Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0120   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0120    Full Text (PDF)

The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey

Mehmet Levent ErdaşEmel Bachá Sımoes

Do corporate governance mechanisms implemented in firms affect dividend payout policies? What is the role of the audit committee, one of the corporate governance mechanisms, in the dividend payout policies implemented by firms? From this point of view, this study aims to examine the relationship between the audit mechanisms and cash dividend payout policies. We have used data from firms listed in Borsa Istanbul, covering the period 2002-2014, and the paper employs a regression analyses performed by using the System GMM estimation method. As a result of the analysis, the higher the level of independence of the audit committee, the higher the cash dividend payout rate. Another finding obtained in the study was a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between the size of the board of directors and the cash dividend payout ratio. The findings reveal the importance of the audit committee in firms. Therefore, this study reveals that corporate governance practices have an impact on dividend payout decisions of firms listed at the Borsa Istanbul. Based on the results, as a result of the development of audit mechanisms, one of the corporate governance practices, it is understood that efficiency can be achieved in terms of cash dividend payout for investors.

JEL Classification : G30 , G35 , M4
DOI :10.26650/JECS2019-0120   IUP :10.26650/JECS2019-0120    Full Text (PDF)

Kurumsal Yönetim Çerçevesinde Denetim Mekanizmaları ve Kar Payı Dağıtım Politikası İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Mehmet Levent ErdaşEmel Bachá Sımoes

Firmalarda uygulanan kurumsal yönetim mekanizmaları kar payı dağıtım politikalarını etkiler mi? Firmaların uyguladıkları kar payı dağıtım politikalarında kurumsal yönetim mekanizmalarından biri olan denetim komitesinin rolü nedir? Bu sorulardan hareketle, bu çalışmanın amacı denetim mekanizmaları ile nakit kar payı dağıtım politikası arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmanın analizleri, 2002-2014 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul endeksinde kayıtlı olan firmalara ait veriler ele alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde, Sistem GMM tahmin yöntemi kullanılarak regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda, denetim komitesinin bağımsızlık düzeyi arttıkça, firmada nakit kar payı dağıtım oranı artmaktadır. Çalışmada elde edilen bir diğer bulgu ise, yönetim kurulunun büyüklüğü ile nakit kar payı dağıtım oranı arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı doğrusal olmayan bir ilişki elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, firmalarda denetim komitesinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Dolayısıyla, bu çalışma kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarının Borsa İstanbul endeksinde kayıtlı firmaların kar payı dağıtım kararları üzerinde bir etkisi olduğu sonucunu ortaya koymuştur. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarından olan denetim mekanizmalarının geliştirilmesi sonucunda, yatırımcılar açısından nakit kar payı dağıtımı konusunda etkinliğin sağlanabileceği anlaşılmaktadır.

JEL Classification : G30 , G35 , M4

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


One of the main issues in the field of financial management is the dividend payout policies of the firms. Recently, the relationship between dividend payout policies and corporate governance practices has an essential place in the financial literature. Do corporate governance mechanisms implemented in firms affect dividend payout policies? What is the role of the audit committee, one of the corporate governance mechanisms, in the dividend payout policies implemented by firms? Based on these questions, the aim of this study is to examine the relationship between audit mechanisms and cash dividend payout policies.

In this study, the relationship between corporate governance practices and dividend payout policies is analysed by considering the theoretical framework and predictions in the finance literature. The structure and independence of the firm’s board of directors is considered to have an impact on the dividend payout policy. The analyses of the study were carried out using the data of the firms listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange in the period from 2002 to 2014. The dependent variable is the cash dividend payout ratio in the research model. The independent variables consist of the firm’s financial structure, the firm’s corporate governance structure and macroeconomic structure. The variables related to the corporate governance structure of the firm consist of the independence of the audit committee, the ratio of non-executive board members, duality, and the ratio of members in the board of directors who are experts in a certain field, the largest shareholder and board size. The variables related to the financial structure of the firm consist of age, profitability, cash flow margin, investment opportunities and free cash flow rate. As the macroeconomic variable, the growth rate in Gross Domestic Product was taken into consideration.

