References

• Almeida, A. T. (2005). Multicriteria modelling of repair contract based on utility and ELECTRE I method with dependability and service quality criteria. Annals of Operations Research, 138(1), 113-126. google scholar
• AFAD (Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Pres-idency), https://tabb-analiz.afad.gov.tr/Default.aspx, Access Date: 25.04.2020. google scholar
• Chen, N., Chen, L., Tang, C., Wu, Z., Chen, A. (2019). Disaster risk evaluation using factor analysis: a case study of Chinese re-gions. Natural Hazards, 99(1), 321-335. google scholar
• Dagsuyu, C., Derse, O., Oturakci, M. (2021). Integrated risk prioritiza-tion and action selection for cold chain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(13), 15646-15658. google scholar
• Dilley, M., Chen, R. S., Deichmann, U., Lerner-Lam, A. L., Arnold, M. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. The World Bank. google scholar
• Emblemsvâg, J. (2008). On probability in risk analysis of natural disas-ters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Jour-nal. google scholar
• Eyre, R., De Luca, F., Simini, F. (2020). Social media usage reveals re-covery of small businesses after natural hazard events. Nature com-munications, 11(1), 1-10. google scholar
• Ersoy, M., Celik, M. Y., Yeşilkaya, L., & Colak, O. (2019). Combination of Fine-Kinney and GRA methods to solve occupational health and safety problems. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Archi-tecture of Gazi University, 34(2), 751-770. google scholar
• Ganguly, K. K., Guin K. K. (2013). A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment. Benchmarking: Int. J. 20(1), 129-146. google scholar
• Gul, M., Guven, B., Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Jour-nal ofLoss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3-16. google scholar
• Guidry, V. T., Margolis, L. H. (2005). Unequal respiratory health risk: using GIS to explore hurricane-related flooding of schools in East-ern North Carolina. Environmental research, 98(3), 383-389. google scholar
• Guo, J., Zhao, S., Huang, C. (2017). Valid historical data for probabilis-tic risk analysis in natural disasters. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(3), 474-493. google scholar
• Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M. (2011). An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environ-ment. Omega, 39(4), 373-386. google scholar
• Hong, J. D., Jeong, K. Y. (2019). Humanitarian supply chain network design using data envelopment analysis and multi-objective pro-gramming models. European Journal of Industrial Engineer-ing, 13(5), 651-680. google scholar
• Ivcevic, A., Mazurek, H., Siame, L., Moussa, A. B., & Bellier, O. (2019). Indicators in risk management: Are they a user-friendly in-terface between natural hazards and societal responses? Challenges and opportunities after UN Sendai conference in 2015. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101301. google scholar
• Kinney, G. F., Wiruth, A. D. (1976). Practical risk analysis for safety management (No. NWC-TP-5865). Naval Weapons Center China Lake Ca. google scholar
• Kokangül, A., Polat, U., Dağsuyu, C. (2017). A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodolo-gies. Safety science, 91, 24-32. google scholar
• Lee, C. H., Lin, S. H., Kao, C. L., Hong, M. Y., Shih, C. L., Chuang, C. C. (2020). Impact of climate change on disaster events in metropol-itan cities-trend of disasters reported by Taiwan national medical response and preparedness system. Environmental research, 183, 109186. google scholar
• Li, N., Liu, X., Xie, W., Wu, J., Zhang, P. (2013). The return period analysis of natural disasters with statistical modeling of bivariate joint probability distribution. Risk Analysis: An International Jour-nal, 33(1), 134-145. google scholar
• Luchuan, R. E. N. (1999). Advance in risk analysis for regional natural disasters [J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 3. google scholar
• Ma, Y., Xu, W., Qin, L., Zhao, X. (2019). Site selection models in natu-ral disaster shelters: a review. Sustainability, 11(2), 399. google scholar
• Mabrouki, C., Bentaleb, F., Mousrij, A. (2014). A decision support methodology for risk management within a port terminal. Safety Science, 63, 124-132. google scholar
• Pang, J., Zhang, G., Chen, G. (2011). ELECTRE I Decision Model of Reliability Design Scheme for Computer Numerical Control Ma-chine. JSW, 6(5), 894-900. google scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, new york: Mcgrew hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguesses and Chi-nese, Revised edition, Paperback (1996, 2000), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 9, 19-22. google scholar
• Sukcharoen, T., Weng, J., Teetat, C. (2016). GIS-based flood risk model evaluated by Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP). In Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XVIII (Vol. 9998, p. 999809). International Society for Optics and Photonics. google scholar
• Supriyadi, B., Windarto, A. P., Soemartono, T. (2018). Mungad,“Classi-fication of natural disaster prone areas in Indonesia using K-means,”. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput, 11(8), 87-98. google scholar
• Osipov, V. I., Rumyantseva, N. A., Eremina, O. N. (2019). Living with risk of natural disasters. Russian Journal ofEarth Sciences, 19(6). google scholar
• URL 1, https://www.nufusu.com/ilceleri/izmir-ilceleri-nufusu, Access Date: 01.05.2020. google scholar
• URL 2, https://www.google.com/maps, Access Date: 01.05.2020. google scholar
• Yilmaz, F., Ozcan, M. S. (2019). A Risk Analysis and Ranking Applica-tion for Lifting Vehicles Used in Construction Sites with Integrated AHP and Fine-Kinney Approach. Advances in Science and Technol-ogy Research Journal, 13(3). google scholar
• Xu, X., Liang, D., Chen, X., Zhou, Y. (2015). A risk elimination coordi-nation method for large group decision-making in natural disaster emergencies. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Interna-tional Journal, 21(5), 1314-1325. google scholar

Citations