Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era

Celalettin VatandaşSaniye Vatandaş

The society that the Republic of Türkiye inherited was a society whose demographic normality had been disrupted. This society formed the basis of all political, economic, and cultural change projects in the early Republican Era. During the first days of the Republic, the political, legal, economic, and cultural reforms that were believed would establish modern Türkiye were implemented one after another, and special importance was given to population policy in accordance with the conditions of the day. Pronatalist and eugenic approaches constituted the characteristic feature of the population policy that had been put into practice without delay and whose details were created during the process. Hence, the endeavor was to construct a national family by encouraging marriage and having multiple children, with the prohibition of marriage for having few children even being mentioned during the process. In addition, special efforts were made to ensure that the current population would consist of healthy and physically strong individuals in accordance with the principle of a sound mind residing in a healthy body. By drawing on the written sources and documents of the period, this research aims to determine the characteristic features of the population policy carried out in the early Republican Era and the efforts and endeavors to construct the national family.

DOI :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010   IUP :10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010    Full Text (PDF)

Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Nüfus Siyaseti ve Aile

Celalettin VatandaşSaniye Vatandaş

Cumhuriyet yönetimi, Osmanlı’dan demografik felakete uğramış bir toplum devraldı. Devralınan toplum, savaşlar, işgaller, kitlesel katliamlar, kitlesel göçler, salgın hastalıklar nedeniyle demografik normalliği tamamıyla bozulmuş bir toplumdu. Bu toplum, erken cumhuriyet dönemindeki tüm siyasal, yasal, ekonomik, kültürel değişim projelerinin zeminini teşkil etti. Cumhuriyetin ilk günleriyle birlikte, iki asrı aşkın süredir dâhil olunan batılılaşma sürecinin son aşamasını teşkil edecek modern Türkiye’yi inşa edeceğine inanılan siyasal, yasal, ekonomik ve kültürel devrimler peş peşe uygulamaya konulurken, mevcut olumsuz şartlar gereği nüfus siyasetine de özel bir önem verildi. Hiç vakit kaybetmeden uygulamaya konan ve süreç içerisinde detayları oluşturulan nüfus siyasetinin karakteristik özelliğini pronatalist ve öjenik yaklaşımlar oluşturdu. Bu nedenle örneğin evliliğin ve çok çocukluluğun özendirildiği, buna karşılık evlenmemenin ve az çocuklu evliliğin yasaklanmasının dahi gündeme geldiği bir süreç ile “milli aile” inşa edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca mevcut nüfusun “sağlam kafa sağlam vücutta bulunur” ilkesi gereği sağlıklı ve bedenen güçlü bireylerden oluşması için özel çaba harcanmıştır. Çünkü toplumun hem demografik normalliğinin tesis edilmesi hem de bu demografinin dinç ve dinamik olması amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırma, doğrudan dönemin yazılı kaynaklarına ve belgelerine dayanılarak, erken cumhuriyet döneminde yürütülen nüfus siyasetinin karakteristik özelliklerini ve bu bağlamda idealize dilen “milli aileyi” inşa etme çaba ve çalışmalarının niteliğini belirleme amacındadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The strong mutual relationship between the family institution and social structure is important. However, social structure is what dominates this reciprocal relationship, because demographic or functional changes in the social structure very quickly and easily affect the family institution structurally and functionally. In this respect, the periods in which extensive or radical changes have taken place in the social structure also gain meaning as the periods in which comprehensive and radical changes had taken place in the family institution. Many factors can be mentioned that lead to comprehensive and radical changes in the social structure. The most important factors among these that cause changes in the social structure are wars, natural disasters, mass migrations, epidemics, political revolutions, radical and massive religious or cultural changes, and sudden and comprehensive economic disasters or developments. Changes and new formations in the social structure under the influence of these or similar factors directly lead to a new cycle of changes and transformations in the family institution. This feature of the social structure-family relationship can be exemplified through Türkiye’s recent history. In this respect, the 30-year period between 1910-1940 that covers the years of the Second Constitutional Era and the early Republican Era is very important. The Balkan War disaster, the Gallipoli Campaign, the disaster in the Battle of Sarikamish, and similar wars in the East, as well as mass murders, epidemics, mass migrations, the country’s shrinkage by 800%-1000% within a short period of 10-15 years, the occupation of the entire country’s territory, and the National Struggle that was carried out with all kinds of difficulties and impossibilities are all factors that meant difficulties that far exceeded anything any society or country could imagine. Moreover, those years represent a time when radical changes took place at the political, legal, economic, and cultural levels within the scope of the Westernization project. If one considers the matter only and especially in terms of disasters, a demographic disaster is seen to have been experienced in Türkiye during this period, and a significant part of the country’s population had been lost due to wars and diseases. Thrace and Anatolia, which would become a homeland through the Republican Era, served as the shelter for those who had migrated from the Balkans and Caucasus in masses, leaving behind all their property and even some of their relatives due to wars and massacres. From this perspective, such a mass migration had rarely been seen in history. These masses experienced great mental and physical shock and pain and constituted the current demographic basis and structure in the nation-building efforts that started during the Second Constitutional Era and gained a systematic character in the Republican Era.

