Istanbul Business Research

SUBMITINFORMATION
EnglishTürkçe

Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051    Full Text (PDF)

The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception

Seda Kızıl, Atılhan Naktiyok

The primary aim of this research is to examine the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the effect of strategic leadership behaviors of the executives on corporate reputation perception which develops in employees. In this research, a scale was used to collect data from 517 employees of 3 private hospitals in Trabzon and collected data was analyzed with required statistical analysis. As a result of research it has been determined that strategic leadership behaviors of the executives has a positive effect on corporate reputation perception of the employees and CSR plays a a partial mediating role on the relationship between strategic leadership-corporate reputation. 

Keywords: Strategic leadership, Corporate reputation, Corporate Social Responsibility
DOI :10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051    Full Text (PDF)

Yöneticilerin Stratejik Liderlik Davranışlarının Kurumsal İtibar Algısı Üzerine Etkisinde Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun (KSS) Rolü

Seda Kızıl, Atılhan Naktiyok

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, yöneticilerin göstermiş olduğu stratejik liderlik davranışlarının çalışanlarda oluşan kurumsal itibar algısı üzerindeki etkisinde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun (KSS) rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmada, 2016 yılında Trabzon’da faaliyet gösteren üç özel hastanede görev yapan 517 çalışandan anket tekniği ile veri toplanmıştır ve bu veriler uygun analizlere tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda yöneticilerin stratejik liderlik davranışlarının çalışanların kurumsal itibar algısını olumlu yönde etkilediği ve KSS faaliyetlerinin stratejik liderlik ile kurumsal itibar arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü üstlendiği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords: Stratejik liderlik, Kurumsal itibar, Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The survival of organizations operating in an ever-changing and complex environment significantly depends on the positive perceptions of stakeholders regarding the organization, or, in other words, on organizations’ abilities to manage their corporate reputations and make them part of the strategic management processes. The reason for this is that awareness of a company’s reputation provides stakeholders with the opportunity to compare the products, jobs, strategies and image of said organization with its rivals. Within this context, important duties fall to the strategic leaders who play an active role in the strategic management process for the effective and careful management of the corporate reputation. First of all, strategic leaders should aim to change the perceptions regarding reputation of the employees who are perfectly placed to influence the perceptions of other stakeholders. However, the existence of strategic leaders may not always create a positive perception among employees. For this reason, employees should be made aware that the organization performs CSR activities. With CSR, organizations provide a service to society, improve the quality of life, manage its economic-legal-ethical-volunteer activities in accordance with the expectations of society and try to find solutions to social problems. Therefore, stakeholders can reach a general conclusion about the organization based on its CSR activities, and they may develop certain expectations for the future. In this context, the aim of this study is to examine the role of CSR activities in the impact of strategic leadership behaviors of managers on the corporate reputation perception of employees. The survey method was used in this study. The study group consisted of 517 employees in three private hospitals operating in Trabzon in 2016. Firstly, strategic leadership, corporate reputation and CSR scales were subjected to explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses. Secondly, correlation analysis was performed across the variables. The correlation analyses showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between strategic leadership and corporate reputation, between strategic leadership and CSR and between CSR and corporate reputation at 99% confidence level in general. Thirdly, a three-stage regression analysis, as proposed by Baron and Kenny (1986: 1177), was carried out to explain the mediating role of CSR in the impact of strategic leadership behaviors on the corporate reputation perception of employees. At the first stage, it was seen that the independent variable (SL) had a significant impact on the dependent variable (CR) (β=.552; p<.001). At the second stage, the impact of the independent variable (SL) on the mediator variable (CSR) was examined (β=.589; p<.001). At the third stage, the impact of the mediator variable (CSR) on the dependent variable (CR) was examined (β=.719; p<.001). Finally, the independent variable (SL) was included in the model with the mediator variable (CSR) and attempts were made to explain the dependent variable (CR). When the last step was examined, it was observed that there was no insignificance in the association between strategic leadership and corporate reputation, but the impact strength decreased (β=.196; p<.001) and that the impact of CSR on corporate reputation continued (β=.603; p<.001. This finding shows that CSR plays a partial mediation role in the impact of strategic leadership on corporate reputation. The Sobel test was performed to determine the significance level of the mediation impact and this was confirmed given that the result was significant (z=13,574; p<.001). The study was limited to three private hospitals in Trabzon. Similar studies could be conducted in different geographical regions and the possible impacts of regional differences could be examined in terms of the research subject. In addition, this study, which was conducted in the health sector, might equally be applied to organizations operating in different industries. In this study, the variables that make up the research subject were evaluated from the perspective of the employees. Other stakeholder groups that organizations interact with could be included in the study to compare evaluations of stakeholder groups.


