Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JEPR1197535   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1197535    Full Text (PDF)

Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market

Selçuk GemicioğluHasan Şahin

The aim of this study is to investigate the existence of unemployment persistence in the Turkish labor market. In this regard, the existence and degree of genuine state dependence was analyzed using the data obtained from the 2013-2016 Survey on Income and Living Conditions and Household Labor Force Survey. The dynamic random effects probit model estimation results showed that there is genuine state dependence in the Turkish labor market. In other words, after controlling for observed and unobserved heterogeneity and initial conditions, past unemployment experiences increased the probability of being unemployed in the future. In addition, the marginal effect of genuine state dependence was found to be higher for the unemployed individuals than for the individuals employed in the initial period. As one’s education level increases, the likelihood of being jobless declines, however, men are more likely than women to do so. Age, gender, education level, marital status, and the number of household employees all have an impact on the likelihood of being unemployed. Demand-side factors such as the unemployment rate and growth rate of employment do not affect the probability of remaining unemployed.

JEL Classification : J64 , J65 , C23
DOI :10.26650/JEPR1197535   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1197535    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye İşgücü Piyasasında Kalıcı İşsizlik

Selçuk GemicioğluHasan Şahin

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye işgücü piyasasında kalıcı işsizliğin varlığını araştırmaktır. Bu doğrultuda 2013-2016 Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması ve Hanehalkı İşgücü Araştırmasından elde edilen veriler kullanılarak gerçek duruma bağımlılığın varlığı ve boyutu analiz edilmiştir. Dinamik rassal etkiler probit modeli tahmin sonuçları Türkiye işgücü piyasasında gerçek duruma bağımlılığın olduğunu göstermiştir. Diğer bir ifade ile gözlenen ve gözlenemeyen heterojenlik ve başlangıç koşulları kontrol edildikten sonra, geçmiş dönemde yaşanan işsizlik deneyimlerinin gelecek dönemde işsiz olma olasılığını artırdığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunun yanı sıra gerçek duruma bağımlılığın marjinal etkisi başlangıç döneminde istihdam edilen bireylere göre işsiz olan bireyler için daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Eğitim seviyesi azaldıkça işsiz kalma olasılığının azaldığı görülürken kadınlara kıyasla erkeklerin daha yüksek işsiz kalma olasılığına sahip olduğu görülmüştür. İşsiz olma olasılığının yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim seviyesi, medeni durum ve hanede çalışan birey sayısından etkilendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. İşsizlik ve istihdamın büyüme oranı gibi talep yönlü faktörlerin ise işsiz olma olasılığını etkilemediği ortaya çıkmıştır.

JEL Classification : J64 , J65 , C23

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The aim of this study is to examine the existence of unemployment persistence in the Turkish labor market. In other words, it aims to investigate the existence of genuine state dependence, which means that past experiences of unemployment cause unemployment again in the future. In this study, we sought answers to several questions: Does the degree of genuine state dependence vary according to the initial conditions and unobservable heterogeneity? What is the expected duration of the spell of unemployment and the probability of entry and exit to unemployment, unemployment persistence, and steady state, according to individual characteristics that be constant over time such as gender and education level? What are individual factors that increase the probability of being unemployed?

