Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JPLC2020-0022   IUP :10.26650/JPLC2020-0022    Full Text (PDF)

Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment

Hakan KarakehyaHande Özger

The modern process refers to the process of social, economic and cultural change that began in Europe, especially from the second half of the 17th century, and then influenced the whole world. The modern process has three basic elements: industrialization, artistic–cultural change, and enlightenment. The sub-elements of the modern process that pave the way for the change of public punishment and thus, the birth of prison are: 1) Increased valuing of human beings, 2) The spread of the belief that tomorrow will be better by accepting science as fundamental value, and 3) The spread of the concept of discipline and awareness of the importance of surveillance. Both the increase in the importance of the human body and the fact that human beings are perceived as individuals who can determine their own way of life have led to the idea that punishments which are incompatible with human dignity and which involve direct physical violence cannot be applied to human beings. The fact that science has become a fundamental value and the idea that the future will be more beautiful for humanity through science has led to the idea that criminals can be rehabilitated in confinement through science. Finally, the concept of discipline has become widespread in the modern process and it has been seen that surveillance is the most effective way of ensuring discipline in the society. Prisons have been built as the most suitable places for the surveillance and thus, the disciplinary reform of the criminals. 

DOI :10.26650/JPLC2020-0022   IUP :10.26650/JPLC2020-0022    Full Text (PDF)

Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaların Ortaya Çıkışında Etkili Olan Koşullar

Hakan KarakehyaHande Özger

Modern süreç, özellikle 17. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren Avrupa’da başlayan ve sonrasında tüm dünyayı etkisi altına alan, sosyal, ekonomik ve kültürel değişim sürecini ifade eder. Modern sürecin ya da daha yaygın kullanımı ile modernizmin üç temel sacayağı vardır. Bunlar; sanayileşme, sanatsal-kültürel değişim ve aydınlanmadır. Modern sürecin kamusal cezalandırmanın değişimine ve dolayısıyla hapishanenin doğuşuna zemin hazırlayan alt unsurları ise; 1) İnsanın öneminin artması, 2) Bilimselliğinin temel değer haline gelerek, yarının daha güzel olacağı inancının yaygınlaşması, 3) Disiplin kavramının yaygınlaşması ve gözetimin öneminin farkına varılması şeklinde sıralandırılabilir. Gerek insan bedeninin öneminin artması gerekse de insanın kendi yaşam yolunu aklıyla belirleyebilen bir birey olarak görülmeye başlanması, ona karşı insan onuruyla bağdaşmayan ve doğrudan fiziksel şiddet içeren cezaların uygulanamayacağı düşüncesini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bilimselliğin temel değer haline gelmesi ve bilim sayesinde geleceğin insanlık için daha güzel olacağı düşüncesinin yaygınlaşması ise suçluların da bilim yoluyla ıslah edilebileceği düşüncesini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Son olarak disiplin kavramı da modern süreçte yaygınlaşmış ve toplum içinde disiplini sağlamanın en etkili yolunun gözetim olduğu görülmüştür. Hükümlülerin gözetlenmesi ve böylelikle disipline edilmesi için en uygun mekanlar olarak ise hapishaneler inşa edilmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Like all social disciplines, law undergoes certain transformations according to time and place. Criminal law is also affected by these changes as a branch of law. An action considered a crime for a while may be decriminalized and may even come to be described as a virtuous behavior. Again, some types of punishment that are applied as the most correct form can be abandoned over time for reasons such as not performing the function of protecting the society from crime. This was similar in the modernization process.

The modern process refers to the social, economic, and cultural change that started in Europe in the second half of the 17th century and subsequently influenced the whole world. Physical punishments applied in pre-modern punishment systems were abandoned during the modern process and replaced almost entirely with prison sentences. It is considered that some sub-elements of the modern process laid the groundwork for the change in public punishment, hence, the birth of the prison in this transformation. These sub-elements are increased valuing of human beings, the spread of the belief that tomorrow will be better by accepting science as fundamental value, and the spread of the concept of discipline and awareness of the importance of surveillance. 

