Research Article


DOI :10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002   IUP :10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002    Full Text (PDF)

Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda

Duygu Seçkin Halaç

Studies on technology orientation was started in the late 1990s in the strategic marketing management literature. Although strategic orientations were all recognized as firm level cultural-based terms, technology orientation was operationalized as a functional level concept in the quantitative studies. Moreover, considering the importance of technology in the new competitive era, technology orientation was understudied comparing with other strategic orientations. Just few quantitative articles include technology orientation as a variable, while none of them focuses on the concept solely. This paper summaries and compares quantitative technology orientation studies that have been published in business related refreed journals since 1997 in terms of adopted/constructed scales for measuring TO, research design headlines, which relations are tested, and which findings were reached. The gap in the literature is determined regarding to current conceptual and empirical works. Therefore, the aim of this study is to portrait the gap in the literature regarding to current conceptual and empirical works on and propose a multidimensional construct for technology orientation. 

DOI :10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002   IUP :10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002    Full Text (PDF)

Teknoloji Oryantasyonu: Yeniden Değerlendirme ve Gelecek Çalışmalar için Ajanda

Duygu Seçkin Halaç

Teknoloji oryantasyonu ile ilgili çalışmalar stratejik pazarlama yönetimi yazınında 1990’ların sonlarına doğru ortaya çıkmıştır. Yazında stratejik oryantasyonlar firma seviyesinde kültür tabanlı kavramlar olarak ele alınsa da, teknoloji oryantasyonu ampirik çalışmalarda fonksiyonel seviyede işlevselleştirilmiştir. Ayrıca, günümüz rekabetçi ortamında teknolojinin önemi giderek artarken, teknoloj oryantasyonu diğer stratejik oryantasyonlarla karşılaştırıldığında daha az ele alınan bir kavram olarak gözükmektedir. Çok az sayıda niceliksel çalışmada bir değişken olarak ele alınmış olan teknoloji oryantasyonu, hiçbir çalışmada tek başına değerlendirilmemiştir. Bu çalışmada, 1997’den itibaren yapılmış olan teknoloji oryantasyonuna ilişkin işletme alan dergilerinde yayınlanmış çalışmalar, adapte ettikleri/oluşturdukları TO ölçekleri, araştırma dizaynı ana başlıkları, hangi ilişkilerin test edilmiş olduğu ve araştırma bulguları bağlamında ele alınmış ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışmanın amacı yazında kavramsal ve ampirik çalışmalar arasındaki boşluğu ortaya çıkarmak ve teknoloji oryantasyonunun çok boyutluluğuna ilişkin bir yapı önermektir. 


