Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JEPR727340   IUP :10.26650/JEPR727340    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?

Mert TopcuLütfi Biçimveren

İktisat teorisi, işsizliği en önemli makroekonomik sorunlardan biri olarak öne çıkartmaktadır. Üretim sürecine yapacağı katkılar göz önüne alındığında genç nüfusun işgücü piyasasına entegrasyonu, çalışma ekonomisi literatürünün temel odak noktalarından biridir. Bu doğrultuda Türkiye ekonomisinde çok sayıda çalışma genç işsizliğin dinamiklerini analiz etmeye odaklanmıştır. Ancak konuyu Türkiye’de cinsiyet bazında ve mikro temelli ele alan çalışma sayısı oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu noktadan hareketle çalışmada, 2014-2019 döneminde İBBS-2 düzeyinde yer alan 26 bölgede genç işsizliğin dinamikleri ve bu dinamiklerin cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı incelenmektedir. Analiz sonuçları, kişi başına gelir değişkeninin hem toplam genç işsizliği hem de cinsiyete göre genç işsizliği negatif etkilediğini göstermektedir. Göreli kohort büyüklüğünün ve iç göçün her üç kategorideki genç işsizliği de pozitif etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Enflasyon oranındaki artış genç kadın işsizliğini artırırken genç erkek işsizliğini azaltmaktadır. Benzer şekilde, ilk evlenme yaşındaki artış ise genç kadın işsizliğini artırırken, genç erkek işsizliğini azaltmaktadır. Bulgular genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde, belirleyicilerin genç kadın işsizliği üzerindeki etkisinin genç erkeklerdeki etkisinden daha büyük olduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, gençlerin işgücü piyasasına entegrasyonuna yönelik geliştirilecek politikalarda cinsiyet faktörünün göz ardı edilmemesi gerektiğine vurgu yapılmaktadır.

JEL Classification : E24 , J11 , R11
DOI :10.26650/JEPR727340   IUP :10.26650/JEPR727340    Full Text (PDF)

Regional Youth Unemployment in Turkey: Do Determinants Vary by Gender?

Mert TopcuLütfi Biçimveren

Economic theory addresses unemployment as one of the crucial macroeconomic problems. Given the contributions to the production process, labor market integration of youth population is one of the main focuses of the labor economics literature. In this direction, a great number of studies have analyzed the dynamics of youth unemployment in the Turkish economy. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the issue in the case of Turkey with respect to gender using micro-level data. Given this knowledge, this study attempts to examine the determinants of the youth unemployment in 26 regions categorized under NUTS-2 over the period 2014-2019, and investigate whether those determinants vary by gender. Estimation results indicate that per capita income negatively affects both the total youth unemployment and youth unemployment by gender. Relative cohort size and internal migration positively affects all of the three youth unemployment categories. An increase in inflation rate increases youth female unemployment whereas youth male unemployment decreases with inflation. In addition, while an increase in age at first marriage increases youth female unemployment, it decreases youth male unemployment. Overall, the findings reveal that the impact that regional youth unemployment dynamics has on youth female unemployment is greater than on youth male unemployment. This study emphasizes that gender-based differences should be taken into account while developing policies towards the integration of youth into the labor market.

JEL Classification : E24 , J11 , R11

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Economic theory is in a broad consensus that enhancing youth population’s prospects is the most effective way to achieve productive employment and sustainable economic growth. Therefore, every single country cares about the status of the younger population and invests in their human capital in order to reach these macroeconomic goals. Despite of all these efforts, however, youth unemployment rates have still been very high across the globe over the last two decades. For example, the average youth unemployment rate for Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development countries as well as European Union (EU) member states was above 12%, which was slightly higher than that for Turkey in the early 2000s. In the late 2010s, however, Turkey experienced youth unemployment rates almost over 20%, which was higher than the averages experienced by the EU and OECD countries. Given this prominence, it is very important to investigate the dynamics of youth unemployment to shed light on what drives the youth labor force to become unemployed. In this direction, there exist a great number of studies examining the dynamics of youth unemployment, not only for multi-country cases (see, for example: Awad, 2019; Jimeno and Rodriguez-Palenzuela, 2003; among others), but also for those in the case of Turkey (see, for example: Kabaklarli and Gur, 2011; Sever and Igdeli, 2018; among others). Although the literature in the case of Turkey is very well-documented, we still do not know much about what the dynamics are once the issue is using micro-level data. To the best of our knowledge, Didin Sonmez and Ozerkek (2018) is the only study that examines this issue in Turkey from the regional point of view. 