Unemployment persistence is based on two factors (Arulampalam, Booth & Taylor, 2000; Stewart, 2007). The first factor is the heterogeneity, which refers to individual differences that are either observe or not. Genuine state dependence is the other factor. Genuine state reliance is when a past event raises the probability of experiencing the same event in the future (Heckman, 1981a). Theoretically, genuine state dependence may occur due to a loss of human capital, unemployment insurance disincentives, stigmatization by employers, a decline in search intensity, habituation, or discouragement (Ayllon, 2013). Empirical findings have shown that there is genuine state dependence on unemployment across many countries (Gangji & Plasman, 2008; Biewen & Steffes, 2010; Plum & Ayllon, 2015; Fok, Scutella, & Wilkins, 2015; Pasaribu, 2016; Cai, Mavromaras, & Sloane, 2018). The research investigated genuine state dependence on unemployment and utilise dynamic models and estimators. The Dynamic Random Effects Probit Model is the most preferred of these models. Among the estimators, Heckman, Orme, and Wooldridge estimators are used depending on the information provided by the data. As in previous studies (Arulampalam et al., 2000; Stewart, 2007; Gangji & Plasman, 2008; Pasaribu, 2016), we used the Dynamic Random Effects Probit Model to examine the existence of genuine state dependence. We estimated parameters using another version of the Wooldridge maximum likelihood estimator, which was suggested in Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal (2013). This estimator offers reliable parameter estimates and enables control over both observed and unobserved heterogeneity. It also addresses the issue of beginning conditions. To investigate genuine state dependence on unemployment in the Turkish labor market, we estimate the Dynamic Random Effects Probit Model using the Survey on Income and Living Conditions and Household Labor Force Survey. The evidence shows that there is genuine state dependence on the Turkish labor market. In addition, according to the components of the unobserved heterogeneity, the conditional unemployment probability and the marginal effects of genuine state dependence vary significantly. The probability of conditional unemployment and the marginal effect of genuine state dependence are both significantly increased by being unemployed in the first period and being in the last two percent of the sample distribution in the part of the unobserved heterogeneity linked to the explanatory variables. Demand-side factors in the labor market such as the unemployment rate and employment growth rate do not affect the probability of unemployment, while factors such as gender, education level, marital status, and the number of employees in the household affect the probability of unemployment. When it comes to the probability of remaining unemployed, disadvantageous groups include men and those with low levels of education. To fight unemployment persistence, policymakers should develop policies that take into account factors such as a loss of human capital, unemployment insurance disincentives, stigmatization by employers, a decline in search intensity, habituation, or discouragement, which cause genuine state dependence. Making pre-graduate internships, which are currently applied in some departments of universities, compulsory for all departments to meet the experience requirement for newly graduated individuals by employers can accelerate and facilitate the transition to employment. 

Unemployed individuals suffer from a loss of human capital, skills, and qualifications as they remain unemployed, and thus employers may adopt negative attitudes towards the employment of individuals who are unemployed for a long time. In order to protect the unemployed from these negative situations, governments can implement programs that protect and increase the skills and qualifications of the unemployed. These programs can be very important, especially for skilled workers working in technology-intensive sectors where high-added value can be created. Modifying unemployment insurance benefits is another policy that may be put into place to help the unemployed find work more quickly and to make sure that people stay on the job market and keep looking for work.


