Research Article


DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002    Full Text (PDF)

Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era

Hüseyin Gürsel Bilmiş

The renovations/regulations in the institutional structure of Ottoman State that started with the Tanzimat Era required/ brought out a novel organization. In the process, Hassa Mimarlar Ocağı (The Corps of Royal Architects), the active institution of the Ottoman architecture during the classical period and till the early 19th century, gave its place to the Ebniye İdaresi (Directorate of Buildings), handing over all sorts of building and construction works to the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality). Henceforth, with new regulations at certain intervals, the Ebniye Kanunları (Building Laws) were introduced in an effort to inspect the construction activities. As the most eminent figures of the era, Ebniye master builders became responsible for all stages of construction production processes within the architectural activities. Despite the fact that educated architects started to emerge together with the introduction of the first architecture school, both local and non-Muslim contractors, architects and master builders from abroad remained as the dominant actors till the early 20th century due to the scarcity of schooled ones. 

This study reviews the qualitative issues of the ebniye master builders who carried out the construction processes of civil and state buildings, with samples from central and provincial cases based on a number of documents found in the Ottoman Archives. Quality and standard issues in the construction materials of the era together with the troublesome construction activities causing technical and financial problems between the master builders and employers were cited by certain contemporary master builders. As a result of the petitions of master builders stating their troubles and proposed solutions, and the efforts of the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality), it was decided that a şehadetname (construction building testimonial) would be issued to ebniye masterbuilders; however, the method was abandoned after its application for a while.

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002    Full Text (PDF)

Osmanlı’nın Son Döneminde Ebniye Kalfalarına Yapı İnşa İzni Verilmesi

Hüseyin Gürsel Bilmiş

Osmanlı Devleti’nin kurumsal yapısında Tanzimat dönemi ile başlayan iyileştirmeler/düzenlemeler, yeni bir teşkilatlanma gerektirmiştir. Bu süreçte Osmanlı mimarisinin klasik dönem ile 19. yüzyıl başlarına kadar etkin kurumu olan Hassa mimarlar ocağı, yerini Ebniye İdaresi’ne bırakmış, her türlü imar ve inşa işleri Şehremaneti’ne devredilmiştir. Bunu takiben belirli aralıklarla yapılan yeni düzenlemelerle Ebniye Kanunları çıkarılarak inşa faaliyetleri denetim altına alınmaya çalışılmıştır. Mimari faaliyetlerde dönemin en önemli aktörleri olarak ebniye kalfaları, yapı üretim sürecinin tüm aşamalarından sorumlu kişiler hâline gelmişlerdir. İlk mimarlık okulunun açılmasıyla eğitimli mimarlar yetişmeye başlamışsa da bunların sayılarının azlığı nedeniyle hem yerel hem de dışarıdan gelen gayrimüslim müteahhit, mimar ve kalfalar 20. yüzyıl başlarına kadar Osmanlı mimari faaliyetlerinin başat unsurları olmuşlardır.

Bu çalışmada, Osmanlı Arşivi’nde tespit edilen bazı belgeler ile sivil ve kamu yapılarının inşa süreçlerini yürüten ebniye kalfalarının niteliksel sorunları merkez ve taşra örneğinde ele alınmıştır. Dönemin yapı malzemelerinde meydana gelen kalite ve standart sorunları ile dönemin kalfalarının teknik ve mali açıdan işverenle sıkıntı yaşamalarına sebep olan sorunlu inşa faaliyetleri, yine aynı dönemin bir grup kalfası tarafından dile getirilmiştir. Kalfaların mevcut sorunları ve bunların çözümüne yönelik önerilerini belirttikleri dilekçeleri ile Şehremaneti’nin bu yöndeki çalışmaları sonucunda ebniye kalfalarına bir sınav ile şehadetname (yapı inşa izni ruhsatı) verilmesi kararlaştırılmış, bir süre uygulama imkânı bulan bu yöntem daha sonra terk edilmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Master builder, a key factor in the construction production within the Ottoman architectural organization, is described with similar explanations in the terminology. Accordingly, a master builder such as a bricklayer master builder or a joiner master builder, is an assistant figure ranked between an apprentice and a master. In the modern sense, he is an assistant architect who acquires expertise and enforces the projects of the architects in the field. In the Ottoman era, the term was used to address the head person and technical inspector of various worker groups in a construction site. In that sense, he is an assistant and implementing person responsible to the ebniye khalifa.  