In the modern process, the importance of humanity has increased with the effects of industrialization and the humanism movement which emerged with the idea of enlightenment. While for industrialization, humanity has gained more importance as a productive power, humanism has enabled the human being to be accepted as an entity, a complex unity of body and soul. As a matter of fact, in the pre-modern period, the body was accepted only as a means of ripening the soul and was despised. Modern punishment systems are so designed that they do not harm the body, which is both a part of the human being and has the power of production and/but disciplines them to contribute to the development of mechanized individuals following the requirements of the industrial society.

It can be said that the hope for the future has increased in the modern process because science has become the fundamental value and with it a strong trust in science. Indeed, when the works of modern thinkers are examined, a firm belief is seen that tomorrow will be better. Underneath this thought lies the trust in reason, science and the human being who will attain the true truth through reason and science. Reason and scientificity came to the fore with the effect of enlightenment thought in the modern process; when it was believed that human beings will dominate nature through reason and science and will use it for their own benefit. According to modernism, humans are also a part of nature and criminals can be brought back into society disciplined by means of reason and science. Hence the belief that tomorrow will be more beautiful as a result of the fact that science had become the fundamental value in the modern process and the strong trust in science has led to the idea of rehabilitation of the criminals.

Another issue affecting the punishment system in the modern period is the spread of the concept of discipline and an understanding of the effectiveness of surveillance. As mentioned above, the main purpose of punishment systems in the modern period is to discipline the criminal. Although it is held that disciplining is generally a process of harmonization with the society, it can be said that the main purpose is to create mechanized individuals following the requirements of the industrial society. This function is carried out not only through prisons but also through schools, religious institutions and military institutions to spread to the whole society. In the modern period, the power of the body increased through discipline and by controlling this power very effectively, the body was imprisoned in a strict dependency relationship. In addition to places such as schools, hospitals, religious institutions, and production areas, prisons have also been important application areas of discipline. These areas are already in integrity between each other so that the mechanical individuals mentioned in a holistic structure are developed. Regarding discipline, it is important to be able to discipline an individual or a society; it is first required to know and understand it well. Understanding the individual or society which is desired to be disciplined passes through surveillance. Therefore, the most important tool of the discipline institutions in the modern process has been surveillance. Consequently, prisons were built as the most suitable places for the observation and, thus, discipline of the criminals.


