Review Article


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042    Full Text (PDF)

Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements

Ulaş Başar Gezgin

Considering the omnipresence, omniscience and omnipotence of big data as the upgraded big brother, any resistance appears to be in vain. However, pessimistic accounts usually revolve on a model of a citizen as an individual. This atomized version of citizenship underestimates the power of citizens’ social solidarity networks which can be as traditional as nuclear or extended families or as modern as professional organizations and rights movements. However, big data activism and these forms of resistance are rarely connected with each other. In this article, we discuss how to integrate already existing rights organizations with data activism. The following themes are explored for this purpose: Snowden revelations and evolution of state surveillance; digital activism and data activism; and data activism and critical citizenship education. The notion of ‘critical’ citizenship education rather than citizenship education is mobilized in our reflection, since the mainstream, official citizenship education agenda is far from addressing the negative effects of big data and associated double surveillance by the state and corporations. Contrary to a merely theoretical understanding of citizenship, data activism needs to unite its forces with already existing rights movements, including human rights and consumer rights movements as distinguishing components of a critical citizenship. The purpose of this article is to show in what ways citizenship education and consumer rights movements can be integrated and updated within the context of data activism. The introductory section provides the background for the main arguments of the article. The method of this work is critical reflection and a theoretical discussion supported by a survey of a set of relevant research papers. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Our era of surveillance capitalism is characterized by pervasive rather than targeted surveillance. Currently, the big brother is not watching the dissidents but everybody for a tiny probability of disobedience. In the past there were mainly two kinds of surveillance: Physical chase which means undercover agents following the target anti-government figures in person and technical chase which mostly corresponds to phone taps. However nowadays there is no need for physical chase, as technical chase replaced it and expanded the areas and ‘opportunities’ of surveillance through ubiquitous surveillance devices including CCTVs, mobile tracking, net tracking etc. 

Citizenship education offered in schools that can form the basis of antisurveillance activism is usually from the governments’ perspective. A critical sense of citizenship is rarely promoted in these official contexts. Thus, acquisition of critical citizenship consciousness is usually through peer learning at informal and nonformal settings. In many countries, adults and especially young adults join protests, and usually they acquire citizenship education skills and knowledge in a blended way whereby offline and online political activisms support each other. Thus ICTs usually utilized for entertainment are educationalized to serve the pedagogical interests of the citizens. They learn more on social media about citizenship education than the formal citizenship education courses. 

We should reflect on informal and non-formal forms of critical citizenship education via ICTs including but not only limited to social media platforms. We propose that in order not to formalize and institutionalize citizens’ actively acquired critical citizenship skills and knowledge, the disconnect between formal non-critical, official forms of citizenship education and informal, non-formal, blended and citizen-based critical citizenship education should continue. Under the funding of governments or corporations, the criticality of citizenship education will be limited. That is why, citizens should support and develop their own citizenship initiatives and resources in both online and offline settings. The citizen and consumer rights movements are the perfect matches for such an endeavor. 

In the case of activist uses of social media, a remarkable point is the fact that most of the Internet users voluntarily release personal information on the web. They are fulfilling their needs for recognition, reputation, socialization etc. Thus, activist use of social media should be able to identify the motivations behind voluntary release of personal information and be cautious about what to share and not to share on social media. This brings up the notion of social media literacy. However, since social media literacy is not necessarily critical, as it may develop on the basis of conservative reactions to the corruption of traditional society by the influence of computers and internet, this literacy should be critical. Hence we have the term ‘critical social media literacy’ as a better match. 

Even under ubiquitous surveillance capitalism, either through literacies or by other means, we should still find the ways to resist. Citizen data activism can be about surveilling the corporate surveillers themselves. Data activist citizens can feed a website with corporate surveillance practices that they find unethical. Unlike the government who justifies surveillance on the basis of security, corporations have no excuse for surveilling other than maximizing profits. Under pre-big-data capitalism, a number of initiatives were successful to protect and promote consumer rights. For citizen data activism, those websites need upgrades to surveil the surveillers.  

Citizen data activism should be in close collaboration with citizen science movements which capitalize on crowdsourcing for scientific purposes. We need to develop alternatives to surveillers by collecting and interpreting our own data –to break ‘the monopoly of interpretation’ as stated previously. 

We urge data activists and rights movements to unite their forces for mutual benefit. The search on Google Scholar for ‘data activism’ and ‘consumer rights’ bring out almost no results. Same holds for ‘data activism’ and ‘rights movements’, and for ‘data activism’ and ‘social solidarity’, while a higher number of results are listed for ‘data activism’ and ‘human rights’ although the number is far from satisfactory considering the possible links between the two. This picture clearly shows that the links mentioned here are uncharted and understudied. 

To conclude, the resistance against big data, the new big brother is not in vain and neither hopeless. Instead, there are potentials not even utilized and links not considered. Through this article on data activism, our hope has been to show a way of resistance to be argued, elaborated on and ultimately evaluated in terms of its merits and demerits by the decision makers of the rights movements.