In the analysis process, regression analyses were performed by using System Generalized Moments Method (GMM) estimation method. The endogeneity problem that may arise from corporate governance practices emerges as an important factor. To overcome this problem, dynamic panel data estimation methods should be applied. In this study, regression estimates were made by using System GMM estimations. This method was developed by Arellano and Bover (1995)/Blundell and Bond (1998). Instrumental variables should be used precisely and accurately to ensure that the findings obtained from the System GMM estimates are valid and reliable. For this purpose, the Arellano/Bond autocorrelation test statistics were used. The Sargan test statistic was used to determine the validity of the instrumental variables. While examining whether the regression analyses were consistent and valid, the multicollinearity between variables was evaluated by using Variance Inflation Factors (VIF). The Breusch-Pagan/Cook-weisberg test was used to determine the heteroskedasticity problem. 

The results showed that the cash dividend payout rate of the firms was positively affected by the cash dividend payout rate in the previous period. An important finding has been reached, which shows that as the independence of the audit committee increases, the cash dividend distribution ratio increases. It has been determined that the cash dividend payout ratio in the firms is positively affected by the increase in the ratio of non-executive board members in the board of directors, the increase in the age of the firm and the growth in the economy in which it operates. On the other hand, the cash dividend payout ratio is negatively affected by the duality, the increase in the share of members with special expertise and the increase in the ownership ratio of the big shareholder. Another important finding in the study is that the relationship between the scale of the board of directors and the cash dividend distribution is not linear. When the factors specific to the firm are analysed, it is determined that the cash dividend payout ratio decreases as the cash flow margin increases.

As a result of this study, corporate governance practices that may affect the cash dividend distribution ratio were examined by focusing on the independence levels of the board members and committees. The findings show that corporate governance practices have very important results for firms. In particular, it is important to apply and disseminate corporate governance principles in order for firms to be able to withstand global crises and survive in highly competitive conditions. This situation is especially important for the national economy. In this context, compliance with corporate governance standards is an important factor that should not be neglected. The results of this study can be considered by financial managers and policymakers in order to make appropriate dividend decisions.