PDF View

References

  • Adorno, T. / Horkheimer, M. Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiği (Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2010). google scholar
  • Akbulut, B., Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2019). google scholar
  • Artuk, M.E. / Gökcen, A. /Yenidünya, A.C., Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2012). google scholar
  • Bahar, H.İ., ‘Hapishaneler, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Arayışları’, Hapishane Kitabı (Kitabevi Yayınları, İstanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Bauman, Z., Akışkan Modernite (Can Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul 2017). google scholar
  • Bauman, Z., Yasa Koyucular ile Yorumcular (Metis Yayınları, İstanbul 2017). google scholar
  • Beccaria, C., Suçlar ve Cezalar Hakkında (İmge Kitabevi, Ankara 2016). google scholar
  • Bentham, J., Panoptikon: Gözün İktidarı (Su Yayınları, İstanbul 2008). google scholar
  • Bıçak, V., Suç Muhakemesi Hukuku (Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2011). google scholar
  • Bozkurt, V., Değişen Dünyada Sosyoloji (Ekin Yayınları, Bursa 2007). google scholar
  • Daştan, N., ‘Cennetten Kovulma Motifinin Semavi Dinler ile Bazı Mitolojilerdeki (Sümer, Türk ve Yunan) google scholar
  • Görünümü’ (2014) (36) Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 61-81. google scholar
  • Day, F.D., ‘Ceza Hukukunun Kökeni ve Doğası’ (2011) 6 (16) Ceza Hukuku Dergisi 240-247. google scholar
  • Demirbaş, T., ‘Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaların ve Cezaevlerinin Evrimi’, Hapishane Kitabı (Kitabevi Yayınları,İstanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Demirbaş, T., Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2016). google scholar
  • Dönmezer, S. / Erman, S., Nazari ve Tatbiki Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım (Cilt II) (Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul 1994). google scholar
  • Farthing, S., Sanatın Tüm Öyküsü (Hayalperest Yayınevi, İstanbul 2012). google scholar
  • Foucault, M., İktidarın Gözü (Ayrıntı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2003). google scholar
  • Foucault, M., ‘Aydınlanma Nedir?’ (2005) 10 (38-39) Liberal Düşünce 231-235. google scholar
  • Foucault, M., Hapishanenin Doğuşu (İmge Kitabevi, Ankara 2017). google scholar
  • Fulberth, G., Kapitalizmin Kısa Tarihi (Yordam Kitap, İstanbul 2011). google scholar
  • Gençoğlu, A.Y., ‘Ticari Kapitalizmden Sanayi Kapitalizmine: Merkantalizm, Liberalizm ve Marksizm’ (2013) 7 (14) Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi 79-94. google scholar
  • Giddens, A., Ulus Devlet ve Şiddet (Kalkedon Yayınları, Yer Belirtilmemiş 2008). google scholar
  • Giddens, A., Modernliğin Sonuçları (Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul 2018). google scholar
  • Gökberk, M., Felsefe Tarihi (Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul 2008). google scholar
  • Günay, D., ‘Sanayi ve Sanayi Tarihi’ (2002) (31) Mimar ve Mühendis Dergisi 8-14. google scholar
  • Hobsbawm, E., Devrim Çağı (Dost Kitabevi, Ankara 2013). google scholar
  • Horkheimer, M., Akıl Tutulması (Metis Yayınları, İstanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Kaboğlu, İ.Ö., Dayanışma Hakları (TODAİE Yayınları, Ankara 1996). google scholar
  • Kant, I., Aydınlanma Nedir? <https://www.istabip.org.tr/site_icerik/2017/haberler/kasim/aydinlanma_nedir_kant.pdf> google scholar
  • Karakehya, H., ‘Modern Cezalandırma Sistemlerinin Büyük Anlatıları’ (2008) 66 (1) İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası 87-108. google scholar
  • Karakehya, H., ‘Tanzimat Sonrası Osmanlı Devletinin Kamusal Cezalandırma Sisteminde Yaşanan Değişim’, Prof. Dr. Nevzat Toroslu’ya Armağan (Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara 2015). google scholar
  • Karakehya, H, ‘Hürriyeti Bağlayıcı Cezaların İnfazıyla Hükümlünün Islahının Sağlanması Mümkün Müdür?’, Dr. Dr. h.c. Silvia Tellenbach’a Armağan (Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2018). google scholar
  • Karakehya, H. / Usluadam, A.K., ‘Neden Gözetl(en)iyoruz?’ (2016) 2 (3- Akar Öcal’a Armağan) Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 187-200. google scholar
  • Kazgan, G., İktisadi Düşünce veya Politik İktisadın Evrimi (Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul 2000). google scholar
  • Keleş, R., Kentleşme Politikası (İmge Kitabevi, Ankara 2016). google scholar
  • Koca M. / Üzülmez İ., Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara 2019). google scholar
  • Küçüktaşdemir, Ö., ‘Aydınlanma ve Ceza Hukuku’ (2014) (113) Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 57-98. google scholar
  • Le Guin, U.K., Mülksüzler (Metis Yayınları, İstanbul 2019). google scholar
  • Locke, John Yönetim Üzerine İkinci İnceleme (Ebabil Yayınları, Ankara 2012) google scholar
  • Lyon, D., Elektronik Göz-Gözetim Toplumunun Yükselişi (Sarmal Yayınevi, İstanbul 1997). google scholar
  • Lyotard, J.F., Postmodern Durum (Vadi Yayınları, Ankara 2000). google scholar
  • Marshall, G., ‘Evolutionism’, Oxford Dictionary of Sociology (Oxford University Press, New York 1998). google scholar
  • Outram, D., Aydınlanma (Dost Kitabevi, Ankara 2007). google scholar
  • Özcan, M.T., Modern Toplum ve Hukuk Devleti (XII Levha Yayınları, İstanbul 2008). google scholar
  • Özgenç, İ., Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2019). google scholar
  • Rousseau, Jean Jacques Toplum Sözleşmesi, (Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 2006) google scholar
  • Roxin, C., Strafverfahrensrecht (C.H. Beck, München 1988). google scholar
  • Rusche, G. /Kirscheimer, O., Punishment and Soical Structrue (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London 2003). google scholar
  • Sokullu Akıncı, F., Kriminoloji (Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul 2007). google scholar
  • Şaylan, G., Postmodernizm (İmge Kitabevi, Ankara 2016). google scholar
  • Toroslu, N., ‘Ceza Hukukunda Okullar’, Nurullah Kunter’e Armağan (İÜHF Yayınları, İstanbul 1998). google scholar
  • Turani, A., Dünya Sanat Tarihi (Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul 2013). google scholar
  • Türkmen, M., Modernleşme ve Hukuk Türkiye’de Ceza Adalet Sistemi ve Denetimli Serbestlik (Doğu Kitabevi,İstanbul 2018). google scholar
  • Urhan, V., ‘M. Foucault ve Bilgi/İktidar İlişkisinin Soykütüğü’(2007) (9) Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 99-118. google scholar
  • Uzun, E., ‘Doğuştan Suçlular’ (2003) Gün Işığı Dergisi 19-21. google scholar
  • Wagner, P., Moderniğin Sosyolojisi (Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul 2005). google scholar
  • Weber, M., Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu (Ayraç Yayınevi, Ankara 1999). google scholar
  • Zafer, H., Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul 2019). google scholar
  • Zekiyan, B., Hümanizm (İnsancılık) Düşünsel İçlem ve Tarihsel Kökenler (İnkılap Kitabevi, İstanbul 2005). google scholar
  • <https://www.kitabimukaddes.com/kutsal-kitap-hakkinda-bilgilendirme-ve-tam-metni/eski-antlasma/yaratilis> google scholar
  • <https://kuran.diyanet.gov.tr/mushaf/kuran-meal-2/bakara-suresi-2/ayet-36/diyanet-isleri-baskanligi-meali-1> google scholar
  • <https://kuran.diyanet.gov.tr/mushaf/kuran-meal-2/araf-suresi-7/ayet-24/diyanet-isleri-baskanligi-meali-1> google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Karakehya, H., & Özger, H. (2020). Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, 8(2), 169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


