Research Article


DOI :10.26650/SP2019-0023   IUP :10.26650/SP2019-0023    Full Text (PDF)

Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children

Aslı Aktan Erciyes

This research examines the effects of second language acquisition in early childhood on the structural and linguistic properties of narrative skills in the child’s native language. To investigate these questions, narrative and vocabulary skills in monolingual and bilingual children (Frog story) were evaluated. One hundred and twelve five- and seven-year-old monolingual (Language 1 [L1]: Mother tongue, Turkish) (N = 61) and bilingual (L1, Turkish; Language 2 [L2]: Second language, English) (N = 51) children participated in the study. Narrative skills were evaluated only for Turkish for monolingual children, whereas bilingual children were tested in English as well, the latter test taking place on a separate day. For the structural evaluation of narrative discourse, a schema is used to evaluate the narrative skills of bilingual children. The elements in the schema are: Frog story elements, sequence, perspective / emotion and affect, and finally engagement. In order to evaluate the linguistic complexity simple and complex clauses were coded. The percentage of complex clauses with respect to total clauses was used as an indication of linguistic complexity. There were two age groups in the monolingual and bilingual groups. The findings revealed that in L1: Turkish, bilingual and monolingual children differed for narrative structure components regardless of age group. Monolinguals outperformed their bilingual peers for frog story elements, sequence, perspective affect, and engagement. Age differences indicated that for five-yearolds there were no differences between monolinguals and bilinguals for perspective affect and engagement which were difficult skills to display at that age. Monolingual children were better at incorporating more complex structures into their narratives compared to bilinguals. It was found that bilingual and monolingual children did not differ in L1 vocabulary skills. The results showed that early exposure to L2 might result in negative outcomes for L1 narrative development.
DOI :10.26650/SP2019-0023   IUP :10.26650/SP2019-0023    Full Text (PDF)

İkinci Dil Ediniminin Okul Öncesi ve Okul Çağı Çocuklarında Anlatı Becerilerinin Kurgusal ve Dilbilgisel Süreçlerine Olan Etkisi

Aslı Aktan Erciyes

Bu araştırma erken çocuklukta ikinci dil öğrenmenin anadildeki anlatı becerilerinin kurgusal ve dil bilgisel yapılarının üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Bu soruları araştırmak için tek dilli ve iki dilli çocuklara anlatı becerileri görevi (kurbağa hikayesi), sözcük dağarcığı testleri uygulanmıştır. Beş ve yedi yaşındaki 112 tek dilli (Dil 1 [D1]: Anadil, Türkçe) (N = 61) ve iki dilli (D1, Türkçe, Dil 2 [D2]: İkinci dil, İngilizce) (N = 51) çocuk araştırmaya katılmıştır. Anlatı becerileri tek dilli çocuklar için sadece Türkçe oturumla değerlendirilmiş, iki dilli çocuklar Türkçe dışında farklı bir oturum gününde ve farklı bir araştırmacıyla İngilizce olarak da değerlendirilmiştir. Anlatı söylemlerinin kurgusal açıdan değerlendirilmesi için alan yazında iki dilli çocukların anlatı becerilerini değerlendirmek için kullanılan ve dört temel alanı kapsayan bir şema kullanılmıştır. Buna göre hikayeler kurbağa hikayesi unsurları, akış, perspektif/duygu ve son olarak anlatımda canlılık alanlarında değerlendirilmiştir. Dil bilgisel karmaşıklık değerlendirilmesi için basit ve karmaşık cümlecikler kodlanmıştır. Karmaşık cümleciklerin yüzdesel oranı dil bilgisel karmaşıklık düzeyinin göstergesi olarak alınmıştır. Bulgular, anadilde anlatı becerilerinin iki dilli çocuklarda tek dilli çocuklara göre farklılık gösterdiğini, anlatı kurgusu unsurlarında (kurbağa hikayesi unsurları, akış, perspektif/duygu ve canlılık) ve dil bilgisel karmaşıklık alanlarında tek dilli çocukların iki dilli çocuklardan daha iyi performans gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Yaşla ilgili farklılıklar beş yaşta perspektif/duygu ve canlılık unsurlarında tek ve iki dilli çocuklar arasında fark olmadığını, bu becerilerin bu yaş grubu için zor olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. İki dilli çocukların D1 sözcük dağarcığı becerilerinde tek dili çocuklardan farkı olmadığı bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar erken dönemde başlayan yoğun ikinci dil pratiklerinin anadildeki anlatı becerileri açısından olumsuz etkiler ortaya koyabileceğini göstermiştir.

EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Narrative competence plays a crucial role in the development of children’s linguistic and cognitive skills in many respects. Therefore, investigating children’s narrative skills provides enriched information in both domains. Narrative competence involves an integration of multiple systems of language as it requires the simultaneous planning of a meaningful content in terms of a coherent structure, a cohesive language use and a concern for the listeners’ informational needs (Johnston, 2008). 

Producing narratives requires a coherent organization of the events making up the story around a goal in a way that renders them meaningful in terms of the intentional states of the characters and to express them by use of complex syntactic structures and appropriate lexical items. (Berman & Slobin, 1994; Johnston, 2008). Research on bilingual children’s narrative development is often limited to specific language-pairings (i.e. Spanish/English) and minority contexts where low-socioeconomic status (SES) is another variable playing a key role (Miller et al., 2006). 

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of L2 (L2: Second language, English) on L1 (L1: Mother tongue, Turkish) and language competence reflected in narratives, both in structural and linguistic aspects. To investigate these questions, narrative skills task was performed with monolingual and bilingual children utilizing the wordless Frog, Where are you? (Mayer, 1969). 

Method

One hundred and twelve five- and seven-year-old monolingual (N = 61) and bilingual (N = 51) children participated in the study. Narrative skills were evaluated only for Turkish for monolingual children, whereas bilingual children were tested in English as well, the latter test taking place on a separate day. In order to assess vocabulary competence for L1 and L2 Türkçe İfade Edici ve Alıcı Dil Testi (TIFALDI, Kazak-Berument & Güven, 2013) and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4 (PPVT-4, Dunn & Dunn, 2012) were administered. In order to assess executive functioning – working memory, the backward digit span task of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- R (WISC-R, Wechsler, 1974) was used.

Results

Narratives were transcribed and narrative quality was evaluated using Pearson (2002) coding scheme. Narratives were coded on four dimensions: Frog story elements, which refers to the episodic components of the story, sequence, which refers to overall plotline of the story, perspective-and-affect, which refers to referencing and internal states, and engagement, which corresponds to effort for listener engagement (Pearson, 2002). For each dimension 2 (Age: 5-and 7-year-olds) x 2 (Language group: monolingual and bilingual) factorial ANOVAs were conducted. For frog story elements, monolinguals (M = 6.13, SD = 2.81) performed better than bilinguals (M = 4.25, SD = 2.91) for both age groups, F(1, 107) = 12.18, p < .001, η p 2 = .10. For sequence, monolinguals (M = 7.73, SD = 2.59) again performed better than bilinguals (M = 5.35, SD = 2.36), F(1, 107) = 27.39, p < .001, η p 2 = .20. For perspective and affect, monolinguals was a main effect of language group (F(1, 107) = 23.87, p < .001, η p 2 = .18) as well as language and age interaction (F(1, 107) = 30.08, p < .001, η p 2 = .02). Post-hoc t-test showed that five-year-old monolinguals and bilinguals did not differ in their performance, (t(51) = 0.36, p = .72), whereas seven-year-old monolinguals (M = 7.36, SD = 1.45) were better than bilinguals (M = 2.60, SD = 2.63), t(56) = 8.79, p < .001. Finally, for engagement, monolinguals was a main effect of language group (F(1, 107) = 40.48, p < .001, η p 2 = .27) as well as language and age interaction (F(1, 107) = 15.04, p < .001, η p 2 = .12). Post-hoc t-tests indicate that there was no difference between five-year-old bilingals and monolinguals, t(51) = 1.78, p = .08. Seven-year-old monolinguals (M = 5.85, SD = 0.91) were better than bilinguals (M = 3.00, SD = 2.04), t(56) = 7.16, p < .001. Monolingual children (M = .50, SD = .15) were better at incorporating more complex linguistic structures into their narratives compared to bilinguals (M = .36, SD = .19), F(1, 107) = 16.99, p < .001 η p 2 = .14.  