PDF View

References

  • Abbas, M., Qureshi, S. U., Ahmed, M. M., & Rizwan, M. (2018). Corporate governance and dividend payout policy: Mediating role of leverage. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 62-86. google scholar
  • Abdelsalam, O, El-Masry, A., & Elsegini, S. (2008). Board composition, ownership structure and dividend policies in an emerging market: Further evidence from CASE 50. Managerial Finance, 34(12), 953-964. google scholar
  • Abor, J., & Fiador, V. (2013). Does corporate governance explain dividend policy in Sub-Saharan Africa? International Journal of Law and Management, 55(3), 201-225. google scholar
  • Adaoglu, C. (2000). Instability in the dividend policy of the Istanbul stock exchange (ISE) corporations: Evidence from an emerging market. Emerging Markets Review, 1(3), 252-270 https://doi.org/10.1016/S15660141(00)00011-X google scholar
  • Adjaoud, F., & Ben-Amar, W. (2010). Corporate governance and dividend ratio: Shareholders’ protection or expropriation? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 648-667. google scholar
  • Adjaoud, F., & Hermassi, N. (2017). The Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the dividend policy of Canadian firms: Empirical study, International Journal of Business, Accounting, and Finance, 11(1), 90-115. google scholar
  • Afsari, N. (2014). Relationship between corporate governance and dividend payment policy of companies listed in Tehran stock exchange. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 8(11), 1891-1899. google scholar
  • Afza, T., & Mirza, H. H. (2010). Ownership structure and cash flows as determinants of corporate dividend policy in Pakistan. International Business Research, 3(3), 210-221. google scholar
  • Afzal, M., & Sehrish, S. (2010). Ownership structure, board composition and dividend ratio in Pakistan. COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad-Pakistan, 24. google scholar
  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377-397. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2331397 google scholar
  • Ahmad, G. N. (2015). Does corporate governance affect dividend policy: Evidence from ASEAN emerging market. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 5(1), 88-94. google scholar
  • Ajanthan, A. (2013). Corporate governance and dividend ratio: A study of listed hotels and restaurant companies in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 3, 98-114. google scholar
  • Aksoy, E. E. (2017). Finansal yönetim: Teorik yaklaşımlar, çözümlü örnekler ve öneri yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi. google scholar
  • Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 62(5), 777-795. google scholar
  • Al-Kahmisi, T. A., & Hassan, H. H. (2018). The effects of corporate governance on dividend payout policies in Malaysian banks. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 2(2), 29-37. google scholar
  • Al-Najjar, B., & Hussainey, K. (2009). The association between dividend payout and outside directorships. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 4-19. google scholar
  • Al-Najjar, B., & Kilincarslan, E. (2017). Corporate dividend decisions and dividend smoothing: New evidence from an empirical study of Turkish firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 13(3), 304-331, https://doi. org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2016-0191 google scholar
  • Al-Rahahleh, A. S. (2017). Corporate governance quality, board gender diversity and corporate dividend policy: Evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 11(2), 86-104. google scholar
  • Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from nonfinancial listed companies in Kuwaiti stock exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310-332. google scholar
  • Amina, H. (2015). Dividend policy and corporate governance in Saudi stock market: Outcome model or substitute model? Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 74-91. google scholar
  • Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297. google scholar
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51. google scholar
  • Arshad, Z., Akram, Y., Scholar, M., Amjad, M., & Usman, M. (2013). Ownership structure and dividend ratio. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(3), 378-401. google scholar
  • Ataay, A. (2006). Aile işletmelerinde başkacılık ve koruma: Vekâlet maliyetleri, T.C. İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Aile 2. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, İstanbul, 64-71. google scholar
  • Awwad, B. S. A. L., & Hamdan, A. M. A. (2018). Gulf cooperation council energy sectors governance and dividend policy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(4), 163-171. google scholar
  • Aydın, N., Başar, M., & Coşkun, M. (2015). Finansal yönetim (2. bs.). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Aydin, A. D., & Cavdar, S. C. (2015). Corporate governance and dividend policy: An empirical analysis from Borsa Istanbul Corporate Governance Index (XKURY). Accounting and Finance Research, 4(3), 66-76. google scholar
  • Aygün, M., & Sayın, C. (2016). Kurumsal yönetim ve denetim kalitesi: Borsa İstanbul şirketleri üzerine bir inceleme. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 618(53), 51-58. google scholar
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2013). Econometric analysis of panel data (5th Ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. google scholar
  • Barclay, M., Holderness C., & Sheehan, D. (2009). Dividends and corporate shareholders. Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2423-2455, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn060 google scholar
  • Belden, S., Fister, T., & Knapp, B. (2005). Dividends and directors: Do outsiders reduce agency costs? Business and Society Review, 110(2), 171-180. google scholar
  • Bena, J., & Hanousek, J. (2008). Rent extraction by large shareholders: Evidence using dividend policy in the Czech republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 58(3-4), 106-130. google scholar
  • Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Commerce Clearing House. google scholar
  • Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and the bird in the hand fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259-270. google scholar
