DOI :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.02   IUP :10.26650/B/SS10.2021.013.02    Tam Metin (PDF)

Determinants of Unemployment: An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries

Umut AkduğanSeyhun Doğan

Determination of the factors that led to unemployment is quite important in the implementation of policies aimed at solving unemployment, which is one of the main problems in both developed and developing countries. In addition to the negative macroeconomic indicators brought about by the global economic crises, findings on the impacts of labour market regulations on employment have been revealed through empirical studies. In this study, determinants of unemployment are examined with macroeconomic variables and labour market institutions variables by using panel data set related to selected OECD countries. However, unlike many other studies on the subject, panel time series methods are used in this study, and variables affecting unemployment are examined by estimating the panel VAR model. When the findings are evaluated, it is concluded that macroeconomic variables have an apparent effect on unemployment as expected and also labour market institutions such as labour market programmes and minimum wage have a significant effect on unemployment.


  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-97. google scholar
  • Baccaro, L., & Rei, D. (2005). Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries: A time series cross-section analysis (1960-98). Discussion Paper DP/160/2005, International Institute for Labor Studies, Geneva, 1-55. google scholar
  • Baccaro, L., & Rei, D. (2007). Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries: does the deregulatory view hold water?, International Organization, 61(3), 527-569. google scholar
  • Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D., & Schmitt, J. (2003). Labor market institutions and unemployment: A critical assessment of the cross-country evidence. Discussion Paper Series, No.168, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, 1-68. google scholar
  • Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D., & Schmitt, J. (2004). Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation. ILO Working Paper, 43, 1-29. google scholar
  • Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). The determinants of unemployment across OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions. OECD Economic Studies, No. 42, 7-86. google scholar
  • Belot, M., & Van Ours, J. C. (2001). Unemployment and labor market institutions: An empirical analysis. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 15(4), 403-418. google scholar
  • Bertola, G., Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2001). Comparative analysis of labor market outcomes: Lessons for the US from international lon-run evidence. NBER Working Paper, No. 8526, 1-75. google scholar
  • Bertola, G., Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2002). Labor market institutions and demographic employment patterns, NBER Working Paper, No. 9043, 1-59. google scholar
  • Betcherman, G., Olivas, K., & Dar, A. (2004). Impacts of active labor market programs: New evidence from evaluations with particular attention to developing and transition countries. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper, No. 0402, 1-94. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O. (1999). European unemployment: The role of shocks and institutions. Baffi Lecture, Rome, January. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O. (2000). The economics of unemployment. Shocks, institutions and interactions. Lionel Robbins Lectures, London School of Economics, October. google scholar
  • Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 1-33. google scholar
  • Boone, J., & Van Ours, J. (2004). Effective active labor market policies. IZA Discussion Paper, No.1335, 1-38. google scholar
  • Boubtane, E., Coulibaly, D., & Rault, C. (2013). Immigration, growth, and unemployment: Panel VAR evidence from OECD countries. Labour, 27(4), 399-420. google scholar
  • Brada, J. C., Marelli, E., & Signorelli, M. (2014). Introduction: Young people and the labor market: Key determinants and new evidence. Comparative Economic Studies, 56(4), 556-566. google scholar
  • Elmeskov, J., Martin, J., & Scarpetta, S. (1998). Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries’ experiences. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5(2). google scholar
  • Fitoussi, J. P., Jestaz, D., Phelps, E. S., Zoega, G., Blanchard, O., & Sims, C. A. (2000). Roots of the recent recoveries: Labor reforms or private sector forces?, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2000(1), 237-311. google scholar
  • Green, R. K. & Hendershott, P. H. (2001). Home - ownership and unemployment in the US. Urban Studies, 38(9), 1509-1520. google scholar
  • Guerello, C. (2014). The cost of deviating from the optimal monetary policy: A panel VAR analysis. Journal of Financial Stability, 15, 210-229. google scholar
  • Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In Ashenfelter, O. C. and Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, Part A, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1865-2097. google scholar
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. google scholar
  • IMF - International Monetary Fund (2003). Unemployment and labor market institutions: Why reforms pay off. World Economic Outlook, Chapter IV, April. google scholar
  • Kluve, J., & Schmidt, C. M. (2002). Can training and employment subsidies combat European unemployment?, Economic Policy, 17(35), 409-448. google scholar
  • Levin, A., Lin, C., & Chu, C. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. google scholar
  • Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46, 190-210. google scholar
  • Martin, J. P., & Grubb, D. (2001). What works and for whom: A review of OECD countries’ experiences with active labour market policies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8(2), 9-56. google scholar
  • Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55-74. google scholar
  • Nickell, S. (1998). Unemployment: Questions and some answers. The Economic Journal, 108(448), 802-816. google scholar
  • Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. In Ashenfelter, O. C. and Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, Part C, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 3029-3084. google scholar
  • Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., & Ochel, W. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: What do we know?, The Economic Journal, 115(500), 1-27. google scholar
  • Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2005). Product market reforms and employment in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No.472, OECD Publishing, Paris, 1-49. google scholar
  • Nunziata, L. (2002). Unemployment, labour market institutions and shocks. Working Paper, No.16, Nuffield College-University of Oxford Economics Group, 1-40. google scholar
  • O’Connell, P. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics, 44, 1-19. google scholar
  • OECD (1994). The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analyses, Strategies. Paris. google scholar
  • OECD (2006). OECD Employment Outlook. June, Paris. google scholar
  • OECD (2018). OECD Employment Outlook. June, Paris. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper, No.1229, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich, 1-40. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of AppliedEconometrics, 22, 265-312. google scholar
  • Scarpetta, S. (1996), Assessing the role of labour market policies and ınstitutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies, No. 26(1), 43-98. google scholar
  • Stockhammer, E., & Klar, E. (2011). Capital accumulation, labour market institutions and unemployment in the medium run. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(2), 437-457. google scholar
  • Traxler, F., & Kittel, B. (2000). The bargaining system and performance: A comparison of 18 OECD countries. google scholar
  • Comparative Political Studies, 33(9), 1154-1190. google scholar


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.