Discussion

Overall, the present study made it possible to see the effects of early and intense L2 exposure on L1 by utilizing narratives elicited in both L1 and L2. Narratives of bilingual children have been studied more often in societies where L1 is not the dominant language (e.g., Akinci, Jisa, & Kern, 2001; Kaufman, 2001; Kupersmitt & Berman, 2001; Viberg, 2001), with a focus on the development of L2 and often with no data for L1 monolinguals that match the minority’s L1, with some exceptions (e.g., Verhoeven & Boeschoten, 1986). In this respect the results of the current study are important as they provide information on bilingual narrative development in an L1 dominant, high-SES context. Findings raise questions regarding how early immersion schooling should start and how it should be designed to enhance both L1 and L2.


PDF View

References

  • Akinci, M. A., Jisa, H. ve Kern, S. (2001). Influence of L1 Turkish on L2 French narratives. L. Verhoeven ve S. Strömqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 189– 208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Aktan-Erciyes, A. ve Aksu-Koç, A. (2016). Second language exposure in the preschool. N. Ketrez ve B. Haznedar (Ed.), The acquisition of Turkish in childhood içinde (ss. 389 – 412). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Aksu-Koç, A. ve Aktan-Erciyes (2018). Narrative discourse: Developmental perspectives. A. Bar-On ve D. Ravid (Ed.), Handbook of communications disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives içinde (ss. 329-356). Amsterdam: De Gruyter Mouton. google scholar
  • Aksu-Koç, A. ve Nicolopoulou, A. (2015). Character reference in young children’s narratives: A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua, 155, 62-84. doi:10.1016/j. lingua.2014.04.006. google scholar
  • Arnold, J. E. ve Griffin, Z. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 521-536. doi:10.1016/j. jml.2006.09.007 google scholar
  • Bamberg, M. (Ed.). (1997). Narrative development: Six approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. google scholar
  • Bamberg, M. ve Damrad-Frye, R. (1991). On the ability to provide evaluative comments: Further explorations of children’s narrative competencies. Journal of Child Language, 18(3), 689-710. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900011314 google scholar
  • Bennett-Kastor, T. (2002). The “frog story” narratives of Irish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(2), 131-146. doi:10.1017/S1366728902000238 google scholar
  • Berman, L. ve Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: Across linguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers. google scholar
  • Berman, R. A. (2009). Language development in narrative contexts. The Cambridge handbook of child language içinde (ss. 355-375). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first-and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children içinde (ss. 70-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Curenton, S. M. ve Justice, L. M. (2004). African American and Caucasian preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2(1), 1-25. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2004/023) google scholar
  • Dickinson, D. K. ve Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergartners from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2(1), 1-25. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(87)90010-X google scholar
  • Dunn L. M. ve Dunn D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4. Baskı). Minneapolis, USA: Pearson Assessment. google scholar
  • Feagans, L. ve Appelbaum, M. I. (1986). Validation of language subtypes in learning disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 358-372. doi: 0022-0fi63/86/$0O.75 google scholar
  • Gerrig, R. J. ve O’Brien, E. J. (2005). The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39(2-3), 225-242. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651681 google scholar
  • Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F. (2002). Narratives in two languages: Assessing performance of bilingual children. Linguistics and Education, 13(2), 175-197. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00061-4 google scholar
  • Halliday, M. A. K. ve Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman: London. google scholar
  • Hemphill, L. ve Snow, C. E. (1996). Language and literacy development: Discontinuities and differences. D. R. Olson ve N. Torrance (Ed.), Handbook of education and human development içinde (ss.173–201). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Hickman, M. (2003). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. google scholar
  • Hudson, J. A. ve Shapiro, L. R. (1991). From knowing to telling: The development of children’s scripts, stories, and personal narratives. A. McCabe ve C. Peterson (Ed.), Developing narrative structure içinde (ss. 89-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. google scholar
  • Iluz-Cohen, P. ve Walters, J. (2012). Telling stories in two languages: Narratives of bilingual preschool children with typical and impaired language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 58-74. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000538 google scholar
  • Johnston, J. R. (2008). Narratives: Twenty-five years later. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(2), 93-98. doi: 10.1097/01.TLD.0000318931.08807.01 google scholar
  • Kail, M., ve Hickmann, M. (1992). French children’s ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First language, 12(34), 73-94. doi:10.1177/014272379201203405 google scholar
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference (Vol. 24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Kaufman, D. (2001). Narrative development in Hebrew and English. L. Verhoeven ve S. Stromqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 319–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. google scholar
  • Kazak-Berument, S. ve Güven, A. G. (2013). Türkçe İfade Edici ve Alıcı Dil (TİFALDİ) Testi: I. Alıcı Dil Kelime Alt Testi standardizasyon ve güvenilirlik geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 24(3), 192-201. google scholar
  • Kuppersmit, J. ve Berman, R. (2001). Linguistic features of Spanish-Hebrew children’s narratives. L. Verhoeven ve S. Stomqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 277–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins google scholar
  • Kupersmitt, J., Yifat, R. ve Blum-Kulka, S. (2014). The development of coherence and cohesion in monolingual and sequential bilingual children’s narratives: Same or different?. Narrative Inquiry, 24(1), 40-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.1.03kup google scholar
  • Küntay, A. C. (2002). Development of the expression of indefiniteness: Presenting new referents in Turkish picture-series stories. Discourse Processes, 33(1), 77-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15326950DP3301_04 google scholar
  • Küntay, A. ve Nakamura, K. (2004). Linguistic strategiesserving evaluative functions: A comparison between Japanese and Turkish narratives. In S. Strömqvist ve L.Verhoeven (Ed.), Relating events in narrative (Vol. 2):Typological and contextual perspectives içinde (ss. 329–358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. google scholar
  • Labov, W. ve Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. T. J. Hjelm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts içinde (ss. 12-44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. google scholar
  • Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where are you? New York: Dial Press. google scholar