  • Bista, N., Bartaula, N. R., Shrestha, O., Gnawali, P., Lamichhane P., & Parajuli, P. (2019). Impact of corporate governance on dividend policy of Nepalese enterprises. In R. Rajagopal, Behl (Eds.), Business governance and society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94613-9_21 google scholar
  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143. google scholar
  • Bokhari, H. W., & Khan, M. A. (2013). The impact of capital structure on firm’s performance (a case of nonfinancial sector of Pakistan). European Journal of Business and Management, 5(31), 2222-2839. google scholar
  • Bolodeoku, I. (2006). Corporate governance: The law’s response to agency costs in Nigeria. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 32(2), 467-522. google scholar
  • Born, J. A., & Rimbey, J. N. (1993). A test of Easterbrook hypothesis regarding dividend payments and agency costs. The Journal of Financial Research, 16(3), 251-260. google scholar
  • Borokhovich, K., Brunarski, K., Harman, Y., & Kehr, J. (2005). Dividends, corporate monitors and agency costs. Financial Review, 40, 37-65. google scholar
  • Brealey, R., & Myers, S. (2005). Principles of corporate finance (8th Ed.). London: McGraw-Hill. Cansızlar, D. (2003). Kurumsal yönetim ilkeleri. SPK. https://ecgi.global/sites/default/files//codes/documents google scholar
  • Ceylan, A., & Korkmaz, T. (2017). İşletmelerde finansal yönetim. Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım. google scholar
  • Chae, J., Kim, S., & Lee, E. (2009). How corporate governance affects payout policy under agency problems and external financing constraints. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 2093-2101. google scholar
  • Chaghadari, M. F., & Chaleshtori, G. N. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance. International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development IPEDR, 10, 484-489. google scholar
  • Chen, L. T., Lim C., & Kim, Y. C. (2011). Financial characteristics, corporate governance and the propensity to pay cash dividends of Chinese listed companies. International Business and Management, 3(1), 176-188. google scholar
  • Chen, Z., Cheung, Y-L., Stouraitis, A., & Wong, A. W. S. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 431-449. google scholar
  • Chung, K. H., Elder, J., & Kim, J. C. (2010). Corporate governance and liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), 265-291. google scholar
  • Clarke, T. (2004). Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance. London and New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406. google scholar
  • Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J. & Tehranian, H. (2009). Corporate governance and earnings management at large U.S. bank holding companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, 412-430. google scholar
  • Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. (1989). A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management, 18, 36-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3665795 google scholar
  • Cunningham, L. A. (2008). Rediscovering board expertise: Legal implications of the empirical literature. U. Cin. L. Rev, 465, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1024261 google scholar
  • Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261354 google scholar
  • Deshmukh, S. (2005). The effect of asymmetric information on dividend policy. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 44(1), 107-127. google scholar
  • Dewasiri, N., Koralalage, Y. W., Azeez, A. A, Jayarathne, P., Kuruppuarachchi, D., & Weerasinghe, V. (2019). Determinants of dividend policy: Evidence from an emerging and developing market. Managerial Finance, 45(3), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2017-0331 google scholar
  • Dinçergök, B., & Pirgaip, B. (2018). Kâr payı dağıtımı ve nakit akışı belirsizliği ilişkisi: BİST imalat sektörü firmalarında bir uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 422-442. google scholar
  • Doğan, M. (2018). Kurumsal yönetimin teorik temelleri. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 1(1), 84-96. google scholar
  • Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A., & Zimmermann H. (2004). Corporate governance and expected stock returns: Evidence from Germany. European Financial Management, 10(2), 267-293. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2004.00250.x google scholar
  • Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659. google scholar
  • Eckbo, B. E., & Verma, S. (1994). Managerial share ownership, voting power, and cash dividend policy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1, 33-62. google scholar
  • Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Crossley, R. M., Malagila, J., Fosu, S., & Vu, T. V. (2017). Corporate governance and dividend policy in UK listed SMEs: The effect of board characteristics. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 25(4), 459-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2017-0020 google scholar
  • Fakhari, H., & Yousefalitabar, N. (2010). Evaluating the relationship between dividend policy and corporate governance in Tehran stock exchange firms. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 62, 69-84. google scholar
  • Ghasemi, R. S., Madrakian, H., & Keivani, F. S. (2013). The relationship between the corporate governance and the stock institutional ownership with the dividend - a case study of Tehran. Journal of Business and Management, 15(2), 65-69. google scholar
  • Ghosh, C., & Sirmans, C. F. (2006). Do managerial motives impact dividend decisions in REITs? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32(3), 327-355. google scholar
  • Gill, A. S., & Obradovich, J. D. (2012). Corporate governance, institutional ownership, and the decision to pay the amount of dividends: Evidence from USA. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 97, 60-71. google scholar
  • Gusni, T. (2017). The determinants of dividend policy: A study of financial industry in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 21(4), 562-574. google scholar
  • Gürbüz, A, & Ergincan, O. Y. (2004). Kurumsal yönetim: Türkiye’deki durumu ve geliştirilmesine yönelik öneriler. İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Hansen, R. S., Kumar, R., & Shome, D. K. (1994). Dividend policy and corporate monitoring: Evidence from the regulated electric utility industry. Financial Management Association International, 23(1), 16-22. google scholar
