Referanslar

• Al-Rawi, A., & S. Fahmy (2018). Social media use in the diaspora: the case of Syrians in Italy. Diaspora and media in europe migration, identity, and integration. K. H. Karim, & A. Al-Rawi (Eds.), (pp. 71-96). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Alinejad D., & S. Ponzanesi (2020). Migrancy and digital mediations of emotion. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 23(5):621 - 638. Retrieved from doi:10.1177/1367877920933649. google scholar
• Andersson, K. B. (2019). Digital diasporas: an overview of the research areas of migration and new media through a narrative literatüre review. Human Technology. 15(2): 142 - 180. google scholar
• Archibugi, D., & D. Held (1995). Cosmopolitan democracy, an agenda for a new world order. Oxford: Polity Press. google scholar
• Baer, H (2016). Redoing feminism: digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies. 16(1): 17-34. google scholar
• Barrow, C. W. (2005). The return of the state: globalization, state theory, and the new imperialism. New Political Science. 27(2): 123-145. google scholar
• Basch et al., (1994). Nations unbound- transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Gordon and Breach Publishers. google scholar
• Bauman, Z (2007). Liquid times: living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
• Bayne, S. & J. Ross (2011). ‘Digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’ discourses: a critique. Digital difference. R. Land, &S. Bayne (Eds.) Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Sense, pp. 159-169. google scholar
• Bayne, S., &J. Ross (2007). The ‘digital native’ and ‘digital immigrant’: a dangerous opposition. Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). 20. google scholar
• Beck, U., & E. Grande (2010). Varieties of second modernity: the cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. The British Journal of Sociology. 61(3): 409-443. google scholar
• Beck, U., & N. Sznaider (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology. 57(1): 1-23. google scholar
• Beck, U. (2008). Mobility and the cosmopolitan perspective. In Tracing Mobilities: towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective. Canzler et al. (Eds.), (pp. 25-36). Hampshire, USA: Ashgate Press. google scholar
• Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: sociology of the second age of modernity. The British Journal of Sociology. 51(1): 79-105. google scholar
• Bennett, L. (2004). Global media and politics: transnational communication regimes and civic cultures. Annual Review of Political Science. 7: 125-148. google scholar
• Broughton, L. (2011). Crossing borders virtual and real: a transnational internet-based community of spaghetti western fans finally meet each other face to face on the wild plains of Almeria, Spain. Language and Intercultural Communication. 11(4): 304-318. google scholar
• Chen, J. (2016). The Chinese political dissidents in exile: struggle for a sustainable and relevant movement. Open Journal of Political Science. 6(1): 53-66. google scholar
• Cheong, N. (2020) Disinformation as a response to the “opposition playground” in Malaysia. From grassroots activism to disinformation. A. Sinpeng & R. Tapsell (Eds.), (pp. 63-85). ISEAS Publishing. google scholar
• Chin, K. S., & D. Smith (2015). A reconceptualization of state transnationalism: South Korea as an illustrative case. Global Networks. 15(1): 78-98. google scholar
• Christensen, M. (2013). TransNational media flows: some key questions and debates. International Journal of Communication. 7: 2400-2418. google scholar
• Ciszek, E. L. (2016). Digital activism: how social media and dissensus inform theory and practice. Public Relations Review. 42(2): 314-321. google scholar
• Coddington, M. et al. (2014). Fact checking the campaign: how political reporters use twitter to set the record straight (or not). The International Journal of Press/Politics. 19(4): 391-409. google scholar
• Dekker, R., & G. Engbersen (2013). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks. 14(4): 401-418. google scholar
• Delanty, G. (2009). The cosmopolitan imagination: the renewal of critical social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Delwaide, J. (2011) The return of the state?. European Review. 19(1): 69-91. google scholar
• Digital 2020 Global Overview Report. (2020). Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/digital-2020. google scholar
• Gainous, J., K. M. Wagner, & C. E. Ziegler (2018). Digital media and political opposition in authoritarian systems: Russia’s 2011 and 2016 Duma elections. Democratization. 25(2): 209-226. google scholar