PDF View

References

  • Acar, A.Z. ve Zehir, C. (2008). Kaynak tabanlı işletme yetenekleri ölçeği geliştirilmesi ve doğrulanması. DEU Isletme Fakultesi Dergisi, 8(3), 103-131. google scholar
  • Acar, A.Z. ve Zehir, C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional business capabilities measurement instrument. Journal of Transnational Management, 14(3), 215-240. google scholar
  • Acar, A.Z. ve Zehir, C. (2010). The harmonized effects of generic strategies and business capabilities on business performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4), 689-711. google scholar
  • Akgun, A.E., & Lynn, G.S. (2003). New product development team improvisation and speed-tomarket: An extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 117-129 google scholar
  • Akman, G., Özkan, C. ve Eriş, H. (2008). Strateji odaklilik ve firma stratejilerinin firma performansina etkisinin analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(Spring), 93-115. google scholar
  • Al-Ansaari, Y., Altalib, M., & Sardoh, M. (2013). Technology orientation, innovation and business performance: A study of Dubai SMEs. The International Technology Management Review, 3(1): 1-11. google scholar
  • Al-Ansaari, Y., Bederr, H., & Chen, C. (2015). Strategic orientation and business performance: An empirical study in the UAE context. Management Decision, 53(10): 2287-2302. google scholar
  • Aloulou, W.J. (2018). Impacts of strategic orientations on new product development and firm performances: Insights from Saudi industrial firms. European Journal of Innovation Management. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2018-0092 google scholar
  • Antoniou, P.H., & Ansoff, I. (2004). Strategic management of technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(2): 275-291 google scholar
  • Atuahene, G. (2005). Resolving the capability– rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(October), 61-83. google scholar
  • Baker, W.E., & Sinkula, J.M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427. google scholar
  • Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. google scholar
  • Batra, S., Sharma, S., Dixit, M.R., Vohra, N., & Gupta, V.K. (2015). Performance implications of industry appropriability for manufacturing SMEs: The role of technology orientation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(5), 660-677. google scholar
  • Becker, K. (2010). Facilitating unlearning during implementation of new technology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(3), 251-268. google scholar
  • Berry, M.M.J., & Taggart, J.H. (1994). Managing technology and innovation: a review. R&D Management, 24(4), 341-353. google scholar
  • Berry, M.M.J. (1996). Technical entrepreneurship, strategic awareness and corporate transformation in small high-tech firms. Technovation, 16(9), pp. 487-498. google scholar
  • Berry, M.M.J., & Taggart, J.H. (1998). Combining technology and corporate strategy in small hightech firms. Research Policy, 26, 883-895. google scholar
  • Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S.T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515-524. google scholar
  • Camelo-Ordaza, C., Martin-Alcazar, F., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2003). Intangible resources and strategic orientation of companies: An analysis in the Spanish context. Journal of Business Research, 56, 95-103. google scholar
  • Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., & Moya, B.R. (2005). Business performance management and unlearning process. Knowledge and Process Management, 12(3), 161-170. google scholar
  • Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Cepeda-Carrion, G., & Jimene-Jimenez, D. (2010). Linking unlearning with innovation through organizational memory and technology. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1): 1-10. google scholar
  • Celuch, K.G., Kasouf, C.J., & Peruvemba, V. (2002). The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 545-554. google scholar
  • Chen, C.W., & Lien, N.H. (2013). Technological opportunitism and firm performance: Moderating context. Journal of Business Research, 66, 2218-2225. google scholar
  • Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Xie, Q., & Li, J. (2014a). CEOs transformational leadership and product innovation performance: Roles of corporate entrepreneurship and technology orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), 2-17. google scholar
  • Chen, X., Chen, A.X. & Zhou, K.Z. (2014b). Strategic orientations, foreign parent control, and differentiation capability building of international joint ventures in an emerging market. Journal of International Marketing, 22(3), 30-49. google scholar
  • Chidamber, S., & Kon, H. (1993). A research retrospective of innovation inception and success: the technology-push demand-pull question (working paper number: 3767). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. google scholar
  • Costa, C. Lages, L.F., & Hortinha, P. (2015). The bright and dark side of CSR in export markets: Its impact on innovation and performance. International Business Review, 24, 749-757. google scholar
  • Covin J.G., & Covin, T.J. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 35-50. google scholar
  • Day, G.S. (1994). The capabilities of market driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, 37-52. google scholar
  • Day, G.S. (1998). What does it mean to be market-driven? Business Strategy Review, 9(1), 1-14. google scholar
  • Demir, H. ve Gümüşoğlu, Ş. (2009). Üretim Yönetimi (İşlemler Yönetimi), 7th edition, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım AŞ. google scholar
  • Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U. (2004). Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 3-22. google scholar
  • Durand, R., & Coeurderoy, R. (2001). Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 471–94. google scholar
  • Figueiredo, P. N. (2008). Industrial policy changes and firm-level technological capability development: Evidence from Northern Brasil. World Development, 36(1), 55-88. google scholar
  • Frohman, A. L. (1982). Technology as a competitive weapon. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 97-104. google scholar
  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J.M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90. google scholar
  • Gao, G.Y., Zhou, K.Z., & Yim, C.K. (2007). On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 3-15. google scholar
  • Guan, J.C., Yam, R., Tang, E.P.Y., & Lau, A.K.W. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38, 802-812. google scholar
  • Hakala, H., & Kohtamaki, M. (2010). The interplay between orientations: entrepreneurial, technology and customer orientations in software companies. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 18(3), 265-290. google scholar
  • Hakala, H. (2011). Strategic orientations in management literature: Three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 199-217. google scholar
  • Hakala, H., & Kohtamaki, M. (2011). Configurations of entrepreneurial- customer- and technology orientation: Differences in learning and performance of software companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behavior and Research, 17(1), 64-81. google scholar
  • Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 217-233. google scholar
  • Henderson, R.M., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63-84. google scholar
  • Ho, J., Plewa, C., & Lu, V.N. (2016). Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2199-2205. google scholar
