DOI :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.04   IUP :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.04    Tam Metin (PDF)

Are Shocks to Unemployment Rate in OECD Countries Permanent or Temporary? Evidence From Unit Root Tests With Non-Normal Errors

Mücahit AydınMehmet Aydın

In this paper, we tested the validity of unemployment hysteresis for the 21 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in the 1990Q1–2017Q3 period using recently developed unit root tests with structural breaks and non-normal errors. There are three different economic approaches to unemployment in the literature: natural-rate hypothesis, structuralist hypothesis, and unemployment hysteresis. Overall, we found support for unemployment hysteresis in 11 of the 21 OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Spain, Finland, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Norway, Portugal and Sweden). According to this hypothesis, shocks on unemployment have a permanent effect, and unemployment rates have no tendency to revert to a steady state in the long run. Conversely, the hysteresis hypothesis was rejected for 10 of the 21 OECD countries (Belgium, Chile, Denmark, Ireland, Korea, Luxemburg, Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) in at least one unit root test. We found the structuralist hypothesis in all 10 of these countries, whereas we could not find the natural-rate hypothesis.


  • Blanchard, O. J., Summers, L. H. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1, 15-78. google scholar
  • Burda, M. (1988). Wait unemployment’in Europe. Economic Policy, 3(7), 391-425. google scholar
  • Christopoulos, D. K., Leon-Ledesma, M. A. (2010). Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(6), 1076-1093. google scholar
  • Friedman, M. (1995). The role of monetary policy. In Essential Readings in Economics, Palgrave, London (pp. 215-231). google scholar
  • Furuoka, F. (2014). Does hysteresis exist in unemployment? New findings from fourteen regions of the Czech Republic. Finance A Uver, 64(1), 59. google scholar
  • Güriş, B, Tiftikçigil BY, Tıraşoğlu M. (2017). Testing for unemployment hysteresis in Turkey: evidence from nonlinear unit root tests. Quality &Quantity, 51(1), 35-46. google scholar
  • Im, K. S., Schmidt, P. (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 219-233. google scholar
  • Jaeger, A., & Parkinson, M. (1994). Some evidence on hysteresis in unemployment rates. European economic review, 38(2), 329-342. google scholar
  • Lee, H., Lee, J., & Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4), 397-413. google scholar
  • Lee, J. D, Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2009). Hysteresis in unemployment revisited: evidence from panel LM unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(4), 325-334. google scholar
  • Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2001). Break point estimation and spurious rejections with endogenous unit root tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(5), 535-558. google scholar
  • Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089. google scholar
  • Lee, J., & Strazicich, M. C. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, 1-16. google scholar
  • Leon-Ledesma, M. A., & McAdam, P. (2004). Unemployment, hysteresis and transition. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(3), 377-401. google scholar
  • Lin, C. H., Kuo, N. F., & Yuan, C. D. (2008). Nonlinear vs. nonstationary of hysteresis in unemployment: evidence from OECD economies. Applied Economics Letters, 15(6), 483-487. google scholar
  • Lindbeck, A., & Snower, D. J. (1986). Wage setting, unemployment, and insider-outsider relations. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 235-239. google scholar
  • Meng, M., Im, K. S., Lee, J., & Tieslau, M. A. (2014). More powerful LM unit root tests with non-normal errors. In Festschrif in Honor of Peter Schmidt Springer, New York, NY, 343-357. google scholar
  • Meng, M., Lee, J., & Payne, J. E. (2017). RALS-LM unit root test with trend breaks and non-normal errors: application to the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 21(1), 31-45. google scholar
  • Meng, M., Strazicich, M.C., & Lee, J. (2017). Hysteresis in unemployment? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests and tests with non-normal errors. Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1399-1414. google scholar
  • Mitchell, W. F. (1993). Testing for unit roots and persistence in OECD unemployment rates. Applied Economics, 25(12), 1489-1501. google scholar
  • Neudorfer, P., Pichelmann, K., & Wagner, M. (1990). Hysteresis, NAIRU and long term unemployment in Austria. Empirical Economics, 15(2), 217-229. google scholar
  • Papell, D. H., Murray, C. J., & Ghiblawi, H. (2000). The structure of unemployment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 309-315. google scholar
  • Phelps, E. S. (1967). Phillips curves, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time. Economica, 254-281. google scholar
  • Romero-Avila, D, & Usabiaga, C. (2007). Unit root tests, persistence, and the unemployment rate of the US states. Southern Economic Journal, 698-716. google scholar
  • Pissarides, C. A. (1992). Loss of skill during unemployment and the persistence of employment shocks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1371-1391. google scholar
  • R0ed, K. (1996). Unemployment hysteresis-macro evidence from 16 OECD countries. Empirical Economics, 21(4), 589-600. google scholar
  • Sessions, J. G. (1994). Unemployment Stigma and Multiple Labour Market Equilibria: A Social-Psychological Interpretation of Hysteresis. Labour, 8(3), 355-376. google scholar
  • Smyth, R. (2003). Unemployment hysteresis in Australian states and territories: evidence from panel data unit root tests. Australian Economic Review, 36(2), 181-192. google scholar
  • Yıldırım, S. (2011). Testing the validity of hysteresis hypothesis for Turkey with CKP multiple structural breaks unitroot test. Akdeniz I.I.B.F. Journal, 22, 28-47. google scholar


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.