CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/T3.2024.40.033   IUP :10.26650/B/T3.2024.40.033    Full Text (PDF)

Use of Personalized Implants Manufactured With 3D Technologies in Maxillofacial Surgery

Mustafa Mert AçıkgözOğuz TemizelGülsüm Ak

Advanced bone resorption in the jaw bones often requires various surgical strategies. Throughout history, different implant designs have been developed for use in such cases. Traditional subperiosteal implants, one of these designs, have been used for a period of time with different success rates in the past, but they have become less preferred due to their low success rates and developments in endosseous implants. With the development of 3-dimensional imaging and design systems, new generation subperiosteal implants, which have gained popularity again, have emerged as a promising alternative treatment method in cases with advanced bone loss. New generation subperiosteal implants are implants that are individually designed and manufactured. The design of these implants begins with the acquisition of high-resolution radiographic images and the application of these customized implants requires advanced surgical and prosthetic precision. In addition, the advantage of subperiosteal implants over hard tissue grafting techniques that require a second surgical site is that they require less waiting time and offer patients a more comfortable treatment process in terms of postoperative morbidity due to the lack of the need for a donor site.


DOI :10.26650/B/T3.2024.40.033   IUP :10.26650/B/T3.2024.40.033    Full Text (PDF)

Maksi̇llofasi̇yal Cerrahi̇de 3D Teknoloji̇leri̇yle Üreti̇len Ki̇şi̇ye Özel İmplantlarin Kullanımı

Mustafa Mert AçıkgözOğuz TemizelGülsüm Ak

Çene kemiklerinde ileri kemik erimesi sıklıkla çeşitli cerrahi stratejiler gerektirir. Tarih boyunca bu tür vakalarda kullanılmak üzere farklı implant tasarımları geliştirilmiştir. Bu tasarımlardan biri olan geleneksel subperiosteal implantlar geçmişte farklı başarı oranlarıyla bir süre kullanılmış ancak düşük başarı oranları ve endosseöz implantlardaki gelişmeler nedeniyle daha az tercih edilir hale gelmiştir. 3 boyutlu görüntüleme ve tasarım sistemlerinin geliştirilmesiyle birlikte tekrar popülerlik kazanan yeni nesil subperiosteal implantlar ileri kemik kaybı olan vakalarda umut vadeden alternatif tedavi yöntemi olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Yeni nesil subperiosteal implantlar, kişiye özel olarak tasarlanıp üretilen implantlardır. Bu implantların tasarımı yüksek çözünürlüklü radyografik görüntülerin elde edilmesiyle başlar ve bu özelleştirilmiş implantların uygulanması ileri cerrahi ve protetik hassasiyet gerektirir. Ek olarak, ikinci bir cerrahi alan gerektiren sert doku greftleme tekniklerine kıyasla subperiosteal implantların avantajı, daha az bekleme süresi gerektirmesi ve donör alana ihtiyaç duyulmaması nedeniyle hastalara postoperatif morbidite açısından daha konforlu bir tedavi süreci sunmasıdır.



References

  • Abraham C. M. (2014). A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treat-ments. The OpenDentistry Journal, 8, 50-55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010050 google scholar
  • Block M. S. (2018). Dental Implants: The Last 100 Years. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: offi-cial journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 76(1), 11-26. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.045 google scholar
  • Born stein, M. M., Horner, K., & Jacobs, R. (2017). Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12161 google scholar
  • Branemark, P.I., Zarb, G.A., Albrektsson, T., & Rosen, H.M. (1985). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointeg-ration in Clinical Dentistry. google scholar
  • Carnicero, A., Pelaez, A., Restoy-Lozano, A., Jacquott, I., & Perera, R. (2021). Improvement of an additively ma-nufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization. Scien-tific Reports, 11(1), 15390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94980-1 google scholar
  • Chan, H. L., Misch, K., & Wang, H. L. (2010). Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Den-tistry, 19(4), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181e59ebd google scholar
  • De Moor, E., Huys, S. E. F., van Lenthe, G. H., Mommaerts, M. Y., & Vander Sloten, J. (2022). Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using fini-te-element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 51(3), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.011 google scholar
  • Eren, O., Sezer, H. K., & Börklü, H. R. (2018). Tersine Mühendislik Tasarımı: Endüstriyel Tasarım Mühendisliği Lisans Öğrencileri için Teknik Seçmeli Ders. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 2(3), 1-11. google scholar
  • Gupta, R., Gupta, N., & Weber, DDS, K. K. (2023). Dental Implants. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. google scholar
  • Jacobs, R., Salmon, B., Codari, M., Hassan, B., & Bornstein, M. M. (2018). Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12903-018-0523-5 google scholar
  • Larobina M. (2023). Thirty Years of the DICOM Standard. Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 9(5), 1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050145 google scholar
  • Moore, D. J., & Hansen, P. A. (2004). A descriptive 18-year retrospective review of subperiosteal implants for patients with severely atrophied edentulous mandibles. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 92(2), 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.018 google scholar
  • Pasqualini, U., & Pasqualini, M. E. (2009). Treatise of Implant Dentistry: The Italian Tribute to Modern Imp-lantology. Ariesdue. google scholar
  • Pauwels, R., Araki, K., Siewerdsen, J. H., & Thongvigitmanee, S. S. (2015). Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 44(1), 20140224. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140224 google scholar
  • Scarfe, W. C., Li, Z., Aboelmaaty, W., Scott, S. A., & Farman, A. G. (2012). Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Australian Dental Journal, 57(Suppl 1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x google scholar
  • Strappa, E. M., Meme, L., Cerea, M., Roy, M., & Bambini, F. (2022). Custom-made additively manufactured subperiosteal implant. Minerva Dental and Oral Science, 71(6), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.22.04640-X google scholar
  • Strock, A.E. (1939). Experimental work on a method for the replacement of missing teeth by direct implantation of a metal support into the alveolus. American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery, 25, 467-472. google scholar
  • Türkücü, T., & Börklü, H. R. (2018). Tersine Mühendislik Yaklaşımına Dayalı Yeni Bir İmalat için Tasarım İşlem Modeli. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 6(1), 91-104. https://doi. org/10.29109/http-gujsc-gazi-edu-tr.327479 google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.