Research Article


DOI :10.26650/jos.1061390   IUP :10.26650/jos.1061390    Full Text (PDF)

Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an

Ahmet Onur

By our reference to the question of the creation of the Qur’an, we mean that verbal term that expresses the debate over whether, in fact, the Qur’an was created or not. This debate arose, especially among the Muʽtazila theological sect, which emerged at the beginning of the second century AH. The question arose in the space approximately under the influence of reason and its dominance, and the impulse of influence from philosophy and theology, the principles of the Muʽtazila led to many serious violations in the Islamic faith. One of the prominent issues in the thought of this sect was the issue of the creation of the Qur’an, wherein they argue that the Holy Qur’an was created the same as other creatures. Analyzing from this thought, they deny that the Qur’an is the word of God that He spoke. This issue intensified and many scholars were persecuted in the era of al-Ma’mun, al-Muʽtasim and al-Wathiq, with the support of the Muʽtazilite judge Ahmed bin Abi Duad. Past and present studies have dealt with the issue of the creation of the Qur’an, but they have not addressed the poetry accompanying it. Accordingly, this paper has tried to trace the origins of this poetry. We have considered the corresponding poetry and the poetry contrary to it. The most prominent poets in the first group were Al-Saheb bin Abbad and Al-Hussein bin Abdul Salam; As for the second group, we stopped at Ali bin al-Jahm, who praised al-Mu’tasim and al-Wathiq with only a few of his poems and ended with poems that had nothing to do with the creation of the Qur’an. Until Al-Mutawakkil assumed the caliphate, he anticipated a victory for the Sunnis. For this reason, he praised the caliph for his role in addressing this issue. Finally, we research the poems of al-Buhturi and those of some religious groups and other poetry that relates to this subject.

DOI :10.26650/jos.1061390   IUP :10.26650/jos.1061390    Full Text (PDF)

Halku’l-Kur’ân Meselesi Konusunda Söylenen Şiirler

Ahmet Onur

Halku’l-Kur’ân Meselesi ile, Kur’an’ın yaratılmış olup olmadığı konusundaki tartışmaları ifade eden kelâm terimini kastedilmektedir. Bu tartışma, bilhassa Hicri 2. asrın başlarında ortaya çıkan Muʽtezile mezhebiyle, yaklaşık olarak aklın tahkim ve takdiminin etkisinde, felsefe ve kelamdan etkilenme dürtüsü ile ortaya çıkmıştır. Muʽtezile görüşleri, İslam inancında birçok ciddi tahribata yol açmış ve bu mezhebin düşüncesinde öne çıkanlar Kur’ân’ın yaratılmışlığı konusu ile O’nun konuştuğunun Allah kelâmı olduğunu inkâr edenlerle ilgili meselelerdir. Bu mesele, Muʽtezile’den olan kâdî Ahmed b. Ebî Du’âd’ın desteğiyle el-Me’mun, el-Muʽtasım ve el-Vâsık devrinde âlimler imtihan edilinceye kadar yoğunlaştı. Geçmişte ve günümüzde yapılan çalışmalarda, Kur’an’ın yaratılmışlığı konusu araştırılmış fakat Kur’ân’ın yaratılmışlığı ile ilgili konuları ele alan şiirler incelenmemiştir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma bu şiirlerin izini sürmeye çalışmıştır. Kur’ân’ın yaratılmışlığı konusuyla ilgili şiirler ve buna karşı görüş bildiren şiirleri ele alınmıştır. İlk olarak El-Sâhib b. Abbâd ve el-Hüseyin b. Abdusselâm, Kur’ân’ın yaratılmışlığını ele alan şiirlerine yer verilmiştir. Ardından Kur’ân’ın yaratılmışlığına pek değinmeyen ve El-Muʽtasım ile El-Vâsık’ı çok az öven Ali b. el-Cehm ve şiirleri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca el-Buhturî’nin bazı kasideleri ve konuyla ilgili şiirlerine değinilmiştir.

