DOI :10.26650/B/ET06.2020.011.09   IUP :10.26650/B/ET06.2020.011.09    Tam Metin (PDF)

The Value of Data for Improving Effectiveness of Campus Courses: the Case of Hybrid Moocs

Oğuz AkSelim YazıcıSevinç Gülseçen

In recent years with the advances in technology, learners started to learn various concepts in informal learning environments apart from the official traditional learning programs. We describe such learning environments as part of the Personal Learning Environment (PLE) approach. One great resource for these environments is using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Learners can learn any subject by enrolling in MOOCs easily and develop themselves by reaching their personal learning goals. But in such an informal learning environment, it would be hard to manage the learning process. Learners need some ability to manage this process that is called “self-regulation”. There are some problems in both fully face to face learning (like difficulties in following courses), and fully online MOOCs (like lack of interaction). So, a midway approach is a hybrid MOOC that is a combination of both methods. Literature and author experiences indicated that this method would make learning more effective. However, there is a need for improving the method with proper data management. We provide a list of data collection methods in hybrid MOOCs and explain how this data helped us to improve the learning process. In the PLE approach, students need data to shape their learning process, similarly instructors need to obtain data with various strategies and reshape the course structure by using this data. We think that in education, data usage is somehow limited, but it is required for making it more efficient.


  • Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K., . . . Mahiri, J. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: The LIFE Center and the Center for Multicultural Education, University of Washington. google scholar
  • Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187. google scholar
  • Castano-Munoz, J., Kreijns, K., Kalz, M., & Punie, Y. (2017). Does digital competence and occupational setting influence MOOC participation? Evidence from a cross-course survey. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 28-46. doi:10.1007/s12528-016-9123-z google scholar
  • Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. Paper presented at the P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), 2013 Eighth International Conference on. google scholar
  • Ebner, M., & Taraghi, B. (2010). Personal learning environment for higher education–a first prototype. Paper presented at the World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications. google scholar
  • Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full Report. Online Submission. google scholar
  • Humanante-Ramos, P. R., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2015). Personal learning environments and online classrooms: An experience with university students. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana De Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 10(1), 26-32. google scholar
  • Initiative, E. L. (2009). things you should know about… Personal Learning Environments. Educause.. google scholar
  • Kloos, C. D., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Ayres, I. E., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2015). Mixing and blending MOOC Technologies with face-to-face pedagogies. Paper presented at the Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2015 IEEE. google scholar
  • Konstan, J. A., Walker, J. D., Brooks, D. C., Brown, K., & Ekstrand, M. D. (2015). Teaching Recommender Systems at Large Scale: Evaluation and Lessons Learned from a Hybrid MOOC. Acm Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 23. doi:10.1145/2728171 google scholar
  • Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. google scholar
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. google scholar
  • Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education, 1, 22-38. google scholar
  • Perez-Sanagustin, M., Hilliger, I., Alario-Hoyos, C., Kloos, C., & Rayyan, S. (2017). H-MOOC framework: reusing MOOCs for hybrid education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 47-64. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9133-5 google scholar
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. google scholar
  • Robinson, R. (2016). Delivering a medical school elective with massive open online course (MOOC) technology. Peerj, 4, 9. doi:10.7717/peerj.2343 google scholar
  • Shah, D. (2015). MOOCs in 2015: Breaking Down the Numbers. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/ news/2015-12-28-moocs-in- 2015-breaking-down-the-numbers google scholar
  • Shearer, R., Gregg, A., Joo, K., & Graham, K. (2014). Transactional Distance in MOOCs: A critical analysis of dialogue, structure, and learner autonomy. google scholar
  • Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education. Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice, 5, 5-15. google scholar
  • Swinnerton, B. J., Morris, N. P., Hotchkiss, S., & Pickering, J. D. (2017). The Integration of an Anatomy Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) into a Medical Anatomy Curriculum. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(1), 53-67. doi:10.1002/ase.1625 google scholar
  • Tsui, E., & Sabetzadeh, F. (2014). Lessons Learnt from and Sustainability of Adopting a Personal Learning Environment & Network (Ple&N). International Association for Development of the Information Society. google scholar
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. google scholar


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.