Construction production at various architectural styles and techniques began to rise together with the increasing innovation movements in the Tanzimat. Efforts were made to overcome this period in an environment where the number of well trained and qualified master builders/masters/architects was limited. Regarding the increased construction activities after the Tanzimat, the deterioration of the construction material standards (in terms of price, quality, measure, diameter, etc.) and the troubles caused by unskilled people with no construction knowledge, which is understood to have been common at the time, were reported officially by a group of master builders before the First Constitutional Period. The main resources of the study are archival documents, some of which will be put forth for the first time in this study, and the cases that were published in the central and provincial press. This study mentions the carried-out works/prepared plans based on the records and requests of the non-Muslim master builders who triggered the process of exams requirement for the construction master builders in the late Ottoman architectural organization. The obstacles to the application of exams to master builders/architects are presented within the frame of the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality) and the Şûrâ-yı Devlet (Council of State) decisions, and the effects of this situation are exemplified with a Bursa case. 

A group of non-Muslim Joiner Master Builders submitted their complaints with regards to one of the most significant issues of the era in the construction sector and proposals towards its solution with a petition to the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality) in the late 1875. Shortly, the content of the petition consists of the problems led by disqualified master builders working in the construction and the construction material standards of the era. As reported, some master builders working in the sector at the time were doing the pricing at their own discretion, causing financial harms to both public and state treasury, and the building owners were having arguments with the joiners for days due to their losses.

The diameters, measures, costs of bricks, wood, and all the materials to be used in the Capital and the provinces were determined by erbab-ı vukuf (experts) till that time, and all the materials were manufactured, priced and delivered accordingly. However, it was stated that the abovementioned method was not followed during those dates, and people manufactured improper woods, erratic bricks and all kinds of other materials in a similar manner without paying attention to the measurements. The master builders who presented the petitions in order to avoid having such issues asked for a set-up of a guild and a chamberlain to be assigned for the joiners as for the other craftsmen.

Upon the demand of the master builders, the certificate prepared by the Şehremaneti Keşif İdaresi (Istanbul Municipality Directorate of Surveys) was assessed by the Şehremaneti (İstanbul Municipality). Troublesome master builders were not knowledgeable enough to prepare building plans and they were not known by the Şehremaneti İdaresi (Istanbul Municipality Directorate) themselves and were not acknowledged officially in the bureaucratic system. Even though these illegal buildings constructed by those incompetent people were located and interfered with, that was not enough due to the weakness of sanction power of the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality). Another problem was the lack of trustworthy and experienced master builders in the surveys and contracts of works given by the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality). That problem had to be resolved by introducing regulations in order to prevent such cases. In this way, the surveys and contracts of construction activities would be done as it was supposed to be. 

In accordance with the schema prepared by the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality) towards the solution of these problems, an exam would be carried out under the supervision of a commission. Master builders would be classified into three groups according to the results of the exam. Since the constructions they were going to undertake were to be different from each other in terms of their size, the first group of master builders would be superior to the second group, and the second group would be superior to the third one. Taking their superiority over each other and providing a guarantor, these people would be given grants for constructions. Sealed/approved by the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality), sample copies of the documents containing the name/record, hometown, and place of residence of the master builder would be registered to a special account book. The names of those people acknowledged by the exam would be announced in the newspapers so that they would be known by the public. In the event that a dispute occured between the acknowledged master builders and building owners, these issues would be dealt with by the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality). If the buildings were contracted to a joiner who did not have a grant or to a person from another group, and the building owner suffered a loss, then those cases would not be considered by the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality). If unauthorized joiners or other people attempted to construct, they would be fined. The purpose of the announcement that the state would not consider cases about constructions contracted to unauthorized master builders was to direct the public to reliable and skilled master builders. One of the obstructions in the achievement of this objective was the problem of finding qualified staff in the construction sector. Although this practice was designed in this manner, the allocation of construction works only to master builders who passed the exam and granted allowance to build would pose a problem for those who did not take the exam even if they were skilled.

The requirement of an exam for master builders in the Capital had similar effects in the provinces as well. A piece of news dated 1892 revealed that the architectural environment in Bursa at the time was not so different from the Capital, and this situation was closely being monitored and voiced by the press. According to the newspaper, master builders in Bursa were supposed to taking such an exam. As all residents and even the visitors of the city knew/saw, the existence of (incomplete) buildings with framed and covered wood on the streets was a evidence of the presence of unqualified master builders who could not make the projects according to the provided budget due to poor financial planning and, thereby, leaving the constructions unfinished.