PDF View

References

  • Altınkurt, Y. (2007). Eğitim Örgütlerinde Stratejik Liderlik ve Okul Müdürlerinin Stratejik Liderlik Uygulamaları. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Aqueveque, C. (2005). Signaling corporate values: Consumers’ suspicious minds. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 70–81. google scholar
  • Argüden, Y. (2003). İtibar yönetimi. (Derleyen: Yılmaz Argüden), İtibar Yönetimi, ArGe Danışmanlık Yayınları, (4), 18. google scholar
  • Arikan, E., Kantur, D., Maden, C. ve Telci, E. E. (2016). Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 129–149. google scholar
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. google scholar
  • Brammer, S. & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44. google scholar
  • Bronn, P. S. & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222. google scholar
  • Carlisle, Y. M. & Faulkner, D. O. (2005). The strategy of reputation. Strategic Change, 14(8), 413–422. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. google scholar
  • Carroll, A. B. & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105. google scholar
  • Chauvin, K. W. & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Labor market reputation and the value of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(6), 543–552. google scholar
  • Choi, S. B., Ullah, S. M. & Kwak, W. J. (2015). Ethical leadership and followers’ attitudes toward corporate social responsibility: The role of perceived ethical work climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(3), 353–365. google scholar
  • Cravens, K., Oliver, E. G. & Ramamoorti, S. (2003). The reputation index: Measuring and managing corporate reputation. European Management Journal, 21(2), 201–212. google scholar
  • Davies, G. & Chun, R. (2009). The leader’s role in managing reputation. in Reputation Capital. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 311-323. google scholar
  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322. google scholar
  • Doorley, J. & Garcia, H. F. (2007). Reputation management the key to successful public relations and corporate communication. New York: Roudledge Taylor&Francis Group. Dörtok, A. (2004). Kurumsal itibarınızdan kaç sıfır atabilirsiniz? İstanbul: Rota Yayınları. google scholar
  • Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A. & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 155–169. google scholar
  • Ergen, T. (2011). Stratejik Liderlik ve Takım Çalışmasındaki Rolü Erzurum İli 112 Acil Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Bir Uygulama. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Firestein, P. J. (2006). Building and protecting corporate reputation. Strategy & Leadership, 34(4), 25–31. google scholar
  • Fombrun, C. & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. google scholar
  • Fombrun, C. & Van Riel, C. B. M. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1-2), 5–13. google scholar
  • Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation Quotientsm: A Multi-Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241–255. google scholar
  • Groves, K. S. & LaRocca, M. A. (2012). Does transformational leadership facilitate follower beliefs in corporate social responsibility? A field study of leader personal values and follower outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1548051811433852. google scholar
  • Güçdemir, Y. (2006). Bankaların web sitelerinin sosyal sorumluluk açısından incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Hakemli Dergisi, (26), 61–73. google scholar
  • Halıcı, A. (2001). İşletmelerde sosyal sorumluluk stratejileri: Çanakkale ilinde bir araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 11–28. google scholar
  • Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Alge, B. J. & Jackson, C. L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and trust propensity: A multi-experience model of perceived ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 1–14. google scholar
  • Hartman, L. P., Rubin, R. S. & Dhanda, K. K. (2007). The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 373. google scholar
  • Hansen, S. D., Dunford, B. B., Alge, B. J. & Jackson, C. L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and trust propensity: A multi-experience model of perceived ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14. 389. google scholar
  • Hinterhuber, H. H., & Friedrich, S. A. (2002). The technology dimension of strategic leadership: The leadership challenge for production economists. International Journal of Production Economics, 77(3), 191–203. google scholar
  • Husted, B. W. (2003). Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or ınternalize? Long Range Planning, 36(5), 481–498. google scholar
  • Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A., (2005). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 63–77. google scholar
  • Kadıbeşegil, S. (2013). İtibar Yönetimi. İstanbul: MediaCat. google scholar
  • Karna, J., Hansen, E., & Juslin, H. (2003). Social responsibility in environmental marketing planning. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5-6), 848–871. google scholar
  • Kotler, P. & Lee, N. (2013). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk. (Çev. Sibel Kaçamak). İstanbul: MediaCat. google scholar
  • Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595–632. google scholar
  • Lemmink, J., Schuijf, A., & Streukens, S. (2003). The role of corporate ımage and company employment ımage in explaining application intentions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 1–15. google scholar
  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 283-297. google scholar
  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of french businesses. Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 37–51. google scholar
  • Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. W. (2013). The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2), 171–192. google scholar
  • Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(4), 227–236. google scholar
  • Özkol, A. E., Çelik, M. ve Gönen, S. (2005). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramı ve muhasebenin sosyal sorumluluğu. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi (MUFAD),(27), 134–145. google scholar
  • Pisapia, J. (2006). Mastering change in a globalizing world: New directions in leadership. Faculty of Education, Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. google scholar
  • Sabuncuoğlu, Z. (2005). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. Bursa: Alfa Aktüel Basım Yayın. google scholar
  • Shahin, A., & Zairi, M. (2007). corporate governance as a critical element for driving excellence in corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 753–770. google scholar
  • Sosik, J. J., Jung, D. I., Berson, Y., Dionne, S. D., & Jaussi, K. S. (2005). Making all the right connections: The strategic leadership of top executives in high-tech organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34(1), 47–61. google scholar
  • Su, L., Huang, S., Van Der Veen, R & Chen, X. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation, customer emotions and behavioral ıntentions: A structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of China Tourism Research, 10(4), 511–529. google scholar
  • Şatır, Ç. ve Sümer, F. E. (2008). Kurum itibarının bileşenleri üzerine bir araştırma: sağlık hizmeti üreten bir kamu kurumunda iç paydaşlar itibarı nasıl algılıyor? Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 5(2), 15–25. google scholar
  • Ülgen, H. ve Mirze, S. K. (2007). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim. İstanbul: Arıkan Basım. google scholar
  • Theaker, A. (2006). Halkla ilişkiler el kitabı. İstanbul: MediaCat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Tian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015). The effects of external stakeholder pressure and ethical leadership on corporate social responsibility in China. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(04), 388–410. google scholar
  • Top, S. ve Öner, A. (2012). İşletme perspektifinden sosyal sorumluluk teorisinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 4(7), 95–108. google scholar
  • Trong Tuan, L. (2012). Corporate social responsibility, leadership, and brand equity in healthcare service. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 347–362. google scholar
  • Uğurluoğlu, Ö. (2009). Hastane Yöneticilerinin Stratejik Liderlik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Ural, E. ve Yılmaz, E. G. (2005). İşletmelerin sosyal sorumluluklarının bağımsız onayı: SA8000 ve halkla ilişkiler. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 247–258. google scholar
  • Ülker, M. (2009). Okul Yöneticilerinin Stratejik Liderlik Özelliklerine İlişkin Öğretmen Algıları. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Kocaeli: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  • Van Riel, C., & Fombrun, C. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Werther, W., & Chandler, D. (2006). Strategic corporate social responsibility. Stakeholders in a Global Economy. Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Wiedmann, K. P., & Buxel, H. (2005). Corporate reputation management in Germany: Results of an empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(2), 145–163. google scholar
  • Wu, L. Z., Kwan, H. K., Yim, F. H. K., Chiu, R. K., & He, X. (2015). CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 819–831. google scholar
  • Yasin, M. Z. (2006). The Use of Strategic Leadership Actions by Deans In Malaysian And American Public Universities. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Florida: Florida Atlantic University. google scholar
  • Yeşiltaş, A. ve Erdem, R. (2017). Hastanelerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerine yönelik içerik analizi. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 113–124. google scholar
  • Zhu, Y., Sun, L. Y. & Leung, A. S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 925–947. http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kızıl, S., & Naktiyok, A. (2019). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception. Istanbul Business Research, 48(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


