Review Article


DOI :10.26650/JECS2022-972972   IUP :10.26650/JECS2022-972972    Full Text (PDF)

Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power

Duygun GöktürkÖzge Çomak

In this article, we aim to work toward a rich theoretical understanding of the relationship between social identity, professional identity, and school leadership in the context of recognitional power. We approach the relationship the study constructs by problematizing the traditional areas of leadership literature that is marked by veneration of leadership and its functional toolkit that includes traits, attitudes, behaviors, efficiency, productivity, mastery, etc. as antecedents to the leadership process. In addition, the article aims to capture the intersection of professional and social identity considering the relations of domination and everyday practices of recognition. These goals are reflected in two research questions: (1) How do we understand the relationship between school leadership, social identity and professional identity? (2) How do we approach social and professional identities in educational leadership studies in terms of recognitional power? We propound that leadership literature should include diverse epistemic approaches, problematize the structural inequalities and the institutionalized relations of recognition and recognitional power, and problematize the intersection of social identity, professional identity, and recognitional power.


PDF View

References

  • Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. google scholar
  • Blackmore, J. (2006). Deconstructing diversity discourses in the field of educational management and leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432 06062492 google scholar
  • Beatty, B.R. (2000). The emotions of educational leadership: breaking the silence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(4), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/136031200750035969 google scholar
  • Beijaard, D., Maijer, P. J., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teacher and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128. google scholar
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468 -2273.2008.00398 google scholar
  • Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539. google scholar
  • Brewer, M.B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324. google scholar
  • Brewer, M.B. (2010). Ethnocentrism. In J.M. Levine & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (pp.247-252). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Briggs, A.R.J. (2007). Exploring professional identities: middle leadership in further education colleges. School Leadership and Management, 27(5), 471-485. google scholar
  • Brown, D.J. (2018). In the minds of followers. In J. Antonakis & D.V. Day (Eds.), The Nature of Leadership (pp. 82-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Carli, L.L., & Eagly, A.H. (2018). Leadership and gender. In J. Antonakis and D.V. Day (Eds.), The Nature of Leadership (pp.244-271). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Crow, G., Day, C., & M0İler, J. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265-277. google scholar
  • Eagly, A.H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018957 google scholar
  • Ellemers, N. (2010). Social identity theory. In J.M. Levine and M.A. Hogg (Eds), Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (pp. 797-801). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Emerson, R.M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41. google scholar
  • English, F.W. (2012). Bourdieu’s misrecognition: Why educational leadership standards will not reform schools or leadership. Journal ofEducational Administration and History, 44(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/002206 20.2012.658763 google scholar
  • Eurostat. (2021). Eurostat News: Women remain outnumbered in management. Retrieved February 23, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210305-2 google scholar
  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Fricker, M. (2013). Evolving concepts of epistemic injustice. In I.J. Kidd, J. Medina and Pohlhaus, G. Jr (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook ofEpistemic Injustice (pp.53-61). New York City, NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Göktürk, D., & Ağın, E. (2020). Liderlik çalışmalarında takipçi (follower) merkezli yaklaşıma ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(4) , 191-210. https://doi.org/10.18037/ ausbd.845781 google scholar
  • Gündemir, S. (2015). The minority glass ceiling hypothesis: Exploring reasons and remedies for the underrepresentation of racial-ethnic minorities in leadership positions (Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Retrieved from https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/the-minority-glass-ceiling-hypothesis-exploring-reasons-and-remed google scholar
  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs “identity”? In S. Hall and P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp.1-17). London, UK: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200. google scholar
  • Hogg, M.A. (2010). Social identity theory of leadership. In J.M. Levine and M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (pp. 801-805). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
  • Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140. google scholar
  • Hogg, M.A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M.P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1-52). Academic Press. google scholar
  • Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. google scholar
  • Honneth, A. (2001). Recognition or redistribution? Changing perspectives on the moral order of society. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2-3), 43-55. google scholar
  • Hornsey, M.J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 204-222. google scholar
  • Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 143-156. google scholar
  • International Labor Organization. (2020). Women in managerial and leadership positions in the G20. Retrieved February 23, 2022, from https://www.ilo.org google scholar
  • Ispa-Landa, S., & Thomas, S. (2019). Race, gender and emotion work among school principals. Gender & Society, 33(3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218821920 google scholar
