Araştırma Makalesi

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2019.12.0012   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2019.12.0012    Tam Metin (PDF)

Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri

Ümmühan Melda Ermiş

Bu çalışmada, Niksar’dan Bizans dönemine ait yeni birtakım buluntuların tanıtılması amaçlanmıştır. Niksar çevresinde bulunan ve günümüzde Yağıbasan Medresesi içinde oluşturulan vitrinlerde sergilenen birkaç parça dikkat çekicidir. Bunlardan biri dört yapraklı yonca biçimli keramoplastik süslemelerdir. Bizans mimarinde cephe süslemesinde kullanılan bu bezemelerin benzer örnekleri Balkanlarda, başkent Konstantinopolis’de ve Batı Anadolu’da görülmektedir. Yağıbasan Medresesi’nde sergilenen dikkat çekici diğer veriler ise Bizans dönemine ait çini parçalarıdır. Bizans dönemine ait çinilerden az örnek bilinmektedir. Bilinen örneklerin çoğunluğu Bulgaristan Preslav, Konstantinopolis ve Bithynia’dandır. Niksar’da Bizans dönemine ait çini örneklerine rastlanması oldukça dikkat çekici bir husus olup, araştırılması gerekli bir konudur. 

DOI :10.26650/artsanat.2019.12.0012   IUP :10.26650/artsanat.2019.12.0012    Tam Metin (PDF)

Examples of Byzantine Ceramoplastic and Polychrome Tile Recently Found at Niksar

Ümmühan Melda Ermiş

The aim of this paper is to introduce the new findings from Niksar dated to the Byzantine period. A small number of striking pieces found in the vicinity of Niksar are currently exhibited in the Yagıbasan Madrasah. Among these are quatrefoil ceramoplastic decorations. These decorations were used to adorn building façades in Byzantine architecture. Their analogs are seen in the Balkans, Constantinopolis (capital of the Byzantine Empire), and Western Anatolia. The other remarkable pieces are tiles from the Byzantine period. Such examples of Byzantine polychrome tiles are rarely seen and these examples are from Preslav, Constantinopolis and Bithynia. The presence of the tiles from the Byzantine period in Niksar is an interesting issue that requires further research.


The aim of this paper is to introduce several new findings from the Byzantine period recovered in Niksar. A few striking pieces found at Niksar are currently showcased at the Yağıbasan Madrassa. A selection of these include quatrefoil ceramoplastic decorations. Significant quantities of decorative quatrefoil ceramoplastic fragments (which are mostly seen in the Balkans and to a lesser extent in the capital Constantinople and Anatolia), have been found in Tokat and the surrounding area. Eyice, in his article on decorative pottery, notes that the remains of a church on the Dumanlı Plateau feature quatrefoil decorations. Several examples were also found in two churches, dated around the Middle Byzantine Period, during Excavations at Komana, managed by Burcu Erciyas. A study carried out by Erciyas and Sökmen identified decorative pottery in various areas around Tokat. Examples of quatrefoil decorative pottery were found in the village of Gökçeoluk at Niksar and the Kaplanlı site of Yıldızlı in the town of Çevreli of Almus during surveys made by the Tokat Museum following an illegal excavation. Various types of quatrefoil ceramoplastic pieces were possibly used as spolia in the Bibi Hatun Mausoleum in Tokat’s town center. The other striking pieces exhibited in the showcases at the Yağıbasan Madrassa are tile fragments from the Byzantine period. One of the fragments was made in polychrome glazed ware with cream-white fabric and composed of three combined pieces. The piece was decorated with a design of interlinking circles each with a cross in its center. The other tile fragment was made from a pinkish fabric in polychrome underglaze painted ware. Patterns on the fragment are drawn with a black contour. The body of a bird facing right is visible in the center of the fragment. Its wing is detailed by a line with three curves, decreasing in size towards the center. The parts displaying the bird’s head and feet are broken and missing. There are few known tile examples from the Byzantine period. Therefore, it was quite remarkable to find tiles from the Byzantine period in Niksar and it is a subject that needs to be investigated in detail. The fragments found in Niksar cannot be precisely dated due to their uncertain contexts and production locations. However, considering that tile production came into and went out of fashion during the Middle Byzantine period and that the area was conquered by the Turks immediately after 1071, they can possibly be dated to the period between the end of the 9th century and the first half of the 11th century. In addition to the tile fragments from Niksar, a tile fragment from the Byzantine period was also identified at the Tokat Museum in recent years. Data relevant to Byzantine tiles was also revealed during the Komana Excavations. The tiles identified in Tokat and Niksar are very significant as the data on Byzantine tiles is limited to the examples from Bulgaria, Constantinopolis (the capital of the Byzantine Empire), Bithynia, fragments from the Mosque of Cordoba, and the Crimea. The latest studies and tile analyses have shown that tile production in Preslav, Constantinople and Bithynia were different, suggesting that the tiles were made in different workshops. The tiles in Bulgaria - dated between the late 9th century and 10th century - were manufactured in kilns installed near the structures where they were found. It is unknown exactly where the tiles in Constantinople, dated between the end of the 9th century and the 11th century, were manufactured. Ettinghausen highlights this production diversity and puts emphasis on central production by one or multiple workshops, probably in or near Istanbul. Visual observations and scientific analyses on the Bithynia and Constantinople tiles as well as the dissimilarities between glaze colors and pattern characteristics indicate different workshops. Studies show that there was tile production in Bithynia. The currently unknown production site of the Tokat examples presents a new research subject. It is significant to find tiles as well as quatrefoil ceramoplastic decorations from the Byzantine period in Niksar. Both decorative elements are seen in the Balkans, the capital city and the surrounding area from the Byzantine period. Commercial and cultural connections between the Black Sea ports must be analyzed in order to explain the presence of the data in Tokat and Niksar. It is also necessary to consider Tokat’s relationship with the northern-southern and eastern-western road networks of Anatolia. Moreover, the cultural impact of the political changes in the Near East between the 8th and 13th centuries should be examined. Rejuvenated influences of the Sassanid and also Turkish and Islamic arts influences spread around the Black Sea by northward trade routes from the Near East. Therefore, relationships between the Byzantine capital, coasts of the Black Sea, and Turkish-Islamic arts – especially in the Near East – should be analyzed on a larger scale in order to determine the position of the ceramoplastic and tile fragments from Niksar and its surroundings within the context of Byzantine art.

