CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/SSc21.2024.028.001   IUP :10.26650/B/SSc21.2024.028.001    Full Text (PDF)

The Patronage of Art: Conceptual and Historical Framework

Erdoğan AltunNuri Fudayl KıcıroğluAyşegül Komsuoğlu

This article examines the historical evolution and complex dynamics of patronage, particularly in the context of art. It shows the asymmetrical relationship between patrons and clients, emphasizing hierarchical power structures and reciprocal obligations. Tracing patronage from feudal times to industrial era, it highlights the shift from monarchs to the bourgeoisie as patrons of art.

By deconstructing the historical trajectory of art patronage, the article reveals the mutual influence between societal changes, power dynamics, and the evolution of artistic expression. Functioning as a reflective lens, it illuminates the nuanced relationship between patrons, artists, and socio-political landscapes, thereby demonstrating the ongoing progression of human interaction and cultural development. In the contemporary epoch, as the traditional patronage paradigms undergo profound transformation, the evolving relationship between art and patrons embodies a fusion of historical legacies and modern adaptations. This relationship vividly epitomizes the interconnected history of power, creativity, and the evolution of societies, outlining their confluence throughout historical epochs.



References

  • Abercrombie, N & Hill, S. (1976). Paternalism and Patronağe. The British Journal of Sociology, 27(4), 413-429. google scholar
  • Barth, F. (1959). Political Leadership among Swat Pathans. London: Athlone. google scholar
  • Bloch, M. (1961). Feudal Society. London: Routledğe and Keğan Paul. google scholar
  • Blok, A. (1969). Variations in patronağe. Sociologische Gids, 16(6), 365-378. google scholar
  • Boissevain, J. (1969). Patrons as brokers. Sociologische Gids, 16(6), 379-386. google scholar
  • —. (1966). Patronağe in Sicily. Man, 1(1), 18-33. google scholar
  • Coulborn, R. (1956). Feudalism in history. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Djerassi, C. (1991). Some Forms of Art Patronağe. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Science, 44(7), 51-68. google scholar
  • Feyzi, A. (2016). Investiğation on The Oriğine of A Patronağe Instrument In Turkish Music Culture “Sending Students to Europe for Musical Education”. Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 47-73. google scholar
  • Feyzi, A. & Özden, E. (2016). Patrimonial System in Turkish Music Culture and Change within the Nineteenth Century. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(47), 1195-1209. google scholar
  • Foster, G.M. (1963). The Dyadic Contract in Tzintzuntzan, II: Patron-Client Relationship, American Anthropologist, 65(6), 1280-1294. google scholar
  • Garnsey, P. & Saller, R. (2015). The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture (2nd edition). Bloomsbury. google scholar
  • Gold, K.B. (1987). Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome. Chapel Hill & London: The University of North Carolina Press. google scholar
  • Gundersheimer, L.W. (1981). Patronage in the Renaissance: An Exploratory Approach. in Lytle, F.G. & Orgel, S. (Eds.), Patronage in the Renaissance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 3-26. google scholar
  • Hall, A. (1974). Patron-client relations. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1(4), 506-509. google scholar
  • Hammer, J.V. (2003). Buyuk Osmanlı Tarihi, Vol 3. İstanbul: Ucdal Neşriyat. google scholar
  • İnalcık, H. (2003). Sair ve Patron. Ankara: Dogu Batı Yayınları. google scholar
  • İpekten, H. (1996). Divan Edebiyatında Edebi Muhitler. İstanbul: M.E.B. Yayınları. google scholar
  • Kauffman, R. (1974). The Patron-Client Concept and Macro-Politics: Prospects and Problems. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 284-308. google scholar
  • Kettering, S. (1986). Patrons, Brokers, and Clients in Seventeenth-Century France. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Lande, C.H. (1977). The dyadic basis of clientelism. in Schmidt, S., Scott, J.C., Lande, C., Guasti, L. (Eds.), Friends, Followers and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press, xxiii-xxxv. google scholar
  • Melton, J.v.H. (2004). The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Myers, B.S. (1959). Encyclopedia of World Art. McGraw-Hill. google scholar
  • Necipoglu, G. (2005). TheAge of Sinan: Architectural Culture in the Ottoman Empire. London: Reaktion Books. google scholar
  • Ozekmekcşi, İ. (2021). His Majesty’s Painter Zonaro: A Professional Career Bound to Politics. in Komsuoglu, A., Toker, H., Nardella, F. (Eds.), The Relationship Between Art and Politics in the 19th Century Ottoman Empire. İstanbul: İstanbul University Press, 19-50. google scholar
  • Saracş, Y. M.A. (2012). Sş air ve Patron Patrimonyal Devlet ve Sanat Uzerindeki Sosyolojik Bir İnceleme. Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi, 31, 384-389. google scholar
  • Scott, J. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91-113. google scholar
  • Silverman, S.F. (1965). Patronage and Community-Nation Relationships in Central İtaly. Ethnology, 4(2), 172-189. google scholar
  • Toker, H. (2016). Elhan-ı Aziz-Sultan Abdulaziz Devrinde Sarayda Musikî. Ankara: TBMM Basımevi. google scholar
  • Weingrod, A. (1968). Patrons, patronage, and political parties. Comparative studies in Society and History, 10(4), 377-400. google scholar
  • Wolf, E.R. (2004). Kinship, friendship, and patron-client relationship complex societies. in M. Benton (Ed.), The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. London: Routledge, 1-22. google scholar


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.