Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JEPR1260520   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1260520    Full Text (PDF)

Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests

Mustafa Zuhal

Technological developments play an important role in economic growth and development and form the basis in the convergence of socioeconomic factors between developed and developing countries, especially income. At the same time, developing countries aim to catch up with the leading countries by improving their technological capabilities, and examining

the technological convergence between countries, especially developing countries, is essential at this stage. This study aims to examine whether technological convergence occurs in 10 emerging economies. For this purpose, the study analyzes technological convergence over the variables of number of patents, labor productivity, and total factor productivity using Pesaran’s (2007) cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) and seemingly unrelated regression augmented Dickey-Fuller (SURADF) unit root tests. According to the results of the analysis, although there is convergence in some countries, it does not confirm in general technological convergence among the countries.

JEL Classification : O47 , J24 , O33
DOI :10.26650/JEPR1260520   IUP :10.26650/JEPR1260520    Full Text (PDF)

Yükselen Ekonomilerde Teknolojik Yakınsama: Birim Kök Testleri ile Bir İnceleme

Mustafa Zuhal

Teknolojik gelişmeler, ülkelerin ekonomik büyümesinde ve kalkınmasında önemli rol oynamaktadır. Özellikle gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler arasındaki başta gelir olmak üzere sosyoekonomik faktörlerde yakınsamanın temelinde teknolojik gelişmeler yer almaktadır. Aynı zamanda gelişmekte olan ülkeler teknolojik yetenek düzeylerini geliştirerek lider ülkeleri yakalamayı hedeflemektedirler. Bu aşamada başta gelişmekte olan ülkeler olmak üzere ülkeler arasındaki teknolojik yakınsamanın incelenmesi önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada on yükselen ekonomide teknolojik yakınsamanın olup olmadığının incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda patent sayıları, işgücü verimliliği ve toplam faktör verimliliği üzerinden teknolojik yakınsama Pesaran CADF ve SURADF birim kök testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, bazı ülkelerde yakınsama olsa da, ülkeler arasında genel olarak teknolojik yakınsama doğrulanamamaktadır.

JEL Classification : O47 , J24 , O33

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Technological developments play an important role in economic growth and development. However, the neoclassical approach ignores technological learning and effort by considering technology as an external element. Moreover, this approach assumes that countries will converge in the long run due to free technology. However, these assumptions of the neoclassical approach have been criticized by the evolutionary approach, and special attention has been given to technological learning. In theevolutionary approach, technological learning and imitation are included in the convergence process. In general, convergence is evaluated as an economy’s tendency toward a steady state by growing or shrinking at a certain speed (Ünsal, 2007, p. 157). In this respect, whether technological convergence occurs in developing countries needsto be investigated. This study aims to examine whether technology convergence occursin developing countries. For this purpose, the study considers the ten big emerging markets (BEM-10) of Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Mexico,Poland, South Africa, and Türkiye from among important economies and discusses these emerging economies. Unlike other studies, this one includes total factor and labor productivity in the analysis as supplemental variables, as well as the number of patents, thus aiming to analyze the technological developments among countries in detail over

different variables. The study also aims to make significant contributions to the technological convergence literature, which is limited in terms of the scope of study and the variables and analysis techniques that have been used. At the same time, this study differs from other studies that have examined technological developments through different variables, thus showing itself to possess originally.

Many theoretical and empirical studies have occurred with regard to the convergence approach. However, due to the scope and content of what is being studied, apart from the fundamental studies on the convergence approach, this article also will extensively examine studies that have evaluated the technological convergence approach in terms of convergence analyses. The papers the study has examined within its scope show that various types of the convergence approach have been developed among countries, regions, and sectors. At the same time, these studies are understood to have examined the presence of convergence using various socioeconomic variables in addition to income convergence. When considering the technological convergence studies, the variables of number of patents, labor productivity, and total factor productivity are seen to have been used intensively to represent technology.

In terms of the number of patents, technological convergence has been confirmed in Argentina, Indonesia, Mexico, Türkiye, China, South Korea, Poland, and South Africa as a result of Pesaran’s (2007) cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) unit root test, as well as South Korea, Argentina, and Poland as a result of the seemingly unrelated regression augmented Dickey-Fuller (SURADF) unit root test. In terms of total factor productivity, Türkiye, Mexico, and Poland are seen to have converged as a result of the Pesaran CADF unit root test, and Türkiye and Mexico as a result of the SURADF unit root test. Regarding labor productivity, convergence has been found in Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil based on the Pesaran CADF test and in Mexico based on the panel SURADF test.

