Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013    Full Text (PDF)

The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process

Murat ÇolakÖzge Bozkaya

As the referendum held in the United Kingdom (UK) in June 2016, the proportion of “leavers” was much higher than “remainers”. Since the referendum, the debate about the future of the European Union (EU) has progressed into a different dimension. The effectiveness of anti-immigrant discourses from political parties points to a very interesting scene. However, it was not surprising that 51.9% of the citizens of UK voted to leave the EU as a result of the referendum, where European skepticism was evident. Based on the literature, this article tries to find an answer as to what extent anti-immigrant discourses can widen their influence. In this sense, it focuses on the discourses of the hard Eurosceptic United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), which presents an example regarding the instrumentalization of the opposition to immigration. Although there is an increase in the emphasis on multiculturalism, in the sense of being a part of the Union, the Brexit process is a tangible outcome with respect to the portrayal of immigrants as an economic and social burden, and it is an expansion of the sphere of influence of anti-immigration sentiments.

Keywords: United Kingdom
DOI :10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013   IUP :10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013    Full Text (PDF)

Birleşik Krallık’taki Göç Karşıtı Söylemlerin Brexit Sürecine Etkisi

Murat ÇolakÖzge Bozkaya

Birleşik Krallık’ta Haziran 2016’da gerçekleştirilen referandum sonucuna göre, Avrupa Birliği’nden “ayrılma taraftarlarının” oranı daha ağır basmış ve bu sürecin ardından Avrupa bütünleşmesinin geleceğine ilişkin tartışmalar farklı bir boyutta ele alınmaya başlamıştır. Avrupa şüpheciliğinin belirgin olduğu yerlerden biri olan Birleşik Krallık’ta referandum sonucunda %51,9’luk oranla Avrupa Birliği’nden ayrılma yönünde oy kullanılması şaşırtıcı bir resim çizmemekteyken, ayrılma kararında göçmen karşıtı parti söylemlerinin oldukça etkili olması ilginç bir tabloya işaret etmektedir. Çalışmada, Brexit sürecinde göçmen karşıtı söylemlerin hangi derecede etkili olduğuna yanıt aranmakta ve çalışma literatüre dayanarak ele alınmaktadır. Bu anlamda, göçmen karşıtlığının araçsallaştırılmasında önemli bir örnek sunan ve sert Avrupa şüphecisi olan Birleşik Krallık Bağımsızlık Partisi’nin süreçteki söylemleri üzerinde yoğunlaşılmaktadır. Birlik olma anlayışında çokkültürlülük vurgusu artış gösterse de, göçmenlerin Avrupa Birliği üye devletlerinde ekonomik ve sosyal anlamda bir yük oluşturduğu üzerinde tezlerin sunulması ve göçmen karşıtlığının etki alanının genişletilmesi konusunda Brexit süreci somut bir çıktı sunmaktadır. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


According to the referendum held in the United Kingdom (UK) in June 2016, the proportion of “leavers” was much higher. Since the referendum, the debate about the future of the European Union (EU) has progressed into a different dimension. In total, 51.9% of the citizens of UK voted to leave the EU as a result of the referendum where European skepticism was evident. This led to some doubts about the future integration model of the EU. In this period, many factors were observed as the impulsion that generated the mode of debates on the future of European integration. One of the most important and controversial factors at the EU level can be identified as migration. Especially after the Syrian Crisis, the number and the types of migrants coming from Syria to other regions were seen as a concern by many states in political, economic, and social terms. Even if the EU’s security and border management policies had taken root far before the start of the Syrian Civil War, the Syrians who escaped from the civil war have increased the security concerns of member states to the highest levels. In parallel with the increase of security concerns, the perception of the EU regarding migrants exists as a controvertible subject at a political level because of the differentiated approaches of EU members regarding this issue. Anti-immigration discourses have become a very effective form of populist expression in certain policy areas. One of the examples of this style of expression that has gained more ground in recent years can be observed in UK’s EU referendum process. In this context, evaluating anti-immigrant discourses in referendum campaigns presents important clues regarding the rise of Eurosceptic trends in the EU.

In this article, discourses on immigration and migrants during the referendum campaigns are presented as one of the main drivers that paved the way for Brexit (Britain-exit). The instrumentalization of the immigrant opposition arose out of debates between the Conservative Party and the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), and this provides an example of the position of migration in the EU. The rise of far-right politics and populist radical discourses are a defined problem that the EU must overcome and the UK referendum process is supposed to be held as a concrete sample regarding this problem. Therefore, as a tool of populist and far-right wing discourses, explaining the anti-immigration aspects in the UK’s referendum process is the main aim of this study. In this context, the presentation of the immigrants as an economic and social burden on the EU member states is a critically moot point that questions the future of the EU. So, as a factor that is pushing the discourses of the far-right wing, populists, and anti-immigrant can be defined as a risk for the EU and its normative characterization. This study aims to explain how anti-immigrant discourses can influence the campaign process and to what extent it affected the UK’s decision to leave the EU.

