Research Article


DOI :10.26650/TUDED2020-846431   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2020-846431    Full Text (PDF)

Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf

Alphan Akgül

In studies on the art of poetry, sound and image play a dominant role. As a natural consequence of the differences between prose and poetic language, the prevailing view is that poetry is an art separate from discourse based on sound, image, and concrete data from the outside world. In poetry, thoughts occasionally occur in didactic form and deep thinking, independent of sound and image. Modernist poets emphasized reason and opposed romantic poetry, where emotions find free expression. They preferred the cry of the mind to the cry of the heart. They expressed the depression of modern life in poems that outweighed the intellectual aspect. In modern Turkish poetry, some poets give works in this direction. This article begins with general information on the poems and ideas in Turkish literature. Next, Eliot and Pound’s views will be summarized, followed by Melih Cevdet Anday and Özdemir Asaf's work, where thoughts are highlighted rather than sound and image. 

DOI :10.26650/TUDED2020-846431   IUP :10.26650/TUDED2020-846431    Full Text (PDF)

Şiirde Düşünmek: Melih Cevdet Anday ve Özdemir Asaf’in Şiirleri Üzerine Gözlemler

Alphan Akgül

Şiir sanatı üzerine yapılan çalışmalarda ses ve imge baskın bir rol oynar. Düzyazı ile şiir dili arasında yapılan ayrımların doğal bir sonucu olarak, şiir sanatının söylevden ayrı, ses ve imge gibi dış dünyanın somut verilerine dayanan bir sanat olduğu görüşü hâkimdir. Buna karşın, şiirde düşünce, kimi zaman didaktik kimi zaman da şiirsel bir derin düşünme şeklinde, ses ve imgeden bağımsız olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Özellikle, duyguların denetimsiz bir şekilde dışa vurulduğu romantik şiire karşı çıkan modernist şairlerin akla yaptıkları vurgu, bu makalenin ağırlık noktasını oluşturur. Modernist şairler kalbin çığlığı yerine zihnin çığlığını tercih etmişler; modern yaşamın buhranını düşünsel yönü ağır basan şiirlerle dile getirmişlerdir. Modern Türk şiirinde de bu yönde eser veren şairlere rastlanır. Bu makalede, ilkin, Türk edebiyatında fikir şiirleri hakkında genel bir bilgi verilecek, ardından Eliot ve Pound’un görüşleri özetlenecek, sonra da Melih Cevdet Anday ve Özdemir Asaf’ın ses ve imgeden çok düşünceyi öne çıkardıkları şiirleri tartışılacaktır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Poetry is literary art in which sound and visual images feature extensively. Therefore, the text analysis on poetry focuses on auditory and visual images. In Ottoman lyric poetry, music and visual images are more important than intellectual content. Modern Turkish poetry is the same. The French symbolists, who influenced Turkish poetry for a long time, tried to bring poetry to non-verbal music as much as possible by seeing thought as an element that sullied its purity. Yahya Kemal Beyatlı and Ahmet Haşim, referring to the symbolists, emphasized form and musical features of the language, more than meaning or idea, as essential in poetry. Therefore, the idea that poetry should be lyrical and musical became dominant in modern Turkish poetry. The transformation started in the 1950s and ended the dominance of sound patterns in poetry. By this time, visual images became dominant in poetry. The focus of poetic became the images that appeared in journals and books of that period. As verbal expression intensified in poetry, voice patterns or imaginary associations rather than ideas and meanings gained prominence. For the reader, poetry expresses a multidimensional visual world. There is no specific subject covered in these poems. Instead, there are image patterns and word associations that readers or critics must carefully decipher.