DOI :10.26650/jos.1061390   IUP :10.26650/jos.1061390    Full Text (PDF)

الش ّ عر الدائر حول مسألة خلق القرآن الكريم

Ahmet Onur

ملخص َل الذي دار حول ما إذا كان القرآن ِ َ ر عن الجد ُعبّ ُ َ قص ّ د بمسألة خلق القرآن ذاك المصطلح الكالمي الذي ي ي ّاني ِ ْرقة المعتزلة الكالميّة التي ظهرت في بداية القرن الث ً ّ ا أم ال. وقد برز هذا الجدل بخاصة مع ف مخلوق ّر بالفلسفة وعلم الكالم، وقد أدّت أصولهم إلى ّأث ٍ من الت ًا بتأثير من تحكيم العقل وتقديمه وبدفع ّ الهجري تقريب مخالفات كثيرة وخطيرة في العقيدة اإلسالميّة، وكانت مسألة خلق القرآن من المسائل البارزة في فكر هذه ِ الف ْر ّ قة، حيث يذهبون إلى أن ْ القرآن الكريم مخلوق كغيره من المخلوقات، وينفون أن يكون كالم الله الذي ُحن فيها العلماء في عهد المأمون والمعتصم والواثق بدفع من ّم به. وقد اشتدّ أمر هذه المسألة حتى امت تكل ّ القاضي المعتزلي أحمد بن أبي دُ َؤاد. ّ ّ ها لم تتناول الشعر المرافق لها، فحاول هذا ًا مسألة خلق القرآن، ولكن وقد تناولت الدّ ً راسات قديما وحديث البحث تتبّ ّ ع هذا الش ّ عر، فوقفنا عند الش ّ عر الموافق والش ّ عر المخالف لها، وكان أبرز الش ّ عراء في القسم األول َّ الص َ احب بن عبّ ّ اد والحسين بن عبد السالم ّ ؛ أم ّ ا في القسم الثاني فقد وقفنا عند علي َ بن الجهم الذي لم يمدح ّ ّ ى المتوكل الخالفة رأى فيه المعتصم والواثق إال قلي ًل وبأشعار ال عالقة لها بخلق القرآن، حتى إذا تول ّصدّ ّ ي لهذه المسألة، كما تناولنا هنا أشعار البحتري وبعض ً نصر ّ ا ألهل السنة فانطلق يمدحه لدوره في الت ّصل بهذا الموضوع. المنظومات الدّينيّة وغيرها من األشعار التي تت


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


This paper considers what was said among scholars past and present about poetry concerning the issue of the creation of the Qur’an, which was the polestar of the Mu’tazila theological sect, first among the sects that embraced this theological concept. The concept achieved predominance among them when they became powerfully close to the ruling authorities. They convinced the three caliphs, Al-Ma’mun, Al-Muʽtasim, and al-Wathiq, to embrace it and defend it and to persecute those who refuse to embrace and defend it. Debates have been held, the aim of which is to respond to the second position, particularly to that thought as it developed under intimidation through torture and murder. The Muʽtazilite Ahmad bin Abi Duad played the primary role in this state-sponsored persecution, and it continued for fifteen years between 218-232 AH. The persecution finally ended when Al-Mutawakkil assumed the caliphate.

If the books of the Muʽtazila scholars mentioned the names of poets because of what happened in their poetry, that is, when it indicated their embrace of Muʽtazila dogma, or because they praised the leaders of the Muʽtazilites, especially Ahmed bin Abi Duad, some of them nonetheless cannot be counted among them.

For the Muʽtazilites required belief in all five principles, It is not permissible to to share only one or more principles with the Muʽtazilite. Therefore, one cannot say that Abu Tammam was one of the Muʽtazilites, even if he praised Ibn Abi Duad in thirteen places in his poetry. His praises were often an effort to receive a reward, and the judge Ahmad bin Abi Duad’s doctrine was only mentioned once.