  • Miller, J. F., Heilmann, J., Nockerts, A., Iglesias, A., Fabiano, L. ve Francis, D. J. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(1), 30-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00205.x google scholar
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, (2015). Milli Eğitim istatistikleri, örgün eğitim 2014-2015. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. google scholar
  • Minami, M. (2008). Telling good stories in different languages: Bilingual children’s styles of story construction and their linguistic and educational implications. Narrative Inquiry, 18(1), 83-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.1.05min google scholar
  • Montgomery, J. W., Polunenko, A. ve Marinellie, S. A. (2009). Role of working memory in children’s understanding spoken narrative: A preliminary investigation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(3), 485-509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409090249 google scholar
  • Muñoz, M. L., Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. B. ve Gulley-Faehnle, A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 332–342. google scholar
  • Mandler, J. M. (1987). On the psychological reality of story structure. Discourse Processes, 10(1), 1-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2003/027) google scholar
  • Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Özdemir, S., Bacanlı, H. ve Sözer, M. (2007). Türkiye’de okul öncesi eğitim ve ılköğretim sistemi: Temel sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları. google scholar
  • Pavlenko, A. (2009). Narrative analysis in the study of bi- and multilingualism. M. Moyerand ve L. Wei (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to research methods in bilingualism içinde (ss.125-181). Oxford: Blackwell. google scholar
  • Pearson B. Z. (2002). Narrative competence among monolingual and bilingual school children in Miami. D. K. Oller ve R. E. Eilers (Ed.), Language and literacy in bilingual children içinde (ss. 135-174). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. google scholar
  • Peterson, C., Jesso, B. ve McCabe, A. (1999). Encouraging narratives in preschoolers: An intervention study. Journal of Child Language, 26(1), 49-67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003651 google scholar
  • Schick, A. ve Melzi, G. (2010). The development of children’s oral narratives across contexts. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 293-317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10409281003680578 google scholar
  • Schwartz, M. ve Shaul, Y. (2013). Narrative development among language-minority children: The role of bilingual versus monolingual preschool education. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(1), 36-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.760568 google scholar
  • Serratrice, L. (2008). The role of discourse and perceptual cues in the choice of referential expressions in English preschoolers, school-age children, and adults. Language Learning and Development, 4(4), 309-332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440802333619 google scholar
  • Severing, R. ve Verhoeven, L. (2001). Bilingual development in Papiamento and Dutch. Verhoeven ve Strömqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 255–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Shrubshall, P. (1997) Narrative, argument and literacy: A comparative study of the narrative discourse development of monolingual and bilingual 5 – 10-year-old learners. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18, 402 – 421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434639708666328 google scholar
  • Silvén, M. ve Rubinov, E. (2010). Language and preliteracy skills in bilinguals and monolinguals at preschool age: Effects of expo-sure to richly inflected speech from birth. Reading and Writing, 23(3-4), 385–414. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9206-6 google scholar
  • Singer, M., Graesser, A. C. ve Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 421-441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1020 google scholar
  • Snow, C. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53(2), 165-189. google scholar
  • Snow, C. E. ve Dickinson, D. K. (1991). Skills that aren’t basic in a new conception of literacy. E. M. Jennings ve A. C. Purves (Ed.), Literate systems and individual lives: Perspectives on literacy and schooling içinde (ss. 179-191). Albany: State University of New York Press. google scholar
  • Stein, N. L. ve Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary children, Vol. 2. R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing içinde (ss. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. google scholar
  • Stein, N. L. ve Glenn, C. G. (1982). Children’s concept of time: The development of a story schema. W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time içinde (ss. 255–282). New York: Academic Press. google scholar
  • Terry, N. P., Mills, M. T., Bingham, G. E., Mansour, S. ve Marencin, N. (2013). Oral narrative performance of African American prekindergartners who speak non-mainstream American English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 291–305. doi: https://doi. org/10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0037) google scholar
  • Uccelli, P. ve Páez, M. (2007). Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 225–236. doi: https://doi. org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/024) google scholar
  • Verhoeven, L. (1993). Acquisition of narrative skills in a bilingual context. B. Ketteman ve W. Wieden (Ed.), Current issues in European second language acquisition research içinde (ss. 307–323). Tubingen, Germany: Gunter Narr. google scholar
  • Verhoeven, L. T. (1994). Transfer in bilingual development: The linguistic interdependence hypothesis revisited. Language Learning, 44(3), 381-415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01112.x google scholar
  • Verhoeven, L. T. ve Boeschoten, H. E. (1986). First language acquisition in a second language submersion environment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(3), 241-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0142716400007554 google scholar
  • Verhoeven, L. ve Strömqvist, S. (2001) Development of narrative production in a multilingual context. L. Verhoeven ve S. Stromqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 1-13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Viberg, A. (2001). Age-related and L2-related features in bilingual narrative development in Sweden. L. Verhoeven ve S. Stromqvist (Ed.), Narrative development in a multilingual context içinde (ss. 87–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. google scholar
  • Watson, R. ve Shapiro, J. (1988). Discourse from home to school. Applied Psychology, 37(4), 395-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1988.tb01151.x Wechsler D. (1974). google scholar
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation. google scholar
  • Wong, A. M. Y. ve Johnston, J. R. (2004). The development of discourse referencing in Cantonesespeaking children. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 633-660. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S030500090400604X google scholar
  • Zwaan, R. A. ve Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-176. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Aktan Erciyes, A. (2019). Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children. Studies in Psychology, 39(2), 369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


