Research Article


DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011    Full Text (PDF)

An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective

Selim Kurt

The thoughts of the Gramsci, presented a national hegemony understanding with his masterpiece The Prison Notebooks, analyzed how capitalist system survives despite its deadly serious inner contradictions, was adapted to international system by Neo-Gramscian scholars and this new interpretation used to determine fundamentals of the global hegemony, as well. The contemporary world hegemony, accepted to begun in the 16th century with the United Provinces (Holland), and it is alleged that passed to the United Kingdom in the 19th century and then to the United States following to the Second World War. However, the economic recession, triggered by the crisis caused by the end of the bipolar world order following the end of the Cold War, peaked with the 2008 global financial crisis. For this reason, American hegemony began to be questioned with a higher voice. In that case, the high growth rate provided by market-based reforms after Mao’s death in 1976 has played an important role in bringing China into the forefront of the US as a major economic power since the early 2000s. Above mentioned situation, coupled with America’s decline, has led to the emergence of rumors that China is the new hegemonic power of the world. However, when analyzed from the Neo-Gramscian perspective, a state, who could become a hegemon in the global level, should have a leading economic system, a socio-cultural and political superstructure suitable for this substructure, and a network of international organizations, that are fostering these values all over the world. 

DOI :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011   IUP :10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011    Full Text (PDF)

Neo-Gramşiyan Perspektiften Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nin Küresel Hegemonya Durumuna İlişkin Eko-Politik Bir Değerlendirme

Selim Kurt

Kapitalist sistemin çok ciddi iç çelişkilere sahip olmasına rağmen nasıl ayakta kaldığını analiz ettiği çalışması Hapishane Defterleri ile ulusal bir hegemonya anlayışı ortaya koyan Gramsci’nin fikirleri Neo-Gramşiyan düşünürler tarafından uluslararası sisteme de uyarlanarak, küresel hegemonyanın temellerinin ortaya konulması için de kullanılmıştır. Hegemonyanın 16. yüzyılda dünyanın ilk kapitalist devleti olarak görülen Birleşik Eyaletler ile başladığı kabul edilmektedir. Zaman içerisinde ise 19. yüzyılda Birleşik Krallık’a ardından da İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasında ABD’ye geçtiği iddia edilmektedir. Ancak Soğuk Savaş’ın ardından iki kutuplu dünya düzeninin sona ermesinin yol açtığı kriz ortamının tetiklediği ekonomik gerileyişin, 2008 küresel mali kriziyle zirveye çıkması, Amerika’nın hegemonyasının daha yüksek sesle sorgulanmasına neden olmuştur. Bunda 1976’da Mao’nun vefatının ardından uygulamaya konulan piyasa temelli reformların sağladığı yüksek büyüme hızının 2000’li yılların başından itibaren Çin’i önemli bir ekonomik güç haline getirerek, ABD’ye rakip olarak ortaya çıkarmasının da önemli bir rolü vardır. Bu durum Amerika’nın gerileyişiyle de birleşince Çin’in dünyanın yeni hegemon gücü olduğu yönünde söylemlerin gündeme gelmesine neden olmuştur. Ancak Neo-Gramşiyan perspektiften değerlendirildiğinde bir devletin küresel manada hegemon olabilmesi için yönlendirici bir ekonomik sisteminin, bu sisteme uygun sosyo-kültürel ve politik üstyapısının ve bu değerleri tüm dünyaya yaymak için kurguladığı bir uluslararası örgütler ağının bulunması gerekmektedir. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


The concept of hegemony is generally defined as the power, established by one unit over the others. Because it cannot be executed by force alone, this authority should be supported with consent, for the duration of it. At this point Gramsci pointed out that the main hegemon in the system is a social class determined by a production method, and this class rising the hegemon position by gaining the consent of the other ones. The hegemony, described by Gramsci in national level, adapted to international system by Neo-Gramscian scholars, and these scholars indicated that the world hegemony realized by internalization of the values of a social class, emerged in a state. It is generally accepted that hegemony started with the emergence of the capitalist economic system, because of the pre-capitalist societies, which had a closed economic cycle system, aren’t useful for understanding of international hegemony. 

The United Provinces (Holland), where capitalist system firstly emerged in 16th century, was accepted as the initial hegemon state of the world. The hegemony of the United Provinces passed on to England, which had become the world’s largest capitalist state in the 19th century by carrying out the industrial revolution. And it is alleged that the hegemony of Britain has been transferred to the United States, which has emerged as the greatest capitalist state of the period after the Second World War, paralleling the economic and political turbulence experienced between the two wars. But, after the end of the Cold War, the United States has begun to face with new crises, affected by the instability and economic decline created by the disintegration of the bipolar system in the world. Especially the 2008 economic crisis, which affected the whole world, caused the future of American hegemony to be questioned with a higher voice.

