Research Article


DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006    Full Text (PDF)

Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps

Sezer Ahmet Kına

Production of common sense assumptions is indispensable for political transformations’ social acceptance. Varied contemporary communication tools and systems have been significant throughout history for production of symbols that shape such transformations. This study is based on the assumption that postage stamps were designed and circulated to introduce Turkey’s Early Republican Period administrative, political, ideological, and economic transformations to its society and the world. Here, representations of stamps’ symbolic power are analyzed through this perspective. Because such representations provide the opportunity to read, through symbols, both the period’s social history and its conflict over political and economic power, the study is framed by Pierre Bourdieu’s understanding of symbolic power. Accordingly, through content analysis, the sample has been triplethematic classified, and symbolic power’s functioning has been critiqued on the following representations of: (i) the nation as an arranged structure, (ii) the founding leader who embodies sensations and insights required by symbolic power, and (iii) national development and construction of the central state. Thus, the stamps’ representations are argued to be informational for both national and international communities. Therefore, these representations are considered prominent as both descriptive missions and commanding functions.

DOI :10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006   IUP :10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006    Full Text (PDF)

Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Simgesel İktidara Bourdieu üzerinden Bakmak: Posta Pulları Örneği

Sezer Ahmet Kına

Siyasal dönüşümlerin, toplumsal bir boyut kazanabilmesi için ortak duyu varsayımları üretimi kaçınılmazdır. Bu dönüşümlere yön veren sembollerin üretimi için dönemin teknik olanaklarının sunduğu iletişim araçlarının ve haberleşme sistemlerinin kullanımı tarih boyunca önem taşımıştır. Bu çalışmada posta pullarının Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde yaşanan yönetimsel, politik, ideolojik ve iktisadi dönüşümlerin topluma ve dünyaya tanıtılması, ayrıca toplumsal karşılığının da olabilmesi amacıyla tasarlandığı ve tedavüle sokulduğu kabulünden yola çıkılmış ve pulların içerdiği simgesel iktidar temsillerine odaklanılmıştır. Temsiller dönemin sosyal tarihi ile siyasal ve iktisadi iktidar mücadelesini semboller üzerinden okuma imkânı verdiğinden çalışma, Pierre Bourdieu’nün simgesel iktidar kavrayışıyla çerçevelenmiştir. Bu doğrultuda yapılan içerik çözümlemesiyle örneklem üzerinden üçlü tematik ayrıma gidilmiş ve simgesel iktidarın işleyişine (i) yapılanmış bir yapı olarak ulusa dair temsiller, (ii) simgesel iktidarın gerektirdiği duyu ve kavrayışın cisimleştiği kurucu liderin temsilleri ve (iii) milli kalkınma hamlesi ve merkezi devlet inşasına dair temsiller üzerinden bakılmıştır. Sonuç olarak Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde yaşanan tarihsel ve toplumsal olaylara ve benimsenen değerlere dair pullardaki temsillerin ulusal ve uluslararası toplumun bilgisine ve kabulüne yönelik olarak sunulduğu tartışılmıştır. Dolayısıyla söz konusu temsillerin hem betimleme misyonlarıyla hem de buyurma işlevleriyle öne çıktığı değerlendirilmiştir.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


One aim of the state’s administration, which controls its citizens’ attitudes by regulating economic, political, cultural, and ideological structures, is to ensure that citizens have a common memory, cultural perception, sense of belonging, and historical imagination. Production of common sense assumptions is indispensable for social acceptance of political and ideological transformations conducted by principal founding powers in state administration. Within this historical phenomenon, founding cadres also used contemporary communication tools and systems to spread to the social base visions of the state, society, and the individual that they had adopted.

Until digitalization spread toward the end of the twentieth century, the post has been a basic tool of public communication in Turkey. Moreover, stamps, used since the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz, have been a crucial tool in the post’s symbolic production. As a material with financial value, stamps, used by both institutions and citizens, with illustrations of conjunctural or historical thematic references, have also played an essential role in conferring certain messages to all the state and society’s components through the motivation for their adoption.