According to the literature, Brexit has been held in terms of the process itself, and a future model of European integration is now on the agenda of many scholars in terms of the many risks that the EU has confronted. Even if Brexit does not seem like an astonishing step, it is a factor pushing anti-immigrant discourses that draw a considerable scene. Among the member states, UK has been defined as the representative of Eurosceptic tradition for a long time. In the EU, where there has been a developing culture of solidarity among member states in areas such as the Eurozone, the Justice and Home Affairs, and the Schengen Area, the separation of UK politics from the culture of solidarity has been assessed as the axis of European skepticism. When considering UK’s isolated preferences in some European level policy areas and its Eurosceptic tendency, we can evaluate Brexit as not being a surprising event. However, anti-immigrant discourses in the process can be evaluated as a challenging dimension. Anti-immigrant discourse has not only widened its influence in the UK’s political scene, it has reached a worrisome dimension in many other parts of the EU today. Therefore, analyzing the Brexit process presents a tangible outcome about to what extent anti-immigrant and populist discourses can widen their influence in the European Union.


PDF View

References

  • Applebaum, A. (2017). Britain After Brexit: A Transformed Political Landscape. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 53–58. google scholar
  • Bakkalcı, C. (2008). Küreselleşme, Bölgesel Entegrasyonlar, Ülkelerüstü Kurumlar, Entegrasyon Teorisi ve Avrupa Birliği. Nobel Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Castles, S., Haas, H., Miller M. (2014). The Age of Migration (Fifth Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
  • Coulter, S. (2016). The UK Labour Market and the Great Recession. Myant, M., Theodoropoulou, S., Piasna, A. (Ed.) Unemployment, Internal Devaluation and Labour Market Deregulation in Europe, 197–227. European Trade Union Institute. google scholar
  • Daddow, O. (2013). Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Euroskeptic Tradition in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 15, 210–227. google scholar
  • European Commission. (2017). White Paper on the Future of Europe and the Way Forward: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU 27, Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2018, https://ec.europa.eu/ commission/white-paper-future-europe-reflections-and-scenarios-eu27_en google scholar
  • Epstein, R., Jacoby, W. (2014). Eastern Ten Years on: Transcending the East-West Divide?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52, 1–16. google scholar
  • Ermağan, İ. (2012). Avrupa Birliği Entegrasyonunda Şüphecilik. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 7(2), 2, 145–168. google scholar
  • Eurostat, (2018). “Unemployment by Sex and Age- Annual Average”, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=une_rt_a&lang=en, (06.09.2018). google scholar
  • Goodwin, M., Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 Referandum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–-332. google scholar
  • Sturge, G. (2018). Migration Statistics, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, No: SN06077, 1-39. google scholar
  • International Organization for Migration. (2011). Glossary on Migration. (ed. Richard Perruchoud, Jillyanne Redpath-Cross), Second Edition. google scholar
  • Ipsos Mori. (2016). Ipsos MORI EU Referendum Prediction Poll, Erişim Tarihi: 06.09.2018, https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/ipsos-mori-eu-referendum-prediction-poll. google scholar
  • Ipsos Mori. (2017). Shifting Ground: 8 Key Findings from A Longitudinal Study on Attitudes Towards Immigration and Brexit, Erişim Tarihi: 07.09.2018, https://www.ipsos.com/ sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2017-10/Shifting%20Ground_Unbound.pdf. google scholar
  • Kaufmann, E. (2017). Can Narratives of White Identity Reduce Opposition to Immigration and Support for Hard Brexit? A Survey Experiment. Political Studies, Erişim Tarihi: (13.04.2018), http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0032321717740489, 1–16. google scholar
  • Köroğlu, N., Çendek, S. (2015). Toplumsal Güvenlik, Kimlik, Bütünleşme Bağlamında Avrupa Şüpheciliği: Cameron Dönemindeki Avrupa Şüpheciliğinin İçerik Analizi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 10(2), 191–216. google scholar
  • Levi, E., Mariani, R., Patriarca, F. (2017). Hate at First Sight? Dynamic Aspects of the Electoral Impact of Migrations: The Case of the UK and Brexit. University of Sussex Science Policy Research Unit Working Paper Series, 1–36. google scholar
  • Ling, Jin. (2016). Will Brexit Matter: A Probe into Its Reasons, Influences and Tendencies. China International Studies, 66, 66–85. google scholar
  • Marshall, G. (1999). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü. Bilim Sanat Yayınları. google scholar
  • Meleady, R., Seger, C., Vermue, M. (2017). Examining the Role of Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact and Anti-immigrant Prejudice in Brexit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 799–808. google scholar
  • Mandacı, Nazif ve Özerim, Gökay. (2013). Uluslararası Göçlerin Bir Güvenlik Konusuna Dönüşümü: Avrupa’da Radikal Sağ Partiler ve Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 10, 105–130. google scholar
  • Menon, A. (2017). Why the British Chose Brexit: Behind the Scenes of the Referandum. Foreign Affairs, 96, 122–126. google scholar
  • Nugent, N. (2004). Previous Enlargement Rounds, Neil Nugent (Ed.), European Union Enlargement. Palgrave Macmillian. google scholar
  • Özerim, G. (2017). Göç Konusunun Birleşik Krallık’ta AB Referandumu Sürecindeki Yeri, Erol Esen ve Duygu Şekeroğlu (Ed.), BREXIT– Elveda Avrupa İngiltere’nin AB’den Ayrılmasından Sonra Avrupa Bütünleşmesi ve Türkiye‐AB İlişkilerinde Fırsatlar ve Tehditler, Siyasal Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Pekkala, Sari ve R. Kerr, William. (2011). Economic Impacts of Immigration: A Survey, Harvard Business School Working Paper 16736, 1–37. google scholar
  • Pirro A., Kessel, S. (2017). “United in Opposition? The Populist Radical Right’s EUPessimism in Times of Crisis”. Journal of European Integration, 39(4), 145–168. google scholar
  • Powell, K. (2017). Brexit Positions: Neoliberalism, Austerity and Immigration-the (Im) possibilities of Political Revolution. Dialectical Anthropology, 41(3), 225–240. google scholar
  • Scuira, L. (2017). Brexit Beyond Borders: Beginning of the EU Collapse and Return to Nationalism. Journal of International Affairs, 70(2), 109–123. google scholar
  • Startin, N. (2015). Have We Reached A Tipping Point? The Mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 311–325. google scholar
  • Serricchio, F., Tsakatika, M., Quaglian L. (2013). Euroskepticism and Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 51–64. google scholar
  • Sutherland, P. (2016). Brexit: What Does it Mean for Europe?. An Irish Quarterly Review, 105, 309–318. google scholar
  • Şemşit, S. (2018). Avrupa Birliği Politikaları Bağlamında Uluslararası Göç Olgusu ve Türleri: Kavramsal Bakış. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 25(1), 269–289. google scholar
  • Taggart, P. (1998). A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Jornal of Political Research, 33, 363–388. google scholar
  • Tahir, J. (2017). Multiculturalism: A Comparative Study of British Political Parties. Journal of European Studies, 33(1), 71–89. google scholar
  • Virdee, S., McGeever, B. (2017). Racism, Crisis and Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies, https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361544, (08.05.2018), 1–18. google scholar
  • Whelan, D. (2018). Assessing the Reasons and Options for Brexit: A Defence of the UK’s Decision to Leave the EU. North East Law Review, 1, 1–5. google scholar
  • Yavuzaslan, K. (2017). Brexit Yol Ayrımında Avrupa Birliği Sosyal Bütünleşme Çabalarına İnovatif Bir Yaklaşım: Sosyal İnovasyon, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 225–250. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, A. (2014). Uluslararası Göç: Çeşitleri, Nedenleri ve Etkileri, Tuskish Studies, 9, 1685–1705. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çolak, M., & Bozkaya, Ö. (2018). The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(75), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