In terms of market structure, Turkey looks like a men-dominated labor market where only one third of women participate in. When the split between youth female unemployment and youth male unemployment is examined, in addition, it is very apparent that average unemployment of youth females is higher than that of youth males. It is therefore likely to expect that regional unemployment dynamics in Turkey could vary by gender. 

Given the aforementioned information, the goal of this study is to investigate the determinants of youth unemployment in 26 regions categorized under NUTS-2 in order to find out whether those determinants vary by gender. To this end, we use annual observations spanning from 2014 to 2019 within a regional panel framework.

Having found that all the variables in the system are I(0), we estimate the slope coefficients using regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, proposed by Driscoll and Kraay (1998). The error structure in this estimator is assumed to be heteroskedastic, autocorrelated up to some lag, and possibly correlated between the cross sections. Given that this approach does not limit the number of cross sections, it becomes very feasible even when the number of cross sections is much larger than the time dimension. Estimation results indicate that per capita income negatively affects both total youth unemployment and youth unemployment by gender. Relative cohort size and internal migration positively affects all of the three youth unemployment categories. An increase in the inflation rate increases youth female unemployment whereas youth male unemployment decreases with inflation. In addition, while an increase in age at first marriage increases youth female unemployment, it decreases youth male unemployment. 

Overall, the findings reveal that the impact that regional youth unemployment dynamics has on youth female unemployment is greater than on youth male unemployment. As a crucial policy recommendation, this study emphasizes that gender-based differences should be taken into account while developing policies towards the integration of youth into the labor market. In order to eliminate the exclusion effect that the findings address, for instance, youth female-oriented employment policies should be supported much more. Other potential policy implications pertaining to the empirical results are also discussed in the study.