AMA

Kızıl S, Naktiyok A. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception. Istanbul Business Research. 2019;48(1):64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


ABNT

Kızıl, S.; Naktiyok, A. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 48, n. 1, p. 64-83, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kızıl, Seda, and Atılhan Naktiyok. 2019. “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception.” Istanbul Business Research 48, no. 1: 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kızıl, Seda, and Atılhan Naktiyok. “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception.” Istanbul Business Research 48, no. 1 (Apr. 2024): 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


Harvard: Australian Style

Kızıl, S & Naktiyok, A 2019, 'The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 64-83, viewed 26 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kızıl, S. and Naktiyok, A. (2019) ‘The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception’, Istanbul Business Research, 48(1), pp. 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051 (26 Apr. 2024).


MLA

Kızıl, Seda, and Atılhan Naktiyok. “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 48, no. 1, 2019, pp. 64-83. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


Vancouver

Kızıl S, Naktiyok A. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 26 Apr. 2024 [cited 26 Apr. 2024];48(1):64-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051 doi: 10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051


ISNAD

Kızıl, Seda - Naktiyok, Atılhan. “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Effect of Strategical Leadership on Corporate Reputation Perception”. Istanbul Business Research 48/1 (Apr. 2024): 64-83. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2019.48.0051



TIMELINE


Submitted21.11.2018
Last Revision10.02.2019
Accepted24.03.2019
Published Online13.06.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.