PDF View

References

  • Arora, P. (2019). Decolonizing privacy studies. Television & New Media, 20(4), 366-378. google scholar
  • Arora, P. (2016). Bottom of the data pyramid: Big data and the global south. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1681-1699. google scholar
  • Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/2053951715594634 google scholar
  • Barnhizer, D. (2013). Through a prism darkly: Surveillance and speech suppression in the ‘post-democracy electronic state’. Retrieved from http://docshare01.docshare.tips/files/17756/177568199.pdf google scholar
  • Biesta, G. (2009). What kind of citizenship for European higher education? Beyond the competent active citizen. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 146-158. google scholar
  • Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436-1437. google scholar
  • Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Liu, Q. (2013). Effective game based citizenship education in the age of new media. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11(1), 16-28. google scholar
  • Chenou, J. M., & Cepeda-Másmela, C. (2019). # NiUnaMenos: Data Activism From the Global South. Television & New Media, 20(4), 396-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476419828995 google scholar
  • Chu, D. S. (2018). Media Use and Protest Mobilization: A Case Study of Umbrella Movement Within Hong Kong Schools. Social Media+Society, 4(1), 1-11. google scholar
  • Colardyn, D., & Bjornavold, J. (2004). Validation of Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Learning: policy and practices in EU Member States 1. European Journal of Education, 39(1), 69-89. google scholar
  • Cox, J., Oh, E. Y., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Masters, K., Greenhill, A., Graham, G. & Holmes, K. (2015). Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: A case study of Zooniverse projects. Computing in Science & Engineering, 17(4), 28-41. google scholar
  • Creemers, R. (2018). China’s Social Credit System: An evolving practice of control. Retrieved from http://www. iberchina.org/files/2018/social_credit_china.pdf google scholar
  • De Ville, J. (2010). Revisiting Plato’s Pharmacy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 23(3), 315-338. google scholar
  • Degli Esposti, S. (2014). When big data meets dataveillance: The hidden side of analytics. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 209. google scholar
  • Dencik, L., & Cable, J. (2017). The advent of surveillance realism: Public opinion and activist responses to the Snowden leaks. International Journal of Communication, 11, 763-781. google scholar
  • Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Cable, J. (2016). Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679678 google scholar
  • Ekbia, H., Mattioli, M., Kouper, I., Arave, G., Ghazinejad, A., Bowman, T., ... & Sugimoto, C. R. (2015). Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(8), 1523-1545. google scholar
  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113-136. google scholar
  • Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677 google scholar
  • George, J., & Leidner, D. (2018). Digital Activism: a Hierarchy of Political Commitment. Retrieved from https:// scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/50176/1/paper0289.pdf google scholar
  • Goode, L. (2015). Anonymous and the political ethos of hacktivism. Popular Communication, 13(1), 74-86. google scholar
  • Gray, J. (2015). Democratising the Data Revolution: A Discussion Paper. Retrieved from https://assets.okfn.org/ files/reports/DemocratisingDataRevolution.pdf google scholar
  • Gray, J., Gerlitz, C., & Bounegru, L. (2018). Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1-13. https://dx.doi. org/10.1177/2053951718786316 google scholar
  • Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6-30. google scholar
  • Gurin, J. (2014). Big Data and Open Data: How Open Will the Future Be. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 10(3), 691-704. google scholar
  • Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open government and democracy: A research review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540-555. google scholar
  • Hintz, A., & Dencik, L. (2016). The politics of surveillance policy: UK regulatory dynamics after Snowden. Internet Policy Review, 5(3), 1-16. google scholar
  • Hogan, M., & Shepherd, T. (2015). Information ownership and materiality in an age of big data surveillance. Journal of Information Policy, 5, 6-31. google scholar
  • Jordan, T. (2007). Online direct action: Hacktivism and radical democracy. In Radical democracy and the internet (pp. 73-88). Palgrave Macmillan, London. google scholar
  • Kara, N. (2018). Understanding University Students’ Thoughts and Practices about Digital Citizenship: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 172-185. google scholar
  • Keating, A., & Melis, G. (2017). Social media and youth political engagement: Preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth?. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 877-894. google scholar
  • Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340-357. google scholar
  • Kotska, G. (2018). China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Genia_ google scholar
  • Kostka Lewis, S. C., & Westlund, O. (2015). Big data and journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital journalism, 3(3), 447-466. google scholar
  • Lim, C. P. (2008). Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning Mathematics, English and Science as a global citizen. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1073-1093. google scholar
  • Lim, K. Y., & Ong, M. Y. (2012). The Rise of Li’Ttledot: A study of citizenship education through game-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1420-1432. google scholar
  • Madden, M., Gilman, M., Levy, K., & Marwick, A. (2017). Privacy, poverty, and Big Data: A matrix of vulnerabilities for poor Americans. Washington University Law Review, 95(1), 53-125. google scholar
  • Mattoni, A. (2018). From data extraction to data leaking. Data-activism in Italian and Spanish anti-corruption campaigns. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(3), 723-746. google scholar