References

  • Anyanwu, J. (2014). Does intra-african trade reduce youth unemployment in Africa? African Development Review, 26(2), 286–309. google scholar
  • Arı, E., ve Yıldız, A. (2017). Examination of affecting variables for youth unemployment with cointegration analysis. Alphanumeric Journal, 5(2), 309–316. google scholar
  • Awad, A. (2019). Economic globalisation and youth unemployment: evidence from African countries. International Economic Journal, 33(2), 252–269. google scholar
  • Balcı İzgi, B., ve Konu, A. (2019). Genç işsizliğini belirleyen unsurlar: Brics ülkeleri ile Türkiye panel ardl uygulaması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1), 95–112. google scholar
  • Bayrak, R., ve Tatlı, H. (2016). Short and long term analysis of some factors effecting youth unemployment in Turkey. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 23(3), 229–242. google scholar
  • Borjas, G. J. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(4), 1667–1717. google scholar
  • Bölükoğlu, A. (2018). Female employment as a reserve army of labor: Case of Turkey, 1988-2013. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 50–67. google scholar
  • Brooks, P. K., & Pradhan, M. (2015). Youth unemployment in Europe: Okun’s law and beyond in the mechanics of a strong euro area: IMF policy analysis. International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Butkus, M., & Seputiene, J. (2019). The output gap and youth unemployment: an analysis based on Okun’s law. Economies, 7, 108, 1–17. google scholar
  • Choudry, M., Marelli, E., & Signorelli, M. (2012). Youth unemployment rate and impact of financial crises. International Journal of Manpower, 33(1), 76–95. google scholar
  • Cvecic, I., & Sokolic, D. (2018). Impact of public expenditure in labour market policies and other selected factors on youth unemployment. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 31(1), 2060-2080. google scholar
  • Çelik, R., ve Arslan, I. (2018). Göç ve işsizlik arasındaki ilişki: ampirik bir uygulama. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 74, 65–75. google scholar
  • Çetinkaya, E. (2010). Genç işsizliğin teorik açıklamaları. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 58, 45–57. google scholar
  • Çondur, F., ve Cömertler Şimşir, N. (2017). Türkiye’de eğitim harcamaları, ekonomik büyüme ve genç işsizlik ilişkilerinin analizi. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(6), 44–59. google scholar
  • Demidova, O., & Signorelli, M. (2012). Determinants of youth unemployment in Russian regions. Post-Communist Economies, 24(2), 191–217. google scholar
  • Didin Sönmez, F., ve Özerkek, Y. (2018). Türkiye’de bölgesel genç işsizliğin belirleyicileri. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 40(2), 297–318. google scholar
  • Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. google scholar
  • Dunsch, S. (2016). Okun’s law and youth unemployment in Germany and Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 49(1), 34–57. Dünya Bankası Veritabanı, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.NE.ZS?end=2019&start=2014 (Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2020). google scholar
  • Erikli, S. (2016). Genç yoksulluğunun temel belirleyicileri: Eğitim ve düzgün iş. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 283–302. google scholar
  • Ghoshray, A., Ordóñez, J., & Sala, H. (2016). Euro, crisis and unemployment: youth patterns, youth policies? Economic Modelling, 58, 442–453. google scholar
  • Gomez-Salvador, R., & Leiner-Killinger, N. (2008). An analysis of youth unemployment in the euro area. ECB Occasional Paper, (89). google scholar
  • Göksel, İ. (2013). Female labor force participation in Turkey: the role of conservatism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 45–54. google scholar
  • Granger, C.W.J. & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in economics, Journal of Econometrics, 4, 111–120. google scholar
  • Greenwood, M. J., & McDowell, J. M. (1986). The factor market consequences of US immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(4), 1738–1772. google scholar
  • Günaydın, D., ve Çetin, M. (2015). Genç işsizliğin temel makroekonomik belirleyicileri: ampirik bir analiz. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22, 17–34. google scholar
  • Güney, A., ve Balkaya, E. (2018). Kamu harcamaları ve ticari açıklığın işsizlik ve genç işsizliğe etkisi. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 49–74. google scholar
  • Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142. google scholar
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. google scholar
  • Isengard, B. (2003). Youth unemployment: Individual risk factors and institutional determinants. A case study of Germany and the United Kingdom. Journal of Youth Studies, 6(4), 357–376. google scholar
  • Jean, S., & Jiménez, M. (2011). The unemployment impact of immigration in OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 241–256. google scholar
  • Jimeno, J., & Rodriguez-Palenzuela, D. (2003). Youth unemployment in the oecd: demographic shifts, labour market ınstitutions and macroeconomic shocks. ENEPRI Working Paper . google scholar
  • Kabaklarlı, E., ve Gür, M. (2011). Türkiye’de genç işsizlik sorunu ve ekonomik belirleyicilerinin uzun dönem eşbütünleşme analizi. 14. Uluslararası Iktisat Ögrencileri Kongresi, Erişim adresi: https://acikerisim.aku.edu.tr/ xmlui/bitstream/handle/11630/7371/Turkiye_de_Genc_Issizlik_Sorunu_ve_Ekono. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y , (Erişim tarihi: 23.05.2020). google scholar
  • Karahan Dursun, P. (2019). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların eğitim düzeylerine göre genç istihdam üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 56(649), 83–111. google scholar
  • Korenman, S. & Neumark, D. (2000). Cohort crowding and youth labor markets: A cross-national analysis. In David Blanchflower and Richard Freeman, (eds.), Youth employment and unemployment in advanced countries (pp. 57-105). USA: Chicago University Press. google scholar
  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. google scholar
  • Lindbeck, A., & Snower, D. J. (2001). Insiders versus outsiders. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 165– 188. google scholar
  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2006). The impact of immigration on the employment of natives in regional labour markets: a meta-analysis. Institute for the Study of Labour, Discussion Paper, 2044, 1‒21. google scholar
  • Marelli, E., Choudhry, M. T., & Signorelli, M. (2013). Youth and total unemployment rate: The impact of policies and institutions. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Sociali, 121(1), 63–86. google scholar
  • Moffat, J., & Roth, D. (2014). Cohort size and youth unemployment in Europe: a regional analysis (No. 40-2014). Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics. O’higgins, N. (1997). The challenge of youth unemployment. International Social Security Review, 50(4), 63–93. google scholar
  • Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance. In: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 89–104. google scholar
  • Özer, U., ve Topal, M. (2017). Genç işsizliği, suç, göç, intihar ve boşanma düzeyleri ile ilişkili midir? Türkiye’den ampirik bir kanıt. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(5), 50–63. google scholar
  • Pastore, F., & Giuliani, L. (2015). The determinants of youth unemployment. a panel data analysis. Discussion Papers 2_2015. CRISEI, University of Naples” Parthenope”, Italy. google scholar
  • Phillips, A. W. (1958). The relation between unemployment and the Rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957 1. Economica, 25(100), 283–299. google scholar
  • Sever, E., ve İğdeli, A. (2018). The determining factors of youth unemployment in developing countries: the case of Turkey. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 75–83. google scholar
  • Şen, M. (2014). Trabzon›dan İstanbul›a Göç Edenlerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Analizi. Çalışma Dünyası Dergisi, 2(3).46–61. google scholar
  • Terzo, G., & Giaconia, C. (2019). The socio-demographic determinants of youth unemployment in Italy: Evidences from national labour survey. EconWorld2018, Seville, Spain. google scholar
  • Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148. google scholar
  • Topcu, M. (2018). İşgücünün dışındaki kalabalık: ev işleriyle uğraşanların belirleyicileri üzerine bir analiz. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(3), 867–881. google scholar
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK) Veritabanı, (Erişim tarihi: 23.05.2020). google scholar
  • Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü (ILO), https://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm (Erişim tarihi: 22.05.2020). google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Topcu, M., & Biçimveren, L. (2020). Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 7(2), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