AMA

Aktan Erciyes A. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children. Studies in Psychology. 2019;39(2):369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


ABNT

Aktan Erciyes, A. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children. Studies in Psychology, [Publisher Location], v. 39, n. 2, p. 369-399, 2019.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Aktan Erciyes, Aslı,. 2019. “Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children.” Studies in Psychology 39, no. 2: 369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


Chicago: Humanities Style

Aktan Erciyes, Aslı,. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children.” Studies in Psychology 39, no. 2 (Dec. 2024): 369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


Harvard: Australian Style

Aktan Erciyes, A 2019, 'Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children', Studies in Psychology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 369-399, viewed 13 Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Aktan Erciyes, A. (2019) ‘Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children’, Studies in Psychology, 39(2), pp. 369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023 (13 Dec. 2024).


MLA

Aktan Erciyes, Aslı,. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children.” Studies in Psychology, vol. 39, no. 2, 2019, pp. 369-399. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023


Vancouver

Aktan Erciyes A. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children. Studies in Psychology [Internet]. 13 Dec. 2024 [cited 13 Dec. 2024];39(2):369-399. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023 doi: 10.26650/SP2019-0023


ISNAD

Aktan Erciyes, Aslı. Effects of Second Language Acquisition on Narrative Structure and Linguistic Processes in Preschool and SchoolAged Children”. Studies in Psychology 39/2 (Dec. 2024): 369-399. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0023



TIMELINE


Submitted14.03.2019
First Revision20.05.2019
Last Revision02.08.2019
Accepted06.08.2019
Published Online08.11.2019

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.