DOI :10.26650/B/SS25.2019.001.10   IUP :10.26650/B/SS25.2019.001.10    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Role of the United Nations in Conflict and Peace in Latin America

Sezai Özçelik

Relatively speaking, Latin America is one of the least conflict-ridden regions in the World and a peaceful continent. South America, especially,hasa been one of the most peaceful places in terms of the absence of direct violence and interstate wars. While there have been bilateral or trilateral conflicts between the neighbors, most conflicts in Latin America can be categorized as internal and intra-state conflicts. Since the 1935 Chaco War between Paraguay and Bolivia, inter-state conflicts have rarely occurred among the Latin America countries. Also, the longest interstate dispute in the World happened in Latin America between Ecuador and Peru, which started in 1809 and finished in 1998. War has been the exception rather than the rule since 1883 in Latin America. The last inter-state conflict in the region was the Falkland/Malvinas War between an outside power and a regional middle power, namely, Great Britain and Argentina. 

The relation between peace efforts of the United Nations and international politics in Latin America today requires our attention and calls for serious reflection and study. Changes in Latin America have been remarkably rapid and widespread since the end of the Cold War. As a result, it is necessary to give scholarly attention to the explanation and understanding of conflict, peace and the role of the United Nations in Latin America. Significant continuity is also visible in the institutions, ideas,and perspectives about conflict and peace in Latin America.1 Much of the conflict in Latin America has been connected within poverty and the proper place of the poor in modern Latin American society and politics. If a scholar properly defines the poor and sheds light on the proper explanation of poverty, it becomes easier to find and solve the root causes of conflicts in Latin America.