  • Hapsoro, D., & Suryanto, T. (2017). Consequences of going concern opinion for financial reports of business firms and capital markets with auditor reputation as a moderation variable: An experimental study. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2A), 197-223. google scholar
  • Harada, K., & Nguyen, P. (2011). Ownership concentration and dividend policy in Japan. Managerial Finance, 37(4), 362-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351111115313 google scholar
  • Hifzalman, P., & Mukhtar, A. (2014). Corporate governance and its impact on performance of banking sector in Pakistan. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 6, 106-117. google scholar
  • Himmelberg, C., Hubbard R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353-384. google scholar
  • Hoberg, G., & Prabhala, N. R. (2009). Disappearing dividends, catering, and risk. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 79-116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40056906 google scholar
  • Hu, A., & Kumar, P. (2004). Managerial entrenchment and payout policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 759-790. google scholar
  • Ibrahim, I., & Shuaibu, H. (2016). Ownership structure and dividend policy of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria: A tobit regression analysis. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 6(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v6i1.9277 google scholar
  • Ikunda, C., Muiru, M., & Kamau, S. M. (2016). The impact of corporate governance on dividend payout of manufacturing firms listed at the Nairobi securities exchange. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(5), 254-261. google scholar
  • Iqbal, S. (2013). The impact of corporate governance on dividend decision of firms: Evidence from Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 7(11), 811-817. google scholar
  • Jahanzeb, A., Memon, P. A., Tunio, J. A., & Shah, S. S. A. (2016). Impact of corporate governance and firm-level control variables on dividend policy of service trade sector of Malaysia. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 3(2), 115-124. google scholar
  • Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., & Zorn, T. S. (1992). Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt, and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 247-263. google scholar
  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. google scholar
  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831-880. google scholar
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X google scholar
  • Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2011). Dividend policy and corporate governance quality: Evidence from ISS. The Financial Review, 46, 251-279. google scholar
  • Jiraporn, P., & Ning, Y. (2006). Dividend policy, shareholder rights, and corporate governance. Journal of Applied Finance, 16, 24-36. google scholar
  • John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), 371-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3 google scholar
  • John, K., & Williams, J. (1985). Dividends, dilution, and taxes: A signalling equilibrium. The Journal of Finance, 40(4), 1053-1070. http://dx.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02363.x google scholar
  • Kajola, S. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance: The case of Nigerian listed firm. European Journal of Economics, 6(3), 1-13. google scholar
  • Kakanda, M. M., & Salim, B. (2017). Corporate governance, risk management disclosure, and firm performance: A theoretical and empirical review perspective. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 7(9), 836-845. google scholar
  • Kanapathippillai, K., & Anandasayanan, S. (2015). Corporate governance practices and its impact on dividend policy: A study on Sri Lankan listed manufacturing companies. Clear International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 6(3), 87-92. google scholar
  • Karamustafa, O., Varıcı, İ., & Er, B. (2009). Kurumsal yönetim ve firma performansı: İMKB kurumsal yönetim endeksi kapsamındaki firmalar üzerinde bir uygulama. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 100-119. google scholar
  • Kawshala, H., & Panditharathna, K. (2017). The effect of dividend policy on corporate profitability: An empirical study on beverage, food and tobacco industry in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(8), 542-546. google scholar
  • Keenan, J. (2004). Corporate governance in UK/USA boardrooms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(2), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00356.x google scholar
  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 189-205. google scholar
  • Kole, S. R. (1995). Measuring managerial equity ownership: A comparison of sources of ownership data. Journal of Corporate Finance: Contracting, Governance and Organization, 1, 413-35. google scholar
  • Kowalewski, O., Stetsyuk, I., & Talavera, O. (2008). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Poland. PostCommunist Economies, 20(2), 203-218, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370802018973 google scholar
  • Kulathunga, K. M. K. N. S., & Weerasinghe, W. D. J. D. (2017). Corporate governance and dividend policy: A study of listed manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka, International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology, 4(2), 64-81. google scholar
  • Kurawa, J. M., & Ishaku, A. (2014). The effect of corporate governance on dividend policy of listed banks in Nigeria: A panel data analysis. Researchjournali’s Journal of Finance, 2(8), 3-12. google scholar
  • Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). Corporate governance and shareholder value maximization: An African perspective. African Development Review, 19(2), 350-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2007.00165.x google scholar
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55, 1-33. google scholar
  • Lang, L. H. P., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1989). Dividend announcements: Cash flow signalling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? Journal of Financial Economics, 24(1), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90077-9 google scholar
  • Lin, K-L., & Shen, C-H. (2012). The impact of corporate governance on the relationship between investment opportunities and dividend policy: An endogenous switching model approach. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 41, 125-145. google scholar
