Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0027   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0027    Full Text (PDF)

The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach

Hande Aksöz Yılmaz

Due to developments in the field of transportation and communication, communication and technological facilities have sped up the migration movements between countries by reducing the cost of migration. Additionally, as a result of developments in facilities and technology provided by globalization, the trade volume of the world is increasing rapidly. This study tested the impact of foreign trade on migrants from Turkey to Germany from the years 1988-2018 with the ARDL bounds testing approach for the first time. Hereby, it is aimed to make an original contribution by the use of this method. This study sought to answer the question of what the impact of Turkey’s import and export has been on outgoing immigrants from Turkey to Germany from 1988-2018. The hypotheses of this study are that Turkey’s imports and exports to Germany are increasing the migratory flows between Turkey and Germany and that foreign trade and migration are complementary between Turkey and Germany. According to the results of the study, what has been found is a cointegration relationship between Turkey’s foreign trade with Germany and immigrants from Turkey to Germany. Moreover; If there is a 1% increase to Turkey’s exports to Germany, the immigrant flow increase 0.30% to Germany from Turkey. If there is a 1% increase to Germany’s imports to Turkey, there is a 0.21% increase in the immigrant flows to Germany from Turkey.

DOI :10.26650/JECS2020-0027   IUP :10.26650/JECS2020-0027    Full Text (PDF)

Dış Ticaretin Türkiye’den Almanya’ya Giden Göçmenler Üzerindeki Etkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı

Hande Aksöz Yılmaz

Ulaşım ve haberleşme alanında yaşanan gelişmeler, iletişim alanında ve teknolojik sahada elde edilmiş kolaylıklar, göç etmenin maliyetini azaltarak; ülkeler arasındaki göç hareketlerini hızlandırmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, küreselleşmenin sağlamış olduğu kolaylıklar ve teknolojik gelişmeler neticesinde dünya ticaret hacmi hızla artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 1988-2018 yılları itibariyle Türkiye’nin Almanya ile gerçekleştirdiği dış ticaretin Türkiye’den Almanya’ya giden göçmenler üzerindeki etkisini ilk kez ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı ile test edilmektedir. Bu nedenle kullanılmış olan yöntem ile özgün bir katkı sağlamış olmak hedeflenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın sorusu: 1988-2018 yıllarında Türkiye’nin Almanya ile olan ithalat ve ihracatının Türkiye’den Almanya’ya giden göçmenler üzerindeki etkisi ne olmuştur? Biçiminde oluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışmanın hipotezleri ise; Hipotez 1: “Türkiye’nin Almanya ile olan ithalat ve ihracatı göç hareketlerini artırmaktadır” ve Hipotez 2: “Türkiye ve Almanya arasındaki dış ticaret ve göç ilişkisi tamamlayıcılık ilişkisi niteliğindedir.” şeklindedir. Çalışmadan elde edilen uygulamalı analiz sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye’nin Almanya ile olan dış ticareti ve Türkiye’den Almanya’ya giden göçmenler arasında eş bütünleşme ilişkisi bulunmaktadır. Bu sonuca ek olarak; Türkiye’nin ithalat ve ihracatında %1’lik artış olduğunda, Türkiye’den Almanya’ya giden göçmenlerin oranı ithalat ve ihracat için sırası ile %0.30 ve %0.21 oranında artmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Migration and foreign trade are two important components of globalization. The relationship between migration and foreign trade has been investigated in the literature for many years. The relationship between foreign trade and migration is put forward as a substitution relationship in the context of traditional foreign trade theories. According to the Heckscher – Ohlin theory, countries obtain a comparative advantage in the trade of goods that requirefactor abundance. (Heckscher,1949). The migration flow from one country to another means more labor inflows into that country. While wages rise in the migrant-sending country (due to the drop in labor supply), wages fall in the receiving country. Thus, factor prices converge between the two countries. This convergence eliminates the pre-immigration comparative advantage and has a dissuasive effect on trade. (Samuelson, 1969). Instead of the “constant return to scale” assumption of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson theorem, Krugman’s (1980) theoretical assumptions take into account that markets produce under imperfect competition and are based on the contribution of firm externality and economies of scale to countries production structures. Within these assumptions, the positive effect of migration emerges on trade. (Markusen, 1983; Gould, 1994).