AMA

Karakehya H, Özger H. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology. 2020;8(2):169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


ABNT

Karakehya, H.; Özger, H. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, [Publisher Location], v. 8, n. 2, p. 169-121, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Karakehya, Hakan, and Hande Özger. 2020. “Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment.” Journal of Penal Law and Criminology 8, no. 2: 169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


Chicago: Humanities Style

Karakehya, Hakan, and Hande Özger. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment.” Journal of Penal Law and Criminology 8, no. 2 (May. 2024): 169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


Harvard: Australian Style

Karakehya, H & Özger, H 2020, 'Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment', Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 169-121, viewed 11 May. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Karakehya, H. and Özger, H. (2020) ‘Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment’, Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, 8(2), pp. 169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022 (11 May. 2024).


MLA

Karakehya, Hakan, and Hande Özger. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment.” Journal of Penal Law and Criminology, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020, pp. 169-121. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


Vancouver

Karakehya H, Özger H. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology [Internet]. 11 May. 2024 [cited 11 May. 2024];8(2):169-121. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022 doi: 10.26650/JPLC2020-0022


ISNAD

Karakehya, Hakan - Özger, Hande. Effective Conditions on Emergence of Imprisonment”. Journal of Penal Law and Criminology 8/2 (May. 2024): 169-121. https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2020-0022



TIMELINE


Submitted17.08.2020
Accepted02.12.2020
Published Online28.12.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.