PDF Görünüm


  • A Lost Art Rediscovered: The Architectural Ceramics of Byzantium, Ed. S.E.J. Gerstel, J.A. Lauffenburger, Baltimore 2001. google scholar
  • BUCHWALD, Hans, “Sardis Church E– A Preliminary Report”, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik, Vol. 26, 1977, s. 265-299. google scholar
  • BUCHWALD, Hans, “Lascarid Architecture”, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik, Vol. 28, 1979, s. 261-296. google scholar
  • BUCHWALD, Hans, Churches EA and E at Sardis, Archaeological Exploration of Sardis Reports 6, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2015. google scholar
  • COCHE De La FERTÉ, Étienne, “Décors en Céramique Byzantine au Musée du Louvre”, Cahiers Archéologiques, Vol. 9, Paris 1957, s. 187-217. google scholar
  • DURAND, Jannic, “Plaques de Ćeramique Byzantine des Collections Publiques Françaises”, Materials Analysis of Byzantine Pottery, Washington 1997, s. 25-50. google scholar
  • ERCİYAS, Burcu; SÖKMEN, Emine, “An Overview of Byzantine Period Settlements Around Comana Pontica in North-central Turkey”, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, Vol. 34 /2, 2010, s. 119-141. google scholar
  • ERCİYAS, D. Burcu; TATBUL, Mustafa N., “Anadolu’da Ortaçağ Kazıları ve Komana”, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, C. 37/2, Ankara 2016, s. 611-626. google scholar
  • ERCİYAS, D. Burcu; TATBUL, M. N.; SÖKMEN, E.; KOCABIYIK, C.; SÜNNETÇİ, R., “Komana’da 2009-2014 Yılları Arasında Yapılan Kazı Çalışmalarının Ön Değerlendirmesi”, Komana Ortaçağ Yerleşimi, Yerleşim Arkeolojisi Serisi 5, İstanbul 2015, s. 21-61. google scholar
  • EREZ, S.; MARÇELLİ, A.A., Tokat Seramikleri, İstanbul 2013. google scholar
  • ETTINGHAUSEN, E.S., “Byzantine Tiles from the Basilica in the Topkapu Sarayı and Saint John of Studios”, Cahiers Archéologiques, Vol. 7, 1954, s. 79-88. google scholar
  • EYİCE, Semavi, “Contributions à l'histoire de l'art Byzantin: Quatre Édifices Inédits ou Mal Connus”, Cahiers Archéologiques, Vol. 10, 1959, s. 245-258. google scholar
  • EYİCE, Semavi, “Bizans Mimarisinde Dış Cephelerde Kullanılan Bazı Keramoplastik Süsler (Süs Çömlekleri)”, Ayasofya Müzesi Yıllığı, S. 3, 1961, s. 25-28. google scholar
  • FILOW, B, Geschichte der Altbulgarischen Kunst, Berlin-Leipzig 1932. google scholar
  • GERSTEL, S.E.J., “New ‘Tiles of Nicomedia’ and Architectural Polychromy in Medieval Byzantium”, Anathemata Eortika: Studies in Honor of Thomas F. Mathews, Mainz 2009, s.173-180. google scholar
  • GERSTEL, S.E.J., “The Nikomedia Workshop: New Evidence on Byzantine Tiles”, The Journal of the Walters Art Museum, Vol.66/67 (2008-9), 2011, s. 5-53. google scholar
  • GERSTEL, S.E.J., “Tiles of Nicomedia and The Cult of Saint Panteleimon”, Byzantine Religious Culture, Studies in Honor of Alice-Mary Talbot, Leiden 2012, s. 173-186. google scholar
  • GRABAR, Andre, Recherches sur les Influences Orientales Dans l’art Balkanique, Paris 1928. google scholar
  • MANGO, Cyril, The Art of the Byzantine Empire 312-1453 Sources and Documents, New Jersey 1972. google scholar
  • MASON, R. B.; MUNDELL MANGO, M., “Glazed ‘Tiles of Nicomedia’ in Bithynia, Constantinople, and Elsewhere”, Constantinople and its Hinterland, Paper from the Twenty-seventh Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, 1995 Aldershot, s. 313-331. google scholar
  • MIATEV, K., Die Keramik von Preslav, Sofya 1936. google scholar
  • MILLET, Gabriel, L’École Grecque Dans l’architecture Byzantine, Paris 1916. google scholar