The prominence of sound and image in Turkish poetry studies neglected logical expressions. However, poetic expressions with logical propositions, such as humor, irony, and satire, have always been important in traditional and modern poetry. The philosophical style in Divan poetry (hikemî tarz), mystical teachings in Sufi poetry, in which conceptual issues such as freedom and equality after Tanzimat, show that poetry has an intellectual aspect. Even Tevfik Fikret, devoted to the aesthetics of poetry, especially its sound features, engaged in political discussions and put forth idealism in the most striking poems of his poetry career. In the poems of Yahya Kemal and Ahmet Haşim, followers of pure poetry, we come across lines that read like a philosophical proposition. There is always an intellectual aspect in the works of poets such as Nazım Hikmet, Necip Fazıl, Fazıl Hüsnü Dağlarca, and Orhan Veli Kanık although they have different styles and content. Although the poems of the “Second New” poets that emerged in the 1950s were interpreted as meaningless and abstract by the critics of the period, thought played an important role in the poems of these poets. These examples make it necessary to discuss the subject of thought in modern poetry, especially in modern Western poetry, where it is never excluded. How?

Modern Western poetry is not a follower of pure poetry, whose supporters claim that “all arts aspire the condition of music.” On the contrary, the prominent modernist poets of the twentieth century react to the chaotic era in which they live and therefore oppose both the sentimental poetry of the romantics and the melodic poetry in which the symbolists destroy the meaning and seek only an ambiguous purity. It does not mean that there is no emotion or musicality in their poetry; these poets transcend traditional poetic styles by equipping emotion with critical mind and musicality with intense intellectual content. Modernist poets bring intellectualism to poetry. They refer to mythology and anthropology and deal with the tension between tradition and modernism. In doing so, they always add a philosophical dimension to their poems. Thus, T. S. Eliot glorifies poets such as John Donne and Andrew Marvell, who were known as metaphysical poets and were active in the seventeenth century, because they could melt reason and emotion in a single pot. Ezra Pound, on the other hand, adds logical poetry (logopoeia) to his poetics, as well as sound and image. In modern Turkish poetry, some poets put the emotional side to the background and emphasize the mind, intelligence, and wit. In the poems of Melih Cevdet Anday and Özdemir Asaf, the lyrical expressions representing the “heart-cry” are replaced by the “mind cry,” and the visual imagery is supplanted by the “logical eye” that examines everything with a critical perspective.


