Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088    Full Text (PDF)

Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma

Funda İşleyenEbru Doğan

Bu çalışmanın amacı; kültürel çeşitliliğe sahip işletmelerde, çalışanların kişilik özelliklerinin kültürelzekâ üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu kapsamda; araştırmanın temelini oluşturan kültürel zekâ kavramı, Büyük Beş Kişilik Modeli ve kültürel zekâ-kişilik ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Almanya’da bilişim ve teknoloji alanında faaliyet gösteren çok kültürlü yapıya sahip çokuluslu işletmelerde çalışanlar oluşturmuştur. Yapılan analizlerin sonucunda, çalışanların kişilik özelliklerinin kültürel zekâ ve boyutlarını etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, kültürel zekâyı en fazla etkileyen kişilik özelliğinin, deneyime açıklık olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088    Full Text (PDF)

Cultural Intelligence: A Research in The Context of The Big Five Personality Model

Funda İşleyenEbru Doğan

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of personality traits of employees on cultural intelligence in culturally diverse businesses. In this context, the concept of cultural intelligence which form the basis of the research, the Big Five Personality Model, and the relationship between cultural intelligence and personality were examined. The sample of the study was composed of employees in multinational companies with a multicultural structure operating in the field of information and technology in Germany. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the personality traits of the employees affect cultural intelligence and its dimensions. In thisregard, it wasfound that the personality trait that mostly affect cultural intelligence is openness to experience.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The success of multinational companies that have employees from different social cultures depends on managing these cultural differences. In this process, both personalities and cultures of employees should be considered. Every person has a unique personality and a different perspective towards different cultures. For this reason, when hiring a new employee, it is necessary to focus on both her personality and cultural intelligence, especially in multinational companies.

The aim of this study is to determine the personality traits in the context of The Big Five Personality Model that affect cultural intelligence. Within this framework, firstly the concepts of cultural intelligence and personality, and the relationship between cultural intelligence and personality have been examined. Then, the findings obtained by analyzing the effect of personality traits on cultural intelligence were evaluated.

The research covers employees in multinational companies operating in the field of information and technology in Germany. The effects of personality traits (extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience) on cultural intelligence and cultural intelligence dimensions (metacognitive, cognitive, motivational and behavioral) were examined. Convenience sampling method was chosen, survey method was used as data collection tool and data were obtained online from 289 employees.

In the research, a five-dimensional personality inventory consisting of forty four expressions developed by John and Srivastava was used to measure personality. In order to measure cultural intelligence, the scale developed by Ang et al., which includes twenty expressions and four dimensions, was used.

Multiple regression analysis was used in the model, and it was found that personality has a significant effect on cultural intelligence and dimensions. The findings obtained show similarities with other studies in the literature.

As a result of the analysis, it was found that the personality trait that mostly affect cultural intelligence is openness to experience. As openness to experience increases, the level of cultural intelligence increases. Individuals with wide interests, open to new ideas, feelings and thoughts, eager to learn, highly imaginative and creative are individuals who are eager to know and communicate with new employees from different cultures.

It has been determined that the second personality trait affecting cultural intelligence is conscientiousness. Individuals with a high level of responsibility are reliable, responsible, self-disciplined and achievement striving. They observe the communication and interaction styles of people from different cultures and communicate effectively with them.

Extraversion personality trait is the third-ranked trait influencing cultural intelligence. Extraverted individuals are highly self-confident and social individuals. For this reason, extraverted individuals communicate more easily with individuals from different cultures and adapt to multicultural environments. 

When the findings are evaluated in terms of the dimensions of cultural intelligence, the personality trait that has a positive effect on all four dimensions is openness to experience. Conscientiousness personality trait has a positive effect on metacognitive and behavioral cultural intelligence. Extraversion has a positive effect on motivational cultural intelligence.

In this context, in multinational companies, the cultural intelligence of employees who are open to experience first, then conscientious and extraverted appears to be relatively higher than those who do not have these characteristics. Thus, individuals with high openness to experience, conscientiousness and extraversion personality trait will be able to work more harmoniously and efficiently with their colleagues in the work environment. Therefore, it will be beneficial to choose individuals with the mentioned personality traits first in terms of organizational performance for multinational enterprises with cultural diversity. However, the importance of providing training to improve the cultural intelligence levels of the employees in multinational companies is obvious.