  • NIEWÖHNER, Philipp, “Saint Benoît in Galata. Der Byzantinische Ursprungsbau”, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Vol. 125 (2010), 2011, s. 155-241. google scholar
  • ÖTÜKEN, Yıldız, “İstanbul Son Devir Bizans Mimarisinde Cephe Süslemeleri”, Vakıflar Dergisi, S.12, 1978, s. 213-233. google scholar
  • RACHENOV, A., Églises de Mésemvria, Sofya 1932. google scholar
  • RICE, D.T., Byzantine Glazed Pottery, Oxford 1930. google scholar
  • RICE, D.T. “Byzantine Polychrome Pottery, A Survey of Recent Discoveries”, Cahiers Archéologiques, Vol.7, 1954, s. 69-77. google scholar
  • RICE, D. T., “The Pottery of Byzantium and the Islam Word”, Studies in Islamic Art and Architecture in Honour of Professor K.A.C. Creswell, London - Beccles 1965, s. 194-236. google scholar
  • TOTEV, T., “L’atelier de Céramique Peinte du Monastère Royal de Preslav”, Cahiers Archéologiques, Vol. 35, 1987, s. 65-80. google scholar
  • TRKULJA, Jelena, Aesthetics and Symbolism of Late Byzantine Church Façades, 1204-1453, Princeton Univertity, Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton 2004. google scholar
  • VERDIER, Philippe, “Tiles of Nicomedia”, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Okeanos: Essays presented to Ihor Ševčenko on his Sixtieth Birthday by his Colleagues and Students, Vol. 7, 1983, s. 632-638. google scholar
  • VOGT, C.; BOUQUILLON, A.; DUBUS, M.; QUERRÉ, G., “Glazed Wall Tiles of Constantinople: Physical and Chemical Characterization, Manufacturing, and Decorative Process”, Materials Analysis of Byzantine Pottery, Washington 1997, s. 51-65. google scholar
  • VORDERSTRASSE, Tasha, “Experiencing the Medieval Churches of Komana”, Komana Small Finds, Yerleşim Arkeolojisi Serisi 7, İstanbul tarihsiz, s. 47-76. google scholar
  • YASHAEVA, Tatyana v.d., The Legacy of Byzantine Cherson, Sevastopol 2011. google scholar
  • ZIMMERMANN, M., Alte Bauten in Bulgarien, Berlin tarihsiz. google scholar


Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın



Ermiş, Ü.M. (2019). Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri. Art-Sanat, 0(12), 193-204.


Ermiş Ü M. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri. Art-Sanat. 2019;0(12):193-204.


Ermiş, Ü.M. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri. Art-Sanat, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 12, p. 193-204, 2019.

Chicago: Author-Date Style

Ermiş, Ümmühan Melda,. 2019. “Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 12: 193-204.

Chicago: Humanities Style

Ermiş, Ümmühan Melda,. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri.” Art-Sanat 0, no. 12 (Jul. 2024): 193-204.

Harvard: Australian Style

Ermiş, ÜM 2019, 'Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri', Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 12, pp. 193-204, viewed 25 Jul. 2024,

Harvard: Author-Date Style

Ermiş, Ü.M. (2019) ‘Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri’, Art-Sanat, 0(12), pp. 193-204. (25 Jul. 2024).


Ermiş, Ümmühan Melda,. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri.” Art-Sanat, vol. 0, no. 12, 2019, pp. 193-204. [Database Container],


Ermiş ÜM. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri. Art-Sanat [Internet]. 25 Jul. 2024 [cited 25 Jul. 2024];0(12):193-204. Available from: doi: 10.26650/artsanat.2019.12.0012


Ermiş, ÜmmühanMelda. Niksar’dan Bizans Dönemine ait Keramoplastik ve Çini Örnekleri”. Art-Sanat 0/12 (Jul. 2024): 193-204.


Son Revizyon15.06.2019


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.