EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics

GÖNDERBİLGİ
EnglishTürkçe

Araştırma Makalesi


DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695    Tam Metin (PDF)

Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz

Devran Şanlı, Aziz Konukman

İhracatta yoğunlaşma, ihracatın gelir ve büyümeye verdiği katkı ve bu durumun sürdürülebilirliği açısından önemlidir. Buradan hareketle ihracatta yoğunlaşma-gelir ilişkisini araştıran bir literatür doğmuştur. Ancak söz konusu ilişki teknoloji düzeylerine göre henüz kapsamlı biçimde analiz edilmemiştir. Mevcut çalışma bu noktadaki boşluğu yüksek teknoloji seviyesinde doldurmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu yönüyle literatürde öncül bir çalışma olacaktır. Bununla birlikte yine ilk kez bu çalışmada kaynak laneti hipotezinin yüksek teknoloji sektörü için geçerliliği sınanmaktadır. 1988-2017 ve 49 ülke örnekleminde panel veri ekonometrisiyle elde edilen bulgular, İhracatın geneli için ileri sürülen U-biçimli ilişkinin yüksek teknoloji(HT) sektörü için geçerli olmadığı göstermektedir. HT ihracatı yoğunlaşması ve gelir arasında çeşitlenme eğrisinin varlığından söz edilemez. Ancak, HT ihracatında çeşitlenmenin itici gücünün, gelir düzeyi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Gelir düzeyi arttıkça ülkeler HT ürünlerini çeşitlendirebilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, doğal kaynak zenginliği HT ihracatının çeşitlenmesinde engelleyici bir unsur olmamakta aksine çeşitlenmeye katkı sağlamaktadır. Bu bulgu, kaynak bolluğunun teknolojik ilerleme ve bilgi ekonomisi faaliyetlerini dışlamadığını göstermektedir. Kontrol değişkenleri olarak ülke ölçeği ve ticaret hacmi göstergeleri ise yoğunlaşmaya pozitif katkı vermektedir. Bu sonuç da ihracatın geneli için ileri sürülen literatürün aksine bir bulgudur.

Anahtar Kelimeler: HT ihracatı, Yoğunlaşma, Gelir, Doğal Kaynak Laneti, Panel Veri
DOI :10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695   IUP :10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695    Tam Metin (PDF)

An Empirical Analysis of Product Concentration and Income in High-Technology Exports

Devran Şanlı, Aziz Konukman

Concentration on exports is important in terms of the contribution of exports to sustainable economic growth and income level. Therefore, literature researching the relationship between export concentration and income has emerged. However, the relationship in question has not yet been extensively analyzed concerning high-technology exports. The current study investigates the product concentration/diversification at the high-technology level, which has made it a pioneering study and the validity of the resource curse hypothesis for the high-technology sector. The findings obtained by panel data econometrics in a sample from 1988 to 2017 in 49 countries show that the U-shaped relationship put forward for general exports does not apply to high-technology (HT) exports. There is no diversification curve between HT-export concentration and income. However,the driver of diversification in HT exports has been found to be income level. Asincome levelsincrease, countries can diversify HT products. Besides, natural resource wealth is not a hindrance to the diversification of HT exports; instead, it contributes to diversification. This finding suggests that resource abundance does not exclude technological progress and knowledge economy activities. As control variables, country scale and trade volume indicators contribute positively to HT concentration. This result contradicts the literature put forward on general export.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Ht-Export, Concentration, Income, Natural Resource Curse, Panel Data

GENİŞLETİLMİŞ ÖZET


This study explores the relationship between HT concentration and income and the validity of the diversification curve. The validity of the resource curse hypothesis for the HT sector is tested. The effect of the country scale and trade volume on concentration in the HT sector is also examined.

This research uses empirical methods to analyze the relationship between HT-export concentration and income. Concentration coefficients in the HT sector were calculated using three different indices: the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), the Gini-Hirschman Index (GHI), and Entropy Index (EI). These indices, which are used to measure the concentration of variables in various subjects in different disciplines, are generally used in the field of economics to measure firm concentration in the markets and geographical concentration in foreign trade. An increase in index values indicates diversification, and a decrease indicates concentration. In the entropy index, the increase indicates diversification, unlike other indices.

