Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0044   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0044    Full Text (PDF)

Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees

Selda Coşkuner AktaşBirgül Çiçek

Challenging the assumption that work and family are incompatible, a growing number of studies have focused on the positive relationships between these two roles. The exploratory study described in this paper aimed to examine whether family characteristics (i.e., taking responsibility for childcare, child-related issues, and household chores) are associated with family-to-work facilitation (FWF). Using data from two major state universities in Ankara (n = 447), we examined the family-to-work-facilitation of full-time employees (both male and female) with children. The findings of the study indicate that women experience FWF more than men, considering all the independent variables. Moreover, FWF (including time and psychology-based FWF) was higher for women than that of men. The relationship between FWF and taking responsibility for childcare, children, and household chores was found to be statistically significant by sex. The time and psychology-based FWF of women who stated that “their husbands were largely responsible” for childcare and child-related matters were higher than those of men. Furthermore, the psychology-based FWF of women who stated that “they and their husbands were equally responsible” for childcare and child-related matters were higher than that of males who gave the same answer. The women who hired help for household tasks had more FWF and psychological-based FWF than men. The findings are discussed within the framework of sex, gender, and the limited related literature, and directions for future research are suggested.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0044   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0044    Full Text (PDF)

Aile-İş Kolaylaştırması, Cinsiyet ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Üniversite Çalışanları Örneği

Selda Coşkuner AktaşBirgül Çiçek

İş ve aile ilişkisini inceleyen çalışmalarda bu iki alanın birbirine müdahalesini kabul eden çalışmalar ağırlık taşımasına rağmen, iş ve ailenin birbirine olumlu etkilerinin incelendiği çalışmalar da literatürde yer edinmeyi başarmıştır. Bu çalışma, çalışan ebeveynlerin, çocukların bakımı ve çocuklarla ilgili konular ile ev içi faaliyetlerde sorumluluk alma durumlarının aile-iş kolaylaştırması üzerindeki etkisinin cinsiyet ve toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında incelenmesi amacını taşımaktadır. Ankara’da iki büyük devlet üniversitesinde çalışan, evli ve çocuk sahibi olan personel (n=447) ile yürütülen çalışmada tüm değişkenler açısından kadınların aile-iş kolaylaştırmasını erkeklerden daha fazla yaşadıklarını göstermiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre kadınların aile-iş kolaylaştırması ile zaman esaslı ve psikolojik esaslı aile-iş kolaylaştırması, erkeklerden daha yüksektir. Bireylerin çocuk bakımı ve çocuklarla ilgili konularda ve ev içi faaliyetlerde sorumluluk alma durumu ile aile-iş kolaylaştırması arasındaki ilişki cinsiyete göre farklılaşmaktadır. Çocuk bakımı ve çocuklarla ilgili konularda büyük ölçüde eşinin sorumlu olduğunu belirten kadınların zaman esaslı aile-iş kolaylaştırması ile eşiyle hemen hemen eşit olarak sorumlu olduğunu belirten kadınların psikolojik esaslı aile-iş kolaylaştırması, erkeklerden daha yüksektir. Ev içi faaliyetlerden büyük ölçüde yardımcının sorumlu olduğunu belirten kadınların aile-iş kolaylaştırması ile psikolojik esaslı aile-iş kolaylaştırması, erkeklere göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Elde edilen bulgular cinsiyet, toplumsal cinsiyet ve sınırlı literatür çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