  • McCaffrey, G. (2016). Compassion, Necessity, and the Pharmakon of the Health Humanities. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics. Retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/index google scholar
  • Meng, A., DiSalvo, C., Tsui, L., & Best, M. (2019). The social impact of open government data in Hong Kong: Umbrella Movement protests and adversarial politics. The Information Society, 35(4), 216-228. https://dx.doi. org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1613464 google scholar
  • Michaelsen, M. (2017). Far Away, So Close: Transnational Activism, Digital Surveillance and Authoritarian Control in Iran. Surveillance & Society, 15(3/4), 465-470. google scholar
  • Milan, S. (2016). Data activism as the new frontier of media activism. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/ download/40974104/media-activism-chapter-v2-SENT.pdf google scholar
  • Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Citizens’ media meets big data: The emergence of data activism. Mediaciones, 11(14), 120-133. google scholar
  • Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big Data from the south (s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319-335. google scholar
  • Milan, S., & Trere, E. (2017). Big Data from the South: The Beginning of a Conversation We Must Have. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/54804190/BigDatafromtheSouth-SSRN.pdf google scholar
  • Milan, S., & Van Der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57-74. google scholar
  • Morva, O. (2013). An alternative way of political criticism: the Redhack team as a case study for hacktivism. In Breaking the media value chain. VII International Conference on Communication and Reality (pp. 477-484). Facultat de Comunicació Blanquerna. google scholar
  • Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304. google scholar
  • Pohle, J., & Van Audenhove, L. (2017). Post-Snowden internet policy: between public outrage, resistance and policy change. Media and Communication, 5(1), 1-6. google scholar
  • Polat, B., Bakıroğlu, C. T., & Sayın, M. E. D. (2013). Hactivism in Turkey: the case of Redhack. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(9), 628-636. google scholar
  • Pybus, J., Coté, M., & Blanke, T. (2015). Hacking the social life of Big Data. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1-10. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053951715616649 google scholar
  • Rajão, R., & Jarke, J. (2018). The materiality of data transparency and the (re) configuration of environmental activism in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 318-332. google scholar
  • Ribeiro, A. B., Rodrigues, M., Caetano, A., Pais, S., & Menezes, I. (2012). Promoting” Active Citizens”? The Critical Vision of NGOs over Citizenship Education as an Educational Priority across Europe. International Journal of Progressive Education, 8(3), 32-47. google scholar
  • Romele, A., Gallino, F., Emmenegger, C., & Gorgone, D. (2017). Panopticism is not Enough: Social Media as Technologies of Voluntary Servitude. Surveillance and Society, 15(2), 204-221. google scholar
  • San Chee, Y., Tan, E. M., & Liu, Q. (2010, April). Statecraft X: Enacting citizenship education using a mobile learning game played on Apple iPhones. In Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (WMUTE), 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 222-224). IEEE. google scholar
  • Segura, M. S., & Waisbord, S. (2019). Between Data Capitalism and Data Citizenship. Television & New Media, 20(4), 412-419. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476419834519 google scholar
  • Steinfeld, N. (2017). Track me, track me not: Support and consent to state and private sector surveillance. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1663-1672. google scholar
  • Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 1-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335 google scholar
  • Treré, E. (2017). Distorsiones tecnopolíticas: represión y resistencia algorítmica del activismo ciudadano en la era del big data. Trípodos, 39, 35-51. google scholar
  • Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS Bulletin, 47(1), 127-138. google scholar
  • Tupper, J. (2014). Social Media and the Idle No More Movement: Citizenship, Activism and Dissent in Canada. Journal of Social Science Education, 13(4), 87-94. google scholar
  • van der Vlist, F. N. (2017). Counter-Mapping Surveillance: A Critical Cartography of Mass Surveillance Technology After Snowden. Surveillance & Society, 15(1), 137-157. google scholar
  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Gezgin, U. (2019). Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(56), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


AMA

Gezgin U. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2019;0(56):67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


ABNT

Gezgin, U. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 56, p. 67-86, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar,. 2019. “Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 56: 67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar,. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 56 (Nov. 2022): 67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


Harvard: Australian Style

Gezgin, U 2019, 'Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 56, pp. 67-86, viewed 27 Nov. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gezgin, U. (2019) ‘Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(56), pp. 67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042 (27 Nov. 2022).


MLA

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar,. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 56, 2019, pp. 67-86. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


Vancouver

Gezgin U. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 27 Nov. 2022 [cited 27 Nov. 2022];0(56):67-86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042


ISNAD

Gezgin, Ulaş Başar. Data Activism: Reviving, Extending and Upgrading Critical Citizenship Education and Consumer Rights Movements”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/56 (Nov. 2022): 67-86. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2018-0042



TIMELINE


Submitted24.01.2019
Accepted25.04.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.