Research Article


DOI :10.26650/imj.2021.91.004   IUP :10.26650/imj.2021.91.004    Full Text (PDF)

A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability

İbrahim CanRefika Bakoğlu

The primary aim of this research is to propose a framework and model for the evaluation of financial sustainability. To allow companies’ evaluation of financial sustainability, the proposed model identified financial assurance considerations. This scope includes profitability, cash generation, and enterprise value indicators used to measure financial data in the years 2008–2017 for five major companies represented in the Sustainability Index with a combined 41.9% share in the Istanbul Stock Exchange’s market value. The findings indicate that the upper limits representing financial performance effectively reflected financial sustainability assurance as an indicator of cash generation, revealing KCHOL, at 79.45 points, ranking advanced; SAHOL, at 67.75 points, and THYAO, at 61.47 points, ranking strong; whereas ISCTR, at 40.57 points, and TCELL at 34.20 points, both ranked as limited for financial sustainability assurance and evaluation.

JEL Classification : G34 , G39 , O16 , P45 , F37
DOI :10.26650/imj.2021.91.004   IUP :10.26650/imj.2021.91.004    Full Text (PDF)

Finansal Sürdürülebilirliğin Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi

İbrahim CanRefika Bakoğlu

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı işletmelerin finansal sürdürülebilirliğini değerlendirebilmeleri için bir çerçeve sunabilmek ve model önerisi geliştirmektir. Şirketlerin finansal sürdürülebilirlik açısından durumlarını değerlendirmelerine olanak sağlaması için önerilen finansal güvence alanının belirlenmesi ile finansal sürdürülebilirlik değerlendirme modeli geliştirilmiştir. Bu çerçevede yapılan inceleme ve araştırmada, 2008-2017 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’un piyasa değerinin % 41,9’unu temsil eden beş büyük şirketin finansal verileri; kârlılık, nakit yaratımı ve şirket değeri göstergeler olarak kabul edilmiştir. Şirketler finansal sürdürülebilirlik için ölçme, derecelendirme ve değerleme işlemlerine tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma bulgularında finansal performansı temsil eden üst limitlerin tamamının nakit yaratımı göstergesiyle finansal sürdürülebilirlik güvence alanının oluşmasında etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, araştırmada ortaya çıkarılan finansal güvence alanına göre; Koç Holding A.Ş. (KCHOL) 79,45 puan ile ileri düzey, H. Ö. Sabancı Holding A.Ş. (SAHOL) 67,75 puan, Türk Hava Yolları A.O. (THYAO) 61,47 puan ile güçlü düzey, Türkiye İş Bankası A.Ş. (ISCTR) 40,57 puan ve Turkcell İletişim Hiz. A.Ş. (TCELL) 34,20 puan ile sınırlı düzeyde finansal sürdürülebilirlik güvencesi sunduğu derecelendirilmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir.

JEL Classification : G34 , G39 , O16 , P45 , F37

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Context–Sustainability is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Brundtland Report, 1987). Sustainability is a worldwide hot topic since its origins in the Stockholm Summit (1972) and continued discussion in the Rio Summit (1992), despite the OECD (2004) reporting that minimal progress has been made in improving applications supporting the concept of sustainable growth and the challenges identified through the agenda have not been satisfactorily addressed. Similarly, the UN’s Millennium Development Goals that were announced in 2000 were projected to continue to 2015, but then delayed to 2030 with upgraded Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s). According to the International Institute for Sustainable Development (2019), there are 145 global corporations pursuing the 17 SDGs, budgeting 5–7 trillion USD annually. According to authorities and experts researching sustainability within its main social, environmental, and governance dimensions, it is difficult to define indicators and models to measure and report sustainability through business, particularly the financial dimension. Contemporary companies are always asking for more, although the world’s natural resources already diminished (OECD, 2004).

Purpose–This study endeavors to identify appropriate sustainable financial performance indicators, limited and relative financial performance measurement, and related assurance areas for establishing long-term financial performance. These characteristics engender the self-efficacy of recovering more of the financial resources used by businesses to create value for all stakeholders and to assure the prevention of financial distress that could threaten financial performance.

Methodology/Approach/Design–The research first examines the concepts related to financial sustainability, such as sustainability, financial performance, economic capital, and financial distress. A unique concept of financial sustainability is then presented in congruence with both the literature and the previously stated purpose of the research. The main approaches to financial sustainability are examined, along with financial performance and financial distress. Previous studies that propose or apply indicators appropriate to the measurement of financial sustainability are examined.

In the literature, business practices within the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability have been evaluated in relation to equity of profitability, which is identical to financial performance. Financial sustainability is also a performance indicator for companies. In this context, financial sustainability is considered to be identical to financial performance, which is also used as a financial management tool in evaluating companies’ strategic competitive position, optimal value measurements for stakeholders, new sources of income and cash flow, effective risk management, and enhanced stakeholder relations.