The substitution relationship between migration and foreign trade has led to the use of trade as a policy instrument to reduce migration. The use of trade policies to reduce migration dates back to the 1970s. Political authorities have recommended that more import be made from those countries in order to reduce the flow of immigrants from southern and eastern countries. This view is compatible with the theoretical framework that defines the substitution relationship between foreign trade and migration (Schiff, 1996).

The complementarity relationship between foreign trade and migration has been considered from two different views in the literature. The first group of studies state that migration is seen as the real factor arbitrage in the context of neoclassical trade theory. (Mundell, 1957; Markusen, 1983). The second group of studies state that migration is considered as a structure in social activity in the context of network and human capital. While the first group give priority to theoretical foundations, the latter focuses on empirical analysis. (Gould, 1994; Eichegreen & Irwin, 1996; Head & Ries, 1998; Dunlevy and Hutchinson, 1999-2001; Girma & Yu, 2002; Rauch & Trindade, 2002; Wagner et al., 2002; Combes et al., 2002; Faustino & Leitão, 2008; Zarzosoa et al.,2009; Egger et al., 2011). 

The work of Özekicioğlu & Soyyiğit (2019) is in line with the results of Emirhan (2014). According to the results of both studies, no significant relationship was found between migration and foreign trade. Both of these studies emphasized the importance of qualitative variables, such as the quality of the immigrants affecting trade, the level of education, and the sector in the relationship between migration and foreign trade.

Turkey has sent the most immigrants to Germany since the 1960’s. Therefore, in this study the impact of foreign trade on migrants from Turkey to Germany has been tested with the ARDL bounds testing approach. This study sought to answer the question what the impact of Turkey’s import and export has been on outgoing immigrants from Turkey to Germany from 1988-2018. The ARDL boundary test approach is preferred because the cointegration relationship between variables can be tested in the long and short term and is appropriate in small samples. According to the results of the study, a cointegration relationship has been found between Turkey’s foreign trade with Germany and outgoing immigrants from Turkey to Germany. If there is a 1% increase to Turkey’s exports to Germany, the immigrant flows increase 0.30% to Germany from Turkey. If there is a 1% increase to Germany’s imports to Turkey, there is a 0.21% increase in the immigrant flows to Germany from Turkey.. The analysis showed that the decrease in the unemployment rate in Turkey from 1988-2018 led to increased immigrant outflow from Turkey to Germany. According to the export model; If there is a 1% decrease to unemployment rates in Turkey, the Turkish immigrant stock in Germany increases 0.21%. If there is a 1% decrease to unemployment rates in Turkey, the Turkish immigrant stock in Germany increases 0.22% in the case according to the import model.. Similar results were obtained with the results found in Taylor (1987), Morrison & Zabin (1994) and Zabin & Hughes (1993), Lopez & Schiff (1995), Hanson & Spilimbergo (1996). However, if unemployment decreases and income rises, immigrants who were previously unable to migrate due to financial constraints begin to migrate.. Unemployment in Germany is expected to reduce Turkish immigration stock in Germany, but according to the obtained results, when the unemployment rate in Germany increases by 1%, the Turkish immigrant stock in Germany increases by 0.11%. The main reason for this result is thought to be because migration flows between Turkey and Germany from 1988-2018 consist of outgoing immigrants from Turkey to Germany through family reunification. Therefore, outgoing immigrants to Germany immigrate for attractive opportunities such as high living standards and the social welfare state. As a requirement of being a social welfare state, all citizens living in Germany benefit from social welfare benefits. A level of income that is decent to human dignity is supported or unemployed citizens are provided with social welfare benefits in Germany (Thimann, 1996).


