google scholar
  • Dingemans, E., & E. Van Ingen. (2015). Does religion breed trust? a cross-national study of the effects of religious involvement, religious faith, and religious context on social trust. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54 (4): 739-755. google scholar
  • Duckitt, J., & C. Parra. (2004). Dimensions of group identification and out-group attitudes in four ethnic groups in New Zealand. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 (4): 237-247. google scholar
  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice, in Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33, San Diego, CA: Academic. google scholar
  • Erikson, R. S., & K. L. Tedin. (2003). American Public Opinion (6th ed.), New York, NY: Longman. google scholar
  • Grechyna, D. (2016). On the determinants of political polarization. Economics Letters 144: 10-14. google scholar
  • Koivula, A., A. Saarinen, & P. Rasane. (2017). Political party preference and social trust in four nordic countries. Comparative European Politics, 15: 1030-1051. google scholar
  • Kwon, O. Y. (2019). Social trust and economic development, the case of South Korea, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
  • Marcel, L., M. Gijsberts, & P. Scheepers. (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in western europe,” European Journal of Political Research, 41 (3): 345-378. google scholar
  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in europe, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22 (2): 201-214. google scholar
  • Norris, P. (2005). Radical right: voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Olson, D. V. A., & M. Li. (2015). Does a nation’s religious composition affect generalized trust? the role of religious heterogeneity and the percent religious. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54 (4): 756-773. google scholar
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. google scholar
  • Putnam, R., & D. E. Campbell. (2010) American grace: how religion divides and unites us, New York, NY: Simon& Schuster. google scholar
  • Rapp, C. (2016). Moral opinion polarization and the erosion of trust. Social Science Research, 58: 34-45. google scholar
  • Stankov, L. (2021). From social conservatism and authoritarian populism to militant right-wing extremism personality and individual differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110733, Accessed on January 11, 2021. google scholar
  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002) The moral foundations of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Valente, R. R., & A. Okulicz-Kozaryn. Religiosity and trust: evidence from the United States. Review of Religious Research,” https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00437-8, Accessed on January 02, 2021. google scholar
  • World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/. google scholar
  • World Values Survey, Retrived from: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp. google scholar
  • You, J.-S. (2012). Social trust: fairness matters more than homogeneity. Political Psychology, 33: 701-721. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Akdede, S.H., Hwang, J., & Keyifli, N. (2023). Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(67), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


AMA

Akdede S H, Hwang J, Keyifli N. Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2023;0(67):21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


ABNT

Akdede, S.H.; Hwang, J.; Keyifli, N. Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 67, p. 21-34, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Akdede, Sacit Hadi, and Jinyoung Hwang and Nazlı Keyifli. 2023. “Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 67: 21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


Chicago: Humanities Style

Akdede, Sacit Hadi, and Jinyoung Hwang and Nazlı Keyifli. “Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 67 (Apr. 2024): 21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


Harvard: Australian Style

Akdede, SH & Hwang, J & Keyifli, N 2023, 'Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 67, pp. 21-34, viewed 19 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Akdede, S.H. and Hwang, J. and Keyifli, N. (2023) ‘Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(67), pp. 21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894 (19 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Akdede, Sacit Hadi, and Jinyoung Hwang and Nazlı Keyifli. “Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 67, 2023, pp. 21-34. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


Vancouver

Akdede SH, Hwang J, Keyifli N. Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 19 Apr. 2024 [cited 19 Apr. 2024];0(67):21-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894 doi: 10.26650/JECS2021-1023894


ISNAD

Akdede, SacitHadi - Hwang, Jinyoung - Keyifli, Nazlı. “Dominant Religion, Radical Right-Wing, and Social Trust: An Empirical Investigation”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/67 (Apr. 2024): 21-34. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-1023894



TIMELINE


Submitted18.11.2021
Accepted30.10.2022
Published Online25.05.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.