Stamps’ situation during the Early Republican Period —when radical paradigmatic innovations were experienced, and some ruptures and continuities were witnessed in this context— presented meanings that would inspire political and social history studies and even become the object of such studies. This study is based on the assumption that postage stamps were designed and circulated to introduce the Early Republican Period’s administrative, political, ideological, and economic transformations to both Turkish society and the world. Thus, stamps’ symbolic representations of power have been focused from this perspective. While the study was being designed, stamps of the founding period —known in the literature as the Early Republican Period, which began with the proclamation of the Republic and ended with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s death and in which radical reforms were implemented— were determined as the study’s scope. In addition, stamps printed and/or used by the Grand National Assembly’s government during the national liberation struggle, which began in 1919 and prepared for the foundation period, was also included in analysis. Therefore, the entire study sample included the stamps’ representations of symbols of power in circulation from 1920-1938.

Since these representations provide the opportunity to read the time’s historical conflicts for political and economic power through symbols, this study relies on Pierre Bourdieu’s understanding of symbolic power. Developing his understanding of symbolic power over Max Weber’s definitions of charisma and legitimacy and underlining that power’s use therefore requires legitimacy, Bourdieu frames the state as defining principles of physical and symbolic violence with its physical and symbolic power over public order. Therefore, he sees public order not only as a monopoly on physical violence in the Weberian sense but also emphasizes consent and argues that the state monopolizes use of symbolic force.

Indeed, Bourdieu focuses on some symbolic representations while revealing power monopolies’ logical functioning. Arguing that time was built with mental structures, he posits that one of these representations appears as memory. For this reason, this defense, which parallels Bourdieu’s views underlining that nothing is a given in the social and political sphere, offers a significant framework for examining the Early Republican Period’s symbolic power. Because this framework provides the opportunity to examine relations among surrounding actors who have unequal distribution of power, it also reminds us of the relationship’s constructive possibilities, for example, domination, absolutization, and nihilation.

The founding cadre’s reforms implemented during the Early Republican Period reveal the necessity of symbolic power. As this study’s object, stamps also have meaning that represents strife within the context. Strengthening and realizing the claim of such representations may become possible by preparing citizenry for the situation. Accordingly, through content analysis, the sample has been triple classified thematically, and symbolic power’s functioning has been critiqued on the following representations of: (i) the nation as an arranged structure, (ii) the founding leader who embodies sensations and insights required by symbolic power, and (iii) national development and construction of the central state. As a result, representations on the sample’s stamps are argued as being informational for both the national and international communities. Therefore, these representations are considered prominent both as descriptive missions and commanding functions. 


