Research Article


DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547    Full Text (PDF)

Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period

Ayça Doğaner

Unemployment is accepted as an important macroeconomic problems in all countries. Due to the unemployment rate being an important variable, it is a priority target in economic policies. In this direction, the issue of how to increase the employment rate and reduce the unemployment rate is included in countries’ short-, medium-, and long-term economic policies of countries. Completely eliminating unemployment is possible. For this reason, hypotheses have been put forward in the literature regarding unemployment. With two basic unemployment theories being found: the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis and the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis. According to the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis, when the actual unemployment rates exceeds the natural unemployment rate due to a shock, unemployment does not return to its previous level once the effects from the shock end. The unemployment time series’ unit root proves the existence of unemployment hysteresis, and the series being stationary process at the level pf unemployment proves the assumption of the natural rate of unemployment. This study determines the precense of unemployment hysteresis in European Union countries using linear and nonlinear unit root tests over annual data for the 1991-2020 period. All tests determined unemployment hysteresis to be present in Luxembourg.

JEL Classification : C12 , C22 , J64
DOI :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547   IUP :10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547    Full Text (PDF)

Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde İşsizlik Histerisi Hipotezinin Doğrusal ve Doğrusal Olmayan Birim Kök Testleriyle Tespiti: 1991-2020 Dönemi

Ayça Doğaner

İşsizlik tüm ülkelerde önemli makroekonomik sorunlardan birisi olarak kabul edilmektedir. İşsizlik oranlarının önemli bir değişken olması nedeniyle, ekonomi politikalarında öncelikli hedeflerden birisi olarak yer almaktadır. Bu doğrultuda istihdam oranlarının artırılması ile işsizlik oranlarının düşürülmesi hususu ülkelerin kısa, orta ve uzun vadeli ekonomi politikalarında bulunmaktadır. İşsizliğin tamamen ortadan kaldırılması mümkün değildir. Bu nedenle işsizliğe ilişkin literatürde öne sürülmüş bazı hipotezler vardır. İşsizliğe ilişkin işsizlik histerisi hipotezi, doğal oran hipotezi olmak üzere 2 temel teori bulunmaktadır. İşsizlik histerisi hipotezine göre, gerçekleşen bir şok ile fiili işsizlik oranlarının, doğal işsizlik oranlarını aşmasının, şokun etkilerinin sona ermesiyle tekrar eski seviyelerine düşmemektedir. İşsizlik serisinin birim köke sahip olması işsizlik histerisinin varlığını, serinin düzey değerinde durağan olması ise doğal işsizlik oranın varsayımını kanıtlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, 1991-2020 döneminde yıllık veriler kullanılarak Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde işsizlik histerisinin olup olmadığı doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan birim kök testleriyle tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan tüm testlerde Lüksemburg’da işsizlik histerisinin varlığı tespit edilmiştir.

JEL Classification : C12 , C22 , J64

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


High unemployment rates are accepted as an important macroeconomic problem in all countries. In general, unemployment is the situation when people are willing to work but are unable to find a job. Unemployment rate are an important macroeconomic variable for all countries in the world, are primary goal. In line with this, the issue of reducing unemployment rates by increasing employment is definitely part of countries’ short-, medium-, and long-term economic policies. 

When evaluating a general economic situation, completely eliminating unemployment is seen to be impossible. The literature has various studies on unemployment, with two main theories being found: the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis and the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis. Unemployment hysteria and the natural rate of unemployment examine the effects of economic shocks on unemployment series. 

A time series that has a unit root, (i.e. is not stationary), can be said to possess a hysteresis effect. Any shock in this situation will cause the unemployment time series to maintain even after the shock wears off. Meanwhile, for time series that do not have a unit root, (i.e. are stationary), the effect of any economic shock will have a temporary effect on the series, with the series returning to its original state once the shock wears off. In the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis, the unemployment rate returns to its previous level in the long run after experiencing an economic shock. In the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis, the unemployment rate does not return to its previous level after the shock.  

Unit root tests are widely used to determine whether unemployment hysteresis is present. The aim of this study is to test the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis in EU countries using linear and nonlinear unit root tests. For this purpose, linear analyses were performed on the unemployment rate time series of this countries, and unit root analyses were performed separetely with regard to linear and non-linear series. The linearity of the series showing EU countries’ overall unemployment rate needs to be determined first before determining whether the series is stationary or not. As a result of the linearity tests, linear unit root tests were applied to the series possessing a linear structure. Nonlinear unit root tests were applied to the series possessing a nonlinear structure. Both the linear and nonlinear unit root tests were applied to the series that showed conflicting result regarding the linearity tests. As a result of the research, the Luxembourg unemployment time series was seen to have a unit root for all models. In line with this, when evaluating all the models together, the unemployment rates in Luxembourg can be said to exhibit unemployment hysteresis.