Likewise, Daʽbil’s poems do not indicate that he espoused Muʽtazila beliefs, while Ibn Al-Murtada mentioned some evidence to prove his praise of Ahl al-Bayt without saying he was a Muʽtazila or not. If the Shiite regions tended toward Muʽtazila generally, this does not mean that they were identical. Daʽbil satirized Ibn Abi Duad, as well as the three caliphs in charge of the ordeal, but his poems do not proceed from a contradiction of the thought of the Muʽtazila or endorse belief in the creation of the Qur’an,. Rather his poetry is interpreted through its Shiiteness or by its nature, concentrating on the original satire. Da’bil was not particularly sincere in his Shi’ism. In the same manner that he preferred money over the suit that Ali al-Rida gave him, he also opposed the Shiite poem by al-Kumayt in the Qahtanites of his people. Further, he also satirizeed Adnanis, the people of al-Kumayt.

As for the most prominent Mu’tazila poets who mentioned the creation of the Qur’an, between Al-Saheb Ibn Abbad and the poet Al-Jamal, Saheb has the priority; He was not motivated by the thought of the Mu’tazilites and now did he claim that the Qur’an was created in praise of the Mu’tazilites to compete for their gifts. Rather, he was himself from the elite of society and a minister with authority. He had councils that included scholars and writers. Al-Saheb himself lavished gifts on the poets. Al-Saheb was a Shiite and Muʽtazilite at the same time. We find in his poetry many manifestations of both his Shiite and Muʽtazili beliefs. In the line of poetry that contradicts the belief in the creation of the Qur’an, Ali ibn al-Jahm and al-Buhturi were the most prominent poets during the time of adversity. Ali’s poetry is superior to the poetry of al-Buhturi. Ali’s poetry springs from his sincere belief in this issue, and he often dealt with supporting the Sunnah and eliminating adversity in his praises of Al-Mutawakkil. Even if he were not sincere in this poetry, he found other ways to praise the caliph sincerely. Ali also wrote poems praising al-Wathiq and al-Muʽtasim, but he did not discuss what they might have said about the creation of the Qur’an, and he did not praise them for that. As soon as Al-Mutawakkil assumed the caliphate, he saw hope for the religion’s victory.

The research also declined to consider certain religious texts that organized the belief, and they are many. These texts do not adhere to the Rajaz meter, but we find many other seas; such as the long sea, the simple, the complete, the abundant, and others. We see this school of poetry as a single place for talking about the creation of the Qur’an. One of the most famous and longest was the poem “The Healing Sufficient” by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziah. This poem reached 5842 verses in the Kamil meter. The poet spoke in more than four hundred poetic verses about the issue of the creation of the Qurʼan among different sects, disproving the suspicions of its naysayers and defending the belief of the Sunnites. This poem deserves an independent consideration in its own research.

At the conclusion of the research, we drew attention to the possibility of expanding the study of the poetry related to the issue of the creation of the Qur’an. The issue has been studied in both the past and present in intellectual and doctrinal prose studies, but it has not singled out – so far as we know - the poetry that surrounds it. The research can and should also be expanded to include the Ash’ari systems and others. There is no doubt also that there are many poems that recited in praise of Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, one of the most prominent of those persecuted in the ordeal, denying the belief that the Qur’an was created. It is also possible to search and study these poems. 