PDF View

References

  • Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., ve Taylor, M. P. (2000). Unemployment persistence. Oxford economic papers, 52(1), 24-50. google scholar
  • Alcan, D., Can, R., ve Pektaş, B. (2015). Türkiye İşgücü Piyasasında Hareketlilik: Mikro Veriye Dayalı Analiz. Kalkınma Bakanlığı Ekonomi Çalışma Tebliğleri Serisi, (2015/1), 32. google scholar
  • Acar, E. Ö. (2016). Küresel Ekonomik Krizin Türkiye İşgücü Piyasasındaki Etkileri: Markov Geçiş Analizi/The Impact of the Global Economic Crisis on the Turkish Labor Market: A Markov Transition Analysis. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(4), 51-66. google scholar
  • Ayllon, S. (2013). Unemployment persistence: not only stigma but discouragement too. Applied Economics Letters, 20(1), 67-71. google scholar
  • Biewen, M., ve Steffes, S. (2010). Unemployment persistence: Is there evidence for stigma effects? Economics Letters, 106(3), 188-190. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O. J., ve Diamond, P. (1994). Ranking, unemployment duration, and wages. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 417-434. google scholar
  • Cai, L., Mavromaras, K., ve Sloane, P. (2018). Low Paid Employment in Britain: Estimating State-Dependence and Stepping Stone Effects. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(2), 283-326. google scholar
  • Cappellari, L. ve Jenkins, S.P. (2008). Transitions between unemployment and low pay, Polachek, S.W. and Tatsiramos, K. (Ed.) Work, Earnings and Other Aspects of the Employment Relation (Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 28), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9121(08)28003-9 google scholar
  • Clark, A., Georgellis, Y., ve Sanfey, P. (2001). Scarring: The psychological impact of past unemployment. Economica, 68(270), 221-241. google scholar
  • Congressional Budget Office. (2012). Understanding and Responding to Persistently High Unemployment. https:// www.cbo.gov/publication/42989 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
  • Fok, Y. K., Scutella, R., ve Wilkins, R. (2015). The Low-Pay No-Pay Cycle: Are There Systematic Differences across Demographic Groups?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(6), 872-896. google scholar
  • Gangji, A., ve Plasman, R. (2008). Microeconomic analysis of unemployment persistence in Belgium. International Journal of Manpower, 29(3), 280-298. google scholar
  • Grotti, R., ve Cutuli, G. (2018). xtpdyn: A community-contributed command for fitting dynamic random-effects probit models with unobserved heterogeneity. The Stata Journal, 18(4), 844-862. google scholar
  • Heckman, J. J. (1981a). Heterogeneity and state dependence. S. Rosen (Ed.), Studies in labor markets içinde (ss. 91-140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
  • Heckman, J. J. (1981b). The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process and some Monte Carlo evidence. C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Ed.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications içinde (ss. 179-195). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. google scholar
  • Katz, L. F., ve Meyer, B. D. (1990). The impact of the potential duration of unemployment benefits on the duration of unemployment. Journal of public economics, 41(1), 45-72. google scholar
  • Lockwood, B. (1991). Information externalities in the labour market and the duration of unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(4), 733-753. google scholar
  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 69-85. google scholar
  • Omori, Y. (1997). Stigma effects of nonemployment. Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 394-416. google scholar
  • Orme, C. D. (1997) The initial conditions problem and two-step estimation in discrete panel data models. University of Manchester. google scholar
  • Pasaribu, S. H. (2016). Persistence of Individual Unemployment in Indonesia: Dynamic Probit Analysis from Panel SUSENAS 2008-2010. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1239-1245. google scholar
  • Pissarides, C. A. (1992). Loss of skill during unemployment and the persistence of employment shocks. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(4), 1371-1391. google scholar
  • Plum, A., ve Ayllon, S. (2015). Heterogeneity in unemployment state dependence. Economics Letters, 136, 85-87. google scholar
  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., ve Skrondal, A. (2013). Avoiding biased versions of Wooldridge’s simple solution to the initial conditions problem. Economics Letters, 120(2), 346-349. google scholar
  • Selim, S., Kırgel, H. D., Çelik, O., ve Yazıcıoğlu, H. (2014). Türkiye’de işsizliğin sosyo-ekonomik belirleyicileri: Panel veri analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 10(22), 1-25. google scholar
  • Stewart, M. B. (2007). The interrelated dynamics of unemployment and low-wage employment. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(3), 511-531. google scholar
  • Tansel, A., ve Tasçı, H. M. (2004). Determinants of Unemployment Duration for Men and Women in Turkey. Institute for Study of Labor (IZA), Discussion Paper 1258, Bonn: IZA. google scholar
  • TÜİK, (2021a). İşgücü İstatistikleri, https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1007 adresinden 23.04.2021 tarihinde erişildi. google scholar
  • TÜİK, (2021b). Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları Araştırması, https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/MicroVeri/GYKA_Panel_2017/ turkce/metaveri/oernekleme-tasariimii/index.html adresinden 23.04.2021 tarihinde erişildi. google scholar
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(1), 39-54. google scholar
  • World Bank, (2021). Social Protection ve Labor: Unemployment, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports. google scholar
  • aspx?source=2&series=SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS&country=# adresinden 23.04.2021 tarihinde erişildi. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Gemicioğlu, S., & Şahin, H. (2023). Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(1), 181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


AMA

Gemicioğlu S, Şahin H. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market. Journal of Economic Policy Researches. 2023;10(1):181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


ABNT

Gemicioğlu, S.; Şahin, H. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, [Publisher Location], v. 10, n. 1, p. 181-211, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Gemicioğlu, Selçuk, and Hasan Şahin. 2023. “Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10, no. 1: 181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


Chicago: Humanities Style

Gemicioğlu, Selçuk, and Hasan Şahin. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10, no. 1 (Dec. 2023): 181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


Harvard: Australian Style

Gemicioğlu, S & Şahin, H 2023, 'Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market', Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 181-211, viewed 3 Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Gemicioğlu, S. and Şahin, H. (2023) ‘Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market’, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(1), pp. 181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535 (3 Dec. 2023).


MLA

Gemicioğlu, Selçuk, and Hasan Şahin. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, pp. 181-211. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535


Vancouver

Gemicioğlu S, Şahin H. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market. Journal of Economic Policy Researches [Internet]. 3 Dec. 2023 [cited 3 Dec. 2023];10(1):181-211. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535 doi: 10.26650/JEPR1197535


ISNAD

Gemicioğlu, Selçuk - Şahin, Hasan. Unemployment Persistence in The Turkish Labor Market”. Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10/1 (Dec. 2023): 181-211. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1197535



TIMELINE


Submitted02.11.2022
Accepted02.01.2023
Published Online31.01.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.