Research Article


DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014    Full Text (PDF)

Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System

Nuray Ekşi

The UNHCR was established as a subsidiary body by the resolution of the UN General Assembly in 1949 in Geneva. The functions of the UNHCR are defined in the Statute which was adopted in 1950 and in various resolutions subsequently adopted by the UN General Assembly. In accordance with the Statute, the work of the High Commissioner is humanitarian and social and of an entirely non-political character. In this study, the establishment and the scope of missions of the UNHCR which has been operating in Turkey since 1960 are firstly explained. Then the host country agreement between Turkey and the UNHCR which was made in 2016 will be examined. In this context, the reasons for making host country agreement; rights immunities, privileges and facilities provided for the UNHCR under this agreement will be described. In this study, the provisions of the treaties and legal arrangements concerning cooperation with the UNHCR from past to the present will also be summarized. The role of the UNHCR in Turkey has been changed since 2013. The factors leading such a change will be identified and the results of the changing role of the UNHCR will be evaluated. Finally, the determinations and proposals made in this study will be stated in the conclusion part.

DOI :10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014   IUP :10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014    Full Text (PDF)

Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler Yüksek Komiserliği’nin Türkiye’deki Faaliyetleri ve Türk İltica Sisteminde Değişen Rolü

Nuray Ekşi

BMMYK, 1949 yılında BM Genel Kurulu tarafından alınan bir kararla BM’nin yan organı olarak Cenevre’de kurulmuştur. BMMYK’nın görevleri, 1950 yılında BM Genel Kurulu ile kabul edilen Tüzüğü’nün yanı sıra daha sonra muhtelif tarihlerde BM Genel Kurulu tarafından alınan kararlarla belirlenmiştir. BMMYK’nın Tüzüğüne göre, BMMYK insani, sosyal amaçlarla faaliyette bulunan ve siyasi nitelik taşımayan bir organdır. Çalışmamızda öncelikle 1960 yılından beri Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan BMMYK’nın kuruluşu ve görev alanı üzerinde durulacaktır. Daha sonra Türkiye ile BMMYK arasında 2016 yılında yapılan ev sahibi ülke anlaşması incelenecektir. Bu bağlamda, ev sahibi ülke anlaşmasının yapılmasının sebepleri, bu anlaşma uyarınca BMMYK’ya tanınan haklar, dokunulmazlıklar, imtiyazlar ve kolaylıklar açıklanacaktır. Çalışmamızda ayrıca geçmişten günümüze kadar olan süreçte bazı antlaşma ve yasal düzenlemelerde yer alan BMMYK ile iş birliğine ilişkin hükümler irdelenecektir. BMMYK’nın Türkiye’deki rolü 2013 yılından itibaren değişmiştir. Bu değişikliğe yol açan etkenler tespit edilecek; BMMYK’nın Türkiye açısından değişen rolünün sonuçları değerlendirilecektir. Çalışmamızda yaptığımız tespitler ve önerilerimiz ise sonuç kısmında belirtilecektir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The initial task of the UNHCR was to help foreigners apply for or receive the refugee status under the 1951 Geneva Convention. Over time, however, UNHCR’s mandate has been expanded through UN General Assembly resolutions. Nowadays, in addition to its work for conventional refugees, the UNHCR has been mandated by the UN to monitor and protect internally displaced persons (IDPs), stateless persons, vulnerable groups, persons with special needs and illegal immigrants, even if they do not fall within the definition of refugee set forth in Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Geneva Convention. UNHCR also deals with displacement due to urbanization, collapsed states, fragile states or threats to regimes. As a result of the expansion of its activities beyond its mandate, UNHCR plays an active role in the aforementioned matters, even in countries without a conventional refugee crisis. Turkey is a country that has hosted the largest number of asylum seekers in the world, and is currently providing shelter to around four million registered