Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/jol.2021.986791   IUP :10.26650/jol.2021.986791    Tam Metin (PDF)

Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi

Bertuğ SakınSümeyra ÖzkanVolkan Yonarkol

Down sendromlu çocuklar sağlıklı akranlarıyla aynı dönemde ilk sözcüklerini üretmeye başlarlar ve kelime dağarcıkları da buna bağlı olarak gelişim gösterir fakat Down sendromlu çocuklarda ilerleyen dönemlerde soyut içerikli ifadeleri anlama sorunları ortaya çıkmaya başlar ve bu durum insan iletişim sisteminin önemli bir parçası olan imgesel dilin büyük bir alanını kapsayan metaforların zihinde işlemlenmesi sürecini ciddi şekilde etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmada kavramsal metaforların zihinde işlemlenmesi süreci, Down sendromu özelinde ele alınmıştır. Çalışmamızın araştırma desenini nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmamızda metaforların zihinde işlemlenmesi sürecinin Down sendromu koşulları altındaki oluşumunun derinlemesine incelenip betimlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak kavramsal metaforların zihinde işlemlenme biçimini incelemek üzere yapılandırılmış sorulardan faydalanılmıştır. Uygulamalarda elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz yoluyla çözümlenerek yorumlanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda Down sendromunun, metaforların zihinde işlemlenmesi sürecine olumsuz yönde etki ettiği, yeni metaforların Down sendromu sebebiyle daha zor algılandığı ve bu metaforları içeren uygulamalarda Down sendromlu bireylerin daha fazla hata yaptıkları, kalıplaşmış metaforlarla yapılan uygulamalarda daha başarılı oldukları, aynı kavramsal arka plana sahip metaforlarda kalıplaşmış olanlar ile yeni üretilenler ve düz anlamlı olanlar ile bozuk yapılı metaforları birbirlerine zıt olacak şekilde hatalı işlemledikleri ve özellikle yönelim metaforlarının işlemlenme sürecinde de ciddi sorunlar yaşandığı tespit edilmiştir.

DOI :10.26650/jol.2021.986791   IUP :10.26650/jol.2021.986791    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Impact of Down Syndrome on the Mental Processing of Conceptual Metaphors

Bertuğ SakınSümeyra ÖzkanVolkan Yonarkol

Children with Down (DS) begin to produce their first words and develop vocabulary at the same time as their healthy peers. However, over the course of time, children with DS begin to experience problems with understanding abstract expressions, which affects their mental processing of metaphors that play an important role in human communication. In this paper, we conducted a qualitative case study to examine and describe how individuals with DS process metaphors. Specifically, we administered a series of structured questions to an individual with DS and used descriptive analysis for the responses. We determined through the research that DS has a negative effect on processing metaphors and that individuals with DS experience more difficulty perceiving and using new metaphors than they do formulaic ones. We also detected an inverse correlation between the incorrect usage of formulaic and new metaphors and literal and malformed metaphors in individuals with DS and observed that the biggest difficulties occur in processing orientational metaphors.


GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder resulting from an extra copy of the 21st chromosome. Along with various physical and cognitive problems, one of the important deficits in individuals with DS is language: DS is characterized by deficiencies in productive language and working memory, and individuals with DS have better receptive than productive language skills. One of the main areas in which receptive language skills play an important role is the mental processing of metaphors. Lakoff and Johnson determined that metaphors form naturally to meet everyday communication needs. Under their conceptual metaphor theory, people form some concepts through natural processes and daily experiences, and these concepts settle in their minds. Additionally, even if people are not aware of these concepts, their existence is made possible by the study of language.

Within the scope of this research, we discuss the mental processing of conceptual metaphors in the context of DS to answer the following research questions: How do individuals with DS process conceptual metaphors? What errors do they commit in processing metaphors? What is the role of DS in these existing errors? For our research, we conducted a single-participant case study, one of the qualitative research methods, to examine and describe how individuals with DS process metaphors. We collected our study data using a test with 69 structured questions featuring 23 linguistic metaphors produced from six conceptual metaphors, all of which were conceptual orientational metaphors. The test consisted of three stages: true-false assessment, meaning matching, and verbal narration. The vocabulary test used contextual fill-in-the-blank and picture matching questions. First, the participant was given new, formulaic, and malformed metaphors and metaphors with literal meaning and asked to assess them as true or false. Second, the participant was given a sample sentence containing a conceptual metaphor and asked to choose the option that best represented the meaning of the sentence. Third, the participant was asked open-ended questions about the meanings of a group of sample sentences and expressions that contained conceptual metaphors. We recorded and transcribed the answers to the structured study questions and performed descriptive analysis of the responses. Our study participant was a female 15-year-old native Turkish speaker named A.K. who had trisomy 21 type Down syndrome and a special education background.

