CHAPTER


DOI :10.26650/B/AH13.2025.002.005   IUP :10.26650/B/AH13.2025.002.005    Full Text (PDF)

Theatre Criticism in the Republican Era

Dikmen Gürün

The journey of theatrical art and criticism in the Ottoman Empire was a long process, and the emphasis was mostly on definitions and educational content about theatre. Theatre criticsm appears to have accelerated with the rise of theatrical life after 1908 (Meşrutiyet / The Constitutional Era). With Darülbedayi’s foundation (Istanbul Municipal Theatre) in 1914, our first subsidised theatre would become operational, sparking a movement in the realm of criticism. In the meantime, Muhsin Ertuğrul, a decisive and leading name of the modern Turkish theatre who for many years was also the artistic director of the Istanbul Municipal Theatre, emphasised that criticism is a profession and a challenging art form.

In time, theatre had increasingly been interpreted as a distinct discipline of art subject to extensive analysis, discussions, and scrutiny with its various aspects. In general, the primary focus of the critic was based on textual analysis to encourage the evolution of modern Turkish theatre. In the 1960s, with the declaration of the 1961 Constitution, the concepts of democracy, human rights and personal liberties influenced the political functions of the theatre. Following those years, the search for new forms became more important. While epic theatre was considered as the basic element of public’s revolutionary ideals, dramatic theatre was considered the symbol of bourgeois ideals.

The years between 1960 and 1980 were a period in which both critics and artists questioned and examined concepts of nationality and universality, as well as concepts of socialist theatre, public theatre and populist theatre.

When we examine criticism from the 1980s to the present, we see that the picture that emerges does not have the same dynamics, colours and vibes. The main reasons for this are coups, oppressive education, freedom restrictions, social turbulences… 



References

  • Akalan, Ayperi. “Sanat ve Politika İlişkisi.” Yön 74, May, 1963. google scholar
  • Akarsu, Günay. “Halk ve Tiyatrosu.” Gelecek 2, June, 1971. google scholar
  • And, Metin. Ataç Tiyatroda. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, 1982. google scholar
  • Baltacıoğlu, İsmail Hakkı. “Türkiye’nin Tiyatro Davası.” Hürses, September 25, 1953. google scholar
  • Berk, Adnan. “Bizde Tiyatro Yazarı Yoksa Bundan Edebi Heyet Mesuldür.” Dünya, November 25, 1955. google scholar
  • Berk, Nurullah. “Tenkit Ahlakımız.” Varlık, August, 1959. google scholar
  • Bezirci, Asım. Nurullah Ataç: Yaşamı, Kişiliği, Eleştiri Anlayışı, Yazıları. Istanbul: Varlık Yayınları, 1983. google scholar
  • Ertuğrul, Muhsin. “Çizmeden Yukarı.” Küçük Sahne Dergisi 5, November, 1953. google scholar
  • Ertuğrul, Muhsin. “Halka İnmek Değil, Halkı Yükseltmek.” Vakit, October 2, 1925. google scholar
  • Ertuğrul, Muhsin. “İhtisas İşi.” Darülbedayi Dergisi 2, March, 1930. google scholar
  • Fuat, Memet. “Sanat Politika İlişkisi.” Yön 75, May, 1963. google scholar
  • Oğuz, Şükran. “Tanzimat Döneminde Mizah ve Diyojen Gazetesi.” MA Thesis, Balıkesir University, 1998. google scholar
  • Sevengil, Refik Ahmet. “Tanzimat Tiyatrosu.” Hadika Gazetesi 33, 27 Şevval 1289 / Miladi January 8, 1873. google scholar
  • Sevengil, Refik Ahmet. “Tanzimat Tiyatrosu.” İbret Gazetesi, 2 Sefer 1290 / Miladi March 11, 1873. google scholar
  • Sevengil, Refik Ahmet. “Tanzimat Tiyatrosu: Namık Kemal ‘Mukaddeme-i Celal’.” Mecmua-i Ebü-z Ziya 43, Hijri 1302/Miladi, 1884. google scholar


SHARE



Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.