Research Article

DOI :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.842750   IUP :10.26650/ibr.2022.51.842750    Full Text (PDF)

Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis

Zeynep İrem ErdoğmuşMelisa Karakaya Arslan

Social media platforms have created a new industry where both influencers and consumers are empowered. Consumers do not only consume but also contribute to the content they face on social media. Through their narratives and content, they may even become social media influencers who have the power to shape the attitudes and behavior of fellow consumers. An important social medium, YouTube, allows people to engage with social media influencers by liking, commenting, sharing, etc. However, engagement practices are not similarly shared among every YouTube user, and people have different reaction styles. Thus, measuring success in creating engaging content becomes a controversial issue for brand endorsement. This research aims to uncover consumer typologies in terms of engagement behavior with social media influencers on YouTube. The influential motives of engagement for each typology are also analyzed in order to describe the groups. For this purpose, 341 participants from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform participated in an online survey, and a two-step cluster analysis was conducted with eleven common social media engagement practices with influencers. The results implied a three-cluster solution, and the clusters were profiled according to several social media engagement motivations. The groups were named as ‘positively active followers,’ ‘passive followers,’ and ‘analytical followers.’ Implications for brand endorsement and content marketing strategies are discussed.

PDF View


  • Abendroth, L. J., and J. E. Heyman. 2013. “Honesty Is the Best Policy: The Effects of Disclosure in Word-of-Mouth Marketing.” Journal of Marketing Communications 19 (4): 245- 257. google scholar
  • Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86-101. google scholar
  • Bowden, J.L.H. (2009), “The process of consumer engagement: a conceptual framework”, Journal of Mar-keting Theory and Practice, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 63-74. google scholar
  • Brechman, JM., Purvis, S.C. (2015) Narrative transportation and advertising. International Journal of Ad-vertising, 34 (2) pp. 366-381. google scholar
  • Brodie, J.R., Hollebeek, L., Juric, B. and Ilic, A. (2011), “Consumer engagement: conceptual domain, fun-damental propositions and implications for research”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 252-271. google scholar
  • Childers, C.C., Lemon, L.L. and Hoy, M.G. (2019), “#sponsored #ad: agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns”, Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 258-274. google scholar
  • Daniel Jr, E. S., Crawford Jackson, E. C., & Westerman, D. K. (2018). The influence of social media influ-encers: Understanding online vaping communities and parasocial interaction through the lens of Taylor’s six-segment strategy wheel. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(2), 96-109. google scholar
  • De Vries, L., Gensler, S. and Leeflang, P.S.H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an inves-tigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. google scholar
  • Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277. google scholar
  • Eigenraam, A. W., Eelen, J., Van Lin, A., & Verlegh, P. W. (2018). A consumer-based taxonomy of digital customer engagement practices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44, 102-121. google scholar
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measure-ment error: Algebra and statistics 18(3), 382-388. google scholar
  • Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90-92. google scholar
  • Gao, Q., & Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: User gratifications, usage patterns, and brand mes-sage content strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 868-890. google scholar
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: Global edition. google scholar
  • Hanson, G., & Haridakis, P. (2008). YouTube users watching and sharing the news: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(3). google scholar
  • Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass commu-nication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317-335. google scholar
  • Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2016). From celebrity to influencer in A Companion to Celebrity ed by P.D. Marshall and S. Redmond, Wiley: London, 194-212. google scholar
  • Holland, M. (2016). “How YouTube Developed into a Successful Platform for User-Generated Con-tent.” Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www. google scholar
  • Hollebeek, L.D., Glynn, M.S., Brodie, R.J. (2014), Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Concep-tualization, Scale Development and Validation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 149-165. google scholar
  • Horton, D. and Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and PSI interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229. google scholar
  • Influencer Marketing Hub (2020), The State of Influencer Marketing 2020: Benchmark Report, Retrieved from google scholar
  • Jimenez-Castillo, D., & Sanchez-Fernandez, R. (2019). The role of digital influencers in brand recommen-dation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 366-376. google scholar
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. google scholar
  • Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on You-Tube?. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247. google scholar
  • Ko, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70. google scholar
  • Krause, A. E., North, A. C., & Heritage, B. (2014). The Uses and Gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 71-77. google scholar
  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive advantage through engagement. Journal of Marketing Rese-arch, 53(4): 497-514. google scholar
  • Landers, R. N., & Behrend, T. S. (2015). An inconvenient truth: Arbitrary distinctions between organizatio-nal, Mechanical Turk, and other convenience samples. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 142-164. google scholar
  • Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New media & society, 11(8), 1327-1347. google scholar
  • Li, C. & Bernoff, J. (2008) Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by SocialTechnologies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. google scholar
  • Lim, H., & Kumar, A. (2019). Variations in consumers’ use of brand online social networking: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 450-457. google scholar
  • Logan, K. (2017). Attitudes towards in-app advertising: a uses and gratifications perspective. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 15(1), 26-48. google scholar
  • Morning Consult (2019), The Influencer Report Engaging Gen Z and Millenilas, Retrieved from pdf google scholar
  • Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M. & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring Motivations for Brand-Related Social Media Use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46. google scholar
  • O’Connor, F. (2016). ‘Millenials & Youtube’: An investigation into the influence of user-generated video content on the consumer decision making process (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). google scholar
  • Park, N., Kee, K. F. & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(6), 729-733. google scholar
  • Pham, M. T. & Avnet, T. (2009). Rethinking regulatory engagement theory. Journal of Consumer Psycho-logy, 19(2), 115-123. google scholar
  • Rasmussen, L. (2018). Parasocial Interaction in the Digital Age: An Examination of Relationship Building and the Effectiveness of YouTube Celebrities. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 280-294. google scholar
  • Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labor on YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 99-113. google scholar
  • Rodgers, S. (2002). The interactive advertising model tested: The role of motives in ad processing. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(2), 22-33. google scholar
  • Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), LEA>s communication series. Media effects: Advances in theory and research (p. 525-548). Law-rence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. google scholar
  • Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25. google scholar
  • Silva, M. J., De Farias, A., S., Grigg, M.K., & Barbosa, M. L.A. (2019). The Power of the Body in Social Media: Analyzing Digital Fitness Influencers As Product Endorsers. ACR North American Advances. google scholar
  • Simpson, Jack (2016) Eight Influencer Marketing Stats for Fashion and Beauty Brands,. Econsultancy, Xeim: Excellency in Marketing. Accessed 7-9-19 at google scholar
  • Smith, N. A., Sabat, I. E., Martinez, L. R., Weaver, K., & Xu, S. (2015). A convenient solution: Using MTurk to sample from hard-to-reach populations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 220. google scholar
  • Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratifica-tions approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329. google scholar
  • Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504-525. google scholar
  • Valsesia, F., Proserpio, D., & Nunes, J. C. (2020). The Positive Effect of Not Following Others on Social Media. Journal of Marketing Research, accessed on google scholar
  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer en-gagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266. google scholar
  • Van Der Heide, B. and Lim, Y.S. (2016). On the conditional cueing of credibility heuristics: the case of online influence. Communication Research, 43 (5), 672-693. google scholar
  • Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qua-litative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369. google scholar
  • Wiedmann, K. P., & von Mettenheim, W. (2020). Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise-social influ-encers’ winning formula?. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Bol. Ahead-of-print No.ahead-of-print. google scholar
  • Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020). How Social Media Influencers Foster Relationships with Followers: The Roles of Source Credibility and Fairness in Parasocial Relationship and Product Interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising, (just-accepted), 1-42. google scholar


Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format



Erdoğmuş, Z.İ., & Karakaya Arslan, M. (2022). Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis. Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), 359-373.


Erdoğmuş Z İ, Karakaya Arslan M. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis. Istanbul Business Research. 2022;51(1):359-373.


Erdoğmuş, Z.İ.; Karakaya Arslan, M. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis. Istanbul Business Research, [Publisher Location], v. 51, n. 1, p. 359-373, 2022.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Erdoğmuş, Zeynep İrem, and Melisa Karakaya Arslan. 2022. “Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1: 359-373.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Erdoğmuş, Zeynep İrem, and Melisa Karakaya Arslan. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis.” Istanbul Business Research 51, no. 1 (Feb. 2023): 359-373.

Harvard: Australian Style

Erdoğmuş, Zİ & Karakaya Arslan, M 2022, 'Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis', Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 359-373, viewed 1 Feb. 2023,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Erdoğmuş, Z.İ. and Karakaya Arslan, M. (2022) ‘Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis’, Istanbul Business Research, 51(1), pp. 359-373. (1 Feb. 2023).


Erdoğmuş, Zeynep İrem, and Melisa Karakaya Arslan. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis.” Istanbul Business Research, vol. 51, no. 1, 2022, pp. 359-373. [Database Container],


Erdoğmuş Zİ, Karakaya Arslan M. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis. Istanbul Business Research [Internet]. 1 Feb. 2023 [cited 1 Feb. 2023];51(1):359-373. Available from: doi: 10.26650/ibr.2022.51.842750


Erdoğmuş, Zeynepİrem - Karakaya Arslan, Melisa. Engaging with Social Media Influencers on Youtube: A Cluster Analysis”. Istanbul Business Research 51/1 (Feb. 2023): 359-373.


Published Online30.03.2022


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.