This period covers the first quarter of the 20th century and is mostly associated with wars, massacres, diseases, and extensive and deep subsistence problems. It also constituted an extremely important threshold of the Westernization that had been going on for more than two centuries. This period corresponds to a time when radical changes in social institutions took place at the highest level within the scope of Westernization efforts that had turned into state policy through the Tanzimat [Reform Era]. The Republican cadres believed that this policy should be all-encompassing nationwide, and they knew and projected that they had much to do when they took power. However, the Republican administration took over a society that had suffered a demographic disaster. For this reason, they believed that before all their political, legal, cultural, and economic projects, they should first repair the existing demographic structure that had lost its natural balance and restore it to a healthier condition. This was a very important aspect for the future of the country, as this would be necessary for the success of the revolutions to be carried out or planned beforehand. They believed that the way to repair the demographic structure in terms of the social structure-family relationship was through the family. They also believed that if the institution of the family, which had been damaged heavily by great disasters, could be made healthy and strong, the demographic structure would return to its normal state and the revolutions would be successful and innate. For these reasons and purposes, they immediately took action. Even in the years of the National Struggle, they had intellectual discussions about the regulations regarding the family institution. They thought of methods and tools to make the family stand stronger and more functional. When they took power, they started to implement all of their plans one after another. Thus, the first 20 years of the Republic are regarded as a period of time in which the perceptions of the individual, politics, state, religion, laws, tradition, culture, bureaucratic structure, family, and society as a whole generally changed significantly, with new ideas regarding these areas beginning to dominate and new expectations arising. The endeavor to complement the political revolution with a social one was an important feature of the period. For this purpose, regulations regarding the appearance and lifestyles of individuals were implemented. New perceptions and practices regarding the status of women emerged. Gender roles were actively discussed. An approach to solidarity was spread nationwide. Marriage was encouraged. The family institution was strengthened. The family was removed from the private sphere and made into an element of the public sphere. Pronatalist and eugenic population policies were implemented. Regulations and practices regarding work life were made, and women’s paid work was encouraged.

The times when radical changes are experienced are the times when opinions about the possible methods for realizing the envisaged regulations are frequently expressed, views on the mechanisms for controlling the disintegration of the social structure are voiced, projects concerning problems are developed, and actual attempts are made regarding what is desired to happen in the future. These times are also when the family institution becomes the center of attention of political power centers due to the societyfamily relationship. Therefore, issues such as new life and new family came to the fore during the Second Constitutional Era when comprehensive and profound demographic, political, economic, legal and cultural changes had been experienced in many respects is no coincidence. During this era, the family institution was strongly and intensely referred to as the foundation of society, the most concrete unit of social solidarity, and the source of the morals and values that are described as the mortar of national solidarity. Due to the unique conditions of the period, the family institution was both removed from being an institution shaped under the influence of religion and transformed from being an element of the private sphere to being an element of the public sphere. The Republican administration made an effort to take over this legacy and give it its own influence. While the leaders of the Republic and intellectuals were doing this, they benefited greatly from the experiences of the Constitutional Era, during which their personalities and worldviews had also been shaped. For this reason, the concept of the national family had a great impact on the family policies of the early Republican Era. The efforts to build and protect the national family, which was first voiced by Ziya Gökalp and put into practice by the Unionist government during the Constitutional Era, became the basis for the policies related to the family in the Republican Era.