lthough the notion of conflict between work and family pervades the literature, researchers have recently begun to accept the positive or beneficial aspects of combining work and family roles (Beute-ll & Schneer, 2014). In other words, although conflicts are likely when employees try to strike a balance between family and work commitments, it is also possible that their involvement in their families and work roles will bring positive results to their lives (Grzywacz & Bass, 2003). Facilitation occurs when engaging with one area of life brings benefits that improve the functioning of another (Wayne, Musis-ca, & Fleeson, 2004, p. 109). Participation in the home (or work) becomes easy thanks to the experienc-es, skills, and opportunities gained and developed at work (or at home) through work and family facil-itation (Frone, 2003). Individuals may experience different types of facilitation in parallel with differ-ent types of conflict: time, energy, and psychological-based facilitation. Time-based facilitation occurs when the time devoted to one role encourages or facilitates the effective management and use of the time devoted to another role. Energy-based facilitation occurs when the energy obtained in one role makes it easier to meet the needs of another role. Finally, psychological facilitation refers to the ability to place issues related to one role in perspective through another role, making it easier to fulfill the requirements of the first role (van Steenbergen, Ellemers, & Moojaart, 2007). In this study, the idea that the family facilitates one’s work life is examined. The antecedents of fam-ily-to-work facilitation (FWF) include taking responsibility for childcare, child-related issues, and house-hold chores. In this context, this study differs from previous ones because the antecedents related to the effect of FWF have been examined within the framework of “sharing of responsibilities” at home. The simple random sampling method was used in this study, in which the effects of taking respon-sibility for childcare, child-related issues, and household chores on FWF were evaluated in terms of both sex and gender. The sample consists of a total of 447 university staff who were both married and had children. The data were collected through a questionnaire consisting of two sections. The first section contains questions regarding demographic information (sex, age, educational status, spouse’s employment status, and the number and age of children), childcare, child-related issues, and household chores. In the second section, the work and family relationship scale developed by van Stenbergen et al. (2007) was employed, particularly the FWF items. These items consist of nine statements with three dimensions (time, energy, and psychology-based FWF). The data for this research were evaluated using the SPSS 21 program. Demographic and descrip-tive information about the participants is presented via descriptive statistics such as frequency, percent-age, average, and standard deviation. To test the hypotheses, two-sample t-test were conducted. The results obtained from the analyses were evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and α = 0.05 signifi-cance level. In the study, most of the participants were male with a master’s/doctorate degree, and they predom-inantly worked as full-time administrative employees. In addition, the average age of the participants was determined as Χ = 40.2 ± 7.2, the number of children was Χ = 1.8 ± 0.5, and the average age of the youngest child was Χ = 7.5 ± 5.2. According to the results of the study, women’s FWF, as well as their time- and psychology-based FWF, was higher than that of men. The relationship between taking responsibility for childcare and child-related issues and FWF, as well as the relationship between taking responsibility for household chores and FWF, differed by gender. The time-based FWF of people whose spouses were largely re-sponsible for childcare and child-related issues was higher for women than men. Furthermore, the psychology-based FWF of those who felt almost equal to their spouses in childcare and child-related issues was higher for women than men. Finally, the FWF and psychology-based FWF with hired help at home were higher for women than men. In the paper, the findings are discussed within the frame-work of sex, gender, and the limited related literature, and directions for future research are suggested.