PDF View

References

  • Dayf, Şevkî. Târîhu’l-Edebi’l-Arabî el-'Asru’l-'Abbâsî el-Evvel. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Ma'ârif, 16.baskı, ty. google scholar
  • -------. Târîhu’l-Edebi’l-Arabî el-'Asru’l-'Abbâsî es-Sânî. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Ma'ârif, 12.baskı, 2001. google scholar
  • ed-Dabbî, el-Mufaddal b. Muhammed. Emsâlu’l-Arab. kaddeme lehu: İhsân Abbâs. Beyrût: Dâru’r-Râ’id el-Arabî, 2.baskı, 1403/1983. google scholar
  • el-Ahtal, Ğiyâs b. Ğavs et-Tağlibî. Şi'ru el-Ahtal. san'at: es-Sukkerî. thk: Fahruddîn Kabâve. Dımaşk- Beyrût: Dâru’l-Fikr ve Dâru’l-Fikr el-Mu'âsir, 4.baskı, 1416/1996. google scholar
  • el-Aşkar, Ömer Süleymân Abdullah. El-'Akîdetu fi’l-Lâh. Ürdün-Ammân: Dâru’n-Nefâ’is, 12.baskı, 1419/1999. google scholar
  • -------. El-Kadâ’u ve’l-Kadar. Ürdün- Ammân: Dâru’n-Nefâ’is, 13.baskı, 1425/2005. google scholar
  • el-Bağavî, Ebû Muhammed el-Hüseyn b. Mas'ûd. Tefsîru’l-Bağavî. thk: Muhammed Abdullah en-Nimr, Osmân Cuma Damîriyye ve Süleymân Muslim el-Harş. Riyad: Dâru Taybe, 1411. google scholar
  • el-Balhî, Ebu’l-Kâsim. Kâdî Abdulcebbâr ve el-Hâkim el-Cuşemî. Fadlu’l-İ'tizâl ve Tabakâtu’l-Mu'tezile. thk: Fu’âd Seyyid. Beyrût: el-Ma'hadu’l-Elmânî li’l-Ebhâs eş-Şerkiyye ve Dâru’l-Fârâbî, 1.baskı, 1439/2017. google scholar
  • el-Buhturî. Dîvânu’l-Buhturî. thk: Hasan Kâmil es-Sayrafî. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Ma'ârif, 3.baskı, ty. google scholar
  • el-Câhiz, Ebû Osman Amr b. Bahr. El-Bayânu ve’t-Tebyîn. thk: Abdusselâm Muhammed Hârûn. Kâhire: Mektebetu’l-Hâncî ve Matba'atu’l-Medenî, 7.baskı, 1418/1998. google scholar
  • el-Cuhenî, Mâni' b. Hammâd )İşraf, tahtît ve murâce'a(. El-Mevsû’e el-Muyesserefi’l-Edyâni ve’l-Mezâhibi ve’l-Ehzâbi’l-İslâmiyye. Riyad: Dâru’n-Nadveti’l-'Âlemiyye, 4.baskı, 1420. google scholar
  • el-Elûsî, Mahmûd Şukrî. Es-Suyûfu’l-Muşrike ve Muhtasaru’s-Savâ'iku’l-Muhrike li Nasîruddîn Muhammed Hoca Nasrullah el-Hindî el-Mekkî. thk: Mecîd el-Halîfe. Kâhire: Mektebetu’l-İmâmi’l-Buhârî, 1.baskı, 1429/2008. google scholar
  • el-Esfahânî, Ebu’l-Ferec Alî b. el-Hüseyn. Kitabu’l-Eğânî. thk: İhsân Abbâs, İbrahim es-Sa'âfîn ve Bekr Abbâs. Beyrût: Dâru Sâdir, 1429/2008. google scholar
  • el-Eş'arî, Ebu’l-Hasan Alî bi İsmâ'îl. Makâlâtu’l-İslâmiyyîn ve İhtilâfu’l-Musallîn. thk: Muhammed Muhyiddîn Abdulhamîd. Kâhire: Mektebetu’n-Nahdati’l-Misriyye, 1.baskı, c1: 1369/1950, c2: 1373/1954. google scholar
  • el-Eşter, Abdulkerîm. Şi'ru Di'bil b. Alî el-Huzâ'î. Dımaşk: Matbû'âtı Mecma'i’l-Luğati’l-Arabiyye, 2.baskı, 1403/1983. google scholar
  • el-Fûzân, Sâlih. Şerhu’l-Manzûmeti’l-Hâ’iyye fî 'Akîdeti Ehli’s-Sunneti ve’l-Cemâ'e li Ebî Bekr Abdullah b. Ebî Dâûd es-Sicistânî. thk: Âdil er-Rifâ'î ve 'İsâm el-Murrî. Riyad: Dâru’l-Âsime, 1.baskı, 1428/2007. google scholar
  • el-Ğâmidî, Muhammed b. Sa'îd. Ârâ’u eş-Şerîfi’l-Murtadâ el-'Akadiyye. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Suûdi Arabistân: Câmi'atu Ummi’l-Kurâ, 1433-1434. google scholar
