References

• Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (1992–2020). Praat, doing phonetics by computer [Computer program, version 6.1.09]. http://www.praat.org/ google scholar
• Büring, D. (1997). The great scope inversion conspiracy. Linguistics & Philosophy 20, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005397026866 google scholar
• Büring, D. (2003). On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistic and Philosophy, 26 (5), 511–545. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025887707652 google scholar
• Büring, D. (2016). (Contrastive) Topic. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds), Handbook of information structure (pp. 64-85). Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Constant, N. (2014). Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation. google scholar
• Erguvanlı, E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. google scholar
• Erkü, F. (1982). Topic, comment and word order in Turkish. Minnesota Papers in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language 8, 30–38. google scholar
• Féry, C. (2007). The prosody of topicalization. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 69-86). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. google scholar
• Féry, C. & Kügler, F. (2008). Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics 36, 680–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001 google scholar
• Frascarelli, M. & Hinterhölzl, R. (2007). Types of topics in German and Italian. In S. Winkler & K. Schwabe (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 87–116). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. google scholar
• Göksel, A. & Özsoy, A. S. (2000). Is there a focus position in Turkish? In A. Göksel & C. Kerslake (Eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages; Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Turkish linguistics (pp. 219–228). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. google scholar
• Göksel, A. & Özsoy, A. S. (2003). dA as a focus/topic associated clitic in Turkish. In A. S. Özsoy & A. Göksel (guest editors), Lingua, Special edition on Focus in Turkish, 1143–1167. google scholar
• Güneş, G. (2010). The pragmatic and prosodic analysis of sentence topics in Turkish; An investigation based on real-life conversations [Unpublished MA thesis]. Boğaziçi University. google scholar
• Gürer, A. (2015). Semantic, prosodic and syntactic marking of information structural units in Turkish [Doctoral dissertation, Boğaziçi University]. google scholar
• Gürer, A. (2020). Information structure within interfaces: Consequences for the phrase structure. Berlin De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505584 google scholar
• Ipek, C. (2011). Phonetic realization of focus with on-focus pitch range expansion in Turkish. In W. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 140–143). Hong Kong : City University of Hong Kong. google scholar
• İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order–prosody interface. Lingua 113, 1025–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00012-3 google scholar
• İvoşeviç, S. & Bekâr, İ. P. (2015). Acoustic correlates of focus in Turkish. In D. Zeyrek, Ç. S. Şimşek, U. Ataş & J. Rehbein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Turkish linguistics (pp. 20–27). Harrassowitz Verlag. google scholar
• Hoffman, B. (1995). The computational analysis of the syntax and interpretation of ‘free’ word order in Turkish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania. google scholar
• Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. google scholar
• Ladefoged, P. (2010). A course in phonetics. Thomson, Wadsworth. google scholar
• Kamali, B. (2011). Topics at the PF interface of Turkish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University. google scholar
• Kan, S. (2009). Prosodic domains and the syntax-prosody mapping in Turkish [Unpublished MA thesis]. Boğaziçi University. google scholar
• Özge, U. & Bozşahin, C. (2010). Intonation in the grammar of Turkish. Lingua 120, 132–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.001 google scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. google scholar
• Roberts, C. (1996). Informative structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J. Hç Yoon & A. Kathol (Eds.), OSU working papers in linguistics 49 (pp. 91–136). Columbus OH: Ohio State University. google scholar
• Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].. University of Massachusetts dissertation. google scholar
• Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Cam¬bridge MA: The MIT Press. google scholar
• Şener, S. (2010). Non- peripheral matters in Turkish syntax [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut dissertation. google scholar
• Tomioka, S. (2009). Contrastive topics operate on speech acts. In M. Zimmermann & C. Féry (Eds), Information structure (pp. 115–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Tomioka, S. (2010). A scope theory of contrastive topics. Iberia 2 (1), 113-130. google scholar
• Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and Prominence [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. google scholar
• Wagner, M. (2012). Contrastive topics decomposed. Semantics and Pragmatics 5, 1-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.8 google scholar
• Wang, B. & Xu, Y. (2011). Differential prosodic encoding of topic and focus in sentence-initial position in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 39, 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.006 google scholar

Citations