PDF View

References

  • Abrams, M. (1971). The mirror and the lamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Ahmet Haşim. (2013). Bütün şiirleri. İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Armağan, Y. (2004). Anday şiirinde zaman’ı “yok”lamak. K. Özkan ve A. Akgül (Ed.), Bütün yüzyılları yaşadım (ss. 49-66). İstanbul: Alkım. google scholar
  • Aksal, S. K. (2014). Ne tuhaf. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • A. Kadir. (2015). Şiirlerim. O. Kahyaoğlu (der.), Modern türkçe şiir antolojisi 1 içinde (s. 291). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
  • Anday, M. C. (1990). Ben belki de duyguculuğa bir tepkiyimdir. Şair çünkü onlar. Enver Ercan, (haz).İstanbul: Kavram. google scholar
  • Anday, M. C. (2017). Doğa toplum ilişkisi. Yalçın Armağan (Ed.), Suçumuz edebiyat içinde (ss. 13-22).İstanbul: Everest. google scholar
  • Anday, M. C. (Haziran/Ekim 1989). Melih cevdet anday’la söyleşi. Defter, 10, Orhan Koçak, (haz.). (s. 81-87). google scholar
  • Anday, M. C. (1997). Rahatı kaçan ağaç. İstanbul: Adam. google scholar
  • Belge, M. (2018). Şairaneden şiirsele. İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
  • Blake, W. (2011). Güz. Nail Bezel (haz.) Şiir perilerine: İngiliz romantik şiirinden seçmeler içinde (s. 13). İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Blake, W. (2011). Kış. Nail Bezel (haz.) Şiir perilerine: İngiliz romantik şiirinden seçmeler içinde (s. 14).İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Blake, W. Hasta gül. Hasta gül içinde (s. 13). (Dost Körpe, çev.). İstanbul: Kabalcı. google scholar
  • Cansever, Edip. (1998). Yerçekimli karanfil. İstanbul: Adam. google scholar
  • Cuddon, J. A. (1999). Dictionary of literary terms & literary theory. Londra: Penguin. google scholar
  • Dağlarca, F. H. (2014). Bütün şiirleri 1. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Dirlikyapan, D. (2016). Ölümü gömdüm, geliyorum. İstanbul: Metis. google scholar
  • Doğan, M. H. (2004). İmgeden akla giden yol. K. Özkan ve A. Akgül (Ed.), Bütün yüzyılları yaşadım, (ss. 67-75). İstanbul: Alkım. google scholar
  • Donne, J. (2006). The flea. Metaphysical poetry (Christopher Ricks ed.). Londra: Penguin. google scholar
  • Dubreuil, L. (2015). On poetry and mind. Diacritics 43(1), ss. 64-80. google scholar
  • Eagleton, T. (2011). Şiir nasıl yazılır (Kaya Genç, çev.) İstanbul: Agora. google scholar
  • Eagleton, T. (2017). Bir şiir nasıl okunur? (Alphan Akgül, çev.). Zeliha Güneş ve Gökhan Tunç (Ed.). Yeni türk edebiyatına giriş 1. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi. google scholar
  • Eco, U. (1997). Yorum ve aşırı yorum. (Kemal Atakay, çev.). İstanbul: Can. google scholar
  • Eliot, T. S. (1934). Selected essays. London: Faber and Faber. google scholar
  • Freud, S. (1999). Sanat ve edebiyat. (Emre Kapkın, Ayşe Tekşen Kapkın, çev.). İstanbul: Payel. google scholar
  • Halman, T. S. (2008). İki soyut şiirin düşündürdükleri. Edebiyat ve kültür yazıları içinde (ss. 195-204), Ankara: Hece. google scholar
  • Kahraman, H. B. (1995). Melih cevdet anday’ın denemelerinde nesnellik-öznellik ikilemi ve etkileşiminin temellendirilmesi aracı olarak dünya. Şükrü Erbaş (ed.), Melih cevdet anday günleri 20-21 mayıs 1995. Ankara: Edebiyatçılar Derneği. google scholar
  • Kahraman, H. B. (Mayıs/Haziran 1994). Melih cevdet anday şiirinde Descartes’çı düşünce sorunsalları açısından bir yaklaşım. Sombahar, 23, ss. 40-46. google scholar
  • Kalpaklı, M. (2010). Bir çağ günümüze: Necatigil ve divan şiiri. Asfalt ovalarda yürüyen abdal: Behçet Necatigil içinde (ss. 25-39). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası. google scholar
  • Kaplan, M. (2005). Şiir tahlilleri 1. İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Kaplan, M. (1995). Tevfik Fikret: Devir-şahsiyet-eser. İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Koçak, O. (2012). Kopuk zincir: Modern şiir üzerine denemeler. İstanbul: Metis. google scholar
  • Köprülü, F. (1976). Türk edebiyatında ilk mutasavvıflar. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. google scholar
  • Köprülü, F. (2011). Halûk’un Defteri. İnci Enginün ve Zeynep Kerman (ed.), Yeni türk edebiyatı metinleri 4 içinde (ss. 391-409). İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Lav, E. B. (2015). Hasta adam. O. Kahyaoğlu (der.), Modern türkçe şiir antolojisi 1 içinde (s. 185). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
  • Leitch, W.B. The norton anthology of theory and criticism. New York, London: W.W. Norton. google scholar
  • Loy, M. (2015). The lost lunar baedeker: poems of Mina Loy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. google scholar
  • Mehmet Âkif. (1966). Safahat. İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka. google scholar
  • Moore, M. (Yaz/Güz 1961). Paris Review - The Art of Poetry No. 4 (theparisreview.org) google scholar