PDF View

References

  • Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Ankara, Türkiye: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Aryee, S., Srinivas, E.S., & Tan, H.H. (2005). Rhythms of life: antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132–146. google scholar
  • Başak, S., Kıngır, S., ve Yaşar, Ş. (2013). Kadının görünmeyen emeği: ikinci vardiya. Anka Kadın Araştırma Merkezi, Rapor No: 2013/01 google scholar
  • Beauvoir, S. (2019). İkinci Cinsiyet 2. Cilt: Yaşanmış Deneyim. (G. A. Savran, Çev.) İstanbul, Türkiye: Koç Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Beutell, N.J., & Schneer, J.A. (2014). Work-family conflict and synergy among Hispanics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(6), 705–735 google scholar
  • Bingöl, O. (2014). Toplumsal cinsiyet olgusu ve Türkiye’de kadınlık. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2014(3), 108–114 google scholar
  • Boeckmann, I., Misra, J., & Budig, M. J. (2015). Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces, 93(4), 1301–1333. google scholar
  • Bozok, M. (2017). Türkiye’de ilgili babalık ve belirleyicileri. Türkiye’de Babalığı Anlamak Serisi-I (AÇEV). İstanbul, Türkiye: Taymaz Matbaacılık google scholar
  • Bozok, M. (2018). Ebeveynlik, erkeklik ve çalışma hayatı arasında Türkiye’de babalık. Türkiye’de Babalığı Anlamak Serisi-II (AÇEV). İstanbul, Türkiye: Taymaz Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Butler, J. (1999). Cinsiyet belası feminizm ve kimliğin altüst edilmesi. (B. Ertür, Çev.) İstanbul, Türkiye: Metis Yayınları google scholar
  • Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: a new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. google scholar
  • Coşkuner, S. (2016). Exploring the links between work and family: Conflict or facilitation? Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 2(4), 843–849. google scholar
  • Connel, R. W. (1998). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve iktidar. (C. Soydemir, Çev.) İstanbul, Türkiye: Ayrıntı Yayınları google scholar
  • Connel, R. W. (2019). Erkeklikler. (N. Konukcu, Çev.) Ankara, Türkiye: PhoenixYayınevi google scholar
  • Dedeoğlu, S. (2000). Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri açısından Türkiye’de aile ve kadın emeği. Toplum ve Bilim, 86,139–170. google scholar
  • Demerouti, E., Geurts, S.A.E., & Kompier, M. (2004). Positive and negative work–home interaction: prevalence and correlates. Equal Opportunities International, 23(1/2), 6–35. google scholar
  • Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research. IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002) içinde. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197. google scholar
  • Eker, H. (2018). Toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında iş dışı zaman kullanımı: Kamuda çalışanlar üzerine sosyolojik bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(15), 1218–1240 google scholar
  • Ersoy, E. (2009). Cinsiyet kültürü içerisinde kadın ve erkek kimliği (Malatya Örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 209–230 google scholar
  • Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick and L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology. (pp.143–162). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association. google scholar
  • Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of Role Strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496 google scholar
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88. google scholar
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family, and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work . (pp.391–412.). Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage google scholar
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92 google scholar
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Bass, B. L. (2003). Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work-family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 248–262. google scholar
  • Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work-family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126. google scholar
  • Gültekin, A. ve Bener, Ö. (2006). 0-6 yaş döneminde çocuğu olan çalışan ve çalışmayan kadınların evle ilgili faaliyetleri yürütme biçimlerinin incelenmesi.Erişim Adresi: http://www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/makaleler/0-6yasdonemicocuklukadinlar.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 08.02.2020. google scholar
  • Güneş, N. ve Demircioğlu, H. (2018). 0-6 yaş arası çocuğu olan annelerin aile-işlevlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 1087–1106. google scholar
  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R., Snoek, J.D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity,New York, USA:Wiley. google scholar
  • Karatepe, O. M., & Bekteshi, L. (2008). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family facilitation and family–work facilitation among frontline hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 517–528. google scholar
  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1992). Non-work participation and work attitudes: a test of scarcity vs. expansion models of personal resources. Human Relations, 45, 775–795. google scholar
  • Livingston, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Emotional responses to work-family conflict: An examination of gender role orientation among working women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 207–216. google scholar
  • Marks, S. P. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921–936. google scholar
  • McHale, J. P., & Irace, K. (2011). Coparenting in diverse family systems. In McHale J. P.and Lindahl, K. M. (Eds.), Coparenting: a conceptual and clinical examination of family systems. (pp.15–37). Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association. google scholar
  • Model, S. (1981). Housework by husbands; determinants and implications. Journal of Family Issues, 2, 225–237. google scholar
  • Marsiglio, W. (1993). Contemporary scholarship on fatherhood: Culture, identity, and conduct. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 484–509. google scholar
  • Nasurdin, A. M., Ahmad, N.H., & Zainal, S. R. M. (2013). Comparing work-family conflict and facilitation among male and female entrepreneurs in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 14(1), 149–162. google scholar
  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, Illinois, USA: The Free Press. google scholar
  • Rothbard, N. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684. google scholar
  • Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men, and time: Gender a differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood. google scholar
  • Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567–578. google scholar
  • T.C. Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı (2019). Türkiye aile yapısı ileri istatistik analizi, 2018. Ankara, Türkiye: TDV. google scholar
  • Terzioğlu, G.R. (1987). Ev idaresi ve ilkeleri. Ankara, Türkiye: Doğuş Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Tiedje, L. B., Wortman, C. B., Downey, G., Emmons, C., Biernat, M., & Lang, R. (1990). Women with multiple roles: Role-compatibility perceptions, satisfaction, and mental health, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 63–72. google scholar
  • Tol, U. U. ve Taşkan, D. (2018). Erkeklik ve babalık halleri. Türkiye’de Babalığı Anlamak Serisi-III (AÇEV). İstanbul, Türkiye: Taymaz Matbaacılık. google scholar
  • Tompson, H. B., & Werner, J. M. (1997). The impact of role conflict/facilitation on core and discretionary behaviors: Testing a mediated model, Journal of Management, 23, 583–601. google scholar
  • Uzel, H. (2019). Anneler, kutsallığınızı paylaşmanızı istiyoruz. G. Türkmen (Ed.) Sürdürülebilir iyi ebeveynlik. (ss. 62–65). İstanbul, Türkiye: Yeni İnsan Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Türkoğlu, B., Çeliköz, N. ve Uslu, M. (2013). 3-6 yaş aralığında çocuğu olan babaların nitelikli zaman algılarına dair görüşleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 54–71. google scholar
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK).(2015). Zaman kullanım araştırması, 2014-2015. Haber Bülteni, Sayı:18627 google scholar
  • Van Steenbergen, E. F. (2007). Work-family facilitation: a positive psychological perspective on role combination. Philosophy of dissertation. Leiden University. Netherlands. google scholar
  • Van Steenbergen, E.F, Ellemers, N., & Moojaart, A. (2007). How work and family can facilitate each other? Distinct types of work-family facilitation and outcomes for women and men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 279–300. google scholar
  • Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64,108–130 google scholar
  • Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work-family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17,63–76. google scholar
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125151 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Coşkuner Aktaş, S., & Çiçek, B. (2021). Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(63), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