PDF View

References

  • Akkoyunlu, Ş. ve Siliverstovs, B. (2009). Migration and trade: complements or substitutes? evidence from Turkish migration to Germany. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 45(5), 47– 61. google scholar
  • Aydın, Y. (2016). The German-Turkey migration corridor: refitting policies for a transnational age. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/. google scholar
  • Bellino, A., & Giuseppe, C. (2016). The role of migration in the variety and quality of trade: evidence from Germany. German Economic Review, 17(1), 1–5. google scholar
  • Brown, R.L., Durbın, J., & Evans, J.M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations overtime. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 37(13), 149 –163. google scholar
  • Boz, F.G. and Durmaz, A. (2016). Göçmenlerin uluslararası ticaret üzerine etkisi: MENA bölgesindeki Türk göçmenler üzerine bir uygulama. Uiiid-İjeas, 17, 259–272. google scholar
  • Buzdağlı, Ö. ve Kızıltan, A. (2011). Göç-ticaret ilişkisi: Türkiye’nin tüketim malı ihracatı üzerine bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 65–75. google scholar
  • Carbaugh, R. J. (2007). Is international trade a substitute for migration?” Global Economy Journal, 7(3), 1–3. google scholar
  • Combes, P.P., Lafourcade, M., & Mayer, T. (2002). Can business and social networks explain the border effect puzzle?Journal of International Economics. 66(2005), 1–29. https://doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.07.003. google scholar
  • Dickey, D.A., & Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica. 49, 1057– 072. google scholar
  • Dunlevy, J.A., & Hutchinson, W. K. (1999). The ımpact of ımmigration on American ımport trade in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Journal of Economic History, 59(4) 1043 –1062. google scholar
  • Dunlevy, J.A., & Hutchinson, W. K. (2001). The pro-trade effect of ımmigration on American exports during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. IZA Discussion Paper: 375. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/. google scholar
  • Egger, P. H., Enrlich, M., & Nelson, D.R. (2012). Migration and trade. The World Economy, 35(2), 216 –241. google scholar
  • Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. (1996). The role of history in bilateral trade flows. NBER Working Papers, 5565. google scholar
  • Engle, R.F., & Granger, C.W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276. google scholar
  • Faini, R., & Venturini, A. (1993). Migration and growth: the experience of Southern Europe, in T. Hatton and J. Williamson (eds.). International Migration and World Development, 1850-1939. London: Routledge. google scholar
  • Gould, D. M. (1994). Immigrant links to the home country: empirical ımplications for U.S. bilateral trade flows, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 302 –316. google scholar
  • Girma, S., & Yu, Z. (2002). The link between ımmigration and trade: evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of World Economics, 138(1), 115 –30. google scholar
  • Hanson, G.H., & Spilimbergo, A. (1996). Illegal ımmigration, border enforcement, and relative wages: evidence from apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border. NBER Working Paper No. 5592. https://doi:10.3386/w5592, google scholar
  • Head, K., & Ries, J. (1998). Immigration and trade creation: econometric evidence from Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 31, 47– 62. google scholar
  • Heckscher, E. F. (1919). The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of ıncome, 21, 497–512, translated in American Economic Association, Readings in the Theory of International Trade, 1949, Philadelphia: Blakiston, 272–300. google scholar
  • Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 231–254. google scholar
  • Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and ınference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2), 169 –210. google scholar
  • Karagöz, K. (2011). Göç-ticaret ilişkisi: panel çekim modeli. Sosyo-Ekonomi, 56–68. google scholar
  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies,product differantation and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959. google scholar
  • Lee, J., & Strazicich, M.C. (2003). Minimum lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. google scholar
  • Markusen, J. (1 983). Factor movements and commodity trade as complements. Journal of İnternational Economics, 14(3-4), 341–356. google scholar
  • Martin, P. L. (1993). Trade and migration: NAFTA and agriculture. Institute for International Economics, Retrived from Schiff, M. (1996, December), South-North migration and trade, The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 1696. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/. google scholar
  • Matsuyama, K. (1995). Complementarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(2), 701–729. google scholar
  • Morrison A.R., & Zabin, C.A. (1994). mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Tulane University. Retrieved from google scholar