According to the dominant understanding of family that the civil and military bureaucrats and intellectuals who operated the state apparatus of the period had, the number of marriages and children in particular or the structural characteristics and functioning of the family institution in general were too important to be left to the personal preferences and pleasures of individuals in the early Republican Era. Therefore, the fact that individuals of marriageable age did not marry (preferred to remain single) or chose to divorce easily became an important state and nation problem. Marriage and having many children are one’s debt to the homeland, and not getting married or having few children is a betrayal to the homeland and nation, with the related disloyalty and selfishness being negative dimensions of personality. According to the common and dominant understanding of the period, this was because family meant the independence of the country, the power of the state, and the prestige and wealth of the nation. Even more importantly, a child means a soldier who will defend the country, economic production and the resultant wealth, the reputation of the nation, and family. Hence, the number of children in the family has always been considered important. Families were encouraged to have many children. But of equal importance was that these children be healthy and strong. For this purpose, eugenic practices were carried out meticulously. In addition, the health and education of the mother were considered important conditions for a healthy family structure. Within the context of all these, the state was the entity that should solve problems such as being single or getting divorced in order to build a family structure of satisfactory quality and quantity. Therefore, the state took the initiative and carried out efforts to control the process through encouragement and intimidation.


PDF View

References

  • Akalın, B. Ö. (1939). Türk çocuğunu nasıl yaşatmalı. Ahmed İhsan Basımevi. google scholar
  • Alaeddin, İ. (1929). Ruhiyat ve terbiye: köy muallim mekteplerine mahsus. Devlet Matbaası. google scholar
  • Alantar, İ. H. (1939). Pediyatri köşesinden öjenik. Kader Matbaası. google scholar
  • Asaf, B. (1993). Spor telakkimiz. Ülkü dergisi 1933-1950 Seçilmiş Spor Makaleleri, (S. Karaküçük, Haz.). google scholar
  • Atatürk, M. K. (1997). Atatürk’ün söylev ve demeçleri. Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurulu. google scholar
  • Atay, F. R. (1933). Nüfus sayımı. Ülkü mecmuası. 6(33). google scholar
  • Aydemir, Ş. S. (1932). Çok nüfuslu Anadolu. Kadro mecmuası, (5), Mayıs 1932. 34-39. google scholar
  • Aydın, C. (2016). Erken cumhuriyet Türkiye’sinde evlilik ve aile [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Bardakçı, M. (2009). Talat Paşa’nın evrak-ı metrukesi. Everest yayınları. google scholar
  • Bashford, A. and Levine, P. (2010). Introduction: Eugenics and the modern world. In A. Bashford & P. Levine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the history of eugenics. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Başvekâlet. (1929). Umumî nüfus tahriri. Başvekâlet Müdevvenat Matbaası. google scholar
  • Behnan, E. (1926). Aile kadını, süs kadını. Türk kadın yolu. (19). 5-7. google scholar
  • Benice, E. İ. (1939). Bekârdan kesip evliye vermek. Cumhuriyet. google scholar
  • Birol, A. E. (1938). Eugenik tatbikatı. Milli Türk tıb kurultayı. Kader Basımevi. google scholar
  • Bock, G. (2004). Avrupa tarihinde kadınlar. (Z. A. Yılmazer, Çev.). Literatür Yayınları. google scholar
  • CHP. (1935). CHP dördüncü büyük kurultayı görüşmeleri tutulgası, 9-16 Mayıs 1935, Ulus Matbaası. google scholar
  • Çambel, H. C. (1929). Yeni Ruh. Hamit Matbaası. google scholar
  • Çambel, P. (1946). Eugenics hakkında düşünceler. Kader Basımevi google scholar
  • Dora, Ş. (1938). Yeni rejimde çocuğun ehemmiyeti ve kıymeti, Uludağ Bursa Halkevi Dergisi. (18). 45-47. google scholar