  • Adams, Francis. 2010. The United Nations in Latin America: Aiding Development, New York: Routledge, pp. 81-92. google scholar
  • Aravena, Rojas F. 2018. “Peace and Security in Latin America: New Challenges, New Directions”, Risk, Violence, Security, and Peace in Latin America: 40 Years of the Latin America Council of Peace Research (CLAIP), edited by Ursula O. Spring and Serena E.S. Oswald, 59-60. Switzerland: Springer. google scholar
  • Beigbeder, Yves. 1994. International Monitoring of Plebiscites, Referanda and National Elections: Self Determination and Transition to Democracy, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhofff Publishers. google scholar
  • Bercovitch, Jacob., and Jackson, Richard. 2009. Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-first Century: Principles, Methods, and Approaches, An Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. google scholar
  • Brands, Hal. 2010. Latin America’s Cold War, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
  • Carpenter, Ami C. 2016. “Gang Conflict and Drug Trafficking: Challenges and Opportunities for Conflict Resolution in Mexico and Central America”, Linking Political Violence and Crime in Latin America, edited by Howarth, Kirsten., and Peterson, Jenny H. 27-51. MD: Lexington Books, google scholar
  • Child, Jack. 1992. The Central American Peace Processes, 1983-1991: Sheathing Swords, Building Confidence, Boulder: Lynne Rienner. google scholar
  • CNN, “Mexico Drug War Fast Facts”, July 16, 2018. https://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/02/world/americas/mexicodrug-war-fast-facts/index.html google scholar
  • Colletta, Nat., et.al. 2000. “Toward an Architecture for Sustainable Peace and Development: Lessons from the World Bank’s Experience”, Colombia: Essays on Conflict, Peace, and Development, edited by Solimano, Andres., 159-160. Washington D.C.: World Bank. google scholar
  • de Souza Neta, D. Marcondes. 2013. “Regional Defense Integration and Peacekeeping Cooperation in the Southern Cone”, Kai Michael Kenkel (ed.), South America and Peace Operations: Coming of Age, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • de Souza Neta, D.M. 2018. “A Renewed Partnerhsip?: Contemporary Latin America-Africa Engagement, Africa and the World: Bilateral and Multilateral International Diplomacy, edited by Nagar, Dawn., and Mutasa, Charles. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. google scholar
  • Dent, David W., and Wilson, Larman C. 2014. Historical Dictionary of Inter-American Organizations, Lanham: Scarecrow Press. google scholar
  • Diamint, Rut. 2013. “From Fear to Humanitarianism: Changing Pattern in Argentina’s Involvement in Peace Operations”, South America and Peace Operations: Coming of Age, edited by Kenkel, Kai Michael, 132-150. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Diehl, Paul F. 2003. “Conclusion: Patterns and Discontinuities in Regional Conflict Management”, Regional Conflict Management, edited by Diehl, Paul F., and Lepgold, Joseph. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. google scholar
  • Fishel, John T. 2008. “Latin America: Haiti and Beyond”, Donald C.F. Daniel et al., Peace Operations: Trends, Progress, and Prospects, Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Sezai ÖZÇELİK 231 google scholar
  • Galtung, Johan. 1969. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research”, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 6, no. 3. pp. 167-191. google scholar
  • Galtung, Johan. 1990. “Cultural Violence”, The Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), pp. 291-305. google scholar
  • Galtung, Johan. and Fischer, Dietrich. 2013. Johan Galtung: The Pioneer of Peace Research, Dordrecht: Springer. google scholar
  • Howard, Tiffiany. 2016. Failed States and the Origins of Violence: A Comparative Analysis of State Failure as a Root Cause of Terrorism and Political Violence, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Kacowicz, Arie M. The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin America Experience, 1881-2001, Notre Dame, IN: University of North Dame Press. google scholar
  • Kacowicz, Arie M. Zone of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective, Albany, NY: SUNY Press. google scholar
  • Kacowicz, Arie M., Zone of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 89-122. google scholar
  • Kenkel, Kai Michael. 2013. “Conclusions: Securing South America’s Peace Operations acquis post-MINUSTAH”, South America and Peace Operations: Coming of Age, edited by Kenkel, Kai Michael., 188-201. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Kennedy, Paul. 2006. The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations, New York: Random House. google scholar
  • Kingstone, Peter. 2011. The Political Economy of Latin America: Reflections on Latin America: Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Koops, Joachim A. 2015. “United Nations Observer Group in Central America (ONUCA)”, Joachim A. Koops et al., The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Malamud, Andres., and Schenoni, Luis L.. 2016 “Neoliberal Institutionalism and Neofunctionalism in Latin American Security Studies”, Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security, edited by Mares, David R., and Kacowicz, Arie M., 44-56. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America, New York: Colombia University Press. google scholar
  • Martin, F. E. 2006. Militarist Peace in Latin America: Conditions for War and Peace, New York: Palgrave. google scholar
  • McClintock, Cynthia. 2018. Electoral Rules and Democracy in Latin America, Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Merke, Federico. “The Primary Institutions of the Latin American Regional Interstate Society”, Paper Presented at the IDEAS Latin America Programme, LSE, London, Thursday 27 January 2011, http://repositorio.udesa.edu.ar/jspui/bitstream/10908/488/1/%5bP%5d%5bW%5d%20DT11FedericoMerke.pdf google scholar