  • el-Ğâmidî, Sâlih b. Ğarm. El-Mesâ’ilu’l-İ'tizâliyye fî Tefsîri’l-Keşşâfi fî Dav’i Mâ Verede fî Kitâbi li’n-Tisâfi l-İbni Muneyyir. Hâ’il-Suûdi Arabistân: Dâru’l-Endelus, 1.baskı, 1418/1998. google scholar
  • el-Hafnî, Abdulmun'im. Mevsû'etu’l-Firaki ve’l-Cemâ'âti ve’l-Mezâhibi’l-İslâmiyye. Kâhire: Dâru’r-Raşâd, 1.baskı, 1413/1993. google scholar
  • el-Hamavî, Yâkût.Mu'camu’l-Udebâ’. thk: İhsân Abbâs. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Ğarb el-İslâmî, 1993. google scholar
  • el-Hayyât, Abdurrahîm b. Muhammed el-Mu'tezilî. Kitâbu’l-İntisârve’r-Reddi alâİbni’r-Revendîel-Mulhid. thk: Nibirc. Kâhire-Beyrût: Mektebetu’d-Dâri’l-Arabiyye li’l-Kitâb ve Evrâk Şarkiyye, 2.baskı, 1413/1993. google scholar
  • el-Hûfî, Ahmed Muhammed. Ez-Zemahşerî. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Fikr el-Arabî, 1.baskı, 1386/1966. google scholar
  • el-Kindî, Ebû Ömer Muhammed b. Yûsuf el-Misrî. Kitabu’l-Vulât ve Kitâbu’l-Kudât. thk: Rufun Gust. Beyrût: Matba'atu’l-Âbâ’i’l-Yesû'iyyîn, 1908. google scholar
  • el-Merdâvî, Ahmed b. Abdullah el-Hanbelî. El-Leâli'u el-BehiyyeŞerhuLâmiyyetiŞeyhi’l-İslâmiİbni Teymiyye. thk: İyâd el-Kaysî. Beyrût: Dâru İbni Hazm, 1.baskı, 1427/2006. google scholar
  • el-Meydânî, Ebu’l-Fadl Ahmed b. Muhammed, Mecma 'u ’l-Emsâl, thk. Muhammed Muhyiddîn Abdulhamîd, Matba'atu’s-Sunneti’l-Muhammediyye, 1374/1955. google scholar
  • er-Râfi'î, Mustafâ Sâdik. Târîhu Âdâbi’l-Arab. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, 1. baskı. 1421/2000. google scholar
  • er-Râğib el-Esfahânî, Ebu’l-Kâsim Hüseyn b. Muhammed. Muhâdarâtu’l-Udebâ’ ve Muhâvarâtu’ş-Şu'arâ’i ve’l-Bulağâ’. thk: Ömer et-Tabbâ'. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Erkam b. Ebi’l-Erkam, 1.baskı, 1420/1999. google scholar
  • es-Safedî, Salâhuddîn Halîl b. İbek. El-Vâfî bi’l-Vefeyât. 'İtinâ’: Vidâd el-Kâdî. Beyrût: el-Cem'iyyetu’l-Elmâniyye li’l-Bahsi’l-İlmî, 2.baskı, 1411/1991. google scholar
  • es-Sâmerrâ’î, Fâdil Sâlih. Ed-Dirâsâtu’n-Nahviyyetu ve’l-Luğaviyyetu 'İnde’z-Zemahşerî. Bağdâd: Matba'tu’l-İrşâd, 1390/1971. google scholar
  • es-Sûlî, Ebû Bekr Muhammed b. Yahyâ. Ahbâru’l-Buhturî. thk: Sâlih el-Eşter. Dımaşk: Matbu'ât el-Mecma'i’l-İlmî el-Arabî, 1378/1958. google scholar
  • -------. Şerhu’s-Sûlî liDîvâniEbî Temmâm. thk: Halaf Reşîd Nu'mân. Irak: Vizâretu’l-İ'lâm ve’s-Sekâfe, c1: 1977, c2: 1978, c3: 1982. google scholar
  • eş-Şehristânî, Ebu’l-Fath Muhammed b. Abdulkeîm. El-Milelu ve’n-Nihel. harracehu: Muhammed b. Feth Bedrân. Mısır: Mektebetu’l-Enclû el-Misriyye, 2.baskı, 1375/1956. google scholar
  • eş-Şerîfu’l-Murtadâ, Alî b. el-Hüseyn. Emâlî el-Murtedâ Ğuraru’l-Fevâ’id ve Dureru’l-Kelâ’id. thk: Muhammed Ebu’l-Fadl İbrahim. Mısır: Dâru İhyâ’i’l-Kutubi’l-Arabiyye İsâ el-Bâbî el-Halebî, 1.baskı, 1373/1954. google scholar