Even though the practice of authorization of the ebniye master builders via an exam was accomplished, it fell through in practice. Despite the fact that Sultan Abdulhamid II asked for the formation of an exam commission and holding the exams again, the Şehremaneti (Istanbul Municipality) did not make any attempts for that, and the task was decelerated. In 1909, the Şûrâ-yı Devlet (Council of State) discussed granting a diploma to unlicensed architects and master builders disclosing their capabilities with an exam and a fee considering their levels, taking into account the fact that the banning of those without a grant from construction would cause a social problem in terms of maintaining and supporting a family. Ultimately, the Şûrâ-yı Devlet (Council of State) abandoned the exam practice and arrived at the conclusion that a certain amount of fees would be charged merely from the master builders who would prove their skills by applying to the Sanayi-i Nefise Mektebi (Academy of Fine Arts).


PDF View

References

  • Akpolat, Mustafa S. “Tanzimat Sonrası Osmanlı Mimarlığı”, Türkler Ansiklopedisi. c. 15. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002, 350-359. google scholar
  • Akyürek, Göksun. Bilgiyi Yeniden İnşa Etmek: Tanzimat Döneminde Mimarlık, Bilgi ve İktidar. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 2011. google scholar
  • Batur, Afife. “Batılışma Döneminde Osmanlı Mimarlığı,” Tanzimat'tan Cumhuriyet'e Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, 4. cilt. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1985, 1038-1067. google scholar
  • Bilmiş, Hüseyin Gürsel. “Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e Bursa’da Mimarlık Ortamı.” Doktora Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, 2019. google scholar
  • Bursa Gazetesi. No. 90. 12 Rebiülevvel 1310 (4 Ekim 1892), 3. google scholar
  • Can, Cengiz. “İstanbul’da 19. Yüzyıl Batılı ve Levanten Mimarların Yapıları ve Koruma Sorunları.” Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 1992. google scholar
  • Can, Selman. Bilinmeyen Aktörleri ve Olayları İle Son Dönem Osmanlı Mimarlığı. İstanbul: Erzurum İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü, 2010. google scholar
  • Can, Selman. “Sultan Abdülmecid Dönemi Mimarlık Örgütünün Yapısı ve İşleyişi.” Sultan Abdülmecid ve Dönemi (1823-1861), Ed. Kemal Kahraman ve İlona Baytar. İstanbul: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür AŞ. Yayınları, 2015, 422-31. google scholar
  • Cezar, Mustafa. Sanatta Batı’ya Açılış ve Osman Hamdi. İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları, 1971. google scholar
  • Düstur 1. Tertib. 4. cilt (İstanbul: Mahmud Bey Matbaası, 1299), 553-560. google scholar
  • Düstur 1. Tertib. 6. cilt (Ankara: Devlet Matbaası, 1939), 1038-1053. google scholar
  • Fındıklıgil Doğuoğlu, Meryem Müzeyyen. “19. Yüzyıl İstanbul’unda Alman Mimari Etkinliği.” Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 2002. google scholar
  • Hamiyet. Birinci sene, numro 11. 15 Eylül 1302 Pazartesi (27 Eylül 1886), 81-82. google scholar
  • Kuran, Aptullah. “19.Yüzyıl Osmanlı Mimarisi”, Selçuklular'dan Cumhuriyet'e Türkiye'de Mimarlık. Haz. Çiğdem Kafescioğlu, Lucienne Thys Şenocak ve Timur Kuran. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2018, 604-611. google scholar
  • Kuzucu, Kemalettin. “1892 Yılında Yaşanan Bir İnşaat Faciası ve Devlet”, Osmanlı İstanbulu IV. İstanbul: İstanbul 29 Mayıs Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2016, 171-204. google scholar
  • Küçükalioğlu Özkılıç, Sema. “1894 Depreminin İstanbul Üzerindeki Etkileri (Deprem Sonrası İmar Faaliyetleri.” Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, 2011. google scholar
  • Ortaylı, İlber. Türkiye Teşkilat ve İdare Tarihi. Ankara: Cedit Neşriyat, 2016. google scholar
  • Şemsettin Sami. Kamus-u Türkî. Dersaadet: İkdam Matbaası, 1317, 1454. google scholar
  • Sönmez, Neslihan. Osmanlı Dönemi Yapı ve Malzeme Terimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: YEM Yayınları, 1997. google scholar
  • Şenyurt, Oya. “1800-1950 Yılları Arasında İstanbul’da Faaliyet Gösteren Rum Mimarlar.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 2002. google scholar