We determined that DS has a negative effect on processing metaphors and that individuals with DS experience more difficulty perceiving and using new metaphors than they do formulaic ones. Both of these occur because individuals with DS have certain deficits in short-term memory, attention, and perception in addition to different physical disorders. Individuals with DS are more exposed to formulaic metaphors in their daily lives (at home, at school, in other institutional and social environments), and thus, they can use formulaic metaphors more effectively than other types of metaphors. We also found an inverse correlation between the incorrect usage of formulaic and new metaphors and literal and malformed metaphors in individuals with DS; this could be because another cognitive disorder known to the condition is lack of generalization ability and low perceptual discrimination.

DS also particularly negatively affects the processing of abstractly structured orientational metaphors, primarily because individuals with DS cannot fully understand the other party and lack the ability to create symbols. When A.K. was asked to define and interpret the metaphorical items, she avoided giving verbal answers and preferred to use body language instead; she also tried to give answers in the context of the closest literal denotation instead of defining the metaphors. This situation can be explained by the inadequacy of productive language skills and the challenges with perceiving abstract concepts due to DS. Individuals with DS, who cannot adequately express themselves verbally, compensate for this deficiency in productive language by using gestures, and they tend to use the closest concrete expressions when they have difficulty explaining abstract concepts. Our findings from the final test of this study showed that using context, providing additional vocabulary options and visual support, and using repetition greatly improve the successful performance of individuals with DS. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Aksan, D. (2015). Her yönüyle dil ana çizgileriyle dilbilim. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları. google scholar
  • Arıca Akkök, E. (2008). Yabancı dilde imgesel anlamlı dil öğelerinin öğretimi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. google scholar
  • Bambini, V., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bertinetto, P. M., & Pietrini, P. (2011). Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Bulletin, 86, 203-216. google scholar
  • Bilgegil, K. M. (1989). Edebîyat bilgi ve kuramları-belagat. İstanbul: Enderun Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Bonnaud, V., Gil, R., & Ingrand, P. (2002). Metaphorical and non-metaphorical links: A behavioral and ERP studyin young and elderly adults. Neurophysiologie clinique, 32, 258-268. google scholar
  • Brock, J., & Jarrold, C. (2005). Serial order reconstruction in Down syndrome: Evidence for a selective deficit in verbal short-term memory. Journal of ChildPsychology andPsychiatry, 46(3), 304-316. google scholar
  • Cardosa-Martins, C., Mervis, C. B., & Mervis, C. A. (1985). Early vocabulary acquisition by children with Down syndrome. American Journal ofMental Deficiency, 90, 177-184. google scholar
  • Chapman, R. S., Schwartz, E., & Bird, E. K. (1991). Language-skills of children and adolescents with Down-syndrome: 1. Comprehension. Journal ofSpeech and Hearing Research, 34, 1106-1120. google scholar
  • Chapman, R. S., & Bird, E. K. (2011). Language development in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood in persons with Down syndrome. In J. A. Burack, R. M. Hodapp, G. Iarocci, E. Zigler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of intellectual disability and development (2nd ed., pp. 167-183). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Chouinard, B. & Cummine, J. (2016). All the world’s a stage: Evaluation of two stages of metaphor comprehension in people with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 107-121. google scholar
  • Cleave, P., Bird, E. K., Czutrin, R. & Smith, L. (2012). A longitudinal study of narrative development in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 50(4), 332-342. google scholar
  • Çalışkan, N. (2009). Kavramsal anahtar modeliyle iki dilli çocuklara metafor ve deyim öğretimi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. google scholar
  • Desai, S. (1997). Down syndrome: a review of the literature. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 84(3), 279-285. google scholar
  • Dykens, E. M., Hodapp, R. M. & Evans, D. W. (1994). Profiles and development of adaptive behaviour in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 580-587. google scholar
  • Forgacs, B., Lukacs, A. & Pleh, C. (2014). Lateralized processing of novel metaphors: Disentangling figurativeness and novelty. Neuropsychologia, 56, 101-109. google scholar
  • Gibson, D. (1978). Down’s syndrome: The psychology of mongolism. New York: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Glenn, S. & Cunningham, C. (2005). Performance of young people with Down syndrome on the Leiter-R and British picture vocabulary scales. Journal of IntellectualDisability Research, 49, 239- 244. google scholar
  • Goldstein, A., Arzouan, Y. & Faust, M. (2012). Killing a novel metaphor and reviving a dead one: ERP correlates of metaphor conventionalization. Brain & Language, 123, 137-142. google scholar
  • Grauwe, S. D., Swain, A., Holcomb, P. J., Ditman, T. & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors. Neuropsychologia, 48, 137-142. google scholar
  • Güleryüz Adamhasan, B. (2014). Teaching and learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. google scholar
  • Hessling, A. & Brimo, D. M. (2019). Spoken fictional narrative and literacy skills of children with Down syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders, 79, 76-89. google scholar
  • Holmes, G. (2014). Gastrointestinal disorders in Down syndrome. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench, 7(1), 6-8. google scholar
  • İnce, Ö. (2002). Yazınsal söylem üzerine. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları. google scholar
  • Karamehmet, B. (2012). Kuramsal iletişimde metafor. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım. google scholar
  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2015). Metaforlar hayat, anlam ve dil. (Çev. G. Y. Demir). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi, 1980). google scholar
  • Laws, G. & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1324-1339. google scholar
  • Lee, N. R., Pennington, B. F. & Keenan, J. M. (2010). Verbal short-term memory deficits in Down syndrome: phonological, semantic, or both? J Neurodevelop Disord, 2, 9-25. google scholar
  • Martin, G. E., Klusek, J., Estigarribia, B. & Roberts, J. E. (2009). Language characteristics of individuals with Down syndrome. Topics in Language Disorders, 29, 112-132. google scholar
  • Nash, H. M. & Snowling, M. J. (2008). Semantic and phonological fluency in children with Down syndrome: atypical organization of language or less efficient retrieval strategies? Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(5), 690-703. google scholar
  • Papagno, C. & Vallar, G. (2001). Understanding metaphors and idioms: a single case neuropsychological study in a person with Down syndrome. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 516-528. google scholar
  • Roch, M., Florit, E. & Levorato, C. (2013). The role of linguistic context in deriving word meanings in individuals with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 605-615. google scholar
  • Rondal, J. A. (1988). Down’s syndrome. D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Ed.), Language development in exceptional circumstances içinde (165-176. ss.). Londra: Churchill Livingstone. google scholar
  • Schmidt, L.G. & Seger, C.A. (2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition, 71, 375-386. google scholar
  • Shnitzer-Meirovich, S., Lifshitz, H. & Mashal, N. (2018). Enhancing the comprehension of visual metaphors in individuals with intellectual disability with or without down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 113-123. google scholar
  • Smith, E. & Jarrold, C. (2014). Grouping, semantic relation and imagery effects in individuals with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3162-3174. google scholar
  • Stefanini, S., Caselli, M. C. & Volterra, V. (2007). Spoken and gestural production in a naming task by young children with Down syndrome. Brain and Language, 101, 208-221. google scholar
  • Tabossi, P. & Zardon, F. (1995). The activation of idiomatic meaning. M. Everaert, E. Linden, A. Schenk, R. Schreuder (Ed.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives içinde (273-282. ss.). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum. google scholar
  • Tartter, V. C., Gomes, H., Dubrovsky, B., Molholm, S. & Stewart, R. V. (2002). Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: Evidence from N400. Brain and Language, 80, 488-509. google scholar
  • Winner, E. & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain damaged patients. Brain, 100, 717-729. google scholar
  • Yang, F. G., Bradley, K., Huq, M., Wu, D. & Krawczyk, D. C. (2013). Contextual effects on conceptual blending in metaphors: An event-related potential study. Journal of Linguistic, 26, 312-326. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Sakın, B., Özkan, S., & Yonarkol, V. (2021). Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi. Dilbilim Dergisi, 0(37), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