China has been transformed into an important economic power since the early 2000s with the high growth rate of the market-based reforms initiated by Deng Xiaoping, who came to power after Mao in 1976, and following that it became the world’s largest exporter state in 2009. For that reason, it was started to be claimed and questioned that China, which is expected to pass the US in terms of economic size in the 2030s, turned into a global hegemony with a higher voice.

When approaching the Neo-Gramscian perspective, an actor, who would like to become a hegemon, should turn into a power center both economically and politically, and spread its values all over the world through international organizations, designed by it. Analyzing the hegemony situation in this respect, it is claimed that, despite the economic power triggered by the impressive growth, China’s economy is highly fragile due to base on export economy mostly financed from the outside, so it is alleged that China’s economic growth could be tackled, in the event of a contraction of its export markets. The best example of this is the decrease in the growth rate of the PRC in parallel with the decrease in exports due to the contraction of the international markets in the 2008 global financial crisis. 

On the other hand, in order to become a global hegemon, China should build a sociocultural and political superstructure that is coherent for its economic substructure. To this end, in order to define itself as a peaceful force against the imperialist past of the west, China adopted Confucianism, which made a great deal of moral values, as a state policy, and tried to introduce itself to the whole world in this way. However, in particular, the violence prone policy imposed in the Xinjiang-Uyghur autonomous region, human rights violations, and the unilateral and provocative activities in the controversial areas of the South China Sea, adversely affected the image, which China tried to create. 

Moreover China should legitimize its economic and political values through the international organizations that is established by it, in order to become a global hegemony. The structure of the international organization, that underlies the US hegemony, has been mostly built after the Second World War. And China is member all of these organizations except NATO. First of all, China legitimizes the existing system established by the United States, because of its membership to all of them. On the other hand, the weight of him in the decision-making mechanisms of these organizations is extremely low. The organizations as Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank and Shanghai Cooperation Organization, led by China as an alternative to above-mentioned organizations, remained largely local both in terms of the covered area and the number of members as compared to the organizations led by the United States. 

As it is seen, when China’s hegemony situation is analyzed from the Neo-Gramscian perspective, it can be said that China cannot be called as a hegemon because it isn’t subjected to qualifications, that should be possessed by a hegemon, and it is impossible for it to gain all of them in a short period of time, as well.