PDF View

References

  • Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: definition, distinctiveness and nomological network. S. Ang, & L. Van Dyne (Ed.), Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement and Applications içinde (ss. 3-15). M.E. Sharpe. google scholar
  • Ang, S., & Inkpen, A. C. (2008). Cultural intelligence and offshore outsourcing success: a framework of firm-level intercultural capability. Decision Sciences, 39(3), 337-358. google scholar
  • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K.Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C. & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335-371. google scholar
  • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Koh, C. (2006). Personality correlates of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 100-123. google scholar
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. google scholar
  • Büyükuysal, M. Ç., & Öz, İ. İ. (2016). Çoklu doğrusal bağıntı varlığında en küçük karelere alternatif yaklaşım: ridge regresyon. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 110-114. google scholar
  • Correl, W. (1976). Persönlichkeitspsychologie. Donauwörth: Ludwig Auer Verlag. google scholar
  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343-359. google scholar
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665. google scholar
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. google scholar
  • Depaula, P. D., Azzollini, S. C., Cosentino, A. C., & Castillo, S. E. (2016). Personality, character strengths and cultural intelligence: “extraversion” or “openness” as further factors associated to the cultural skills. Avances en Psicologia Latinamericana, 34(2), 415-436. google scholar
  • Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS’le veri analizi (4. Baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: individual interactions across cultures. Stanford California: Stanford University Press. google scholar
  • Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 139-146. google scholar
  • Evans, E. H. (2012). Expatriate success: cultural intelligence and personality as predictors for cross-cultural adjustment [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. The University of Tennessee. google scholar
  • Fehr, T. (2006) Big Five: Die fünf grundlegenden dimensionen der persönlichkeit und ihre 30 facetten. Simon, W. (Ed.). Persönlichkeitsmodelle und persönlichkeitstests içinde (ss.113-135). Gabal Verlag. google scholar
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books. google scholar
  • George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524. google scholar
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34. google scholar
  • Güriş, S., Çağlayan Akay, E., & Güriş, B. (2020). R ile Temel Ekonometri. İstanbul: DER Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: the big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879. google scholar
  • John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2(3), 171-203. google scholar
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives, L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research içinde (Second Ed., ss. 101-138). Guilford Publications. google scholar
  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652. google scholar
  • Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47-52. google scholar
  • Li, M., Mobley, W. H., & Kelly, A. (2016). Linking personality to cultural intelligence: an interactive effect of openness and agreeableness. Personality, and Individual Differences, 89, 105-110. google scholar
  • McAdams, D. P. (1997). A conceptual history of personality, In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Ed.), Handbook of psychology içinde (ss. 3-39). CA: Academic Press. google scholar
  • McCann, S. J. H. (2018). U.S. State resident big five personality and work satisfaction: the importance of neuroticism. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(2), 155-191. google scholar
  • Mönks, F. J., & Knoers, A. M. P. (1996). Lehrbuch der Entwicklungspsychologie. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag. google scholar
  • Rammstedt, B., Koch, K., Borg, I., & Reitz, T. (2004). Entwicklung und validierung einer kurzskala für die messung der big-five-persönlichkeitsdimensionen in umfragen. ZUMA Nachrichten, 28(55), 5-28. google scholar
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Örgütsel davranış (Çev. Ed. İ. Erdem). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sendler, U. (Ed.). (2013). Industrie 4.0-Beherrschung der industriellen komplexität mit SysLM. Industrie 4.0 içinde (ss.1-19). Springer Verlag. google scholar
  • Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The big five personality traits and the life course: a 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 208-232. google scholar
  • Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology içinde (third ed., ss. 883-947). Random House. Triandis, H. C. (2006). Cultural intelligence in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 31(1), 20-26. google scholar
  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., Ng, K. Y., Rockstuhl, T., Tan, M. L., & Koh, C. (2012). Sub-dimensions of the four-factor model of cultural intelligence: expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(4), 295-313. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

İşleyen, F., & Doğan, E. (2020). Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(33), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


AMA

İşleyen F, Doğan E. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics. 2020;0(33):65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


ABNT

İşleyen, F.; Doğan, E. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 33, p. 65-82, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

İşleyen, Funda, and Ebru Doğan. 2020. “Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma.” Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 33: 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


Chicago: Humanities Style

İşleyen, Funda, and Ebru Doğan. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma.” Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 33 (Apr. 2021): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


Harvard: Australian Style

İşleyen, F & Doğan, E 2020, 'Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma', Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 33, pp. 65-82, viewed 20 Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


Harvard: Author-Date Style

İşleyen, F. and Doğan, E. (2020) ‘Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma’, Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(33), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088 (20 Apr. 2021).


MLA

İşleyen, Funda, and Ebru Doğan. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma.” Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 33, 2020, pp. 65-82. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


Vancouver

İşleyen F, Doğan E. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics [Internet]. 20 Apr. 2021 [cited 20 Apr. 2021];0(33):65-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088 doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088


ISNAD

İşleyen, Funda - Doğan, Ebru. Kültürel Zekâ: Beş Büyük Kişilik Modeli Bağlamında Bir Araştırma”. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0/33 (Apr. 2021): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.33.837088



TIMELINE


Submitted07.12.2020
Accepted19.12.2020
Published Online15.01.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.