DOI :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.080   IUP :10.26650/PB/SS10.2019.001.080    Full Text (PDF)

The Relationship Between E-government and Corruption: an Empirical Analysis Using Panel Data

Gamze Öz Yalaman

E-Government can be defined as the use of information and communication technologies by the government in order to work more effectively share information and deliver better services to the public. It is known that e-government applications strengthen accountability, increase transparency and efficiency of the government. Corruption is a highly complex phenomenon which rooted in bureaucratic and political institutions and their effects vary from country to country. Given the socio-economic conditions, political and institutional infrastructure and other factors, it is difficult to make a generally accepted definition of corruption, but in its narrowest definition, abuse of public power for private interests. It is known that corruption creates negative effects on the economic growth of the countries, tax structure, quality of public services, and the rule of law.In this context, the paper tests the effects of e-government on corruption via panel data analysis by using a large data set consisting of 193 countries belonging to the period 2003-2017. While examining the relationship between e-government and corruption, many control variables that may affect this relationship were taken into consideration. The empirical findings of the study show that e-government has a statistically significant and negative effect on corruption. Consistent with the common literature, the findings of the study emphasize that the increase in e-government applications reduces corruption.

JEL Classification : D73 , H11 , O57


  • Andersen, T. B. (2009). “E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy”, Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201-210. google scholar
  • Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data, John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
  • Bhatnagar S. (2003). E-government and access to information, United Nations Global Corruption Report 2003. UNPAN008435.pdf google scholar
  • Birleşmiş Milletler (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspectivehttps:// google scholar
  • Braun, M., & Di Tella, R. (2004). “Inflation, inflation variability, and corruption”, Economics & Politics, 16(1), 77-100. google scholar
  • Dimant, E., & Tosato, G. (2018). “Causes and effects of corruption: what has past decade’s empirical research taught us? A survey”. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 335-356. google scholar
  • Dünya Bankası (1997). Helping Countries Combat Corruption, The Role of the World Bank, http:// google scholar
  • Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). “E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation”, World Development, 57, 114-126. google scholar
  • Elbahnasawy, N. G., & Revier, C. F. (2012). “The determinants of corruption: Cross‐country‐ panel‐data analysis”, The Developing Economies, 50(4), 311-333. google scholar
  • Furlong S. Vitro Robert (2005). E-government in Canada: Building public trust through citizencentric governance, The knowledge economy in development: Perspectives for effective partnerships, 2005Washington, DCInter-American Development Bank. google scholar
  • Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). “An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN”, Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50. google scholar
  • Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S., & Lim, V. K. (2013). “Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis”, Information & Management, 50(8), 638-649. google scholar
  • Nam, T. (2018). “Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study”, Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273-282. google scholar
  • Palvia, S. C. J., & Sharma, S. S. (2007, December). E-government and e-governance: definitions/ domain framework and status around the world. In International Conference on E-governance (pp. 1-12). google scholar
  • Panzardi, R., Calcopietro, C., & Ivanovic, E. F. (2002). New-economy sector study electronic government and governance: lessons for Argentina. New-economy sector study: electronic government and governance-lessons from Argentina Retrieved from http://documents. worldbank. org/ curated/en/527061468769894044/pdf/266390WP0E1Gov1gentina1Final1Report. pdf. google scholar
  • Serra, D. (2006). “Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis”, Public Choice, 126(1-2), 225-256. google scholar
  • Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). “E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data”, Intl Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298-316. google scholar
  • Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). “The effects of e‐government on trust and confidence in government”, Public administration review, 66(3), 354-369. google scholar
  • Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2004). “Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government”, Journal of public administration research and theory, 15(3), 371-391. google scholar
  • West, D. M. (2004). “E‐government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes”, Public administration review, 64(1), 15-27. google scholar
  • World Bank. 2002. The e-government handbook for developing countries : The e-government handbook for developing countries: a project of InfoDev and the Center for Democracy and Technology (English). infoDev. Washington, DC: World Bank. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.