DOI :10.26650/B/ET06.2020.011.06   IUP :10.26650/B/ET06.2020.011.06    Full Text (PDF)

A Core Problem With Human Data Processing: Epistemic Circularity in Action

Mehmet Selim Derindere

Managers are expected to solve critical problems of our society in an efficient manner and in ways so that the problems remain solved. In order to accomplish this, the managers are provided with vast amounts of resources including mountains of data and a wide variety of problem-solving methods available. On the other hand, the effectiveness of social and organizational problem solving is far from satisfactory and this lack of effectiveness is ubiquitous. One reason for this ineffectiveness we claim has to do with how the human mind works. The inherent capabilities and limitations of human mind coupled with social-cognitive skills lead to sub-par problem-solving. An especially counterproductive problem-solving approach used by managers is setting and attempting to solve problems using erroneous cognitive skills that not only fails to include relevant data but also uses the existing data in a counterproductive manner. The very data processing skills of managers make problem-solving a dead end for the actors involved at great cost to them and to the society. This chapter looks at a core human data processing problem that renders the available data and techniques ineffective. Epistemic Circularity disregards all the disconfirming or threatening data and fails to include it in the problem solution. Epistemic Circularity thus renders the relevant data useless in developing effective solutions. Easy knowledge, a product of epistemic circularity, leads to ineffective problem solving which in many cases result in exacerbated problems and counterproductive consequences.


  • Ackoff, R. L. (1967). Management misinformation systems. Management Science, 14(4), 147–156. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, Learning and Action: Individual and Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (1987). Bridging economics and psychology: The case of the economic theory of the firm. American Psychologist, 42(5), 456–463. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (1988). Crafting a Theory of Practice: The Case of Organizational Paradoxes. In Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 137–162). Cambridge , MA: Ballinger. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching Smart People How to Learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 4–15. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for Action A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and Rationalizations. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (2007). Double Loop Learning in Organizations: A Theory of Action View. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development (1st Editio, p. 624). Boston: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Argyris, C. (2010). Organizational Traps: Leadership, Culture, Organizational Design. In Organizational Traps: Leadership, Culture, Organizational Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action Science (1st Editio). New York: Jossey-Bass, Inc. google scholar
  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning : A Theory of Action Perspective. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing. google scholar
  • Arieli, D., Friedman, V. J., & Agbaria, K. (2009). The paradox of participation in action research. Action Research, 7(3), 263–290. google scholar
  • Bergmann, M. (2006). Justification Without Awareness: A Defense of Epistemic Externalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
  • Bondy, P., & Delaplante, K. (2011). Against epistemic circularity. In OSSA Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1–8). Windsor. google scholar
  • Burns, J. C., & Okey, J. R. (1985). Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 167–177. google scholar
  • Dent, E. B. (2003). The Interactional Model: an Alternative To the Direct Cause and Effect Construct for Mutually Causal Organizational Phenomena. Foundations of Science, 8, 295–314. google scholar
  • Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344. google scholar
  • Friedman, V. J. (2001). Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice. Handbook of Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 131–143. google scholar
  • Hasenfeld, Y., & Furman, W. (1994). Intervention research as an interorganizational exchange. In Intervention research: Design and development for human service (pp. 297–311). google scholar
  • Heisenberg, W. (1972). Physics and beyond : encounters and conversations. New York: Harper & Row. google scholar
  • Jenkins, C. S. I. (2011). Reflective Knowledge and Epistemic Circularity. Philosophical Papers, 40(3), 305–325. google scholar
  • Knight, F. H. (2014). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (2014 Repri). Cambridge: Pantianos Classics. google scholar
  • Le Fevre, D. M., & Robinson, V. (2015). The Interpersonal Challenges of Instructional Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 58–95. google scholar
  • Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135–160. google scholar
  • Mintzberg, H. (2005). Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. google scholar
  • Popper, K. R. (2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (2nd Editio). google scholar
  • Razer, M., & Friedman, V. J. (2016). From Exclusion to Excellence: Building Restorative Relationships to Create Inclusive Schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. google scholar
  • Robinson, V., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner Research for Educators. California: Corwin Press. google scholar
  • Rudolph, J. W., Taylor, S. S., & Foldy, E. G. (2001). Collaborative Off-Line Reflection: a Way to Develop Skill in Action Science and Action Inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 405–412). London: Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Schmitt, F. F. S. (2004). What Is Wrong with Epistemic Circularity? In Philosophical Issues (Vol. 14, pp. 379– 402). google scholar
  • Schwarz, R. (2013). Smart Leaders, Smarter Teams: how you and your team get unstuck to get results. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Schön, D. A., & Argyris, C. (1992). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness (Revised Ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. google scholar
  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday. google scholar
  • Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, Communications and the Public Interest. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. google scholar
  • Simon, H. A. (1994). Bottleneck of Attention: Connecting Thought with Motivation. In W. D. Spaulding (Ed.), Integrative Views of Motivation, Cognition and Emotion (pp. 1–22). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. google scholar
  • Sperber, D., & Mercier, H. (2017). The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. Penguin UK. google scholar
  • Van Cleve, J. (2003). Is Knowledge Easy--or Impossible? Externalism as the Only Alternative to Skepticism. In S. Luper (Ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Hampshire: Ashgate. google scholar
  • Vogel, J. (1987). Tracking, Closure, and Inductive Knowledge. In S. Luper-Foy (Ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics (pp. 197–215). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. google scholar
  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: Norton. google scholar
  • Watzlawick, Paul. (1977). How real is real? Confusion, disinformation, communication. New York: Vintage Books. google scholar
  • Watzlawick, Paul. (1993). The Situation Is Hopeless But Not Serious. New York: W.W Norton & Company Inc. google scholar
  • Watzlawick, Paul, Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (2011). Change: Principles of Problem Formulation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W Norton & Company Inc. google scholar
  • Wolfberg, A., & Dixon, N. M. (2000). Speaking Truth to Power: Nurturing a Reflective Culture at the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency. Reflections, 7(4), 1–13. google scholar
  • Wright, J. C. (1962). Consistency and complexity of response sequences as a function of schedules of noncontingent reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 601–609. google scholar


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.