This study aims to examine whether technology convergence occurs in developing countries. For this purpose, the study has discussed the 10 big emerging markets.Technological convergence is understood to have occurred in a limited number of countries regarding number of patents, total factor productivity, and labor productivity. Natural convergence was not seen to have occurred as assumed in the neoclassical approach. The fact that technological convergence was not confirmed in the group of examined countries offers important implications for developing countries. High income and technology, especially in South Korea, are known to result from conscious policies aimed at science, industry, and technology. In this respect, special attention should be given to technological learning in developing countries. At the same time, policies for national technological efforts and learning need to be developed and implemented consistently. In addition, importance is had in establishing and successfully operating national innovation systems.


PDF View

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth And other essays on economic growth and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Albulescu, C., Oros, C., & Tiwari, A. (2017). Is there any convergence in health expenditures across EU countries?Economics Bulletin, 37(3), 2095-2101. hal-01981082 . google scholar
  • AlKathiri, N. (2022). Labour productivity growth and convergence in manufacturing: A nonparametric production frontier approach. Applied Economics, 54(4), 406-429. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1963410. google scholar
  • Apergis, N. (2015). Convergence in Public Expenditure Across a Sample of Emerging Countries: Evidence from Club Convergence. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(3) , 448-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/154049 6X.2015.1025670. google scholar
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. (2017). Per capita carbon dioxide emissions across U.S. states by sector and fossil fuel source: Evidence from club convergence tests. Energy Economics 63, 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eneco.2016.11.027. google scholar
  • Apergis, N., Christou, C., & Hassapis, C. (2013). Convergence in public expenditures across EU countries: evidence from club convergence. Economics & Finance Research, 1, 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/216494 80.2013.86273. google scholar
  • Archibugi , D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological Change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4. google scholar
  • Archibugi, D. (1992). Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6), 357-368. DOI: 10.1093/spp/19.6.35. google scholar
  • Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo). World Development 32(4), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.008. google scholar
  • Bakırtaş, T. (2014). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Ekonomik Kalkınma Küresel Kalkınma Odaklı Sorunlar Yeni Model Arayışları. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 1-27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215930. google scholar
  • Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1816469. google scholar
  • Blanco, F., Delgado, F., & Presno, M. (2020). R&D expenditure in the EU: convergence or divergence? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 33(1), 1685-1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1756371. google scholar
  • Bozkurt, K. (2018). Teknolojik Yakınsama: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz. L. Aytemiz, E. Karayılmazlar içinde, Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimlerde Akademik Araştırmalar- V (s. 357-370). Ankara: Gece Kitaplığı. google scholar
  • Breuer, J., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. (2001). Misleading Inferences from Panel Unit-Root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity. Review of International Economics, 9 (3), 482-493. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-9396.00294. google scholar
  • Breuer, J., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. (2002). Series-specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64 (5), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00276. google scholar
  • Byrne, J., Fazio, G., & Piacentino, D. (2009). Total Factor Productivity Convergence among Italian Regions: Some Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests. Regional Studies 43(1), 63-76. https://doi. org/10.1080/00343400701654137. . google scholar
  • Caldas, J., Godinho, M., & Mamede, R. (2009). Simulating the prospects of technological catching us. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18(6), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802233651. . google scholar
  • Camilla, M., Serlenga, L., & Shin, Y. (2013). Globalisation and technological convergence in the EU. J Prod Anal 40, 15-29. DOI 10.1007/s11123-012-0308-9. google scholar
  • Castellanos-Sosa, F. (2020). Labor Productivity Convergence in Mexico, . International Journal of Political Economy, 49 (3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2020.1824733. google scholar
  • Cavenaile, L., & Dubois, D. (2011). An empirical analysis of incomeconvergence in the European Union. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 1705-1708. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.560104. google scholar
  • Caviggioli, F. (2016). Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data. Technovation 55-56, 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016lj.technovation.2016.04.003. google scholar
  • Co, C., & Wohar, M. (2004). Technological convergence among US regions and states. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13(2), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590410001628107. google scholar
  • Ferreiro, J., Garcia-Del-Valle, M., & Gomez, C. (2009). Is the composition of public expenditures converging in EMU countries? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31(3), 459-484. DOI 10.2753/PKE0160-3477310305. google scholar
  • Fischer, R., & Serra, S. (1996). Income Convergence within and between Countries. International Economic Review, 37(3), 531-551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2527440. google scholar
