DOI :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.022   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.022    Full Text (PDF)

The Ramsey Tax Component in the Terms of Gasoline Taxation in Turkey

Demet ÖzocaklıAtilla Ahmet Uğur

Ramsey who took the first foundations of optimal tax theory and handled optimal consumption taxes analytically for the first time, discussed how taxation rules should be in order to ensure efficiency in resource allocation and to minimize loss of efficiency. In this respect, he put forward the Inverse Elasticity Rule. The Inverse Elasticity Rule refers to tax lower than the goods with a high change in the amount of compensated demand due to taxation and higher than the low changes in the amount of compensated demand. Accordingly in this study, price elasticity of gasoline demand for Turkey was estimated by the Statıc Ordinary Least Square and the Dynamic Partial Adjustment Model for the period 2006-2017. According to the Dynamic Model, the price elasticity of the short-term gasoline demand is inelastic and according to the Inverse Elasticity Rule, gasoline is favorable in terms of obtaining higher government income. In this case gasoline may be subject to higher taxes to obtain government revenue by The Inverse Elasticity Rule as the price elasticity of gasoline demand in Turkey for the period 2006-2017 is inelastic. In this context Ramsey Tax Component that allowing the possibility of gasoline consumption being a weak substitution of leisure time and situated in the optimal gasoline tax was calculated for Turkey. The Ramsey Tax Component is expressed as a component based on the Inverse Elasticity Rule and calculated on the basis of the idea that goods are which lower change in the amount of compensated demand resulting from taxation provides higher government revenue. In this direction, Ramsey Gasoline Tax Component calculated for the year of 2017 for Turkey. Calculated Ramsey Gasoline Tax Component was determined to be less 2.46 times from the gasoline Excise Tax amount taken by the government.

JEL Classification : C13 , H20 , R48


  • Aykaç, G. (2016). “Türkiye İşgücü Piyasası’nın İşgücü Arz Esnekliği: 2003 – 2011”, Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 16 (1), ss.13-29. google scholar
  • Baltagi, B. & Griffin, J. M. (1983). “Gasoline Demand in the OECD: An Application of Polling and Testing Procedures”, European Economic Review, 22(2), pp.117-137. google scholar
  • Berkenwald, M. (2016). Energy Prices and Taxes. International Energy Agency Energy Statistics Training Week, Paris 3 March, Prices_Overview.pdf, (12.20.2018). google scholar
  • Dahl, C. & Sterner, T. (1991). “A Survey of Econometric Gasoline Demand Elasticities”, International Journal of Energy Systems, Vol.11, pp. 53-76. google scholar
  • Dahl, C. (2012). “Measuring Global Gasoline and Diesel Price and Income Elasticities”, Energy Policy, 41(C), pp.2-13. google scholar
  • Erdoğdu, E. (2013). “Motor Fuel Prices in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 69(6), pp.143-153. google scholar
  • Hasanov M. (2005). “The Demand for Transport Fuels in Turkey” Energy Economics, Vol.51, pp.125-134. google scholar
  • Heady, C. (1993). “Optimal Taxation as a Guide to Tax Policy: A Survey”, Fiscal Studies, 14(1), pp.15-41. google scholar
  • Ley, E. & Boccardo, J. (2009). “The Taxation of Motor Fuel: International Comparison”, Policy Research Working Paper, No.WPS5212, Washington, DC: World Bank. google scholar
  • Lin C.Y. & Prince, L. (2009). “The Optimal Gas Tax for California”, Energy Policy, 37(12), pp.5173- 5183. google scholar
  • Lin, C.Y. & Zeng J.J. (2014). “The Optimal Gasoline Tax for China”, Theoretical Economics Letters, 4(49), pp.270-278. google scholar
  • Mirrlees J.A. (1971). “An Explooration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.38, pp.175-208. google scholar
  • Parry, I.W.H & Small, K.A. (2005). “Does Britain or the United States Have The Right Gasoline Tax?”, American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 95(4), pp.1276-1289. google scholar
  • Ramsey F. (1927). “A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation”, Economic Journal, 37(145), pp.47-61. google scholar
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Finance. (2002). Özel Tüketim Vergisi Kanunu Tasarısı ve Plan ve Bütçe Komisyonu Raporu (1/988), Madde Gerekçeleri, Madde 1, 17.5.2002, s.884. google scholar
  • Sarabia, A.A. & Trillo, F.H. (2014). “Optimal Gasoline Tax in Developing, Oil Producing Countries: The Case of Mexico”, Energy Policy, Vol.67, pp.564-571. google scholar
  • Sorensen, P.B. (2007). “The Theory of Optimal Taxation: What is the Policy Relevance?”, International Tax Public Finance, Vol.14, pp.383-406. google scholar
  • Sterner, T., Dahl, C. & Franzen M. (1992). “Carbon Tax Policy, Carbon Emission and the Global Environment”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 26(2), pp.109-119. google scholar
  • Stiglitz J.E. (1987). “Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New Welfare Economics”, Handbook of Public Economics, Vol.2, pp.991-1042. google scholar
  • Williams, R. C. (2005). “An Estimate of the Second-Best Optimal Gasoline Tax Considering Both Efficiency and Equity”, NBER Public Economics Program Meeting. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.