DOI :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.049   IUP :10.26650/PB/PS12.2019.002.049    Full Text (PDF)

House rents as a spatial segregation factor

Hasan İçen

Spatial segregation is a process that settlements often experience within different periods or dynamics. The city may defined as a social space without considering its physical conditions and depictions, therefore it interacts with the individuals it contains and can shaped accordingly. The clusters, which discussed in this study defined as the segregation within the city, are due to this social structure of the city. In this aspect, spatial segregation can read via everyday practices or settlement. This study is about welfare geographies. The study planned as a reading of welfare geography under the themes of segregation in urban space, identity and consumption, closed sites and rents. The study argues that the most appropriate proposition on how to eliminate social exclusion and spatial segregation in the city - in accordance with the nature of welfare geography studies - is to raise awareness on these issues. Therefore, it can be said that this study seeks to answer a normative question and aims to raise public awareness as a kind of activism. 


  • Alpman, P. S., & Göker, G. (2010). Sınıfsal Farklılıklar Bağlamında Aseptik Mekanların Temsili: Konut Reklamları Örneği. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Haziran, (13), 67-92. google scholar
  • Andersen, H. S. (2019). Urban sores: On the interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighbourhoods. Routledge. google scholar
  • Bradshaw, J. (2000). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. Report. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York. google scholar
  • Caldeira, T. P. (1996). Building up walls: the new pattern of spatial segregation in Sao Paulo. International Social Science Journal, 48(147), 55-66. google scholar
  • Doğanay, H., Özdemir, Ü., & Şahin, İ. F. (2011). Genel Beşeri ve Ekonomik Coğrafya. Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  • Falah, G. (1999). Welfare geography of a peripheralized national minority: The case of Israel’s Arab population. Urban Geography, 20(5), 417-437. google scholar
  • Kul, M. (2013). Suçtan daha büyük suç korkusu. İstanbul: Yeniyüzyıl. google scholar
  • Kurtulus, H. (2005). Istanbul’da kentsel ayrisma. Istanbul, Baglam yayinlari. google scholar
  • Milbourne, P. (2010). The geographies of poverty and welfare. Geography Compass, 4(2), 158-171. google scholar
  • Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2013). Segregation, polarisation and social exclusion in metropolitan areas. In Urban Segregation and the Welfare State (pp. 15-28). Routledge. google scholar
  • Özgür, E. F. (2006). Sosyal ve mekânsal ayrışma çerçevesinde yeni konutlaşma eğilimleri: Kapalı siteler, İstanbul, Çekmeköy örneği. Planlama Dergisi, 4, 79-95. google scholar
  • Sibley, D. (2002). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Routledge. google scholar
  • Smith, D. M. (1974). Who gets what where, and how: a welfare focus for human geography. Geography, 289-297. google scholar
  • Yüceşahin, M. M., & Tuysuz, S. (2011). Ankara kentinde sosyo-mekânsal farklılaşmanın örüntüleri: Ampirik bir analiz. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2),159-188. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.