In countries possessing unemployment hysteresis, a shock to the economy is permanent and causes long-term effects. For this reason, active policy implementations are needed. Due to the way unemployment series diverge from the average unemployment rate as a result of an economic shock, studies should be carried out to resolve unemployment issues using various administrative policies. The unemploment rate is also directly related to many macroeconomic variables such as inflation and gross domestic product. Therefore, any instability experienced in the unemployment rate will also upset other economic balances. As a result, increasing the general economic structure’s resilience against internal and external shocks is important for keeping unemployment rates at a specific level. 


PDF View

References

  • Akay, E., Oskonbaeva & Z., Bülbül, H. (2020). What do unit root tests tell us about unemployment hysteresis in transition economies?. Applied Economic Analysis, 28(84), 221-238. google scholar
  • Akkuş, Ö. & Topuz, S.G. (2019). İşsizlik histerisinin geçerliliği:gelişmekte olan en kırılgan beşli. Sosyoekonomi, 27(39), 69-80. google scholar
  • Arestis, P. & Mariscal, I. (2000). OECD unemployment:structural breaks and stationary. Applied Economics, 32, 399-403. google scholar
  • Arı, A., Zeren, F. & Özcan, B. (2013). Doğu Asya ve Pasifik ülkelerinde işsizlik histerisi: panel veri yaklaşımı. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 35(2), 105-122. google scholar
  • Bayrakdar, S. (2015). Türkiye için işsizlik histerisi ya da doğal işsizlik oranı hipotezinin geçerliliğinin sınanması. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 45-61. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O.J. & Summers, L.H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15-78. google scholar
  • Bolat, A., Tiwari, A.K. & Erdayi, A.U. (2014). Unemployment hysteresis in the Eurozone area:evidences from nonlinear heterogeneous panel unit root test. Applied Economic Letters, 21(8), 536-540. google scholar
  • Brunello, G. (1990). Hysteresis and the Japanese experience:a preliminary ınvestigation. Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 483-500. google scholar
  • Camarero, M., Carrion-i-Silvestre & J.L., Tamarit, C. (2006). Testing for hysteresis in unemployment in OECD countries. new evidence using stationary panel tests with breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68, 167-182. google scholar
  • Camarero, M. & Tamarit, C. (2004). Hysteresis vs. natural rate of unemployment:new evidence for OECD countries. Economics Letters, 84, 413-417. google scholar
  • Chang,T., Nieh, K.C. & Wei, C.C. (2005). An empirical note on testing hysteresis in unemployment for ten European countries:panel SURADF approach. Applied Economics Letters, 12, 881-886. google scholar
  • Christopoulos, D.K. & Leon Ledesma, M.A. (2007). Unemployment hysteresis in EU countries:what do we really know about it?. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(2), 80-89. google scholar
  • Dinler, Z. (2012). İktisada Giriş, 18. Basım, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Dursun, G. (2017). Unemployment hysteresis in Central and Eastern European countries:further evidence from fourier unit root test. Rome:Econ World2017@Rome Proceedings. google scholar
  • Gözgör, G. (2013). Testing unemployment persistence in Central and Eastern European countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(3), 694-700. google scholar
  • Harvey, D., Leybourne, I. & Stephen J. (2007). Testing for time series linearity. Econometrics Journal, 10, 149-165. google scholar
  • Harvey, D., Leybourne,I., Stephen J. & Xiao, Bin. (2008). A powerful test for linearity when the order of ıntegration is unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics&Econometrics, 12(3). google scholar
  • Hepsağ, A. (2021). A unit root test based on smooth transitions and nonlinear adjustment. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 50(3). 625-632. google scholar
  • Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58, 1-17. google scholar
  • Kahyaoğlu H., Tüzün O., Ceylan F., & Ekinci R. (2016). İşsizlik histerisinin geçerliliği: Türkiye ve seçilmiş AB ülkeleri üzerine bir uygulama. MCBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(4), 103-128. google scholar
  • Kapetanios, G., Yongcheol, S. & Andy, S. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379. google scholar
  • Kruse, R. (2011). A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistical Papers, 52, 71-85. google scholar
  • Kümbül Güler, B. (2006). İşsizlik ve yarattığı psiko-sosyal sorunların öğrenilmiş çaresizlik bağlamında incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1), 373-394. google scholar
  • Lee, J. & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum langrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 85(4), 1082-1089. google scholar
  • Marjanovic, G. & Mihajlovic, V. (2014). Analysis of hysteresis in unemployment rates with structural breaks:the case of selected European countries. Engineering Economics, 25(4), 378-386. google scholar
  • Mladenovic, Z. (2016). Econometric testing of unemployment hysteresis in selected cee countries:lessons for the Serbian economy. Ekonomika Preduzeca. 64(7-8), 403-413. google scholar
  • Mike, F. & Alper, A.E. (2020). Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler için işsizlik histerisinin incelenmesi:fourier ADF test bulguları. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 1-14. google scholar
  • Mitchell, W. F. (1993). Testing for unit roots and persistence in OECD unemployment rates. Applied Econometrics, 25, 1489-1501. google scholar
  • Papell, D.H., Murray, C.J. & Ghiblawi, H. (2000). The structure of unemployment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 309-315. google scholar
  • Pata, U.K. (2020). OECD ülkelerinde işsizlik histerisinin ampirik bir analizi:fourier panel durağanlık testi. SGD-Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 10(1), 125-144. google scholar
  • Phelps, E.S. (1967). Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment Over Time. Economica, 34, 254-281. google scholar
  • Sevüktekin, M. & Çınar, M. (2017). Ekonometrik zaman serileri analizi e-views uygulamalı. 5. Basım, Bursa:Dora Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sigeze, Ç., Coşkun, N. & Ballı E. (2019). AB ülkelerinde ve Türkiye’de işsizlik histerisinin fourier-kpss birim kök testi ile incelenmesi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 34(1), 15-24. google scholar
  • Sollis, R. (2009). A simple unit root test against asymmetric STAR nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rates in Nordic countries. Economic Modelling, 26(1), 118-125. google scholar
  • Song, F.M. & Wu, Y. (1998). Hysteresis in unemployment:evidence from OECD countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 181-192. google scholar
  • Tarı, R. (2006). Ekonometri. 4. Basım, İstanbul:Avcı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Yılancı, V. (2008). Are unemployment rates nonstationary or nonlinear? Evidence from 19 OECD countries”. Economic Bulletin, 3, 1-5. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, T., Fidan, F. & Karataş, V. (2004). İşsizliğin sosyo-psikolojik sonuçları:sosyo-demografik özelliklere göre bireylerin tutumları(bir alan araştırması). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 48, 163-183. google scholar
  • Yiğit, Ö. & Gökçe, A. (2012). Türkiye ekonomisi için NAIRU tahmini. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 23(83), 6991. google scholar
  • Xie, H., Chang, T., Grigorescu, A. & Hung, K. (2018). Revisit hysteresis unemployment in Eastern European countries using quantile regression. Economicky Casopis, 66(5), 522-537. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Doğaner, A. (2022). Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 72(2), 753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