  • FRED. (2023, 01 03). Economic Data. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/searchresults?st=factor+productivity adresinden alındı google scholar
  • ILO. (2023, 01 03). Statistics on Labour Productivity. https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/labour-productivity/ adresinden alındı google scholar
  • Jungmittag, A. (2005). Innovations, Technological Specialisation and Economic Convergence in the EU. S. Welfens, and A. Wziatek-Kubiak içinde, Structural Change and Exchange Rate Dynamics The Economics of EU Eastern Enlargement (s. 171-199). Berlin: Springer . google scholar
  • Kathuria, V., & Oh, K. (2018). ICT access: Testing for convergence across countries. The Information Society 34(3), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438549. . google scholar
  • Lall, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialisation. World Development, 20(2), 165-186. https://doi. org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90097-F. google scholar
  • Lall, S. (1998). Technological Capabilities in Emerging Asia,. Oxford Development Studies, 26(2), 213-243. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13600819808424154. google scholar
  • Leonida, L., Petraglia, C., & Murillo-Zamorano, L. (2004). Total factor productivity and the convergence hypothesis in the Italian regions. Applied Economics, 36(19), 2187-2193. DOI: 10.1080/0003684042000282506. google scholar
  • Lim, L., & McAleer, M. (2004). Convergence and catching up in ASEAN: a comparative analysis. Applied Economics, 36(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000174038. . google scholar
  • Makkonen, T. (2015). National innovation system capabilities among leader and follower countries: widening gaps or global convergence? Innovation and Development, 5(1), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/215793 0X.2014.992818. . google scholar
  • Narayan, S. (2007). Do health expenditures ‘catch-up’? Evidence from OECD countries. Health Econ. 16(10), 9931008. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1196. google scholar
  • Nghiem, S., & Connelly, L. (2017). Convergence and determinants of health expenditures in OECD countries. Health Economics Review 7(29), 2-11. DOI 10.1186/s13561-017-0164-. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951. . google scholar
  • Rey, S., & Montouri, B. (1999). US Regional Income Convergence: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Regional Studies, 33(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950122945. google scholar
  • Sedgley, N. (1998). Technology gaps, economic growth and convergence across US states, . Applied Economics Letters, 5(1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/758540128. google scholar
  • Strazicich, M., & List, J. (2003). Are CO 2 Emission Levels Converging Among Industrial Countries? Environmental andResource Economics 24, 263-271. https://doi.Org/10.1023/A:1022910701857. google scholar
  • Taymaz, E. (2001). Ulusal Yenilik Sistemi Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde Teknolojik Değişim ve Yenilik Süreçleri. Ankara: TÜBİTAK / TTGV / DİE. google scholar
  • Turganbayev, Y. (2017). Total factor productivity convergence across the Kazakh regions. Post-Communist Economies, 29(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267975. google scholar
  • Ulucak, R. (2018). Çevre Kalitesi Açısından Yakınsama Hipotezine Yeni Bir Bakış: Ekolojik Ayak İzi ve Kulüp Yakınsamaya Dayalı Ampirik Bir Analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 29-38. https:// doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.552674. google scholar
  • Utku-İsmihan, F. (2019). Knowledge, technological convergence and economic growth: a dynamic panel data analysis of Middle East and North Africa and Latin America. Quality & Quantity 53, 713-733. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11135-018-0785-7. google scholar
  • Ünsal, E. (2007). İktisadi Büyüme. Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • WIPO. (2023, 01 13). WIPO IP Statistics Data Center. https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/index.htm?tab=patent adresinden alındı google scholar
  • World Bank. (2022, 12 08). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/ knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups adresinden alındı google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Zuhal, M. (2023). Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(2), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


AMA

Zuhal M. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches. 2023;10(2):567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


ABNT

Zuhal, M. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, [Publisher Location], v. 10, n. 2, p. 567-586, 2023.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Zuhal, Mustafa,. 2023. “Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10, no. 2: 567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


Chicago: Humanities Style

Zuhal, Mustafa,. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10, no. 2 (Jul. 2024): 567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


Harvard: Australian Style

Zuhal, M 2023, 'Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests', Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 567-586, viewed 20 Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Zuhal, M. (2023) ‘Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests’, Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 10(2), pp. 567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520 (20 Jul. 2024).


MLA

Zuhal, Mustafa,. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests.” Journal of Economic Policy Researches, vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, pp. 567-586. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520


Vancouver

Zuhal M. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests. Journal of Economic Policy Researches [Internet]. 20 Jul. 2024 [cited 20 Jul. 2024];10(2):567-586. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520 doi: 10.26650/JEPR1260520


ISNAD

Zuhal, Mustafa. Technological Convergence in Emerging Economies: An Investigation with Unit Root Tests”. Journal of Economic Policy Researches 10/2 (Jul. 2024): 567-586. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1260520



TIMELINE


Submitted05.03.2023
Accepted12.06.2023
Published Online02.08.2023

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.