Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015    Full Text (PDF)

The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period

Süleyman Hilmi Kal

Foreign currency usage (as deposits and loans) of the Turkish banking system (dollarization) has gradually decreased from 50 percent in 2003 to 30 percent in 2010. Yet, in the second half of 2011 dollarization in the Turkish banking system began increasing and reached to 50 percent. During the same period, volatility of the Turkish lira US dollar exchange rate has also elevated in a parallel fashion. Adverse effects of volatility on the economy such as discouraging investments, causing higher exchange rate passthrough to inflation are known. Analytic information regarding the determinants of conditional exchange rate volatility is important for monetary policy. In this paper, we investigate determinants of the Turkish lira US dollar exchange rate volatility EGARCH-M. Our results indicate that dollarization of the banking system, particularly credit dollarization has increasing effects on conditional exchange rate volatility. On the other hand, portfolio capital flows both to debt and stocks have reducing effect on conditional exchange rate volatility. At the same time, country risk measure, rise in Turkish government debt default insurance premium (CDS) has increasing effect on conditional exchange rate volatility. Elevation of conditional volatility and increase in interest spreads on Turkish lira US dollar loans lead to depreciation of the Turkish lira, while increase in interest rate spreads on Turkish lira US dollar deposits lead to appreciation of Turkish lira. As policy recommendation of this paper, dollarization in the banking system must be reduced by using appropriate tools while capital flows to the country must be encouraged.

JEL Classification : E51 , F31 , F32
DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015    Full Text (PDF)

2003-2018 Dönemi Türk Ekonomisinde Dolarizasyon, Kısa Vadeli Sermaye Hareketleri ve Kur Oynaklığı İlişkisi

Süleyman Hilmi Kal

Türk bankacılık sisteminde 2003-2010 yılları arasında yüzde 50’lerden yüzde 30’lara gerileyen yabancı para cinsi mevduat ve kredi kullanım oranı (dolarizasyon), 2011 senesi ortalarından itibaren bir yükseliş sürecine girmiştir. Aynı dönemde, Türk lirası (TL) ABD doları (Dolar) kur oynaklığının da paralel bir seyir izlediği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada TL Dolar kur oynaklığını etkileyen dolarizasyon dâhil diğer faktörler, genelleştirilmiş ardışık koşullu dağınık oynaklık (GARCH) sınıfı modellerden uygun bir model olan EGARCH-M modeli kullanılmak suretiyle araştırılmıştır. Yapılan ekonometrik analizden elde edilen bulgular, bankacılık sitemindeki yabancı para kullanımının, özellikle kredi dolarizasyonun, koşullu kur oynaklığına yukarı yönlü etkisine; hisse senedi ve borç senedi piyasalarına olan kısa vadeli sermaye akımlarının da koşullu kur oynaklığına aşağı yönlü etkisine işaret etmektedir. Türk kamu borçlanma senedi temerrüt primlerindeki (CDS) yükseliş de kur oynaklığına yukarı yönlü etki ettiği de bulgular arasındadır. Koşullu kur oynaklığının kurda değer kaybına yol açtığı, mevduatlardaki TL Dolar faiz farkın artışın TL’nin değerlenmesine, kredilerdeki TL Dolar faiz farkındaki artışın TL’nin değer kaybına yol açtığı görülmektedir. Ekonomide negatif etkileri bilinen kur oynaklığının düşmesi için bankacılık sistemindeki yabancı para kullanım oranının azaltılması ve sermaye akımlarının teşviki gerekmektedir.

JEL Classification : E51 , F31 , F32

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Liberalization process of the capital markets in Turkey began by July 1984 dated number 30 executive order of the government and the process has continued with executive order number 32 on August 1989. New regulations allow domestic and foreign individuals and institutions to open bank accounts, invest in Turkish debt and stock markets in Turkish Lira and foreign currency with some restrictions on borrowing with foreign currency. Short and long term capital flows increased with the liberalization of capital markets in Turkey.

Deposit and credit dollarization of banking system is defined as ratio of foreign exchange deposits and credit to the total deposits and credits. In between 2003- 2019 (the sample period of this study), the dollarization (both deposit and credit) of Turkish economy followed a volatile path (Figure I). Dollarization which was around 45% at the beginning of 2000’s declined below 30% until year 2010. After the modifications in the framework of the monetary policy implementation, both deposit and credit dollarization began to rise. The simultaneity of the modification in the monetary policy framework and the rise in dollarization may be related to the fact that required reserve ratios of Turkish lira deposits increased while those of foreign currency decreased were decreased by the monetary authority. During the same period, a simultaneous elevation of volatility of the Turkish lira US dollar exchange rate was observed. In the literature the relationship between deposit dollarization and exchange rate volatility has been showed in multiple studies (Akçay 1997, Honohan, 2006, Corrado, 2008, Yinusa 2008 Mengesha and Holmes, 2013), yet the impact of credit dollarization on exchange rate has not been investigated in our best knowledge. In this paper, we investigate the effects of credit and deposit dollarization and portfolio capital flows on volatility the Turkish Lira (TL) US Dollar (USD) exchange rate. For this purpose we employed the EGARCH-M model. This paper, contributes to literature by its comprehensive approach of examining exchange rate volatility relationship with dollarization of both kinds, portfolio flows and country risk factor (CDS).