  • Holan, P.M., Philips, N., & Lawrence, T.B. (2004). Managing organizational forgetting. MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter, 45-51. google scholar
  • Hortinha, P., Lages, C., & Lages, L.F. (2011). The trade-off between customer and technology orientations: impact on innovation capabilities and export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 19(3), 36-58. google scholar
  • Hsu, T.T., Hsieh, M.H., Tsai, K.H., & Wang, W.Y. (2014). Strategic orientations and new product performance: The roles of technology capability. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 31, 44-58. google scholar
  • uber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115 google scholar
  • Hult, G.T. M., Huley, R.F., & Knight, G.A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429-438. google scholar
  • Hurley, R.F., & Hult, T.M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42-54. google scholar
  • Hyung, L.D., & Dedahanov, A. (2014). Firm performance and entrepreneurial, market and technology orientations in Korean technology intensive SMEs. Asian Social Sciences 10(22), 37-47. google scholar
  • Ibrahim, M.A., & Shariff, M.N.M. (2016). Mediating role of access to finance on the relationship between strategic orientation attributes and SMEs performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(3), 473-496. google scholar
  • Itami, H., & Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 119-135. google scholar
  • Jaferian, S., & Rezvani, M. (2014). Export new product success: The impact of market and technology orientation. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 1(5), 322-337. google scholar
  • Jeong, I., Pae J.H., & Zhou D. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: the case of Chinese manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 348–358. google scholar
  • Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64, 408-417. google scholar
  • Joachim, A.A., Omotayo, O.A., & Omotayo, O.J. (2011). Strategic orientations and technology policy: An empirical test of relationship in a developing economy. Contemporary Management Research, 5(1), 1-11. google scholar
  • Johnson, J.L., Martin, K.D., & Saini, A. (2012). The role of a firm’s strategic orientation in determining market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 715-724. google scholar
  • Kantrow, A.M. (1980). The strategy-technology connection. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 6-21. google scholar
  • Kasim, A., & Altınay, L. (2016). How do technology orientation, organizational learning, market conditions, and firm growth connect? A preliminary analysis on small and medium size hotels in Peninsular Malaysia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(7), 121-126. google scholar
  • Killen, C. P., Hunt, R. A., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2008). Learning investments and organizational capabilities: Case studies on the development of project portfolio mangement. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(3), 334-351 google scholar
  • Kocak, A., Carsrud, A., & Oflazoglu, S. (2017). Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: Impact on innovation and firm performance. Management Decision, 55(2), 248-270. google scholar
  • Kohli, A.K., & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. google scholar
  • Lau, C.M., Yiu, D.W., Yeung, P.K., & Lu, Y. (2008). Strategic orientation of high-technology firms in a transnational economy. Journal of Business Research, 61, 765-777. google scholar
  • Lee, D.H., Choi, S.B., & Kwak, W.J. (2014). The Effects of Four Dimensions of Strategic Orientation on Firm Innovativeness and Performance in Emerging Market Small- and Medium-Size Enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(5), 78-96. google scholar
  • Lee, D.H., Dedahanov, A.T., & Rhee, J. (2015). Moderating role of external networks and mediating effect of innovation performance on the relationship between technology orientation and firm performance. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 321-334. google scholar
  • Leng, Z., Liu, Z., Tan, M., & Pang, J. (2015). Speed leaders and quality champions. Management Decision, 53(6), 1247 – 1267. google scholar
  • Levy, B. & Kou, W.J. (1991). The strategic orientations of firms and the performance of Korea and Taiwan in frontier industries: lessons from comparative case studies of keyboard and personal computer assembly. World Development, 19(4), 363-374. google scholar
  • Li, J.J. (2005). The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategic orientations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22, 423-443. google scholar
  • Lindman, M. (2000). New product uniqueness in the context of industrial product development. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1-3), 247-271. google scholar
  • Liu, S.S., Luo, X., & Shi, Y.Z. (2002). Integrating customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in organizations-in-transition: an empirical study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 367-382. google scholar
  • Liu, T.C., & Chen, Y.C. (2015). Strategy orientation, product innovativeness, and new product performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 21(1), 2-16. google scholar
  • Lopez, S.P., Peon, J.M.M., & Ordas, C.J.V. (2005). Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. The Organizational Learning, 12(3), 227-245. google scholar
  • Lynch, J., Mason, R.J., Beresford, A.K.C., & Found, P.A. (2012). An examination of the role for Business Orientation in an uncertain business environment. International Journal of Economics, 137, 145-156. google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. google scholar
  • Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451. google scholar
  • Madanmohan, T.R., Kumar, U., & Kumar, V. (2004). Import-led technological capability: A comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 24, 979-993. google scholar
  • Mandal, S. (2017). The influence of organizational culture on healthcare supply chain resilience: Moderating role of technology orientation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(8), 1021-1037. google scholar
  • Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw Hill. google scholar
  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A.D., Coleman, Jr., & H.J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562. google scholar
  • Mohanty, K., & Kar, S. (2012). Achieving innovation and success. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, Jan-March, 36-42. google scholar
  • Morgan, R.E., & Strong, C.A. (1998). Market orientation and dimension of strategic orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 32(11-12), 1051-1073. google scholar
  • Morgan, R.E., & Strong, C.A. (2003). Business performance and dimension of strategic orientation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 163-176. google scholar
  • Morone, J. (1989). Strategic use of technology. California Management Review, 31(4), 91-110. google scholar
  • Mu, J., & Benedetto, C.A. (2011). Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: Mediator, moderator and interplay. R&D Management, 41(4), 337- 359. google scholar
  • Mutlu, H.M., & Sürer, A. (2016). Effects of market, e-marketing, and technology orientations on innovativeness and performance in Turkish health organizations. Health Marketing Quarterly, 33(2), 95-111. google scholar
  • Narver, J.C., & Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, October, 20-35. google scholar
  • Nakola, J.O., Tarus, B.K, Buigut, K., & Kipchirchir, K.E. (2015). Effect of strategic orientation on performance of small and medium enterprises: Evidence from Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(11), 336-351. google scholar
  • Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: A comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 534-553. google scholar
  • Panda, H., & Ramanathan, K. (1996). Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector. Technovation, 16(10), 561-588. google scholar
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy, New York: Free Press. google scholar
  • Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91. google scholar
  • Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. (2012). The effects of service orientation, technology orientation and open innovation on the performance of software-intensive service businesses. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Conference Proceedings, 1532-1541. google scholar
  • Salavou, H. (2005). Do customer and technology orientations influence product innovativeness in SMEs? Some new evidence from Greece. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 307-338. google scholar
  • Salojärvi, H., Ritala, P., Sainio, L.M., & Saarenketo, S. (2015). Synergistic effect of technology and customer relationship orientations: consequences for market performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(5), 511-520. google scholar
  • Sanino, L.M, Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2012). Constituents of radical innovationexploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty. Technovation, 32, 591-599. google scholar
  • Skerlavaj, M., Stemberger, M.I., Skrinjar, R., & Vlado, D. (2007). Organizational learning culturethe missing link between business process change and organizational performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 346-367. google scholar
  • Sok, P., & O’Cass, A. (2011). Achieving superior innovation-based performance outcomes in SMEs through innovation resource-capability complementarity. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1285-1293. google scholar
  • Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two-environmental context. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 259-276. google scholar
  • Song, M., Nason, R.W., Anthony, C., & Benedetto, D. (2008). Distinctive marketing information technology capabilities and strategic types: A cross-national investigation. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1), 4-38. google scholar
  • Spanjol, J., Qualls, W.J., & Rosa, J.A. (2011). How many and what kind? The role of strategic orientation in new product ideation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 236-250. google scholar
  • Srithika, T.M., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2009). Facilitating organizational unlearning using appreciative inquiry as an intervention. Vikalpa, 34(4), 67-77. google scholar
  • Starbuck, W.H. (1996). Unlearning ineffective or obsolete technologies. Working Paper Series, Stern School of Business, IS-97-30. google scholar
  • Süral-Özer, P., Özmen, Ö., & Saatçioğlu, Ö. (2004). Bilgi yönetiminin etkinliğinde kilit bir faktör olarak bilgi işçileri ve insan kaynakları yönetiminin farklılaşan özellikleri. DEÜ SBE Dergisi, 6(1), 254-275. google scholar
  • Sürer, A. ve Mutlu, H.M. (2012). Pazar, e-pazarlama, girişimcilik ve teknoloji yönelimlerinin ihracat performansı uzerine etkileri. IUYD, 3(2), 27-52. google scholar
  • Sürer, A. & Mutlu, H.M. (2016). The effects of an E-marketing orientation on performance in Turkish exporter firms. Journal of Internet Commerce, 14, 123-138. google scholar
  • Tan, J., & Tan, D. (2005). Environment- strategy co-evaluation and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 141-157. google scholar
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. google scholar
  • Tsai, K.H. (2004). The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan’s electronic industry. The Journal of High Technology. Management Research, 15, 183-195. google scholar
  • Tsang, E.W.K., & Zahra, S. (2008). Organizational unlearning. Human Relations, 61(10), 1435-1462. google scholar
  • Tsou, H.T., Chen, J.S., & Liao, W.H. (2014). Market and technology orientations for service delivery innovation: The link of innovative competence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(6), 499-513. google scholar
  • Urban, B. (2010). Technology and entrepreneurial orientation at the organisational level in the Johannesburg area. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 1-9. google scholar
  • Urban, B., & Barreria, J. (2010). Empirical investigations into firm technology orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 7(4), 329-351. google scholar
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprise: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942-962. google scholar
  • Voudouris, I., Lioukas, S., Latrelli, M., & Caloghirou, Y. (2012). Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment’s strategic importance. Technovation, 32, 400-414. google scholar
  • Wang, X., Lu, Y., Zhao, Y., Gong, S., & Li, B. (2013). Organizational unlearning, organizational flexibility and innovation capability: An empirical study of SMEs in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 61(2), 132-155. google scholar
  • Wang, Y., Lo, H.P., Zhang, Q., & Xue, Y. (2006). How technological capability influences business performance: An integrated framework based on the contingency approach. Journal of Technology Management in China, 1(1), 27-52. google scholar
  • Weerawardena, J., O’Cass, A., & Julian, C. (2006). Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structure and organizational learning in innovation and brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 59, 37-45. google scholar
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. google scholar
  • Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Zhu, H., & Wu, G. (2012). What are the effective strategic orientations for new product success under different environments? An empirical study of Chinese Businesses. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 166-179. google scholar
  • Yıldız, H.E., & Fey, C.F. (2010). Compatibility and unlearning in knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 448-456. google scholar
  • Yılmaz, C., Alpkan, L., & Ergun, E. (2005). Cultural determinants of customer- and learningoriented value systems and their joint effects on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1340-1352. google scholar
  • Zahra, S.A., & Covin, J.G. (1993). Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 451-478. google scholar
  • Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 189-219. google scholar
  • Zehir, C., Muceldili, E., Akyüz, B., & Celep, A. (2010). The impact of information technology investments on firm performance in national and multinational companies. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 7, 143-154. google scholar
  • Zhou, K.Z., Yim, C.K., & Tse, D.K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69, 42-60. google scholar
  • Zhou, K.Z., Gao, G.Y., Yang, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Developing strategic orientation in China: antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1049-1058. google scholar
  • Zhou, K.Z., & Li, C.B. (2007). How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 447-466. google scholar
  • Zhou, K.Z., & Li, C.B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63, 224-231. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Seçkin Halaç, D. (2019). Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda. Istanbul Management Journal, 0(86), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