  • Lin, S., Lai, H., & Hsu, A. (2018). How does asymmetric information affect catering behavior? Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 54, 2433-2454. google scholar
  • Lin, T., Chen, Y., & Tsai, H. (2017). The relationship among information asymmetry, dividend policy and ownership structure. Finance Research Letters, 20, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.06.008 google scholar
  • Litai, C., Chuan, L., & Kim, Y. (2011). Financial characteristics, corporate governance and the propensity to pay cash dividends of Chinese listed companies. International Business and Management, 3(1), 176-188. google scholar
  • Mallin, C. A. (2010). Corporate governance (3rd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. google scholar
  • Mancinelli, L., & Ozkan, A. (2006). Ownership structure and dividend policy: Evidence from Italian firms. The European Journal of Finance, 12(3), 265-282. google scholar
  • Maniagi, G. M., Denco, M. J., Ondiek, B. A., Okaka, D., & Musiega, D. (2013). Corporate governance, dividend policy and performance. Special reference to banks listed on Nairobi security exchange Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 5(2), 56-69. google scholar
  • Mansourinia, E., Emamgholipour, M., Rekabdarkolaei, E. A., & Hozoori, M. (2013). The effect of board size, board independence and CEO duality on dividend policy of companies: Evidence from Tehran stock exchange. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(6), 237-241. google scholar
  • Mardani, R. M., Sumiati, M., & Indrawati, N. K. (2018). Ownership structure, corporate governance and dividend policy: Evidence from Indonesia. In the 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation, KnE Social Sciences, 1249-1255. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3466 google scholar
  • Maury, C., & Pajuste, A. (2005). Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1813-1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.07.002 google scholar
  • Mehdi, M., Sahut, J., & Teulon, F. (2017). Do corporate governance and ownership structure impact dividend policy in emerging market during financial crisis? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(3), 274-297. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2014-0079 google scholar
  • Mileva, E. (2007). Using Arellano-Bond dynamic panel GMM estimators in stata. Bronx: Fordhan University Economic Department. google scholar
  • Miller, M. H., & Rock, K. (1985). Dividend policy under asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, 40, 10311051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb02362.x google scholar
  • Miller, M., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/294442 google scholar
  • Mitton, T. (2004). Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 5(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2004.05.003 google scholar
  • Mohan, A., & Chandramohan, S. (2018). Impact of corporate governance on firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 6(2), 209-218. google scholar
  • Mollah, S., Faroogue, O. A., Mobarek, A., & Molyneux, P. (2019). Bank corporate governance and future earnings predictability. Jour. of Fin. Services Research, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-019-00307-7 google scholar
  • Montalvan, S. M., Barilla, C. D., Ruiz, G. D., & Figueroa, D. L. (2017). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Peru: Is there any link? Revista Mexicana de Economiay Finanzas, 12(2), 103-116. google scholar
  • Musa, H., Rech, F., & Musova, Z. (2019). The role corporate governance in debt and dividend policies: Case of Slovakia. Invest. Manag. and Financial Innov., 16(2), 206-217. https://doi:10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.18 google scholar
  • Myers, S. C. & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Jou. of Fin. Econ., 13, 187-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0 google scholar
  • Noe, T. H., & Rebello, M. J. (1996). Asymmetric information, managerial opportunism, financing, and payout policies. The Journal of Finance, 51(2), 637-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02697.x google scholar
  • Okka, O. (2009). Analitik finansal yönetim teori ve problemler (1. bs). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. google scholar
  • Oleksy, P., & Zygula, A. (2018). The effect of ownership structure on dividend policy and shareholder value: A financialisation perspective on construction companies in Poland. Central European Economic Journal, 3(50), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ceej-2017-0016 google scholar
  • Opeyemi, M. F., Olusegun, D. J., Olukayode, A. E., & Olusola, O. S. (2018). Determinants of dividend policy of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. World Journal of Finance and Investment Research, 3(1), 25-40. google scholar
  • Otekunrin, A. O., Nwanji, T. I., Hermans, R. E., Ajayi, S. A., Dayo, F., Falaye, A. J., & Eluyela, D. F. (2018). Dividend policy and corporate governance regulation and practice in Nigerian banks. Journal of Management and Corporate Governance, 10(2), 18-59. google scholar
  • Öztürk, M. B., & Demirgüneş, K. (2008). Kurumsal yönetim bakış açısıyla entellektüel sermaye. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 375-411. google scholar
  • Pahi, D., & Yadav, I. S. (2018). Role of corporate governance in determining dividend policy: Panel evidence from India. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 9(3), 111-115. google scholar
  • Pandey, M. I. (2005). Financial management (9th Ed.). India: Vikas Publishing House. google scholar
  • Pieloch-Babiarz, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board characteristics and dividend policy: Evidence from the Warsaw stock exchange. Economics and Law, 18(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2019.022 google scholar
  • Rajput, M., & Jhunjhunwala, S. (2019). Corporate governance and payout policy: Evidence from India. Corporate Governance, 19(5), 1117-1132. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2018-0258 google scholar
  • Renneboog, L., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2008). Corporate restructuring and bondholder wealth. European Financial Management, 14(4), 792-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00414.x google scholar