  • Jenkins, R. (2008). Social Identity. New York, NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Johnson, L., & Crow, G. M. (2017) Professional identities of school leaders across international contexts.Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 45(5), 747-748. google scholar
  • Kidd, J.I., Medina, J., & Pohlhaus, G. (2017). Introduction to the Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. In I.J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Jr. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (pp.1-11). New York City, NY: Routledge. google scholar
  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J.I., & Stapel, D.A. (2009). Differenting social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1543-1549. google scholar
  • Lamont, M. (2018). Addressing recognition gaps: Destigmatization and the reduction of inequality. American Sociological Review, 83(3), 419-444. google scholar
  • Larson, J.R., Foster-Fishman, P.G., & Keys, C.B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 446-461. google scholar
  • Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J., & De Vader, C.L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378. google scholar
  • Magess, J.C., & Galinsky, A.D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628 google scholar
  • Murakami, E. T., & Törnsen, M. (2017). Female secondary school principals: Equity in the development of professional identities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(5), 806-824. google scholar
  • Nielson, A. (2016). Second career teachers and (mis)recognitions of professional identities. School Leadership & Management, 36(2), 221-245. google scholar
  • Nordholm, D., Arnqvist, A., & Nihlfors, E. (2020). Principals’ emotional identity - the Swedish case. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 335-351. google scholar
  • Parekh, B. (2009). Logic of identity. Politics & Philosophy & Economics, 8(3): 267-284. google scholar
  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why Status Matters for Inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1-16. google scholar
  • Rosette, A.S., Leonardelli, G.J., & Phillips, K.W. (2008). The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758-777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758 google scholar
  • Ryan, J. (2017). Dialogue, identity, and inclusion: Administrators as mediators in diverse school contexts. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 340-369. google scholar
  • Sturm, R.E., & Manzoni, L. (2018). Leadership and power. In J. Antonakis and D.V. Day (Eds.), The Nature of Leadership (pp. 272-300). SAGE Publication. google scholar
  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and group behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93. google scholar
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology ofIntergroup Relations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press. google scholar
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology ofIntergroup Relations (pp. 33- 47). Pacific Groove, CA: Brooks/Cole. google scholar
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (Eds.), The Psychology ofIntergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, Illinois: Nelson-Hall. google scholar
  • Turner, J.C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal ofSocial Psychology, 5, 5-34. google scholar
  • Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Turner, J.C., & Reynolds, K.J. (2010). The story of social identity. In T. Postmes and N.R. Branscombe (Eds.), Rediscovering Social Identity: Key Readings (pp. 13-32). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press. google scholar
  • Van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal ofSocial Psychology, 36, 537-556. google scholar
  • Van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Leadership and identity. In J. Antonakis and D.V. Day (Eds.), The Nature ofLeadership (pp. 300-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication. google scholar
  • Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D. & Hogg, M.A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856. google scholar
  • Zorn, D., & Boler, M. (2007). Rethinking emotions and educational leadership. International Journal ofLeadership in Education, 10(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120601174345 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Göktürk, D., & Çomak, Ö. (2022). Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(65), 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


AMA

Göktürk D, Çomak Ö. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2022;0(65):415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


ABNT

Göktürk, D.; Çomak, Ö. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 65, p. 415-428, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Göktürk, Duygun, and Özge Çomak. 2022. “Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 65: 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


Chicago: Humanities Style

Göktürk, Duygun, and Özge Çomak. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0, no. 65 (Oct. 2022): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


Harvard: Australian Style

Göktürk, D & Çomak, Ö 2022, 'Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power', Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 65, pp. 415-428, viewed 5 Oct. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Göktürk, D. and Çomak, Ö. (2022) ‘Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power’, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(65), pp. 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972 (5 Oct. 2022).


MLA

Göktürk, Duygun, and Özge Çomak. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power.” Journal of Economy Culture and Society, vol. 0, no. 65, 2022, pp. 415-428. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972


Vancouver

Göktürk D, Çomak Ö. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society [Internet]. 5 Oct. 2022 [cited 5 Oct. 2022];0(65):415-428. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972 doi: 10.26650/JECS2022-972972


ISNAD

Göktürk, Duygun - Çomak, Özge. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 0/65 (Oct. 2022): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972



TIMELINE


Submitted19.07.2021
Accepted12.03.2022
Published Online10.05.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.