Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JEPR.930212   IUP :10.26650/JEPR.930212    Full Text (PDF)

The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries

Cihat KöksalGüldenur Çetin

The aim of this study is to test the international trade of Turkey’s polluting sectors using variables such as foreign direct investments and economic growth within the scope of the pollution haven hypothesis and to present policy recommendations for other developing countries. This study analyzes the annual data for the 1985-2017 period by using the multivariate regression model. As a result of the empirical tests, it is seen that Turkey is more attractive in the polluting sectors because environmental regulations are not very strict during the examined periods, and it has become more likely to export in these sectors through foreign direct investments. According to the analysis results, it has been revealed that Turkey can be qualified as a pollution shelter for the relevant period, and various policy recommendations have been developed in this context.

JEL Classification : E00 , F10 , F40
DOI :10.26650/JEPR.930212   IUP :10.26650/JEPR.930212    Full Text (PDF)

Türkiye’de Kirlilik Yaratan Sektörlerin Dış Ticaretinin Analizi

Cihat KöksalGüldenur Çetin

Bu çalışmanın amacı kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin dış ticaretini kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi kapsamında doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve ekonomik büyüme gibi değişkenler kullanarak test etmek ve Türkiye örneğinden yola çıkarak diğer gelişmekte olan ülkeler için politika önerileri sunmaktır. Bu çalışma, çok değişkenli regresyon modeli ile 1985-2017 dönemlerine ait yıllık verileri analiz edilerek gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan ampirik testler sonucunda Türkiye’nin incelenen dönemler içinde kirlilik üreten sektörlerde, çevresel düzenlemelerin çok sıkı olmamasından dolayı daha cazip bulunduğu ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar aracılığıyla bu sektörlerde daha fazla ihracat yapar hale geldiği görülmektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’nin, ilgili dönem için kirlilik sığınağı şeklinde nitelendirilebileceği ortaya konmuş olup, bu kapsamda çeşitli politika önerileri geliştirilmiştir. 

JEL Classification : E00 , F10 , F40

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


With the changes and developments in production systems after the industrial revolution, the production of materials in sufficient quantity and quality to meet cross-border demands has also led to increased resource and production facility needs. The increase in the amount of waste, especially with the periods when foreign trade activities accelerated, brought up whether production brings pollution with it for countries. The fact that production, which is the most basic element in achieving the economic growth targets of the countries, is also seen as a factor that harms the environmental conditions of the countries. On the one hand, it pushes the developed countries to shift their dirty industries to the developing countries; on the other hand, it has encouraged the development of environmentally friendly production processes by establishing clean production systems.

The pollution haven hypothesis states that due to the shifting of the production by developed countries to developing countries with the liberalization process in foreign trade, there will be an increase in environmental quality in developed countries. However, in developing countries, pollution will increase, and developed countries will turn into pollution havens.

The basis of the pollution halo hypothesis is that foreign direct investments reduce environmental damage in developing countries. Therefore, the central assumption of the hypothesis, foreign direct investments, will reduce pollution in developing countries.

When the examined literature is evaluated, it is seen that the studies revealing the amount of toxic waste and the trade relationship are predominant, especially in terms of developing countries. In addition to these, some studies examine the subject by classifying the countries according to their incomes and contribute to the literature by addressing the issue of pollution depending on their income levels. When the literature is evaluated in general, it is seen that studies are investigating China, the USA, and African countries. At this point, List and Co (2000) examined the USA and found that the difference in environmental policies between states is significant. Hoffmann, Lee, Ramasamy, and Yeung (2005) found that the difference in environmental policies between states is significant for 112 countries. Atıcı and Kurt (2007) studied Turkey and found that the Pollution Haven Hypothesis is valid. Asghari (2013) studied MENA and found that the Pollution Halo Hypothesis is valid. Kivyiro and Arminen (2014) studied about six countries, and they found that the Pollution Halo Hypothesis is valid for the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa, and Zambia. For Zimbabwe and Kenya, the Pollution Haven hypothesis has also been found valid. Fang, Liu, and Gao (2019), Xu, Zhao, Xie, and Zhu (2020), and Cheng, Li, and Liu (2020) studied China and found that the Pollution Haven Hypothesis is valid.

