DOI :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.036   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.036    Full Text (PDF)

Psychological and Sociological Aspects Preventing “common Wallet” Perception in the Public Budget

Fidan KılavuzCihan Yüksel

This study mentions the perception of “common wallet” and the determining phases of shaping process, in order to scrutinize the way Society’s perception has got its background using sociological and psychological parameters. What “common wallet” means is the public budget which is the legitimate source that enables the government to spend and gather resources. Understanding of public budget is closely related to social interactions between citizens, their behaviours and acts since it is a product of labour productivity. Thus, since the budget rights starting point is the citizen’s common money; it is based on the need to identifying common (social) need from this budget.

On the other hand humans are described as social entities firstly. Humans effect the society they live in and they get effected by the society as a reason for that. Because of these, social interaction as an individual and as a group effects what we can identify as a social common value “common wallet” perception and the shaping process. Based on this perspective “common wallet” perception and determinants of the shaping process are examined via social psychology perspective; while the concepts of altruism, altruistic punishment, lack of social belonging, bystander effect, social loafing, cognitive contradiction theory and ethical behaviors/cultural behaviors were utilized, the public budget consciousness shaped within this social relations was tried put forwards.

From this point of view it is aimed to contribute to the problem from a wider perspective and to provide constructive solutions.

JEL Classification : H31 , H61


  • Barclay, P. (2006). “Reputational Benefits for Altruistic Punishment”, Evolution and Human Behavior, 27 (5), pp. 325-344. google scholar
  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). “Altruistic Punishment in Humans”, Nature, 415 (6868), pp. 137-140. google scholar
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 2, California, Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Fredricks, S., Ramsey, M. & Hornett, A. (2011). “Kinship and Bystander Effect: The Role of Others in Ethical Decisions”, Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 2 (1), pp. 2-22. google scholar
  • Grantham, T. C. (2011). “New Directions for Gifted Black Males Suffering from Bystander Effects: A Call for Upstanders”, Roeper Review, 33 (4), pp. 263-272. google scholar
  • Haşlak, İ. (2006). “Etik Kongresinin Ardından”, Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID), 1 (1), ss. 185-192. google scholar
  • Hudson, J. M. & Bruckman, A. S. (2004). “The Bystander Effect: A Lens for Understanding Patterns of Participation”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (2), pp. 165-195. google scholar
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. & Cemalcılar, Z. (2014). Dünden Bugüne İnsan ve İnsanlar: Sosyal Psikolojiye Giriş, 16. Baskı, İstanbul, Evrim Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A. & Bennett, N. (2004). “Social Loafing: A Field Investigation”, Journal of Management, 30 (2), pp. 285-304. google scholar
  • Özdemir, M. (2012). “Kamu Yönetiminde Etik”, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 4 (7), ss. 177-193. google scholar
  • Özdevecioğlu, M., Kaya, Y. & Dedeoğlu, T. (2014). “Kişilik Özelliklerinin İzleyici Etkisi (Bystander Effect) Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kontrol Odağinin Rolü”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, ss. 25-40. google scholar
  • Seeman, M. (1959). “On the Meaning of Alienation”, American Sociological Review, 24 (6), pp. 783-791. google scholar
  • Toigonbaeva, D., & Eser, R. (2011). “Psikoloji ve İktisadın Birleşimi Olarak, Davranışsal İktisat”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6 (1), ss. 287‐321. google scholar
  • Zijderveld, A. C. (1985). Soyut Toplum, (Çev: Cevdet Cerit), İstanbul, Pınar Yayınları. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.