PDF View

References

  • Amadeo, K. (2018). China’s economic growth: cause, pros, cons, future. (Erişim Tarihi: 02.02.2018), https:// www.thebalance.com/china-s-economic-growth-cause-pros-cons-future-3305478. google scholar
  • Arrighi, G. (2010). Adam Smith Pekin’de: 21. yüzyılın soykütüğü. (İ. Yıldız, Çev.) İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
  • Balaam, D.N. ve Dillman, B. (2015). Uluslararası ekonomi politiğe giriş. (N. Uslu, Çev.) Ankara: Adres Yayınları. google scholar
  • BBC (2015). Çin’den dünya bankasına rakip: Asya altyapı yatırım bankası. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), https://www. bbc.com/turkce/ekonomi/2015/06/150629_asya_altyapi_bankasi. google scholar
  • Bieler, A. ve Morton, A. D. (2004). A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Capital and Class, (82), 85-113. google scholar
  • Carroll, W. E. (2011). China in the shanghai cooperation organization: hegemony, multi-polar balance, or cooperation in central asia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19), 1-8. google scholar
  • CNN (2018). Çin’in 2017 ihracat ve ithalat rakamları belli oldu. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), https://www. cnnturk.com/ekonomi/dunya/cinin-2017-ihracat-ve-ithalat-rakamlari-belli-oldu. google scholar
  • Cox, R. (2013). Gramsci, hegemonya ve uluslararası ilişkiler. (S. Durgun, Çev.). E. Diri (Ed.), Uluslararası ilişkilerde anahtar metinler (ss. 551-567). İstanbul: Uluslararası İlişkiler Kütüphanesi. google scholar
  • Demirtepe, M. T. ve Erdoğan, İ. (2013). Bölgesel Çıkarlar ve küresel hedefler odağında Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü. M. T. Demirtepe & G. Özkan (Eds.), Uluslararası sistemde orta Asya: dış politika ve güvenlik (ss. 83-103). Ankara: USAK Yayınları. google scholar
  • Deutsche Welle (2018). Dünyada savunma harcamaları 2 trilyon dolara yaklaştı. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), http://www.dw.com/tr/d%C3%BCnyada-savunma-harcamalar%C4%B1-2-trilyon-dolarayakla%C5%9Ft%C4% B1/a-43611673. google scholar
  • Euronews (2016). Türkiye’nin ortağı olduğu Asya altyapı yatırım bankası resmen faaliyete başladı. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), http://tr.euronews.com/2016/01/17/turkiye-nin-ortagi-oldugu-asya-altyapi-yatirimbankasi-resmen-faaliyete-basladi. google scholar
  • Ferguson, N. (2011). The West and the rest: the changing global balance of power in historical perspective. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/19251_090511ferguson.pdf. google scholar
  • Fontana, B. (2013). Hegemonya ve iktidar: Gramsci ve Machiavelli arasındaki ilişki üzerine. (O. Gayretli, Çev.) İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayıncılık. google scholar
  • Gilpin, R. (1999). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Gilpin, R. (2016). Uluslararası ilişkilerin ekonomi politiği. (M. Duran ve diğerleri, Çev.) Ankara: Kripto Basım Yayım Ltd. Şti. google scholar
  • Gramsci, A. (2014). Hapishane defterleri. (A. Cemgil Çev.) İstanbul: Belge Yayınları. google scholar
  • Guillemette, Y. ve Turner D. (2018). The long view: scenarios for the world economy to 2060. OECD Economic Policy Paper No. 22. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/scenarios-for-the-worldeconomy-to-2060.htm. google scholar
  • Hu, S. (2007). Confucianism and contemporary chinese politics. Politics & Policy, 35(1), 136-153. doi: |https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00051.x. google scholar
  • Human Rights Watch (2019). China Events of 2018. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), https://www.hrw.org/worldreport/2019/country-chapters/china-and-tibet#eaa21f. google scholar
  • IMF (2018a). China’s economic outlook in six charts. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), https://www.imf.org/en/ News/Articles/2018/07/25/na072618-chinas-economic-outlook-in-six-charts. google scholar
  • IMF (2018b). IMF members’ quotas and voting power, and IMF board of governors. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx. Jacques, M. (2009). When China rules the world. New York: Penguin Books. google scholar
  • Jawli N. (2016). South China Sea and India’s Geopolitical Interests. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, 29(1/2), 85-100. google scholar
  • Kane, J. (2003). Global civil society?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Lahtinen, A. (2015). China’s soft power: challenges of confucianism and confucius institutes. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 14(2), 200-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2015.1059055. google scholar
  • Layne, C. (2008). China’s challenge to US hegemony. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), http://acme.highpoint. edu/~msetzler/IR/IRreadingsbank/chinauscontain.ch08.6.pdf. google scholar
  • Los Angeles Times (2017). President Trump wants other members of NATO to pay their fair share. Here’s what that would look like. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-nato-defensespending-2017-story.html. google scholar
  • Lu, R. (2014). China’s neo-confucianism. (Erişim tarihi: 05.06.2018), http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/ 07/ chinas-neo-confucianism/. google scholar
  • MacDonald A. P. (2013). China’s maritime strategy: a prolonged period of formulation. Canadian Naval Review, 8(4), 9-13. Mazarr, M. J., Heath, T. R. ve Cevallos, A. S. (2018). China and the international order. California: RAND Cooperation. google scholar
  • Morton, D. M. (2011). Gramsci’yi çözümlemek. (B. Baysal, Çev.) İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları. google scholar
  • Nye, J. (2011). The future of power. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), http://www.lawac.org/speech-archive/ pdf/1596.pdf. google scholar
  • OECD Observer (2017). China’s economy. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), http://oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory. php/aid/5844/China_s_economy.html. Office of the United States Trade Representative (t.y.). The People’s Republic of China. (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china. google scholar
  • Sandıklı, A. (2010). China: future’s superpower?. A. Sandıklı (Ed.), China: a new superpower (ss. 39-64). İstanbul: BİLGESAM Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sarıöz Gökten, Y. (2013). Hegemonya ilişkilerinin dünü bugünü ve geleceği: neo-Gramsci’ci bir bakış. Ankara: NotaBene Yayınları. google scholar
  • Sayın, Y. (2013). Konfüçyüs’ün yeniden keşfi ve Çin’in dış politikasında dönüşüm. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (29), 223-237. google scholar
  • Sayın, Y. (2014). Confucianist transformation in the chinese foreign policy. (Erişim tarihi: 05.06.2018), http:// www.strategicoutlook.org/asia---pasific/news-confucianist-transformation-in-the-chines e-foreign-policy-. html. google scholar