  • Schiff, M. (1996, December), South-North migration and trade, The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, 1696, Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/. google scholar
  • Mundell, R. A. (1957). International trade and factor mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3), 321-335. google scholar
  • Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics,37(17), 1979–1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103 google scholar
  • Özekicioğlu, H. ve Soyyiğit S. (2019). Dış ticaret ve göç ilişkisi üzerine bir çekim modeli analizi: Almanya örneği. Journal of Economy Culture and Society.60, 125–143, https://10.26650/JECS2019-0015. google scholar
  • Panagariya, A. (1992). Factor mobility, trade and welfare. a North-South analysis with economies of scale. Journal of Development Economics,39, 229–245. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. google scholar
  • Phillips, P.C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. google scholar
  • Rauch, J.E., & Tridade, V. (2002). Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 116 –130. google scholar
  • Russell, S. S., & Teitelbaum, M. S. (1992). International migration and international trade. World Bank Discussion Paper, 160. Washington. USA. google scholar
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1949). International factor-price equalization once again. Economic Journal, 59, 181–197. google scholar
  • Schiff, M. (1996). South-North migration and trade. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, Retrievedfrom http://documents.worldbank.org/. google scholar
  • Taylor, J.E. (1987). Undocumented Mexico—U.S. migration and the returns to households in rural Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 626–638, https://doi.org/10.2307/1241697 google scholar
  • Thımann, C. (1996). Finance and development Germany’s social assistance program: the dilemma of reform. 33(3). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1996/09/pdf/thimann.pdf. google scholar
  • Wagner, D., Head, K., & Ries, J. (2002). Immigration and the trade of provinces. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(5), 507–525. google scholar
  • Williamson, J.G. (1995), The evolution of global labor markets since 1830: background evidence and hypotheses. Explorations in Economic History, 32, 141–156. google scholar
  • Wong, K. Y. (1983). On choosing among trade in goods and ınternational capital and labor mobility: a theoretical analysis,Journal of International Economics14, 223–250. google scholar
  • Zabin C., & S. Hughes (1993). Economic ıntegration and labor flows: stage migration in farm labor markets in Mexico and the United States. International Migration Review,29(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839502900204. google scholar
  • Zarzosoa, P. H., Lehmann, F. N., & Horsewood, N. (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial? static and dynamic panel gravity models. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20, 46 – 65 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Aksöz Yılmaz, H. (2020). The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


AMA

Aksöz Yılmaz H. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society. 2020;0(62):123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


ABNT

Aksöz Yılmaz, H. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 62, p. 123-143, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aksöz Yılmaz, Hande,. 2020. “The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62: 123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aksöz Yılmaz, Hande,. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62 (Jun. 2021): 123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


Harvard: Australian Style

Aksöz Yılmaz, H 2020, 'The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach', Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, pp. 123-143, viewed 23 Jun. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aksöz Yılmaz, H. (2020) ‘The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach’, Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), pp. 123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027 (23 Jun. 2021).


MLA

Aksöz Yılmaz, Hande,. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, 2020, pp. 123-143. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027


Vancouver

Aksöz Yılmaz H. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society [Internet]. 23 Jun. 2021 [cited 23 Jun. 2021];0(62):123-143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027 doi: 10.26650/JECS2020-0027


ISNAD

Aksöz Yılmaz, Hande. The Impact of Foreign Trade on Immigration from Turkey to Germany: ARDL Bounds Test Approach”. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0/62 (Jun. 2021): 123-143. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0027



TIMELINE


Submitted06.03.2020
Accepted30.06.2020
Published Online25.11.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.