DOI :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.006   IUP :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.006    Full Text (PDF)

Fear geographies of everyday life in public

Ahmet UysalHasan İçen

The city, which is the most important element of modern life style, refers to the intersection of the differences of various groups in a space. It also mentioned in previous studies that most of the patterns developed on the city coherent to these differences. This divided urban structure, which described as spatial segregation, refers to different spatial identities. These identities are originally compositions or representations which space contains. The feelings that the individual feels in these compositions are also the subject of the emotional geography, a little-known branch of geography. Emotional geography studies are generally referred as behavioural geography, but these two fields are different. Researchers argue that the individual builds his/her world with emotions, so emotional geography examines the relationship between space and emotions and tries to understand how the individual’s emotions interact with his/ her environment. Beyond this, one of the emotions mentioned is important, which is fear, in geography studies. It is obvious that fear affects the daily lives of individuals in urban space. At this point, it is the basic argument of the study that individual’s perceptions of risk increases according to certain places and time. The most important question in the study is whether spatial references are effective in the production of fears, which affecting the daily life in urban space. 


  • Anderson, B. (2009) Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 2(2): 77–81. google scholar
  • Bauman, Z. (2017) “Akışkan Modernite”, İstanbul, Can Yayınları google scholar
  • Bondi, L. Davidson, J ve Smith, M (2007) “Introduction: Geography’s ‘Emotional Turn”, (içinde) Davidson, J., Bondi, L. ve Smith, M (2007) google scholar
  • Emotional Geographies, Aldershot, Ashgate google scholar
  • Davidson, J. (2001) ‘Fear and trembling in the mall: women, agoraphobia and body boundaries’, in Isabel Dyck, Nancy Davis Lewis and Sara google scholar
  • McLafferty (eds) Geographies of Women’s Health. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 213-230. google scholar
  • De Certeau, M. (2010) “Gündelik Hayatın Keşfi 2”, İstanbul, Dost Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Garginer, M (2016) Gündelik Hayatın Eleştirileri, İstanbul, Heretik Yayınclık. google scholar
  • Lefebvre, H. (2012) “Gündelik Hayatın Eleştiris”i, İstanbul, Sel Yayıncılık google scholar
  • Sibley, David (1995) Geographies of Exclusion. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Thrift, N. (2008) Non‐Representational Theory: Space/Politics/Affect, London, Routledge google scholar
  • Uysal, A. (2016) Londra’daki Türkiyeli Çocukların Ulusaşırı Mekânlarda Duygusal Coğrafyaları, Göç Dergisi, 3/1,99-119. google scholar
  • Uysal, A. Göngör, Ş (2016) Postyapısalcı ve ilişkisel coğrafyalarda bir tarz olarak temsil ötesi teori (ler), Coğrafya Dergisi, 33, 83-93. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.