These data were used in regression analysis as a dependent variable at the next stage. Variables used in the study were obtained from the World Integrated Trade Solutions (WITS), World Bank (WB), OECD, and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) databases in a sample covering the period 1988- 2017 in 49 countries. The countries included in the sample were predominantly OECD economies. It was found that linear SEK assumptions could not be met in the tests of autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, and cross-section dependence on panel regression residuals. In consideration of these problems, regression with DriscollKraay (1998) standard errors gives robust results. The F values obtained from the estimates show that the models are generally significant. The stationary regression residuals eliminate the possibility of spurious regression and indicates that the series are cointegrated. The variance inflation factor was calculated to be more diminutive than the critical threshold value (Mean VIF = 2.14 < 10), showing no multicollinearity between variables. Because the variables are used in logarithmic form, the estimated coefficients can be interpreted directly as elasticity.

The findings obtained by panel data econometrics in a sample from 1988 to 2017 in 49 countries show that the U-shaped relationship put forward for general export does not apply to HT export. There is no concentration or diversification curve for HT exports. However, the driver of HT-export diversification has been found to be income level. As income levels increase, countries can diversify HT products. A linear and negative relationship was found between export concentrations and income in the HT sector. When the income increases by 1%, the HT-export concentration decreases by approximately 0.14 units compared to the HHI index. In other words, diversity increases.

Natural resource wealth is not a hindrance to HT-export diversification, but rather contributes to diversification. This finding suggests that resource abundance does not exclude technological progress and knowledge economy activities. As control variables, country scale and trade volume indicators contribute positively to HT concentration. A 1% increase in the population increases HT-export concentration to 0.47 units according to the HHI index; the increase in openness increases by 0.25 units. In addition, when the interval estimates are examined together with the point estimates, the coefficient signs do not change. This result contradicts the literature put forward for general export. In the rankings of all indices, South Africa, Italy, the United States, Austria, and Germany appear as the countries with the lowest degrees of concentration.

The possibilities and limitations of this study fall within the framework of panel data econometrics assumptions. However, the accuracy of the data obtained from the databases constitutes another constraint. The findings are at the country level and do not contain information on sectors and regions.

Policy makers aiming at product diversification in the HT industry must first design policies that target and promote income levels. To achieve income growth, the macroeconomic environment such as investment and savings levels, institutional and legal structure, as well as primary production factors (human and physical capital, R&D stock) put forward by growth models must be convenient. Where the resource curse hypothesis is valid, where knowledge economies and technology-intensive activities are restricted and production structure and trade are concentrated in primary goods (natural resources), countries should focus on institutional structure reforms necessary to overcome the vicious cycle. Good management of natural resources and corporate structure will increase the diversification in HT exports.

The relationship between HT-export concentration and income has not yet been extensively analyzed according to the level of technology. The present study aims to remark on this point. This aspect makes it will be a pioneering study in the literature. Also, this is the initial study in the literature that tests the validity of the resource curse hypothesis for the HT sector. 