AMA

Sakın B, Özkan S, Yonarkol V. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi. Dilbilim Dergisi. 2021;0(37):11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


ABNT

Sakın, B.; Özkan, S.; Yonarkol, V. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi. Dilbilim Dergisi, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 37, p. 11-23, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Sakın, Bertuğ, and Sümeyra Özkan and Volkan Yonarkol. 2021. “Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi.” Dilbilim Dergisi 0, no. 37: 11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


Chicago: Humanities Style

Sakın, Bertuğ, and Sümeyra Özkan and Volkan Yonarkol. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi.” Dilbilim Dergisi 0, no. 37 (Oct. 2022): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


Harvard: Australian Style

Sakın, B & Özkan, S & Yonarkol, V 2021, 'Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi', Dilbilim Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 37, pp. 11-23, viewed 2 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Sakın, B. and Özkan, S. and Yonarkol, V. (2021) ‘Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi’, Dilbilim Dergisi, 0(37), pp. 11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791 (2 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Sakın, Bertuğ, and Sümeyra Özkan and Volkan Yonarkol. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi.” Dilbilim Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 37, 2021, pp. 11-23. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791


Vancouver

Sakın B, Özkan S, Yonarkol V. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi. Dilbilim Dergisi [Internet]. 2 Oct. 2022 [cited 2 Oct. 2022];0(37):11-23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791 doi: 10.26650/jol.2021.986791


ISNAD

Sakın, Bertuğ - Özkan, Sümeyra - Yonarkol, Volkan. Down Sendromunun Kavramsal Metaforların Zihinde İşlemlenme Sürecine Etkisi”. Dilbilim Dergisi 0/37 (Oct. 2022): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2021.986791



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim27.08.2021
Kabul17.12.2021
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma31.12.2021

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.