  • Sen, G. (2003). The United States and GATT/WTO system. R, Foot, S. N, MacFarlane & M, Mastanduno (Eds.), US hegemony and international organizations: the United States and multilateral institutions (ss. 115-139). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. google scholar
  • Shah D. P. (2017). China’s maritime security strategy: an assessment of the white paper on Asia-Pacific security cooperation. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 13(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1080/09733159.2017.1317122 google scholar
  • Šimalčík, M. (2016). Confucianism in chinese foreign policy: a strategic-cultural analysis of the south china sea dispute (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Groningen Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi, Hollanda. google scholar
  • Smith, N. (2010). Get used to it, America: we’re no longer no. 1. (Erişim Tarihi: 20.02.2019), https://www. bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-12-18/china-as-no-1-economy-to-reap-benefits-that-once-flowed-tou-s. google scholar
  • Suzuki, S. (2010). The myth and reality of China’s ‘soft power’. I.Parmar & M. Cox (Eds.), Soft power and US foreign policy: Theoretical, historical and contemporary perspectives (ss. 199-215). New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • The Spectator Index (2017). GDP per capita (ppp) growth between 2012-2017. (Erişim tarihi: 04.06.2018), https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/946848333775228933. google scholar
  • The United Nations (2018). Birleşmiş Milletler teşkilatı. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), http://www.unicankara. org.tr/today/1.html#1m. google scholar
  • The World Bank (2018a). International bank for reconstruction and development subscriptions and voting power of member countries. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ BODINT/ Resources/278027-1215524804501/ IBRDCountryVotingTable.pdf. The World Bank (2018b). google scholar
  • The World Bank in China. (Erişim tarihi: 02.06.2018), http://www.worldbank.org/en/ country/china/ overview#1. google scholar
  • The World Bank (2018c). GDP growth (annual %). (Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019), https://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN. google scholar
  • Uzmanpara (2018). Çin’in ABD’ye karşı 1,2 trilyon dolarlık tahvil kozu. (Erişim tarihi: 04.06.2018), http://uzmanpara.milliyet.com.tr/haber-detay/gundem2/cinin-abdye-karsi-1-2-trilyon-dolarlik-tahvilkozu/78000/ 78132/. google scholar
  • Varrall, M. (2015). Chinese worldviews and chinese foreign policy, Sydney: Lowy Institude. google scholar
  • Wallerstein, I. (1983). The three instances of hegemony in the history of the capitalist world-economy. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 24(1-2), 100-108. google scholar
  • Wallerstein, I (2014). Dünya-sistemleri analizi: bir giriş. (E. Abadoğlu ve N. Ersoy, Çev.) İstanbul: bgst Yayınları. google scholar
  • Wallerstein, I. (2015). Amerikan gücünün gerileyişi: kaotik bir dünyada ABD. (T. Birkan, Çev.) İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Woods, N. (2003). The United States and international financial institutions: power and influence within the World Bank and the IMF, R. Foot, S. N. MacFarlane & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), US hegemony and international organizations: the United States and multilateral ınstitutions (ss. 92-115), New York: Oxford University Press Inc. google scholar
  • World Intagrated Trade Solution (2018). Top exporters and importers 2016. (Erişim tarihi: 08.06.2018), https:// wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/WLD/Year/LTST/TradeFlow/EXPIMP/Partner/by-country. google scholar
  • World Trade Organization (2013). Part III: rules, norms and enforcement. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), https:// www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/historywto_06_e.pdf. google scholar
  • World Trade Organization (2018). Members and observers. (Erişim tarihi: 07.06.2018), https://www.wto.org/ english/thewto_e/ whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm. google scholar
  • Yazan, Y. (2017). Tanrı’nın elinin Avrupa’ya dokunuşu(!): büyük savaş çağında ABD’nin zamansız hegemonya girişimi ve “tarihin vetosu”. B. Gülboy & B. Akkuş (Eds.), Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nı anlamak: uluslararası ilişkiler teorileri çerçevesinde analizler (ss. 51-101). İstanbul: Milenyum Yayınları. google scholar
  • Zhao, Q. (2012). No war in the East China Sea. T. Arai, S. Goto & Z. Wang (Eds.), Clash of national identities: China, Japan, and the East China Sea territorial dispute (ss. 46-56). Washington: Wilson Center. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Kurt, S. (2019). An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(1), 43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


AMA

Kurt S. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences. 2019;28(1):43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


ABNT

Kurt, S. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, [Publisher Location], v. 28, n. 1, p. 43-72, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Kurt, Selim,. 2019. “An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 1: 43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


Chicago: Humanities Style

Kurt, Selim,. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28, no. 1 (Feb. 2023): 43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


Harvard: Australian Style

Kurt, S 2019, 'An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective', Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43-72, viewed 4 Feb. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Kurt, S. (2019) ‘An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective’, Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, 28(1), pp. 43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011 (4 Feb. 2023).


MLA

Kurt, Selim,. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective.” Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, 2019, pp. 43-72. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


Vancouver

Kurt S. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences [Internet]. 4 Feb. 2023 [cited 4 Feb. 2023];28(1):43-72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011 doi: 10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011


ISNAD

Kurt, Selim. An Eco-Political Assessment of Global Hegemony Position of People’s Republic of China from NeoGramscian Perpective”. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences 28/1 (Feb. 2023): 43-72. https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2019.28.1.0011



TIMELINE


Submitted21.06.2018
Accepted27.03.2019
Published Online31.03.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.