  • et-Tabarî, Ebû Ca'fer Muhammed b. Cerîr. Tefsîru’t-Tabarî. thk: Abdullah b. Abdulmuhsin et-Türkî. Kâhire: Hecer li’t-Tibâ'e ve’n-Naşr ve’t-Tevzî', 1.baskı, 1422/2001. google scholar
  • et-Tevhîdî, Ebû Hayyân Alî b. Muhammed. Ahlâku’l-Vezîreyn. thk: Muhammed b. Tavît et-Tancî. Beyrût: Dâru Sâdir, 1412/1992. google scholar
  • ez-Zehebî, Şemsuddîn Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Osmân. Târîhu’l-İslâm ve Vefeyâtu’l-Meşâhîri ve’l-A'lâm. thk: Ömer Abdusselâm Tedmurî. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Kitâbi’l-Arabî, 1411/1991. google scholar
  • -------. Mîzânu’l-İ'tidâl fi Nakdi ’r-Ricâl. thk: Alî Muhammed Mu'avvad, Âdil Ahmed Abdulmevcûd ve Abdulfattâh Ebû Sinne. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, 1.baskı, 1416/1995. google scholar
  • -------. Siyeru A'lâmi’n-Nubelâ'. thk: Hassân Abdulmannân. Lübnân: Beytu’l-Efkâr ed-Devliyye, 2004. google scholar
  • ez-Zemahşerî, Cârullâh Ebu’l-Kâsim Mehmûd b. Ömer. El-Mustaksâ fî Emsâli ’l-Arab. İşrâf: Muhammed Abdulmu'îd Hân. Haydarâbâd ed-Deken-Hindistan: Mektebetu Meclisi Dâ’ireti’l-Ma'ârifi’l-'Osmâniyye, 1.baskı, 1381/1962. google scholar
  • -------. Dîvânu Câri’l-Lâh Ez-Zemahşerî. Şerh: Fâtime Yûsuf el- Hiyemî. Beyrût: Dâru Sâdir, 1429/2008. google scholar
  • -------. Rebî'u ’l-Abrâr ve Nusûsu ’l-Ahbâr. thk: Abdulemîr Muhennâ. Beyrût: Mu’essesetu’l-A'lamî li’l-Matbû'ât, 1.baskı, 1412/1992. google scholar
  • -------. Tefsîru’l-Keşşâf. itnâ bih: Halîl Me’mûn Şîhâ. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Ma'rife, 3.baskı, 1430/2009. google scholar
  • Hâcî Halîfe, Mustafâ b. Abdullah )Kâtib Çelebî(. Kerfu’z-ZunûnAnEsâmi’l-Kutubive’l-Funûn. Beyrût: Dâru İhyâ’i’t-Turâsi’l-Arabî, ty. google scholar
  • Hârûf, Muhammed Fehd. El-Muyesserufi’l-Kırâ’âti’l-Arba'a 'A.pe. râce'ahu: Muhammed Kureyyim Râcih. Dımaşk-Beyrût: Dâru’l-Kalimi’t-Tayyib, l.baskı, 1420/2000. google scholar
  • İbnu Abbâd, es-Sâhib. Dîvânu es-Sâhib b. Abbâd. Şerh: İbrahim Şemsuddîn. Beyrût: Mu’essesetu’l-A'lamî li’l-Matbû'ât, l.baskı, 1422/2001. google scholar
  • İbnu Asâkir, Alî b. el-Hüseyn. Târîhu Medîneti Dımark. thk: Muhibbuddîn Ömer b. Ğarâme el-Amrevî. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1.baskı, 1417/1997. google scholar
  • İbnu Ebî Ya'lâ, Kâdî Ebu’l-Hüseyn Muhammed. Tabakâtu’l-Hanâbile. thk: Abdurrahman b. Süleyman el-'Useymîn. Riyad: el-Emâne el-'Âmme li’l-İhtifâl bi Murûr Mi'ti Sene alâ Te'sîsi’l-Mamleke, 1419/1999. google scholar
  • İbnu Ebi’l-'İzz, Kâdî Alî b. Alî ed-Dımaşkî. Şerhu’l-'Akîde et-Tahhâviyye. thk: Abdullah b. Abdulmuhsin et-Türkî ve Şu'ayb el-Ernâ’ût. Beyrût: Mu'essesetu’r-Risâle, 2.baskı, 1411/1990. google scholar
  • İbnu Hallikân, Şemsuddîn Ahmed b. Muhammed. Vefeyâtu’l-A‘Yân ve Enbâ’u Ebnâ’i’z-Zaman. thk: İhsân Abbâs. Beyrût: Dâru Sâdir, 1968. google scholar
  • İbnu Hişâm, Cemâluddîn Abdullah b. Yûsuf. Şerhu Şuzûri’z-Zeheb fîMarifeti Kelâmi’l-Arab. İtenâ bih: Muhammed Ebu’l-Fadl Âşûr. Beyrût: Dâru İhyâ’i’t-Turâsi’l-Arabî, 1.baskı, 1422/2001. google scholar