• Gao, X. (2020). State-society relations in China’s state-led digitalisation: progress and prospects. The China Review. 20(3): 2-3. google scholar
• Giglou, R. I. et al. (2018). Social media responses of the Turkish diaspora to protests in Turkey: the impact of Gezi on attitude and behavioural change. In Diaspora and media in europe migration, identity, and integration, K. H. Karim, & A. Al-Rawi (Eds.), (pp. 97-125). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Gomes, C. (2018). Siloed diversity - transnational migration, digital media and social networks. London, UK: Palgrave. google scholar
• Graves, L., & F. Cherubini (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Reuters institute digital news report (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism), Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox. ac.uk/our-research/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe. google scholar
• Howard, P. N. et al. (2011). Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media during the Arab Spring?. SSRN, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595096. google scholar
• Jauhiainen, J. S., S. Özçürümez, & Ö. Tursun (2021). Internet and social media uses, digital divides, and digitally mediated transnationalism in forced migration: Syrians in Turkey. Global Networks Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.1111/glob.12339. google scholar
• Kaun, A., & J. Uldam (2018). Digital activism: after the hype. New Media & Society. 20(6): 2099-2106. google scholar
• Keating, A.,& G. Melis (2017). Social media and youth political engagement: preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth?. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19(4): 877-894. google scholar
• Kendzior, S. (2011). Digital distrust: Uzbek cynicism and solidarity in the internet age. American Ethnologist American Ethnologist. 38(3): 559-575. google scholar
• Kraetzschmar, H. (2011). Mapping opposition cooperation in the Arab world: from single-issue coalitions to transnational networks. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 38(3): 287-302. google scholar
• Lewandowsky, S. et al. (2017). Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 6(4): 353-369. google scholar
• Lu, S. J., & X. Liu (2018). The nation-state in the digital age: a contextual analysis in 33 countries. International Journal of Communication. 12: 110-130. google scholar
• Mainwaring, S. (2020) Always in control? Sovereign states in cyberspace. European Journal of International Security. 5(2): 215-232. google scholar
• Major, A. (2013). Transnational state formation and the global politics of austerity. Sociological Theory. 31(1): 24-48. google scholar
• Malcomson, S. L. (1998). The varieties of cosmopolitan experience. Cosmopolitics: thinking and feeling beyond the nation, P. Cheah, & B. Robbins (Eds.), (pp. 233-245). Minnesota, USA: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
• Margheritis, A. (2007). State-led transnationalism and migration: reaching out to the Argentine community in Spain. Global Networks. 7(1): 87-106 google scholar
• Michaelsen, M. (2020). Special report 2020: the digital transnational repression toolkit, and its silencing effects. google scholar
• Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/digital-transnational-repression-toolkit-and-its-silencing-effects. google scholar
• Michaelsen, M. (2018). Exit and voice in a digital age: Iran’s exiled activists and the authoritarian state. Globalizations. 15(2): 248-264. google scholar
• Moyakine, E., & A. T. (2021). Struggling to strike the right balance between interests at stake: the ‘yarovaya’, ‘fake news’ and ‘disrespect’ laws as examples of ill-conceived legislation in the age of modern technology. Computer Law & Security Review. 40(April): 1-13. google scholar
• Mutsvairo, B. (2016). Dovetailing desires for democracy with new icts’ potentiality as platform for activism. In Digital activism in the social media era critical reflections on emerging trends in Sub-saharan Africa. B. Mutsvairo (Eds.), (pp. 3-23). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
• Nitsche, L. (2020). Digital authoritarianism on the rise?. Deutsche welle akademie, Retrieved from https://www. dw.com/en/digital-authoritarianism-on-the-rise/a-53445949. google scholar
• 0degârd, G., & F. Berglund (2008). Opposition and integration in Norwegian youth networks: the significance of social and political resources, 1992—2002. Acta Sociologica. 51(4): 275-291. google scholar
• Pearce, K. (2014). Two can play at the game: social media opportunities in Azerbaijan for government and opposition. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 22(1): 39-66. google scholar