temporarily protected Syrians. Moreover, the number of applications made in Turkey for international protection will likely increase, not decrease, in future. Turkey also prevents illegal immigration to Europe and thus plays a key role for the protection of Europe’s borders. Despite the fact that Turkey has been facing a mass influx of Syrians and other complex migration-related problems, it has been left alone by the international organizations and other states. While Turkey was among the negotiators and original signatories of the 1951 Geneva Convention, it continues to maintain a geographical limitation to the applicability of the Convention to the refugees coming from non-European countries. Hence, Turkey is not obliged to apply 1951 Geneva Convention to refugees coming from outside Europe. Foreigners coming from non-European countries and claiming refugee status are treated as “conditional refugee” under Turkish law. They are granted conditional refugee certificates which enable them to stay in Turkey until they find a safe third country with UNHCR’s help. Therefore, under the current Turkish legislation, there is a distinction among foreigners who claim international protection according to their country of origin. Foreigners coming from European countries and meeting the conditions set forth in Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Geneva Convention can be provided refugee status. Save as temporarily protected Syrians, under Turkish refugee law, foreigners coming from non-European countries are not conventional refugees but “conditional refugees”. Conditional refugees can stay in Turkey until they find a safe third country with UNHCR’s help. That is the reason why the UNHCR offices in Turkey have been playing a leading role in resettling non-European asylum seekers to safe third countries, particularly until 2008. However, this role of the UNHCR has gradually diminished since the commencement in 2008 of the preparatory work of the Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection, which was published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey on April 11, 2013. Indeed, since September 2018, the UNHCR operations in Turkey have been reduced to providing counseling and relief services. Activities to assist in voluntary repatriation and resettlement from Turkey, as specified in the UNHCR’s Statute, are now hardly carried out. The tasks specified in the Statute of the UNHCR also cover assisting governmental and private efforts to promote voluntary repatriation. Further, UNCHR’s tasks also include resettlement of refugees, as determined by the UN General Assembly, and to the extent UNCHR’s financial resources so allow. Turkey can, for the time being, cope with its own responsibilities in the field of asylum. However, considering the numbers, this burden is not sustainable. At a point in time where Turkey is in serious need for resettlement and voluntary return assistance, limiting UNHCR’s operational activities in Turkey to counseling and relief services simply amounts to transforming the UNHCR into an association such as the Red Crescent. Moreover, counseling and relief services provided by the UNHCR have been affecting Turkey negatively, and have turned Turkey into a target country for illegal immigration. Limiting the UNHCR missions and operations in Turkey to counselling and relief services is contrary to the Statute of UNHCR itself. We believe that UNHCR’s main task in Turkey should be resettlement and providing support for voluntary return. It should also force the other states to take steps on “burden sharing” or “responsibility sharing”. This would pave the way for diminishing, to a certain extent, the number of refugee and temporarily protected Syrians in Turkey, as well as the social, economic, political costs incurred by Turkey, and allow the government of Turkey to provided better assistance to foreigners who really need it. Otherwise, it will be difficult to deal with the problems arising from the increasing number of foreigners, the ensuing costs, and the reaction of Turkish citizens, in the near future.