PDF Görünüm

Referanslar

  • Aditya, A., & Acharyya, R. (2013). Export Diversification, Composition, and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Analysis. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 22(7), 959-992. google scholar
  • Amurgo-Pacheco, A., & Pierola, M. D. (2008). Patterns of Export Diversification in Developing Countries: Intensive and Extensive Margins (No. 4473). The World Bank. google scholar
  • Attaran, M., & Zwick, M. (1987). Entropy and Other Measures of Industrial Diversification. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 17-34. google scholar
  • Bahar, D. (2016). Diversification or Specialization: What is the Path to Growth and Development? Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institution. Policy Brief Report. https:// brook.gs/3vYrDwJ google scholar
  • Baliamoune-Lutz, M. (2009). Institutions, Trade, and Social Cohesion in Fragile States: Implications for Policy Conditionality and Aid Allocation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(6), 877-890. google scholar
  • Bebczuk, R. N., & Berrettoni, D. (2006). Explaining Export Diversification: An Empirical Analysis (No. 065). IIE, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. google scholar
  • Besedes, T., & Prusa, T. J. (2006). Ins, Outs, and the Duration of Trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’economique, 39(1), 266-295. google scholar
  • Blomstrom, M., & Kokko, A. (2006). From Natural Resources to High-Tech Production: The Evolution of Industrial Competitiveness in Sweden and Finland. In D. Lederman W. F. Maloney (Eds.), Natural Resources Neither Curse nor Destiny, USA: Stanford University Press. (pp.213-256). google scholar
  • Bonaglia, F., & Fukasaku, K. (2003). Export Diversification in Low-Income Countries: An International Challenge After Doha (No. 209). OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Breusch, T. S. & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review ofEconomic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. google scholar
  • Cadot, O., Carrere, C., & Strauss-Kahn, V (2011). Export Diversification: What’s Behind the Hump? Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 93(2), 590-605 google scholar
  • Carrere, C., Cadot, O., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2011). Trade Diversification: Drivers and Impacts. In Jansen, M., Peters, R., & Salazar-Xirinachs, J. M. (ed). Trade and Employment: From Myths to Facts. Geneva: International Labour Office. (pp. 253-307). google scholar
  • Cieslik, A., & Parteka, A. (2018). Export Variety, Productivity, and Country Size in a Multi-good Ricardian Model of Export Diversification (No. 6/2018-52). GUT FME Working Paper Series A. google scholar
  • De Ferranti, D., Perry, G. E., Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. E. (2002). From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy: Trade and Job Quality. The World Bank. google scholar
  • Dixit, A., & Norman, V. (1980). Theory of International Trade: A Dual, General Equilibrium Approach. UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  • Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. google scholar
  • Ekmen, S., & Erlat, G. (2014). Export Diversification and Competitiveness: Intensive and Extensive Margins of Turkey. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 24(88), 35-64. google scholar
  • Erlat, G., & Akyüz, O. (2001). Country Concentration of Turkish Exports and Imports Over Time. Topics in Middle Eastern and African Economies Vol. 3, September 2001. http://meea. sites.luc.edu/volume3/gerlat.pdf google scholar
  • FTC (2010), Horizontal Merger Guidelines 2010. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/ attachments/merger-review/100819hmg.pdf google scholar
  • Giri, R., Quayyum, M. S. N., & Yin, R. (2019). Understanding Export Diversification: Key Drivers and Policy Implications (WP/19/105). International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Gourdon, J. (2010). FDI Flows and Export Diversification: Looking at Extensive and Intensive Margins. In Lopez-Calix, P. Walkenhorst & N. Diop (ed.), Trade Competitiveness of the Middle East and North Africa. The World Bank. (pp.13-44). google scholar
  • Helpman E., & P. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. google scholar
  • Hesse, H. (2009). Export Diversification and Economic Growth. In Brenton, P., Newfarmer, R., Shaw, W., & Walkenhorst, P (ed.), Breaking into New Markets: Emerging Lessons for Export Diversification, The World Bank. (pp. 55-80). google scholar
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. google scholar
  • Jongwanich, J. (2020). Export Diversification, Margins and Economic Growth at Industrial Level: Evidence from Thailand. The World Economy. 43(10), 2674-2722. google scholar
  • Kaulich, F. (2012). Diversification vs. Specialization as Alternative Strategies for Economic Development: Can We Settle a Debate by Looking at the Empirical Evidence? (3/2012) UNIDO Development Policy Working Paper. google scholar
  • Klinger, B., & Lederman, D. (2004). Discovery and Development: An Empricial Exploration of “New” Products (No. 3450). The World Bank. google scholar
  • Klinger, B., & Lederman, D. (2011). Export Discoveries, Diversification and Barriers to Entry. Economic Systems, 35(1), 64-83. google scholar
  • Krugman P., & Venables A.J. (1990). Integration and the Competitiveness of Peripheral Industry. In Bliss C. and J. Braga De Macedo (ed.), Unity With Diversity in the European Economy: The Community’s Southern Frontier. UK: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 56-77). google scholar
  • Lectard, P., & Rougier, E. (2018). Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization. World Development, 102, 90-110. google scholar
  • Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. (2003). Trade Structure and Growth (No 3025). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. google scholar
  • Leite, C. A., & Weidmann, J. (1999). Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth (No. 99/85). International Monetary Fund. google scholar
  • Love, J. (1979). Trade Concentration and Export İnstability. The Journal of Development Studies, 15(3), 60-69. google scholar
  • Mau, K. (2016). Export Diversification and Income Differences Reconsidered: The Extensive Product Margin in Theory and Application. Review of World Economics, 152(2), 351-381. google scholar
  • Meilak, C. (2008). Measuring Export Concentration: The Implications for Small States. Bank of Valletta Review, 37, 35-48. google scholar
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. google scholar
  • Min, S., Shin, H., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2011). Analysis of Export Diversification Pattern in Korean Industry. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade (2011-615), KIET Research Paper. google scholar
  • Minondo, A. (2011). Does Comparative Advantage Explain Countries’ Diversification Level? Review of World Economics, 147(3), 507-526. google scholar
  • Mohan, P. (2011). Caribbean Export Diversification Along its Development Path. University of the West Indies. http://www.ccmfuwi.org/files/publications/conference/2011/5_1-Mohan-Watson-p.pdf google scholar
  • Murphy-Braynen, M. B., & Thurman, R. M. (2019). The Relationship Between Export Diversification & Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis with a Focus on Small Island States. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 10(4), 73-84. google scholar
  • Naldi, M., & Flamini, M. (2014, March). Interval Estimation of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index Under Incomplete Market Information. In 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation. IEEE, (pp. 318-323). google scholar
  • Nassif, C. (2010). Promoting New Exports: Experience from Industry Case Studies. In, J.R. Lopez-Calix, P Walkenhorst, and N. Diop (ed.) Trade Competitiveness of the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank, (pp. 47-62). google scholar
  • Naude, W., & Rossouw, R. (2011). Export Diversification and Economic Performance: Evidence from Brazil, China, India and South Africa. Economic Change and Restructuring, 44(1-2), 99-134. google scholar
  • OECD (2019). Aid for Trade at a Glance 2019: Economic Diversification and Empowerment, Paris: OECD Publishing. google scholar
  • Papageorgiou, C., & Spatafora, N. (2012). Economic Diversification in LICs. In Economic Diversification in LICs: Stylized Facts and Macroeconomic Implications. USA: Internatıonal Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475532180.006. google scholar
  • Parteka, A. (2010). Employment and Export Specialisation Along the Development Path: Some Robust Evidence. Review of World Economics, 145(4), 615-640. google scholar
  • Parteka, A., & Tamberi, M. (2011). Export Diversification and Development-Empirical Assessment (No. 359). Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali Working Paper. google scholar
  • Parteka, A. (2013). Trade Diversity and Stages of Development-Evidence on EU Countries (No. 8/2013). GUT FME Working Paper Series A. google scholar
  • Parteka, A., & Tamberi, M. (2013). Product Diversification, Relative Specialisation and Economic Development: Import-Export Analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 38, 121-135. google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2003). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence. https://bit.ly/329NmVX google scholar
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels (No. 1240). IZA Discussion Paper. http://repec.iza.org/dp1240.pdf google scholar
  • Prebisch, R. (1950). Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems, New York: United Nations for ECLA. google scholar
  • Regis, P. J. (2018). The Extensive and Intensive Margins of Exports of Firms in Developing and Emerging Countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 56, 39-49. google scholar
  • Rhoades, S. A. (1993). The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Federal Reserve Bulletin, (Mar), 188189. google scholar
  • Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth (No. w5398). National Bureau of Economic Research. google scholar
  • Seabe, M. P., & Mogotsi, I. B. (2012). Determinants of Export Diversification for Southern African Customs Union Countries. International Journal of Economics & Business Studies, 2(1). 36-49. google scholar
  • Singer, H. W. (1950). The Distribution of Gains Between Borrowing and Investing Countries. American Economic Review, 40(2), 473-485. google scholar
  • Tegene, A. (1990). Commodity Concentration and Export Earnings Instability: The Evidence from African Countries. The American Economist, 34(2), 55-59. google scholar