• Plaza, D., & A. Below (2014). Social media as a tool for transnational caregiving within the Caribbean diaspora. Social and Economic Studies. 63(1): 25-56. google scholar
• Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital diasporas: postcoloniality, media and affect. Interventions. 22(8): 977-993. google scholar
• Qiang, X. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: President Xi’s surveillance state. Journal of Democracy. 30(1): 53-67. google scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1986). Representations are social facts: modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In Writing culture: the poetics andpolitics of ethnography. J. Clifford, & G. Marcus (Eds.), (pp. 194 - 232). Berkeley, USA: University of California Press. google scholar
• Radsch, C. (2013). Digital dissidence & political change: cyberactivism and citizen journalism in Egypt. Doctoral Dissertation, American University, School ofInternational Service. google scholar
• Segerberg, A., & L. Bennett (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: using twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review. 14(3): 197-215. google scholar
• Seo, H. et al. (2009). Global activism and new media: a study of transnational ngos’ online public relations. Public Relations Review. 35(2): 123-126. google scholar
• Shaw, M. (1997). The state of globalization: towards a theory of state transformation. Review of International Political Economy Review ofInternational Political Economy. 4(3): 497-513. google scholar
• Shields, P. (2014). Borders as information flows and transnational networks. Global Media and Communication. 10(1): 3-33. google scholar
• Song H. et al. (2020). Social media news use and political cynicism: differential pathways through “news finds me” perception. Mass Communication and Society. 23(1): 47-70. google scholar
• Sreberny, A. (2015). Women’s digital activism in a changing middle east. International Journal of Middle East Studies. 47(2): 357-361. google scholar
• Starikov, V. S. et al. (2018). Transnationalism online: exploring migration processes with large data sets. Monitoring ofPublic Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 26(5): 213-232. google scholar
• Sumiala, J., & L. Korpiola (2017). Mediated Muslim martyrdom: rethinking digital solidarity in the “Arab Spring”. New Media & Society. 19(1): 52-66. google scholar
• Tabak, H. (2016). Metodolojik ulusçuluk ve Türkiye’de dış politika çalışmaları. Uluslararası İlişkiler/International Relations. 13(51): 21-39. google scholar
• Tabak, H. (2020a). Transnational kemalism—power, hegemony, and dissidence. Bustan: The Middle East Book Review. 11(2): 145-155. google scholar
• Tabak, H. (2020b). Transnationality, foreign policy research and the cosmopolitan alternative: on the practice of domestic global politics. A Transnational Account of Turkish Foreign Policy. H. Pabuççular and D. Kuru (Eds.), (pp. 41-68), London, UK: Palgrave. google scholar
• Tabak H., Erdoğan S., & Doğan M. (2022). Fragmented local normative orders, unresolved localisations, and the making of contestant gender equality norms in Turkey. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies. 28(1). google scholar
• Tabak, H., & Doğan, M. (2022). Global gender equality norm and trade unions in Turkey: local contestations, rival validations, and discrepant receptions. SIYASAL: Journal of Political Sciences, 31(1): 53-72. Retrieved from doi:10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.947376 google scholar
• Tedeschi, M. et al. (2020). Transnationalism: current debates and new perspectives. GeoJournal. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10271-8. google scholar
• The international fact-checking network (2015). Florida, USA: Poynter Institute Retrieved from https://www. poynter.org/ifcn/. google scholar
• Ustun, Z. (2021). Cartographies of digital dissidence: networked movements, internet laws, and internet ungovernance forums in Turkey and Brazil. First Monday. 26(7). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5210/fm. v26i7.11060 google scholar
• Varea, R. R. et al. (2018). Digital diaspora, reinvigorating indigenous identity and online activism: social media and the reorientation of rotuman identity. Media International Australia. 169(1): 32-42. google scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice. 4(1): 17-34. google scholar
• Wimmer, A., & N. G. Schiller (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks. 2(4): 301-334. google scholar
• World internet development report 2017 (2019). P. Ping (Tr.), Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies (Eds.). Berlin, Germany: Springer. google scholar

Atıflar