Profitability, cash generation, and enterprise value are the indicators used to measure the limited and relative financial performance of the five companies selected with high market value (41.9%) in the Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST) in January 2019 that have been continuously listed in the BIST Sustainability Index since its establishment.

The financial data of the five companies selected for the research for the period 2008– 2017 were obtained from the official Public Disclosure Platform, and the calculations are performed using the previously defined financial performance indicators; namely, profitability (net profit/paid-in capital), cash generation (cash generated in the cash flow statement), and company value (share price x number of shares). The change in these values beginning in 2008 is presented in a table. The highest and lowest values in this table are shown for all three indicators in a separate table and graph.

Findings–The financial sustainability of the companies selected for the research is calculated to assess the limited and relative standing of the companies and financial data in 2008–2017 by the weighted average of all three indicators on a chart using MS Excel. Accordingly, based on the time series beginning in 2008 as 1, which is considered the baseline, the upper limits of the change in the years up to 2017 were associated with financial performance, revealing a trend following a pattern of 1–2, 1–2, 7–1, 3–2, 3–3, 0–3, 3–3, 5–6, 1–7, 5. The lower limits associated with financial distress were observed to be greater than 1 or identified the lowest 1.

The findings reveal all of the upper limits representing financial performance to be effective in the formation of financial sustainability assurance as an indicator of cash generation. The limited and relative financial sustainability assurance of the companies selected for the research were rated, indicating KCHOL, ranking advanced, at 79.45 points; SAHOL, at 67.75 points, and THYAO, at 61.47 points, both ranking strong; and ISCTR, at 40.57 points, and TCELL, at 34.20 points, both ranking as limited for financial sustainability assurance and evaluation. Furthermore, stock prices of the companies are assessed in the years 2017–2021. Accordingly, THYAO stock prices distinctly differ from all other companies. Similar to a previous study of THYAO, the results of indicators vary widely, indicating the potential validity of the initial study’s assertion of possible financial difficulties. 