  • İbnu Kayyim el-Cevziyye, Muhammed b. Ebî Bekr. El-Kâfiye er-Şâfiye fi’l-İntisâri li’l-Firkati’n-Nâciye. thk: Muhammed b. Abdurrahman el-'Ureyfî vd. Mekke el-Mukerreme: Mu’essesetu Süleyman b. Abdulazîz er-Râcihî el-Hayriyye ve Dâru İlmi’l-Fevâ’id, 1.baskı, 1428. google scholar
  • İbnu Kesîr, Ebu’l-Fidâ’ İsmâ'îl. El-Bidâye ve ’n-Nihfye. thk: Alî Ebû Zeyd Ebû Zeyd vd. râce'ahu: Abdulkadir el-Ernâ’ût ve Beşşar 'Avvâd Ma'rûf. Dımaşk-Beyrût: Dâru İbnu Kesîr, 1436/2015. google scholar
  • İbnu Kuteybe, Abdullah b. Muslim ed-Dîneverî. El-İhtilâfu fi’l-Lafzi ve’r-reddi ala’l-Cehmiyyeti ve’l-Murebbihe. Kaddame lehu: Ömer b. Mahmûd Ebû Ömer. Riyad: Dâru’r-Râye, 1.baskı, 1412/1991. google scholar
  • İbnu Nubâte, Cemâluddîn el-Masrî. Serhu’l-'Uyûn fî Şerhi Risâreti ibni Zeydûn. thk: Muhammed Ebu’l-Fadl İbrahim. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Fikr el-Arabî ve Matba'atu’l-Medenî, 1383/1964. google scholar
  • İbnu Teymiyye, Şeyhu’l-İslâm Ahmed b. Abdulhalîm. El-Cevâbu’s-Sahîh li Men Beddele Dîne’l-Mesîh. thk: Alî b. Hasan Nâsir, Abdulazîz b. İbrahim el-Asker ve Hamdân b. Muhammed el-Hamdân. Riyad: Dâru’l-Âsıme, 2.baskı, 1419/1999. google scholar
  • İbnu’l-Cehm, Alî. Dîvânu Alî b. el-Cehm. thk: Halîl Merdem Bek. Beyrût: Menşûrât Dâru’l-Âfâk el-Cedîde, 2.baskı, 1400/1980. google scholar
  • İbnu’l-Esîr, 'İzzuddîn Alî b. Ebi’l-Kerem. El-Kâmilu fi’t-Târîh. thk: Ömer Abdusselâm Tedmurî. Beyrût: Dâru’l-Kitabi’l-Arabî, 2012. google scholar
  • İbnu’l-Murtadâ, Ahmed b. Yahyâ. Tabakâtu’l-Mü'tezile. thk: Sûsenneh Dîweld-Wilzar. Beyrût-Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner ve el-Matba'atu’l-Kâsûlikiyye, 1380/1961. google scholar
  • İslâm Web Sitesi, 12/04/2017: https://cutt.us/g3Pi2. Accessed: 02/11/2021. google scholar
  • Kehhâle, Ömer Rızâ. Mu'cemi’l-Mü'eUifîn. Beyrût: Mu’essesetu’r-Risâle, 1.baskı, 1414/1993. google scholar
  • Nâcî, Hilâl. “Dîvânu en-Nâşi'i’l-Ekber Abdullah b. Muhammed el-Enbârî el-Kısm el-Evvel”. El-Mevred. 11)1(, Bahar 1982: 89-104. google scholar
  • -------. “Dîvânu en-Nâşi'i’l-Ekber Abdullah b. Muhammed el-Enbârî el-Kısm el-Hâmis”. El-Mevred. 12(1),Bahar 1983: 57-78. google scholar
  • -------. “Dîvânu en-Nâşi'i’l-Ekber Abdullah b. Muhammed el-Enbârî el-Kısm es-Sânî”. El-Mevred. 11)2(, Yaz 1982: 61-78. google scholar
  • Şevkî, Celâl. El-'Ulûmu’l-'Akliyyefi’l-Manzûmâti’l-Arabiiye. Kuveyt: Mu’essesetu’l-Kuveyt li’t-Tagaddumi’l-İlmî, 1.baskı, 1990. google scholar
  • Zeydân, Corcî. Târîhu Âdâbi’l-Luğati’l-Arabiyye. Eşrafe aleyhi: Şevkî Dayf. Kâhire: Dâru’l-Hilâl, ty. google scholar
  • Zu’r-Rumme, Ğaylân b. 'Ukbe el-'Adevî. Dîvânu Zi’r-Rimme. Şerh: Ebû Nasr el-Bâhilî. thk: Abdulkuddûs Ebû Sâlih. Beyrût: Mu'essesetu’r-Risâle, 3.baskı, 1414/1993. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Onur, A. (2022). Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Oriental Studies, 0(40), 15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