  • Şenyurt, Oya. “Geç Osmanlı’da İnşaat Örgütlenmesi ve İnşaat Alanının Aktörleri: Gayrimüslimler”. Mimar Kemalettin ve Çağı: Mimarlık/Toplumsal Yaşam/Politika. Ankara: TMMOB-VGM, 2007, 67-80. google scholar
  • Şenyurt, Oya. “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Son Dönemlerinde ‘Hâssa Başmimarları’.” TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi 2/4 (2009): 489-503. google scholar
  • Şenyurt, Oya. Osmanlı Mimarlık Örgütlenmesinde Değişim ve Dönüşüm. İstanbul: Doğu Kitabevi, 2011. google scholar
  • Turan, Şerafettin. “Osmanlı Teşkilatında Hassa Mimarları.” Ankara Üniversitesi DTCF Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi I (1963): 159-202. google scholar
  • Ürekli, Fatma. İstanbul'da 1894 Depremi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1999. google scholar
  • Yavuz, Mehmet. “19. Yüzyıl Sonu 20. Yüzyıl Başlarında İstanbul’da Alman Mimarların Yaptıkları Mimari Eserler.” Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, 2001. google scholar
  • Yavuz, Mehmet. “Osmanlı’da Alman Mimarlar ve Eserleri”, Türkler Ansiklopedisi. c. 15. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, 2002, 400-411. google scholar
  • Yavuz, Mehmet. “Mimar August Jasmund Hakkında Bilmediklerimiz.” Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 8 (2004): 181-205. google scholar
  • Yazıcı Metin, Nurcan. Tanzimat'tan Cumhuriyet'e Hükümet Konaklarının İnşa Süreci ve Mimarisi-Devlet Kapısı. İstanbul: Kitabevi Yayınları, 2019. google scholar
  • Yazıcı Metin, Nurcan. “Osmanlı'da Mimarlık Kurumunun Evrimi ve Tanzimat Dönemi Mimarlık Ortamı.” Doktora Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, 2007. google scholar
  • Yıldıran, Neşe. “İstanbul’da II. Abdülhamid Dönemi (1876-1908) Mimarisi.” Doktora Tezi, Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, 1989. google scholar
  • Başkanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) Şura-yı Devlet (ŞD); 684/25.6.1. (Muhtemelen 1875 sonları). google scholar
  • 684/25.5.1. 29 L 1292, (28 Kasım 1875). ŞD.684/25.5.2. 29 L 1292, (28 Kasım 1875). google scholar
  • ŞD.684/25.4.1. 3 Za 1292, (1 Aralık 1875). ŞD.684/25.3.1. 15 Za 1292, (13 Aralık 1875). ŞD.684/25.1.1. 30 Za 1292, (28 Aralık 1875). ŞD.684/25.1.2. 30 Za 1292, (28 Aralık 1875). google scholar
  • Başkanlık Osmanlı Arşivi (BOA) Dahiliye Mektubi Kalemi (DH.MKT); 2754/3.1.1. 12 M 1327, (3 Şubat 1909). google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Bilmiş, H.G. (2020). Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era. Art-Sanat, 0(14), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


AMA

Bilmiş H G. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era. Art-Sanat. 2020;0(14):17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


ABNT

Bilmiş, H.G. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 14, p. 17-38, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Bilmiş, Hüseyin Gürsel,. 2020. “Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 14: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


Chicago: Humanities Style

Bilmiş, Hüseyin Gürsel,. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 14 (May. 2021): 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


Harvard: Australian Style

Bilmiş, HG 2020, 'Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 14, pp. 17-38, viewed 9 May. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Bilmiş, H.G. (2020) ‘Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era’, Art-Sanat, 0(14), pp. 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002 (9 May. 2021).


MLA

Bilmiş, Hüseyin Gürsel,. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 14, 2020, pp. 17-38. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


Vancouver

Bilmiş HG. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 9 May. 2021 [cited 9 May. 2021];0(14):17-38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002 doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002


ISNAD

Bilmiş, HüseyinGürsel. Construction Grant for Ebniye Master Builders in The Late Ottoman Era”. Art-Sanat 0/14 (May. 2021): 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26650/artsanat.2020.14.0002



TIMELINE


Submitted15.03.2020
Accepted11.07.2020
Published Online31.07.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.