PDF View

References

  • Ahlborn C, “The Normative Erosion of International Refugee Protection through UN Security Council Practice”, (2011) Volume 24 Leiden Journal of International Law 1009-1027. google scholar
  • Amerasinghe CF, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2005). google scholar
  • Barutciski M, “The Limits to the UNHCR’s Supervisory Role” in James C. Simeon (eds), The UNHCR and the Supervision of International Refugee Law (Cambridge University Press 2013). google scholar
  • Betts A, Loescher G and Milner J, The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection (2nd edn, Routledge 2012). google scholar
  • Dowd R and McAdam J, “International Cooperation and Responsibility Sharing to Protect Refugees: What, Why and How?” (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 863-892. google scholar
  • Dunoff LJ, “Chapter 5: Is Sovereign Equality Obsolete?, Understanding Twenty-First Century International Organizations” in Janne E Nijman and Wouter G Werner (eds), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law Editors (2012) 99-127. google scholar
  • Ekşi N, Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Hukuku (5th edn, Beta 2018). google scholar
  • Ekşi N, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuka İlişkin Temel Mevzuat, 13th edn, Beta 2018). google scholar
  • Ekşi N, Geri Gönderme Merkezlerinin Denetlenmesine İlişkin Kılavuz İlkeler, İçişleri Bakanlığı Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü-Uluslararası Göç Örgütü-IOM, (Ankara, 2017). google scholar
  • Ekşi N, Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Hukuku, (4th edn, Beta 2016). google scholar
  • Ekşi N, 6458 Sayılı Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu’nda İdari Gözetim, (Beta 2014). google scholar
  • Ekşi N, Yabancılar ve Uluslararası Koruma Kanunu (Tasarısı) (Beta 2012). google scholar
  • Juss SS, “The UNHCR Handbook and the Interface between Soft Law and Hard Law in International Refugee Law” in Satvinder Singh Juss and Colin Harvey (eds), Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law, (Cheltenham 2013) 31-67. google scholar
  • Kälin W, “Supervising the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: Article 35 and Beyond” in Erika Feller, Volker Türk and Frances Nicholson (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003) 613-666. google scholar
  • Klabbers J, An Introduction to International Institutional Law, (Cambridge University Press 2002). google scholar
  • Lewis C, UNHCR and International Refugee Law: From Treaties to Innovation, (Routledge 2012). google scholar
  • Sands P and Klein P, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions, (Sweet& Maxwell 2001). google scholar
  • Saraçlı M, Uluslararası Hukukta Yerinden Edilmiş Kişiler (Seçkin 2011). google scholar
  • Thomas Hammarberg, “Human Rights of Asylum Seekers and Refugees” (Strasbourg, 1 October, 2009) CommDH (2009)31. google scholar
  • TÜRK Volker, “The UNHCR’s Role in Supervising International Protection Standards in the Context of its Mandate” in James C. Simeon (eds), The UNHCR and the Supervision of International Refugee Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) 39-58. google scholar
  • UN General Assembly, Statute of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 14 December 1950, A/RES/428(V) <www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3628.html > accessed 30 December 2018. google scholar
  • UN General Assembly, Refugees and Stateless Persons, (3 December 1949) A/RES/319 (IV) https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f1ed34.html [accessed 30 March 2019]. google scholar
  • UN Commission on Human Rights, Report of the Representative of the Secretary-General, Mr. Francis M. Deng, 1997/39. Addendum: Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, (11 February 1998), E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2 https://www.refworld.org/docid/3d4f95e11.html accessed 30 December 2018. google scholar
  • Uzun E, “Uluslararası Hukuk Çerçevesinde BMMYK’nın Yapısı, Görevleri ve Uluslararası Mülteci Hukukunun Gelişimindeki Yeri”, (2014) 2(2) Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi, 61-85. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Ekşi, N. (2019). Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System. Istanbul Law Review, 77(1), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


AMA

Ekşi N. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System. Istanbul Law Review. 2019;77(1):343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


ABNT

Ekşi, N. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System. Istanbul Law Review, [Publisher Location], v. 77, n. 1, p. 343-370, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ekşi, Nuray,. 2019. “Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System.” Istanbul Law Review 77, no. 1: 343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


Chicago: Humanities Style

Ekşi, Nuray,. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System.” Istanbul Law Review 77, no. 1 (Apr. 2025): 343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


Harvard: Australian Style

Ekşi, N 2019, 'Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System', Istanbul Law Review, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 343-370, viewed 25 Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ekşi, N. (2019) ‘Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System’, Istanbul Law Review, 77(1), pp. 343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014 (25 Apr. 2025).


MLA

Ekşi, Nuray,. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System.” Istanbul Law Review, vol. 77, no. 1, 2019, pp. 343-370. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


Vancouver

Ekşi N. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System. Istanbul Law Review [Internet]. 25 Apr. 2025 [cited 25 Apr. 2025];77(1):343-370. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014 doi: 10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014


ISNAD

Ekşi, Nuray. Activities of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey and Its Changing Role in Turkish Asylum System”. Istanbul Law Review 77/1 (Apr. 2025): 343-370. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2019.77.1.0014



TIMELINE


Submitted08.05.2019
Accepted01.07.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.