In this study, the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Pollution Halo Hypothesis are explained, and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis is tested for Turkey for the 1985-2017 period. In this study, multivariate regression analysis was applied as a method. For this purpose, the Pollution Limit (KH), GDP (GDP), GDP squared (GDP2 ), Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Urbanization (URB), Financial Development (FD), and Ecological Footprint (EF) variables were used. Two models were estimated in the study. The first of these is Model 1, where KH is the independent variable and GDP, GDP2 , FDI, and URB are dependent variables. Accordingly, there is a statistically significant positive relationship between KH and GDP variables. In other words, as economic growth increases, the pollution limit is positively affected. GDP2 and KH are in a statistically significant and negative relationship. There is a statistically significant and positive relationship between FDI and KH. Accordingly, as foreign direct investments increase, the pollution limits increase significantly. This finding shows us the conclusion that the pollution haven hypothesis is confirmed. 

Finally, URB and KH data are statistically significant and positively correlated. As the rate of urbanization increases, the levels of pollution also increase. Since this situation also shows the transition of employment from the agricultural sector to the industrial sectors, these people are primarily employed in the polluting sectors. According to Model 2 regression results, EF is positively affected by GDP. In other words, economic growth creates environmental pollution. This result again confirms the pollution haven hypothesis in the case of Turkey, supporting the findings of Model 1. Financial development data are positively related to environmental pollution. This situation shows that the financial sectors in Turkey do not allocate resources to green sectors that will prevent environmental pollution. 

In this respect, some recommendations have been developed for policymakers in Turkey. As seen, ecological footprints and greenhouse gas emissions are on the rise in Turkey. Environmental policies such as a gradual transition to renewable energy in energy production, stricter environmental regulations, and encouraging companies that produce and export based on clean technology will play an essential role in reducing pollution levels. 