AMA

Onur A. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Oriental Studies. 2022;0(40):15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


ABNT

Onur, A. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Oriental Studies, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 40, p. 15-50, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Onur, Ahmet,. 2022. “Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an.” Journal of Oriental Studies 0, no. 40: 15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


Chicago: Humanities Style

Onur, Ahmet,. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an.” Journal of Oriental Studies 0, no. 40 (May. 2022): 15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


Harvard: Australian Style

Onur, A 2022, 'Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an', Journal of Oriental Studies, vol. 0, no. 40, pp. 15-50, viewed 24 May. 2022, https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Onur, A. (2022) ‘Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an’, Journal of Oriental Studies, 0(40), pp. 15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390 (24 May. 2022).


MLA

Onur, Ahmet,. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an.” Journal of Oriental Studies, vol. 0, no. 40, 2022, pp. 15-50. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390


Vancouver

Onur A. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Oriental Studies [Internet]. 24 May. 2022 [cited 24 May. 2022];0(40):15-50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390 doi: 10.26650/jos.1061390


ISNAD

Onur, Ahmet. Poetry on the Issue of Creating the Holy Qur’an”. Journal of Oriental Studies 0/40 (May. 2022): 15-50. https://doi.org/10.26650/jos.1061390



TIMELINE


Submitted21.01.2022
Accepted04.03.2022
Published Online28.04.2022

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.