  • Oelsner, Andrea. 2009. International Relations in Latin America: Peace and Security in the Southern Cone, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Orakhelashvili, Alexander. Collective Security, Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Orozco, Manuel. 2002. International Norms and Mobilization for Democracy: Nicaragua in the World, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Öğretir Özçelik, Ayşe D. 2017. “Explanation and Understanding of Human Aggression: Freudian Psychoanalytical Analysis, Fromm’s Neo-Freudian Perspectives, and Bandura’s Social Learning Theory”, International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 2151-2164. http://www.ijsser.org/uploads/ijsser_02__133.pdf google scholar
  • Öğretir Özçelik, Ayşe D.”Aggression Theories Revisited: Lorenz’s Instinctivism, Wilson’s Socio-biology, and Skinner’s Behavioral Theories, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, vol. 7, no.2, pp. 38-45. http://www.aessweb.com/pdf-files/JASR-2017-7(2)-38-45.pdf google scholar
  • Öğretir. Ayşe Dilek., and Özçelik, Sezai. 2008. “The Study of Ethnocentrism, Stereotype, and Prejudice: Psychoanalytical and Psycho-dynamic Theories”, Journal of Qafqaz University, vol. 24, pp. 236-244. google scholar
  • Özçelik, Sezai. 2015. “Climate Change Negotiations Positions of the United States, the European Union, and the G-77 before and after the Kyoto Protocol: 1995-2002”, Enerji ve Diplomasi Dergisi, vol. 1, no.1, issue 2, pp.34-60. google scholar
  • Özçelik, Sezai. 2016. “Latin Amerika ve Ortadoğu: Benzerlikler ve Farklılıklar”, Yeni Türkiye: Ortadoğu Özel Sayısı-I, issue: 82, year: 22, January-June. pp. 306-315. google scholar
  • Özçelik, Sezai. 2018. “Latin Amerika Çatışmaları ve Analizleri”, Dünya Siyasetinde Latin Amerika-2, edited by Ermağan, İsmail, 271-295. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Özçelik, Sezai. 2018. “The Cold War Re-visited: Explaining and Understanding of the End of the Cold War”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, vol. 49 (1), pp. 1-20. http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/44/2259/23496.pdf google scholar
  • Özçelik, Sezai. 2019. “Introduction”, International Security, edited by Doğan, Nejat. Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publication. google scholar
  • Pallister, Kevin. 2017. Election Administration and the Politics of Voter Access, New York: Routledge pp. 124-148. google scholar
  • Romero, Carlos A. 1998. “Exporting Peace by Other Means: Venezuela”, International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era, edited by Dominguez, Pittsburg, Jorge I., PA: University of Pittsburgy Press. google scholar
  • Scarfi, Juan Pablo. 2016. “In the Name of the Americas: The Pan-American ;Redefinition of the Montroe Doctine the Emerging Language of American International Law In the Western Hemisphere, 1898-1933”, Diplomatic History, 40. google scholar
  • Shaw, Carolyn M. 2003. “Conflict Management in Latin America”, Paul F. Diehl and Joseph Lepgold (eds.), Regional Conflict Management, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. google scholar
  • Smith, Joseph. 2005. The United States and Latin America: A History of American Diplomacy, 1776-2000, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Smith, Joseph. 2007. Historical Dictionary of United States-Latin American Relations, Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press. google scholar
  • Sotomayor, Arturo. “Latin America’s Experience with Peace Support Operations: From Peacekeeping Recipients to Peace Exporters”, Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security, edited by Mares, David R., and Kacowicz, Arie M. 325-26. New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Toothaker, Christopher. 2 December 2011. “Chavez: New Regional Group Revive Bolivar’s dream”, The Associate Press, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/world/americas/venezuela-new-regional-group-meets.html google scholar
  • US State Department, Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Country Report on Terrorism 2011, July 2012;Matthew Levitt, “South of the Border, A Threat from Hezbollah”, The Journal of International Security Affairs,https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/opeds/Levitt20130515-JISA.pdf google scholar
  • Uti possidetis ita possideatis means “as you possess, so may you possess.” Uti possidetis de jure doctrine is defined as “old administrative boundaries will become international boundaries when a political subdivision achieves independence.” Paul R. Hansel, et al. “The Colonial Legacy and Border Stability: Uti Possidetis and Territorial Claims in the Americas”, http://paulhensel.org/Research/io05.pdf google scholar
  • Villa, Rafael D. 2017. “Security Community or Balance of Power?: Hybrid Security Governance in Latin America”, Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America, edited by Marcial A.G. Suarez et al., New York: Palgrave MacMillan. google scholar
  • Whitfield, Teresa. 1999. “The Role of the United Nations in El Salvador and Guatemala: A Preliminary Comparison”,Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America, edited by Arnson, Cynthia. Standford, 257-290. CA: Standford University Press. google scholar
  • Wilson, Gary. 2014. The United Nations and Collective Security, New York: Routledge. google scholar
  • Wilson, Larman C., and Dent, David W. 1995. “The United States and the OAS”, U.S.-Latin American Policymaking: A Reference Handbook, edited by Dent, David W., Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. google scholar


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.