Empirical results provide insights to the dynamics of Turkish lira US dollar exchange rate volatility since 2003. According to this, increase in deposit and especially credit dollarization elevate conditional volatility of the TL-USD exchange rate. On the other hand, portfolio flows reduce it. In addition to conditional volatility findings indicate that higher deposit interest rate spread between TL and USD deposits, appreciate the TL-USD exchange rate, while higher spreads in loan interest rate TL-USD depreciate TL. These results are in line with theory and literature.

Findings of this study indicate that dollarization of the financial system through deposit and credit dollarization elevate volatility of the exchange rate risk in Turkey. So, reducing dollarization of the financial markets gradually decrease exchange rate volatility and risk, eventually attracting foreign portfolio flows by increasing return per unit of risk (Sharpe ratio) which in turn reduce volatility further more. This virtuous cycle eventually reduce volatility more and stabilize exchange rate, increase investments and lead to economic growth and prosperity


PDF View

References

  • Akçay, C. O., Alper, E. C., & Karasulu, M. (1997). Currency substitution and Exchange rate instability: The Turkish case. European Economic Review, 41, 827–835. google scholar
  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Hajileeb, M. (2013). Exchange rate volatility and its impact on domestic investment. Research in Economics, 67(1), 1-12. google scholar
  • Barguellil, A., Ben-Salha, O., & Zmami, M. (2011). Exchange Rate Volatility and Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Integration, 33(2), 1302–1336. google scholar
  • Başçı ,E., & Kara, H. (2011). Finansal istikrar ve para politikası, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, Bilgesel Yayıncılık, 26(302), 9-25. google scholar
  • Brunner, A., & Hess, G. (1993). Are Higher Levels of Inflation Less Predictable? A State-Dependent Conditional Heteroscadasticity Approach. Journal of Business & Economic Statisics, 11(2), 187– 97. google scholar
  • Caporale, G. M., Ali, F. M., & Spagnolo, F. (2017). International Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility in emerging Asia Markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 76, 1–15. google scholar
  • Fielding D., & Shields K. (2003). Do Currency Unions Deliver More Economic Integration than Fixed Exchange Rates? Evidence from the CFA and the ECCU. Discussion Papers in Economics 03/9, Department of Economics, University of Leicester. google scholar
  • Bollersev T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. google scholar
  • Corrado, G. (2008). An open economy model with currency substitution and real dollarization. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(1), 32–46. google scholar
  • Honohan, P. (2001). Dollarization and Exchange Rate Fluctuations, IIIS Discussion Paper No. 201. google scholar
  • Kal, S. (2015). Analysis of Asymmetric Dynamics of Turkish Exports, non-published manuscript. google scholar
  • Kal, S., Arslaner, F., & Arslaner, N. (2015). Sources of Asymmetry and Nonlinearity in Pass-Through of Exchange Rate and Import Price to Consumer Price Inflation for the Turkish Economy during Inflation Targeting Regime, CBRT Working Paper 15/30. google scholar
  • Kumamoto, H., & Kumamoto, M. (2014). Does currency substitution affect Exchange rate volatility?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(4), 698–704. google scholar
  • Mengesha, L. G., & Holmes, M. J. (2013). Does Dollarization Alleviate or Aggrevate Exchange Rate Volatility, Journal of Economic Development, 38(2), ??. google scholar
  • Nelson, D. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59, 347–370. google scholar
  • Saatçioğlu, C., Bulut, C., & Korap, H. L. (2007). Does Currency Substitution Affect Exchange Rate Uncertainity ? The Case of Turkey, Journal of Qafqaz University 20 ??. google scholar
  • Yinusa, D. O., & Akinlo, A. E. (2008). Exchange Rate Volatility, Currency Substitution and Monetary Policy in Nigeria. Indian Economic Review, 43(2), 161–181. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kal, S.H. (2019). The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 69(2), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


AMA

Kal S H. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2019;69(2):357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


ABNT

Kal, S.H. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics, [Publisher Location], v. 69, n. 2, p. 357-377, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kal, Süleyman Hilmi,. 2019. “The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 69, no. 2: 357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kal, Süleyman Hilmi,. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 69, no. 2 (Apr. 2021): 357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


Harvard: Australian Style

Kal, SH 2019, 'The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period', Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 357-377, viewed 20 Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kal, S.H. (2019) ‘The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period’, Istanbul Journal of Economics, 69(2), pp. 357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015 (20 Apr. 2021).


MLA

Kal, Süleyman Hilmi,. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 2, 2019, pp. 357-377. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


Vancouver

Kal SH. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics [Internet]. 20 Apr. 2021 [cited 20 Apr. 2021];69(2):357-377. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015 doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015


ISNAD

Kal, SüleymanHilmi. The Relationship between Dollarization, Portfolio Flows and Exchange Rate Volatility for the Turkish Economy during the 2003-2018 Period”. Istanbul Journal of Economics 69/2 (Apr. 2021): 357-377. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2019-0015



TIMELINE


Submitted23.05.2019
Accepted09.12.2019
Published Online31.12.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.