  • Durakbaşı, A. (2002). Halide Edip Türk modernleşmesi ve feminizm. İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • Erdal, İ. (2011). Ülkü mecmuasına göre erken cumhuriyet dönemi nüfus politikası (1923-1938). google scholar
  • Ankara üniversitesi Türk inkılâp tarihi enstitüsü Atatürk yolu dergisi. (48). Güz 2011. 779-791 google scholar
  • Erickson, E. J. (2001). Ordered to die a history of ottoman army in the first world war. Greenwod Press. google scholar
  • Eryücel, E. (2017). Öjenik siyaset ve Türkiye’de uygulanması (1918-1945). [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Gazi üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Feroz, A. (1995). Modern Türkiye’nin oluşumu. (Y. Alogan, Çev.). Sarmal Yayınları. google scholar
  • Fethi, R. (1939). Çocuk meselesi. Cumhuriyet. 28 Nisan 1939. google scholar
  • Freeden, M. (1979). Eugenics and progressive thought : A study in ıdeological affinity. The historical journal, 22(3). Online. Retrieved 11.01.2023, from http://www.istor.org/stable/2638658 google scholar
  • Galip, R. (1929). Doğum artırma işi. Cumhuriyet. 27 Nisan 1929. google scholar
  • Galton. F. (1904). Eugenics: ıt’s definition, scope and aims.The American journal of sociology. 10(1). Online. Retrieved 11.01.2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2762125 google scholar
  • Gökalp, Z. (1917). Asrî aile ve millî aile. Yeni mecmua, (20), 381-383. google scholar
  • Gökalp, Z. (1976). Türkçülüğün esasları. (M. Kaplan, Haz.). Kültür Bakanlığı Ziya Gökalp Yayınları google scholar
  • Gökalp, Z., (2006), Felsefe dersleri. (A. Utku & E. Erbay, Haz.). Çizgi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Gökay, F. K. (1934). Milli nüfus siyasetinde (eugenique) meselesinin mahiyeti. Ülkü mecmuası. 3(15). 206-212 google scholar
  • Göktürk, H. A. (1939). Evlenme birliğinde eşlerin durumu. CHP Konferanslar Serisi- 4. Recep Ulusoğlu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Halim, B. (1933). Kadınlar sulh yolunda. Şehir. Mayıs 1933. google scholar
  • Hamit Sadi. (1934). İktisadi Türkiye. Ahmet Sait Matbaası. google scholar
  • Irmak, S. (1943). Kendimize doğru: memleketimizin bazı meseleleri. Foto Magazin Basımevi. google scholar
  • İnan, A. (1982). Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’ün 1923 Eskişehir-İzmit konuşmaları. TTK Yayınları. google scholar
  • İsmail Habib. (1936). Sayım gününün büyüklüğü. Nüfus meselesi ve nüfus sayımı hakkında fikirler. Başvekalet İstatistik Umum Müdürlüğü. google scholar
  • Kansu, Ş. A. (1934). Türk topraklarının adamı. Ülkü mecmuası. 4(24), 563-580. google scholar
  • Kansu, Ş.A. (1939). Öjenik problemleri. Ülkü Mecmuası, 12(72), 480-488. google scholar
  • Karanakçı, S. (1939). Cumhuriyet çocukları. Cumhuriyet, 22 Nisan 1939. google scholar
  • Kaya, Ş. (1941). 3530 sayılı beden terbiyesi kanunun müzakere zabıtları. Beden terbiyesi mevzuatı, (N. Ergeneli, N. Tuna, Der.). Aleaaddin Kıral Basımevi. google scholar
  • Kerim, F. (1934). Milli nüfus siyasetimizde (eugenique) meselesinin mahiyeti. Ülkü. (5). Mayıs 1934. google scholar
  • Koraltürk, M. (1997). “Milli Aile’ye ilişkin bir belge”, Toplumsal tarih, Sayı: 46, 23-25. google scholar
  • Köse, M. (2010). 1927 Nüfus Sayımı ve Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Afyonkocatepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Küçüka, N. A. (1936). Çocuk düşürme. Ülkü mecmuası. 7(37). google scholar
  • Malik, H. (1932). Yaratıcı küçük insan ve kabiliyeti. Anadolu Maarif Kütüphanesi. google scholar
  • McCarthy, J. (1995). Ölüm ve Sürgün. (B. Umar, Çev.). İnkılap Yayınları. google scholar
  • Meclis-i Ayan. (1918). Meclis-i Ayan Zabıt Ceridesi, Devre. 3, Cilt. 2, İçtima Senesi.4, 41. İnikad. (24 Mart 1334/24 Mart 1918), 2215-2217. google scholar
  • Muhiddin, N. (1925). Analık vazifeleri- çocuklarımızı nasıl büyütmeliyiz?. Kadın yolu. (1). 16 Temmuz 1925. google scholar
  • Nadi, N. (1965). Perde aralığından. Cumhuriyet Yayınları. google scholar