  • Riaz, S., Liu, Y., & Ahmad, M. I. (2016). Dividend policy and corporate governance perspective. Accounting and Finance Research, 5(3), 77-86. google scholar
  • Ridwan, M. Z., & Pratiwi, H. (2018). Dividend policy in Indonesian companies: Does corporate governance matter? International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25), 306-310. google scholar
  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to Do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. google scholar
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2002). Corporate finance (6th Ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Com. google scholar
  • Roy, A. (2015). Dividend policy, ownership structure and corporate governance: An empirical analysis of Indian firms. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(1), 1-33. google scholar
  • Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. The Journal of Financial Research, 5(3): 249-259. google scholar
  • Sakr, A., Gawad, H. A., & Soliman, M. M. (2016). The Effect of corporate governance on corporate payout policy on Egyptian firms. The Business and Management Review, 7(2), 102-112. google scholar
  • Sani, A. A., & Musa, A. M. (2017). Corporate board attributes and dividend payout policy of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in IT, Management and Engineering, 7(1), 7-13. google scholar
  • Schen, Y. P., & Suffian, M. T. (2014). CEO duality and dividend policy: Empirical evidence on oil and gas companies in Malaysia. International Conference on Accounting Research & Education, 1-14. google scholar
  • Schooley, D., & Barney, L. (1994). Using dividend policy and managerial ownership to reduce agency costs. Journal of Financial Research, 12, 363-373. google scholar
  • Setia-Atmaja, L. Y. (2009). Governance mechanisms and firm value: The impact of ownership concentration and dividends. Corp. Gover. An Int. Rev., 17(6), 694-709, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00768.x google scholar
  • Setiawan, D., & Phua, L. K. (2013). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Indonesia. Business Strategy Series, 14(5/6), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/BSS-01-2013-0003 google scholar
  • Shafana, M., & Safeena, S. (2019). Board independence and dividend policy in listed non-financial companies in Sri Lanka. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(11), 134-143. google scholar
  • Shahid, M. S., Gul, F., Rizwan, M., & Bucha, M. H. (2016). Ownership structure, board size, board composition and dividend policy: New evidence from two emerging markets. Journal of Business Studies, 12(2), 25-36. google scholar
  • Shehu, M. (2015). Board characteristics and dividend payout: Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(16), 35-40. google scholar
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461488. https://doi.org/10.1086/261385 google scholar
  • Silva, L. C., Goergen, M., & Renneboog, L. (2004). Dividend policy and corporate governance. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Smith, C., & Watts, R. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W google scholar
  • Smith, F. S., Puleo, V. A., & Casey, K. M. (2008). Dividend policy and corporate governance: A research note. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(3), 220-224. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv5i3c1p6 google scholar
  • Stepanyan, G. G. (2011). Firm life cycle and the choice of the form of payout. SSRN Electronic Journal, http://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.1632834 google scholar
  • Sumail, L. O. (2018). Corporate governance and dividend payout ratio in non-financial firms listed in Indonesian stock exchange. Business and Economic Horizons, 14(4), 851-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/beh.2018.58 google scholar
  • Tabalujan, B. S. (2001). Corporate governance of Indonesian banks: The legal and business contexts. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.268569 google scholar
  • Tamimi, M., Takhtaei, N., & Malchi, F. (2014). Relationship between firm age and financial leverage with dividend policy. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 53-63. google scholar
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2013). İleri panel veri analizi (2. bs.). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları. google scholar
  • Tümerdem, M. (2016). Finansal piyasalar ve kurumlar (yeni düzenlemeler perspektifinde finansal araçlar, faaliyetler ve kurumlar). Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım. google scholar
  • Uwalomwa, U., Olamide, O., & Francis, I. (2015). The effects of corporate governance mechanisms on firms dividend payout policy in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practise, 2015, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2015.313679 google scholar
  • Uwuigbe, U., Jafaru, J., & Ajayı, A. (2012). Dividend policy and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Nigeria. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 11(3), 442-454. google scholar
  • Wang, M-H., Ke, M-C., Liu, D-Y., & Huang, Y-S. (2011). Dividend policy and the life cycle hypothesis: Evidence from Taiwan. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 5(1), 33-52. google scholar
  • Wei, Z., Wu, S., Li, C., & Chen, W. (2011). Family control, institutional environment and cash dividend policy: Evidence from China. China Jou. of Account. Res., 4(1-2), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2011.04.001 google scholar
  • Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25-51. google scholar
  • Wintoki, B., Linck, J., & Netter, J. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581-606. google scholar
  • Yaseen, H. (2019). Dividend policy explained by country’s standards of living: An international evidence. In D. Procházka (Eds.), Global versus local perspectives on finance and accounting. Cham: ACFA2018 2018 Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer. google scholar
  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196-220. google scholar
  • Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15, 291-334. google scholar
  • Zhang, H. (2008). Corporate governance and dividend policy: A comparison of Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong and in the Mainland. China Economic Review, Elsevier, 19(3), 437-459. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Erdaş, M.L., & Sımoes, E.B. (2020). The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