AMA

Seçkin Halaç D. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda. Istanbul Management Journal. 2019;0(86):25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


ABNT

Seçkin Halaç, D. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda. Istanbul Management Journal, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 86, p. 25-55, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Seçkin Halaç, Duygu,. 2019. “Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 86: 25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


Chicago: Humanities Style

Seçkin Halaç, Duygu,. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda.” Istanbul Management Journal 0, no. 86 (Oct. 2022): 25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


Harvard: Australian Style

Seçkin Halaç, D 2019, 'Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda', Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 86, pp. 25-55, viewed 6 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Seçkin Halaç, D. (2019) ‘Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda’, Istanbul Management Journal, 0(86), pp. 25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002 (6 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Seçkin Halaç, Duygu,. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda.” Istanbul Management Journal, vol. 0, no. 86, 2019, pp. 25-55. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


Vancouver

Seçkin Halaç D. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda. Istanbul Management Journal [Internet]. 6 Oct. 2022 [cited 6 Oct. 2022];0(86):25-55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002 doi: 10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002


ISNAD

Seçkin Halaç, Duygu. Technology Orientation: A Reassessment and a Future Research Agenda”. Istanbul Management Journal 0/86 (Oct. 2022): 25-55. https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2019.86.0002



TIMELINE


Submitted10.05.2018
Accepted02.01.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.