PDF View

References

  • Ağaoğulları, M. Z. & Pabuçcuoğlu, M. B. (2018). Türk pulları kataloğu: 1863-2017 (1st ed.). İstanbul Filateli ve Kültür Merkezi A.Ş. google scholar
  • Akan, M. & Kuran, T. (2019). Türkiye'de postanın mikrotarihi - Cilt 1:1920-1950 (1st ed.). Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. google scholar
  • Akın, Y. (2019). “Gürbüz ve yavuz evlatlar”: Erken Cumhuriyet’te beden terbiyesi ve spor (4th ed.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Alp, Ö. (2016a, December 8). 1921 yılı Türk pulları. http://koleksiyonodasi.com/1921-yili-turk-pullari/ adresinden 12 Nisan 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
  • Alp, Ö. (2016b, December 8). 1922 yılı Türk pulları. http://koleksiyonodasi.com/1922-yili-turk-pullari/ adresinden 12 Nisan 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
  • Alp, Ö. (2016c, December 8). 1924 yılı Türk Pulları. http://koleksiyonodasi.com/1924-yili-turk-pullari/ adresinden 13 Nisan 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
  • Atkinson, P. & Hammersley, M. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Le marche des biens symboliques. L'Annee sociologique, 22, 49-126. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27887912 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Sur le pouvoir symbolique. Annales: Economies, societes, civilisations, 32(3), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1977.293828 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power (R. Nice, Trans.). Critique of Anthropology, 4(13-14), 77-85. https://doi. org/10.1177/0308275x7900401307 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed (R. Nice, Trans.). Poetics, 12(4-5), 311-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups (R. Nice, Trans.). Theory and Society, 14(6), 723744. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174048 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital (R. Nice, Trans.). J. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (1st ed., pp. 241-258). Greenwood Publishing. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups (L. J. D. Wacquant & D. Young, Trans.). Berkeley Journal of Sociology: A Critical Review, 32, 1-18. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035356 google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1991a). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries (R. Nice, Trans.). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (1991b). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Books. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (2013a). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (2013b). Vekalet ve siyasal fetişizm (L. Ünsaldı, Trans). P. Bourdieu (Ed), Seçilmiş metinler (1st ed., pp.231-252). Heretik Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (2014). Simgesel sermaye ve toplumsal sınıflar (N. Ökten, Trans.). Cogito, 76, 192-203. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (2014). Düşünümsel bir antropoloji için cevaplar (N. Ökten, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (2015). Devlet üzerine: College de France dersleri (1989-1992) (A. Sümer, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Bourdieu, P. (2021). Ayrım: Beğeni yargısının toplumsal eleştirisi (D. Fırat & G. Berkkut, Trans.). Nika Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Damalı, A. (2003). Sosyal yardım pulları: Osmanlı - Türkiye (1st ed.). Nilüfer Vakfı. google scholar
  • Garmiryan, A. N. (1979). Birinci Adana serisi (1st ed.). İstanbul Grafik Sanatlar Müzesi. google scholar
  • Goloğlu, M. (2017). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti tarihi I: Devrimler ve tepkileri (1924-1930) (1st ed.). Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. google scholar
  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social Sciences and humanities (1st ed.). Addison - Wesley. google scholar
  • Kaplan, A. (1943). Content analysis and the theory of signs. Philosophy of Science, 10(4), 230-247. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/184268 google scholar
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. google scholar
  • Neuman, W. L. (2014). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri: Nitel ve nicel yaklaşımlar (Ö. Akkaya, Trans.). Yayınodası LTD. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S. & Özdemir, M. S. (2017). Babamın pulları: “Osmanlı İmparatorluğu ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti pul koleksiyonu” (1st ed.). MLS Holding A.Ş. google scholar
  • Punch, K. F. (2011). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan & Z. Akyüz, Trans.). Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Swartz, D. (2011). Kültür ve iktidar: Pierre Bourdieu’nün sosyolojisi (E. Gen, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500402 google scholar
  • Togay, U. (2008, October 2). Ankara Hükümeti posta pulları - 1922. http://turkishpostalhistory.com/tr/filateli-dernekleri/2-philatelic-organizations/26-ankara-filateli-dernei.html adresinden 18 Nisan 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, M. (2019). Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi’ndeki toplumsal değişimi posta pulları üzerinden okumak. Millî Folklor, 124, 230-245. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/millifolklor/issue/51228/666941 google scholar
  • Weber, M. (1958). Politics as a vocation (H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills, Trans.). H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (1st ed., pp. 77-128). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Weber, M. (2000). Sosyoloji yazıları (T. Parla, Trans.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Weber, M. (2005). Bürokrasi ve otorite (B. Akın, Trans.). Adres Yayınları. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kına, S.A. (2022). Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(62), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


AMA

Kına S A. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2022;0(62):33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


ABNT

Kına, S.A. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 62, p. 33-65, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kına, Sezer Ahmet,. 2022. “Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 62: 33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kına, Sezer Ahmet,. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0, no. 62 (Nov. 2022): 33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


Harvard: Australian Style

Kına, SA 2022, 'Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps', Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 62, pp. 33-65, viewed 27 Nov. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kına, S.A. (2022) ‘Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps’, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 0(62), pp. 33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006 (27 Nov. 2022).


MLA

Kına, Sezer Ahmet,. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps.” Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, vol. 0, no. 62, 2022, pp. 33-65. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


Vancouver

Kına SA. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences [Internet]. 27 Nov. 2022 [cited 27 Nov. 2022];0(62):33-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006 doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006


ISNAD

Kına, SezerAhmet. Examination of Symbolic Power during Turkey’s Early Republican Period from Bourdieu’s Perspective: A Case of Postage Stamps”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 0/62 (Nov. 2022): 33-65. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2022-1058006



TIMELINE


Submitted29.01.2022
Accepted04.04.2022
Published Online19.07.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.