  • Nadi, Y. (1935). Hakiki kuvvet ve zenginliğimiz olan nüfusumuz artıyor. Cumhuriyet, 26 Ekim 1935 google scholar
  • Nasır, Z. (1933). Sıhhat ve iktisat. Ülkü, 2(11), 416-418. google scholar
  • Nayır, Y. N. (1939). Nüfus meselesi karşısında Türkiye. Ülkü mecmuası, 14(79). google scholar
  • Nüzhet Baba. (1993). Beden terbiyesi ve gençlik meselesi izcilik. İçinde S. Karaküçük (Der.), Ülkü dergisi 1933-1950 seçilmiş spor makaleleri. google scholar
  • Öğün, T. (2004). Unutulmuş bir göç trajedisi vilayat-ı şarkiye mültecileri (1915-1923). Babil Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Refik, H. (1925). Kadın-valide, Türk kadın yolu, (4). 6 Ağustos 1341/ 6 Ağustos 1925. google scholar
  • Saydam, R. (1939). Açış Nutku, Yedinci Ulusal Türk Tıp Kurultayı. Kader Basımevi. google scholar
  • Selek, C. H. (1935). Memlekette nüfus azlığını nasıl artırabiliriz, Cumhuriyet Gazetesi, 12 Mayıs 1935. google scholar
  • Semiz, Y. (2010). 1923-1950 döneminde Türkiye’de nüfusu artırma gayretleri ve mecburi evlenme kanunu (bekarlık vergisi). Türkiyat araştırmaları dergisi, (27), 423-469. google scholar
  • Sıtkı, A. R. (1934). İnkılâp psychologiesi. Kader Basımevi. google scholar
  • Süreyya, Ş. (1932). Çok nüfuslu Anadolu. Kadro, 1(5). google scholar
  • Şemsi, M. (1933). Harbin ıstifai tesirleri ve zabitlerimizin neslimizin ıslahındaki ehemmiyetleri. Askeri Matbaa. google scholar
  • Şenel, A. (1993). Irk ve ırkçılık düşüncesi. Bilim ve Sanat Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Taşcıoğlu, Ö. L. (2017). Birinci dünya harbindeki Türk ve Ermeni kayıplar, Trakya üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 19(2), 1-28. google scholar
  • TBMM. (1934). TBMM CHF grubu nüfus komisyonu raporu. Ankara: TBMM Matbaası. google scholar
  • TBMM. (1938). TBMM zabıt ceridesi, devre 5, İçtima Senesi 3, c. 26, 15 Haziran 1938. google scholar
  • TBMM. (1926). Zabıt Ceridesi. Devre II, cilt 24. 91. İçtima. 26.04.1926 google scholar
  • TBMM. (1927). Zabıt Ceridesi. Devre II. Cilt 29. 38. İçtima. 26.02.1927 google scholar
  • TBMM. (2013). Tarihe düşülen notlar-3, Ankara, TBMM Basımevi. google scholar
  • TİCİ. (1926). Üçüncü umumi kongreye takdim edilen merkez-i umumi raporu. Yeni Gün Matbaası. google scholar
  • Tiner, Ş. H. (1938). Eugenik bahsine umumi bir bakış. Kader Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Tokgöz, S. K. (1938). Öjenism ırk ıslahı. Sümer Basımevi. google scholar
  • Toprak, Z. (1991). The Family, Feminism and The State During The Young Turk Period 1908- 1918. Varia Turcica, 13(199), 441-452. google scholar
  • Toprak, Z. (1998). Osmanlı kadınları çalıştırma cemiyeti: kadın askerler ve milli aile. Tarih ve toplum, 51, 34-38. google scholar
  • Tökin, İ. H. (1932). Asya’da nüfus hareketleri. Kadro mecmuası. (4), Nisan 1932. google scholar
  • Tunç, M. Ş. (1932). Nüfus sayımı kalkınma çağı. Nüfus meselesi ve nüfus sayımı hakkında fikirler. İstatistik Umum Müdürlüğü Yayını. google scholar
  • Ulubelen, E. (1967). İngiliz belgelerinde Türkiye. Aykaç Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Uzman, M. O. (1939). Öjenik: CHP Halk Konferansları Serisi-2. Recep Ulusoğlu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Ülkü. (1933). Ülkü niçin çıkıyor. Ülkü mecmuası. 1(1), 1-2. google scholar
  • Velidedeoğlu, H. V. (1939). Evlenme ve boşanma, CHP konferanslar Serisi-1. Recep Ulusoğlu Basımevi. google scholar
  • Yaman, K (1940). Aktif yurddaş. Beden terbiyesi ve spor. (14), 14, Şubat 1940. google scholar
  • Zeki, C. (1926). Çocuk düşüren veya düşürtenlerin cezası bunlar hakkındaki takibât-ı kanuniye. Türk kadın yolu. (19), 15 Eylül 1926. google scholar
  • Zingali, G. (1932). Nüfusun kemiyet ve keyfiyeti inkişafı için İtalya’da alınan tedbirler. (Y. Adil, Çev.). Başvekâlet İstatistik Umum Müdürlüğü. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Vatandaş, C., & Vatandaş, S. (2024). Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