PDF View

References

  • Adams, C. (2015). “Sustainability and the Company of the Future”, Reinventing the Company in the Digital Age. google scholar
  • Akyüz, F., & Yeşil, T. (2017). BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksine Kayıtlı Üretim Sektöründe Faaliyet Gösteren Şirketlerin Finansal Performanslarının İncelenmesi. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 9(16), 61-78. google scholar
  • Aktas, M. (2009). İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında Hisse Senedi Getirilileri İle İlişkili Olan Finansal Oranların Araştırılması. Journal Of The School Of Business Administration, Istanbul University, 37(2), 137-150. google scholar
  • Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2017). “The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential” google scholar
  • Beaver, W. H. (1966). “Financial Ratios As Predictors of Bankruptcy.” J. Account. Res. 1966, 4, 71-102. google scholar
  • Beaver, W. H. (1968) Market Prices, Financial Ratios, And The Prediction of Failure. J. Account. Res., 8, 179-192. google scholar
  • Beaver, W. H., Correia, M. & McNichols, M. F. (2010). Financial Statement Analysis and the Prediction of Financial Distress, Foundation and Trends in Accounting, vol. 5, no 2, pp 99-173 google scholar
  • Beloff B., Lines M. & Tanzil, D.E. (2005). “Transforming Sustainability Strategy into Action: the Chemical Industry”. Wiley-Interscience google scholar
  • Berns, M., Townend, A., Khayat Z., Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M. & Kruschwitz, N. (2009). “The Business of Sustainaility: Results and Insights from the First Annual MIT Sloan Management Review Global Sustainability Survey” (How Sustainability Affects Value Creation, p.24). google scholar
  • Borsa İstanbul (2021). https://datastore.borsaistanbul.com/ Erişim: 30.01.2021 google scholar
  • Boulouta, I. & Pitelis, C. (2013). “Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness”, Journal of Business Ethics 119, February 2013 google scholar
  • Brundtland Report (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), UN General Assembly, UN Conference on Environment and Development. google scholar
  • Can, I. (2019). Finansal Sürdürülebilirlik Göstergeleri Ve Değerlendirilmesi: Borsa İstanbul Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi Şirketleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Fakültesi, Sürdürülebilir Büyüme ve Kalite Yönetimi Bilim Dalı google scholar
  • Cengiz, H. ve Püskül, A. S. Ö. (2016). Hisse Senedi Getirileri ve Kârlılık Arasındaki İlişki: Borsa İstanbul Endeksinde İşlem Gören İşletmelerin Analizi. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Yıl:7 Sayı:12 google scholar
  • Çalış, N. ve Sakarya, Ş. (2020). Finansal Performans ve Hisse Senedi Getirisi İlişkisi: BİST Bankacılık Endeksi Üzerine Bir İnceleme” MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi • Sayı 2, Cilt 9. google scholar
  • DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, 147-160. google scholar
  • Endrikat, J., Guenther, E. & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making Sense Of Conflicting Empirical Findings: A Meta-Analytic Review of The Relationship Between Corporate Environmental And Financial Performance. Eur. Manag. J. 32, 735-751. (çapraz atıf) google scholar
  • Gök, İ. Y., & Özdemir, O. (2017). Borsa İstanbul Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinin Performans Karakteristiği. Sosyoekonomi, 25(34), 87-105 google scholar
  • Güngör, B., & Kaygin, C. Y. (2015). Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi ile Hisse Senedi Fiyatını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi. Kafkas University. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Journal, 6(9), 149. google scholar
  • Hahn, T. & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the Bounded Instrumentality in Current Corporate Sustainability Research: Toward an Inclusive Notion of Profitability. J. Bus. Ethics 104, 325-345. (çapraz atıf) google scholar
  • Hunt, S.D. (2011). “Sustainable Marketing, Equity And Economic Growth: A Resource-Advantage, Economic Freedom Approach”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 7-20 google scholar
  • IISD, (2019) International Institute for Sustainable Development Çevrimiçi: www.iisd.org/blog/ geneva-sustainable-finance Erişim: 09.10.2020 google scholar
  • Kaya, A. & Öztürk, M. (2015). “Muhasebe Kârları İle Hisse Senedi Fiyatları Arasındaki İlişki: BİST Firmaları Üzerine Bir Uygulama” Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Sayı 67. google scholar
  • Klassen, D. R. & McLaughlin, C. (1996). “The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance” Management Science 42(8):1199-1214 google scholar
  • Kuo, H.C., Wang, L.H., Sheu, H.J. & Li, F.K. (2003). “Credit Evaluation For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises By The Examination of Firm-Specific Financial Ratios And Non-Financial Variables: Evidence From Taiwan”. Rev. Pac. Basin Financ. Mark. Policies, 6, 5-20 google scholar
  • Marwa, N., & Aziakpono, M. (2015). Financial Sustainability of Tanzanian Saving And Credit Cooperatives. In Presented at REPOA’s 19th annual research workshop. Dar es salaam, Tanzania. google scholar
  • McGuire, J., Sundgren, A. & Schneeweiss, T. (1988). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal 31, 854-872 google scholar
  • Mitchell, M., Curtis, A. & Davidson, P. (2007). “Can The ‘Triple Bottom Line’ Concept Help Organisations Respond To Sustainability Issues? google scholar
  • OECD, (2004). “Sustainable Development International Measurements” OECD and IISD - International Institute Sustainabile Developlemnt, google scholar
  • Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu (SPK), (2020). spk.gov.tr/Duyuru/Goster/20201002/0 google scholar
  • Suggett, D. & Goodsir, B. (2002). “Triple Bottom Line Measurement and Reporting in Australia, Making It Tangible” google scholar
  • Taşdemir, B., & Güngör Tanç. (2017). Sürdürülebilirlik Raporları Kapsamında Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun Finansal Performans Üzerine Etkisi: BİST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksinde Bir Araştırma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi). google scholar
  • Ünal, S., & Yüksel, R. (2017). “Finansal Performans ve Hisse Senedi Getirisi İlişkisi: BİST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksindeki Bankalar Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(5), 264-270. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Can, İ., & Bakoğlu, R. (2021). A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability. Istanbul Management Journal, 0(91), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


AMA

Can İ, Bakoğlu R. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability. Istanbul Management Journal. 2021;0(91):87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


ABNT

Can, İ.; Bakoğlu, R. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability. Istanbul Management Journal, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 91, p. 87-107, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Can, İbrahim, and Refika Bakoğlu. 2021. “A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 91: 87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


Chicago: Humanities Style

Can, İbrahim, and Refika Bakoğlu. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 91 (Oct. 2022): 87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


Harvard: Australian Style

Can, İ & Bakoğlu, R 2021, 'A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability', Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 91, pp. 87-107, viewed 6 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Can, İ. and Bakoğlu, R. (2021) ‘A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability’, Istanbul Management Journal, 0(91), pp. 87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004 (6 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Can, İbrahim, and Refika Bakoğlu. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability.” Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 91, 2021, pp. 87-107. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


Vancouver

Can İ, Bakoğlu R. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability. Istanbul Management Journal [Internet]. 6 Oct. 2022 [cited 6 Oct. 2022];0(91):87-107. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004 doi: 10.26650/imj.2021.91.004


ISNAD

Can, İbrahim - Bakoğlu, Refika. A Conceptual Model for the Evaluation of Financial Sustainability”. Istanbul Management Journal 0/91 (Oct. 2022): 87-107. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2021.91.004



TIMELINE


Submitted21.01.2021
Accepted03.11.2021
Published Online29.12.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.