AMA

Coşkuner Aktaş S, Çiçek B. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society. 2021;0(63):317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


ABNT

Coşkuner Aktaş, S.; Çiçek, B. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 63, p. 317-338, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Coşkuner Aktaş, Selda, and Birgül Çiçek. 2021. “Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 63: 317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


Chicago: Humanities Style

Coşkuner Aktaş, Selda, and Birgül Çiçek. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 63 (Sep. 2021): 317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


Harvard: Australian Style

Coşkuner Aktaş, S & Çiçek, B 2021, 'Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees', Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 63, pp. 317-338, viewed 23 Sep. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Coşkuner Aktaş, S. and Çiçek, B. (2021) ‘Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees’, Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(63), pp. 317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044 (23 Sep. 2021).


MLA

Coşkuner Aktaş, Selda, and Birgül Çiçek. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 63, 2021, pp. 317-338. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044


Vancouver

Coşkuner Aktaş S, Çiçek B. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society [Internet]. 23 Sep. 2021 [cited 23 Sep. 2021];0(63):317-338. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044 doi: 10.26650/JECS2020-0044


ISNAD

Coşkuner Aktaş, Selda - Çiçek, Birgül. Family-to-Work Facilitation, Sex, and Gender: A Sample of University Employees”. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0/63 (Sep. 2021): 317-338. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0044



TIMELINE


Submitted12.04.2020
Accepted11.11.2020
Published Online28.01.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.