  • Nâzım Hikmet. (2010). Bütün şiirleri. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Necatigil, B. (2013). Bütün eserleri. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Necip Fazıl. (1997). Çile. İstanbul: Büyük Doğu. google scholar
  • Orhan Veli. (2013). Bütün şiirleri. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Özer, Nilay. (2017). “Ölümün değil, yaşamın kuramcısı”: Stevens şiirinden öğrenmemiz gereken. Erişim adresi: https://t24.com.tr/k24/yazi/wallace-stevens,1373 google scholar
  • Özdemir Asaf. (2011). Çiçek senfonisi. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Platon. (2011). Diyaloglar. (Teoman Aktürel, çev.). İstanbul: Remzi. google scholar
  • Pound, E. (1973). Selected prose 1909-1965. A New Directions Book. google scholar
  • Ramazani, J. vd. (2003). Modern poetry vol 1. New York ve Londra: W.W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  • Schiralli, M. (1981). Education and the demands of literature texts: poetic meaning. McGill Journal of education XVI(1), 21-31. google scholar
  • Shakespeare, W. Nasıl hoşunuza giderse. (Özdemir Nutku, çev.) İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası. google scholar
  • Şentürk, A. A. (2006). Osmanlı şiiri antolojisi. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Şinasi. (1945). Müntahabat-ı eş’arım. İstanbul: Akba. google scholar
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (2013). On dokuzuncu asır Türk edebiyatı tarihi. İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Tanpınar, A. H. (2011). Bütün şiirleri. İstanbul: Dergâh. google scholar
  • Temizyürek, M. (2021, 17 Ocak). Şair hikmet burcunda. Erişim adresi: https://t24.com.tr/k24/yazi/sair-hikmet-burcunda,3037 google scholar
  • Urgan, M. (2008). İngiliz edebiyatı tarihi. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Ülgener, S. F. (2006). Zihniyet, aydınlar ve izm’ler. İstanbul: Derin. google scholar
  • Wimsatt, W. K. & Beardsley M. C. (1954). The intentional fallacy. The verbal icon (ss. 3-18). The University Press of Kentucky. google scholar
  • Wordsworth, W. & Coleridge, S. T. (2005). Lyrical Ballads. R. L. Brett ve A. R. Jones (ed.). Londra ve Newyork: Routledge. google scholar
  • Yahya Kemal. (1969). Kendi gök kubbemiz. İstanbul: Millî Eğitim. google scholar
  • Yavuz, H. (2005). Edebiyat ve sanat üzerine yazılar. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Yavuz, H. (2006). Büyü’sün yaz. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
  • Yücel, C. (2009). Bir siyasinin şiirleri. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası. google scholar
  • Yücel, T. (2004). Melih cevdet anday’ın şiirinde uzam ve zamanın izinde. K. Özkan ve A. Akgül (Ed.), Bütün yüzyılları yaşadım içinde (ss.127-140). İstanbul: Alkım. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Akgül, A. (2021). Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 61(1), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


AMA

Akgül A. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature. 2021;61(1):21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


ABNT

Akgül, A. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, [Publisher Location], v. 61, n. 1, p. 21-44, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Akgül, Alphan,. 2021. “Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 61, no. 1: 21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


Chicago: Humanities Style

Akgül, Alphan,. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 61, no. 1 (Sep. 2021): 21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


Harvard: Australian Style

Akgül, A 2021, 'Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf', Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 21-44, viewed 25 Sep. 2021, https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Akgül, A. (2021) ‘Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf’, Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 61(1), pp. 21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431 (25 Sep. 2021).


MLA

Akgül, Alphan,. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf.” Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, vol. 61, no. 1, 2021, pp. 21-44. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


Vancouver

Akgül A. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature [Internet]. 25 Sep. 2021 [cited 25 Sep. 2021];61(1):21-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431 doi: 10.26650/TUDED2020-846431


ISNAD

Akgül, Alphan. Thinking in Poetry: Observations on the Poems of Melih Cevdet Anday And Özdemir Asaf”. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature 61/1 (Sep. 2021): 21-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED2020-846431



TIMELINE


Submitted24.12.2020
Accepted26.02.2021
Published Online29.06.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.