AMA

Vatandaş C, Vatandaş S. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology. 2024;44(1):257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


ABNT

Vatandaş, C.; Vatandaş, S. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, [Publisher Location], v. 44, n. 1, p. 257-282, 2024.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Vatandaş, Celalettin, and Saniye Vatandaş. 2024. “Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1: 257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


Chicago: Humanities Style

Vatandaş, Celalettin, and Saniye Vatandaş. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1 (Oct. 2024): 257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


Harvard: Australian Style

Vatandaş, C & Vatandaş, S 2024, 'Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era', İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 257-282, viewed 11 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Vatandaş, C. and Vatandaş, S. (2024) ‘Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era’, İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 44(1), pp. 257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010 (11 Oct. 2024).


MLA

Vatandaş, Celalettin, and Saniye Vatandaş. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era.” İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, vol. 44, no. 1, 2024, pp. 257-282. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


Vancouver

Vatandaş C, Vatandaş S. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 11 Oct. 2024 [cited 11 Oct. 2024];44(1):257-282. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010 doi: 10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010


ISNAD

Vatandaş, Celalettin - Vatandaş, Saniye. Population Politics and Family in Türkiye’s Early Republican Era”. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology 44/1 (Oct. 2024): 257-282. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2024.44.1.0010



TIMELINE


Submitted04.09.2023
Accepted19.10.2023
Published Online10.07.2024

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.