AMA

Erdaş M L, Sımoes E B. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society. 2020;0(62):255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


ABNT

Erdaş, M.L.; Sımoes, E.B. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 62, p. 255-284, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Erdaş, Mehmet Levent, and Emel Bachá Sımoes. 2020. “The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62: 255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


Chicago: Humanities Style

Erdaş, Mehmet Levent, and Emel Bachá Sımoes. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0, no. 62 (Jun. 2021): 255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


Harvard: Australian Style

Erdaş, ML & Sımoes, EB 2020, 'The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey', Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, pp. 255-284, viewed 25 Jun. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Erdaş, M.L. and Sımoes, E.B. (2020) ‘The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey’, Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 0(62), pp. 255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120 (25 Jun. 2021).


MLA

Erdaş, Mehmet Levent, and Emel Bachá Sımoes. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey.” Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 62, 2020, pp. 255-284. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120


Vancouver

Erdaş ML, Sımoes EB. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society [Internet]. 25 Jun. 2021 [cited 25 Jun. 2021];0(62):255-284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120 doi: 10.26650/JECS2019-0120


ISNAD

Erdaş, MehmetLevent - Sımoes, EmelBachá. The Relationship between Audit Mechanisms and Dividend Payout Policy within the Framework of Corporate Governance: The Case of Turkey”. Journal of Economy, Culture and Society 0/62 (Jun. 2021): 255-284. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0120



TIMELINE


Submitted13.12.2019
Accepted16.04.2020
Published Online12.05.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.