AMA

Topcu M, Biçimveren L. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?. Journal of Economic Policy Researches. 2020;7(2):51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


ABNT

Topcu, M.; Biçimveren, L. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, [Publisher Location], v. 7, n. 2, p. 51-67, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Topcu, Mert, and Lütfi Biçimveren. 2020. “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 7, no. 2: 51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


Chicago: Humanities Style

Topcu, Mert, and Lütfi Biçimveren. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 7, no. 2 (Jan. 2021): 51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


Harvard: Australian Style

Topcu, M & Biçimveren, L 2020, 'Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?', Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 51-67, viewed 17 Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Topcu, M. and Biçimveren, L. (2020) ‘Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?’, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 7(2), pp. 51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340 (17 Jan. 2021).


MLA

Topcu, Mert, and Lütfi Biçimveren. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, pp. 51-67. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


Vancouver

Topcu M, Biçimveren L. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?. Journal of Economic Policy Researches [Internet]. 17 Jan. 2021 [cited 17 Jan. 2021];7(2):51-67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340 doi: 10.26650/JEPR727340


ISNAD

Topcu, Mert - Biçimveren, Lütfi. Türkiye’de Bölgesel Genç İşsizlik: Belirleyiciler Cinsiyete Göre Değişken mi?”. Journal of Economic Policy Researches 7/2 (Jan. 2021): 51-67. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR727340


PDF View


TIMELINE


Submitted26.04.2020
Accepted07.06.2020
Published Online29.07.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.