AMA

Doğaner A. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics. 2022;72(2):753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


ABNT

Doğaner, A. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics, [Publisher Location], v. 72, n. 2, p. 753-785, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Doğaner, Ayça,. 2022. “Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 72, no. 2: 753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


Chicago: Humanities Style

Doğaner, Ayça,. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics 72, no. 2 (Feb. 2023): 753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


Harvard: Australian Style

Doğaner, A 2022, 'Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period', Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 753-785, viewed 2 Feb. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Doğaner, A. (2022) ‘Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period’, Istanbul Journal of Economics, 72(2), pp. 753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547 (2 Feb. 2023).


MLA

Doğaner, Ayça,. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period.” Istanbul Journal of Economics, vol. 72, no. 2, 2022, pp. 753-785. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


Vancouver

Doğaner A. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period. Istanbul Journal of Economics [Internet]. 2 Feb. 2023 [cited 2 Feb. 2023];72(2):753-785. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547 doi: 10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547


ISNAD

Doğaner, Ayça. Determining Unemployment Hysteresis in European Countries Using Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests: The 1991-2020 Period”. Istanbul Journal of Economics 72/2 (Feb. 2023): 753-785. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON2022-1100547



TIMELINE


Submitted08.04.2022
Accepted12.08.2022
Published Online13.10.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.