Atıflar

Biçimlendirilmiş bir atıfı kopyalayıp yapıştırın veya seçtiğiniz biçimde dışa aktarmak için seçeneklerden birini kullanın


DIŞA AKTAR



APA

Şanlı, D., & Konukman, A. (2022). Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(36), 153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


AMA

Şanlı D, Konukman A. Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics. 2022;0(36):153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


ABNT

Şanlı, D.; Konukman, A. Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 36, p. 153-185, 2022.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Şanlı, Devran, and Aziz Konukman. 2022. “Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 36: 153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


Chicago: Humanities Style

Şanlı, Devran, and Aziz Konukman. “Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0, no. 36 (Sep. 2023): 153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


Harvard: Australian Style

Şanlı, D & Konukman, A 2022, 'Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz', EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 36, pp. 153-185, viewed 23 Sep. 2023, https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Şanlı, D. and Konukman, A. (2022) ‘Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz’, EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 0(36), pp. 153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695 (23 Sep. 2023).


MLA

Şanlı, Devran, and Aziz Konukman. “Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz.” EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, vol. 0, no. 36, 2022, pp. 153-185. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


Vancouver

Şanlı D, Konukman A. Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics [Internet]. 23 Sep. 2023 [cited 23 Sep. 2023];0(36):153-185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695 doi: 10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695


ISNAD

Şanlı, Devran - Konukman, Aziz. “Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatında Ürün Yoğunlaşması ve Gelir Üzerine Ampirik Bir Analiz”. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics 0/36 (Sep. 2023): 153-185. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2022.36.1039695



ZAMAN ÇİZELGESİ


Gönderim21.12.2021
Kabul14.04.2022
Çevrimiçi Yayınlanma10.05.2022

LİSANS


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


PAYLAŞ




İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, uluslararası yayıncılık standartları ve etiğine uygun olarak, yüksek kalitede bilimsel dergi ve kitapların yayınlanmasıyla giderek artan bilimsel bilginin yayılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları açık erişimli, ticari olmayan, bilimsel yayıncılığı takip etmektedir.