PDF View

References

  • Asghari, M. (2013). Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis, International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences (IJSRES), 1 (6), 92-100. google scholar
  • Atıcı, C., & Kurt, F. (2007). Türkiye’nin dış ticareti ve çevre kirliliği: Çevresel Kuznets eğrisi yaklaşımı. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 13(2), 61-69. google scholar
  • Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N., & Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2019). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 23010-23026. google scholar
  • Cheng, Z., Li, L., & Liu, J. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China. Journal of environmental management, 265, 110532, 1-13. google scholar
  • Çetinkaya, Ş. (2018). Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi ve kirli endüstrilerin Türkiye ekonomisindeki yeri, II. Uluslararası Multidisipliner Çalışmalar Kongresi. google scholar
  • Çınar, S., Yılmazer, M., & Fazlılar, T. A. (2012). Kirlilik yaratan sektörlerin ticareti ve çevre: Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler karşılaştırması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(2), 212-226. google scholar
  • Dou, J., & Han, X. (2019). How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: Empirical test on Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Porter Hypothesis. Journal of cleaner production, 217, 105-115. google scholar
  • Fang, J., Liu, C., & Gao, C. (2019). The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports: Evidence from environmental information disclosure policy in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(36), 37101-37113. google scholar
  • Global Footprint Network (2021) Ecological footprint Oakland, USA, (2021, 11 Nisan) Erişim Adresi: https:// footprintnetwork.org/ google scholar
  • Gökalp, M., & Yıldırım, A. (2004). “Dış ticaret-çevre etkileşimi ve kirlilik sığınakları hipotezi: Türkiye uygulaması”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 11(2), 99-114. google scholar
  • Hoffmann, R., Lee, C. G., Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2005). FDI and pollution: A Granger causality test using panel data, Journal of International Development, 17, 311-317. google scholar
  • Keller, W., & Levinson, A. (1999). Environmental compliance costs and foreign direct investment inflows to U.S. States, NBER Working Paper Series, 1-42. google scholar
  • Kisswani, K. M., & Zaitouni, M. (2021). Does FDI affect environmental degradation? Examining pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses using ARDL modelling. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1-27. google scholar
  • Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595-606. google scholar
  • Köksal, C., Işik, M., & Katircioğlu, S. (2020). The role of shadow economies in ecological footprint quality: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 13457-13466. google scholar
  • Köksal, C., Katircioğlu, S., & Katircioğlu, S. (2021). The role of financial efficiency in renewable energy demand: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 285, 112-122. google scholar
  • List, J.A., & Co, C.Y. (2000). The Effects Of Environmental Regulations On Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 1-20. google scholar
  • Low, P., & Yeates, A. (1992). Do dirty industries migrate. P. Low (Ed.) International Trade and the Environment, World Bank Discussion Paper, No. 159, 89-104. google scholar
  • Mert, M., & Caglar, A. E. (2020). Testing pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses for google scholar
  • Turkey: A new perspective, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32933-32943. google scholar
  • Nadeem, A. M., Ali, T., Khan, M. T., & Guo, Z. (2020). Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: An exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 27((13), 15407-15425. google scholar
  • Pethig, R. (1976). Pollution, welfare, and environmental poolicy in the theory of comparative google scholar
  • advantage. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2(3), 160-169. google scholar
  • Polloni-Silva, E., Ferraz, D., Camioto, F. D. C., Rebelatto, D. A. D. N., & Moralles, H. F. (2021). Environmental kuznets curve and the pollution-halo/haven hypotheses: An investigation in Brazilian Municipalities. Sustainability, 13(8), 4114, 1-19 google scholar
  • Repkine, A., & Min, D. (2020). Foreign-funded enterprises and pollution halo hypothesis: A spatial econometric analysis of thirty Chinese Regions. Sustainability, 12(12), 5048, 1-24. google scholar
  • Sapkota, P., & Bastola, U. (2017). Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Data analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 64, 206-212. google scholar
  • Şahinöz, A., & Fotourehchi, Z. (2014). Kirlilik Emisyonu ve Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları: Türkiye İçin “Kirlilik Sığınağı Hipotezi” Testi. Sosyoekonomi, 21(21), 187-210. google scholar
  • Tobey, J. A. (1990). The Effect of Domestic Environmental Policies, Kyklos, 43(2), 191-209. google scholar
  • UN Comtrade. (2021). Commodity Trade Statistics Database, (2021, 11 Nisan) Erişim Adresi: comtrade.un.org google scholar
  • Xu, H., Zhao, G., Xie, R., & Zhu, K. (2020). A trade-related CO2 emissions and its composition: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110893, 1-14. google scholar
  • Xu, Y., Dietzenbacher, E., & Los, B. (2020). International trade and air pollution damages in the United States. Ecological Economics, 171, 106599. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, M., Destek, M., & Nakıpoğlu, Ö. F. (2017). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi veİdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(2), 99-111. google scholar
  • World Bank, (2021). World Development Indicators, (2021, 11 Nisan) Erişim Adresi: dataworldbank.org google scholar
  • Zeren, F. (2015). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların CO2emisyonunaetkisi: Kirlilik hale hipotezi mi kirlilik cenneti hipotezi mi?. Journal of Yaşar University, 10(37), 6442-6448. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Köksal, C., & Çetin, G. (2021). The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 8(2), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


AMA

Köksal C, Çetin G. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries. Journal of Economic Policy Researches. 2021;8(2):257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


ABNT

Köksal, C.; Çetin, G. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, [Publisher Location], v. 8, n. 2, p. 257-275, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Köksal, Cihat, and Güldenur Çetin. 2021. “The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 8, no. 2: 257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


Chicago: Humanities Style

Köksal, Cihat, and Güldenur Çetin. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 8, no. 2 (Sep. 2021): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


Harvard: Australian Style

Köksal, C & Çetin, G 2021, 'The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries', Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 257-275, viewed 24 Sep. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Köksal, C. and Çetin, G. (2021) ‘The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries’, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 8(2), pp. 257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212 (24 Sep. 2021).


MLA

Köksal, Cihat, and Güldenur Çetin. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, pp. 257-275. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212


Vancouver

Köksal C, Çetin G. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries. Journal of Economic Policy Researches [Internet]. 24 Sep. 2021 [cited 24 Sep. 2021];8(2):257-275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212 doi: 10.26650/JEPR.930212


ISNAD

Köksal, Cihat - Çetin, Güldenur. The International Trade Analysis of Turkey’s Polluting Industries”. Journal of Economic Policy Researches 8/2 (Sep. 2021): 257-275. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR.930212



TIMELINE


Submitted30.04.2021
Accepted24.07.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.