AMA

Çolak M, Bozkaya Ö. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process. Journal of Social Policy Conferences. 2018;0(75):185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


ABNT

Çolak, M.; Bozkaya, Ö. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 75, p. 185-209, 2018.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çolak, Murat, and Özge Bozkaya. 2018. “The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 75: 185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çolak, Murat, and Özge Bozkaya. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0, no. 75 (Mar. 2024): 185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


Harvard: Australian Style

Çolak, M & Bozkaya, Ö 2018, 'The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process', Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 75, pp. 185-209, viewed 28 Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çolak, M. and Bozkaya, Ö. (2018) ‘The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process’, Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 0(75), pp. 185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013 (28 Mar. 2024).


MLA

Çolak, Murat, and Özge Bozkaya. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process.” Journal of Social Policy Conferences, vol. 0, no. 75, 2018, pp. 185-209. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


Vancouver

Çolak M, Bozkaya Ö. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process. Journal of Social Policy Conferences [Internet]. 28 Mar. 2024 [cited 28 Mar. 2024];0(75):185-209. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013 doi: 10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013


ISNAD

Çolak, Murat - Bozkaya, Özge. The Impact of Anti-Immigration Discourses in the United Kingdom on the Brexit Process”. Journal of Social Policy Conferences 0/75 (Mar. 2024): 185-209. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2018.75.0013



TIMELINE


Submitted29.07.2018
Accepted26.09.2018
Published Online28.12.2018

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.